Pages:
Author

Topic: Another New Rule On Gambling Adverts Ban Celebrities and Sports Stars - page 4. (Read 1767 times)

full member
Activity: 952
Merit: 105

What happens is that even if you are right and some people that are famous take their position with responsibility and do their best to avoid promoting stuff that could deteriorate the lives of people that does not mean that all people have that very same opinion, which is why this law is being passed on the first place, however it is going to be very difficult for a law like this to be enforced as I am not so sure how they are going to measure that a star is too famous among the young and forbid them to promote a casino.
Sometimes people can not pre guess the affects of certain thing - Gambling is a very controversial stuff in many religions. People are not that liberal in every society.
And since society is a mix of different culture - so they have to be extra careful in every way. Good move though - I appreciate it!
legendary
Activity: 2534
Merit: 1338
It is nothing really new, after all businesses are experts at finding a way to get around the law and in many cases from the beginning they were behind those making those laws to make sure there are ways to get around them, so I do not find this to be surprising at all, besides unless a very specific criteria is devised to make this a reality I think this is a law that is not going to have too much of an effect in the daily operations of casinos.
Most of the kids indulge themselves in trouble when they are not having a check and balance. Also Celebrates have a role towards society - they have to promote a positive image of the society for the sake of glory and peace. They cannot take any blame on them. In our country we have never seen any actor promoting smoking - which is injurious to health.
What happens is that even if you are right and some people that are famous take their position with responsibility and do their best to avoid promoting stuff that could deteriorate the lives of people that does not mean that all people have that very same opinion, which is why this law is being passed on the first place, however it is going to be very difficult for a law like this to be enforced as I am not so sure how they are going to measure that a star is too famous among the young and forbid them to promote a casino.
hero member
Activity: 2338
Merit: 953
Temporary forum vacation
It does not seem clear to me what this new rule mean. It does not seem to be a ban on using sports personalities,,, just to not let them target Under 18s (which for me is a very very fair rule).

Role models like it or not live in a different time,,, but they can post their half naked bodies on IG and Under18s can see that easily (or use Google on their own of course).
I think that is a good move.
We all know that Celebrities already have so many things which bother them - so they don't want to take a burden of any trouble on them. MAybe they are allowed to do this. They would keep themselves away from trouble.

Fk celebrities man,,, I got my own things bothering me,,, I could not care less if they are banned from advertising crypto or gambling or their own hair products. I love athletes as sportspeople, I love Son (South Korean footballer) but can give 2 craps about what clothes he wears.

Hum - that is a valid point but that again goes in their personal domain. Their half naked body would not affect youngster to do that since they would be aware of their culture - but showing someone that this hobby is productive will surely have some impact on kids. And the society where different ethnicity live together this would have a bad impact.

I have no idea what you are talking about. I am talking about role models influencing people who are not old enough to vote,,, therefore not able to make their own rational decisions. I agree we cannot show them gambling ads, but at the same time we are showing them nudity-for-money.
full member
Activity: 1204
Merit: 110
I find it really funny, IDK why but internet is so simple these days and youngsters are so developed that they are always one step ahead of us. Don't take me in wrong way but children are very smart now and no matter what you do to stop such advertisement they pop in somehow.

Do you know when you are on single wifi connection in house and somebody watches or searches a keyword then anyone connected to that network will start receiving the advertisement automatically because sometime ads are IP tracked and they release on every device that's connected.

We have made simple accessible universe for ourselves but at the same time we have made complex optimisation process.

I think branding is different stuff, they should focus on the ad media networks logics.
There are various ways of advertising the business without adding face to it. In our region most of the big brand has removed faced and celebrities to the ads.
So it think its a good move not to add faces. Rather focus on the services and product. That would cut the cost as well.
sr. member
Activity: 2604
Merit: 338
Vave.com - Crypto Casino
~snip~

Do you know when you are on single wifi connection in house and somebody watches or searches a keyword then anyone connected to that network will start receiving the advertisement automatically because sometime ads are IP tracked and they release on every device that's connected.

^ I did not know this!
So possible that the ads will prone to the children that they will come curious and try the ads.
But I disagree with this, this is not their concern, it should be us (as a parent) who watch and guide our children's future. So at this point, if we know that the celebrity has an advert for a gambling platform, just keep away this to your children and tell them gambling is not good and they should not be addicted to it, awareness could be fine too.
There is some regulatory board which do really protect and filter out on what are the ads that would be shown on tv but its totally different when we are on online world on which it would really be hard to filter it out.

Its a good initiative just i was saying earlier but it would really be that hard to implement and having that zero exposure which is something that impossible.They could impose things
but expect that it wouldnt be completely be that effective.
full member
Activity: 378
Merit: 167
betfury
~snip~

Do you know when you are on single wifi connection in house and somebody watches or searches a keyword then anyone connected to that network will start receiving the advertisement automatically because sometime ads are IP tracked and they release on every device that's connected.

^ I did not know this!
So possible that the ads will prone to the children that they will come curious and try the ads.
But I disagree with this, this is not their concern, it should be us (as a parent) who watch and guide our children's future. So at this point, if we know that the celebrity has an advert for a gambling platform, just keep away this to your children and tell them gambling is not good and they should not be addicted to it, awareness could be fine too.
I just heard this time, maybe what you mean is public area wifi that is connected freely in some city parks or is it a play area or shopping center? If so, people who are connected just stop by and if they get home/enjoy the connection, maybe not because the radius of the capture distance, maybe you mean Pop up? This is an advertisement decoration that appears on your cellphone screen and is not only about gambling and the company's arena gives the intro, I've experienced it.
I agree with you and the others that we as parents cannot completely spy on gadgets from our supervision, if we want we turn off javascript and turn on pop ups and redirects on gadgets, maybe it will help a little.
In my opinion the company is not wrong and has the right to develop their flagship products and services. It is undeniable that the artist is the sweetener of all types of sales, both goods, services and licenses (gambling). and the easiest media for hypnoselling to boost company profits
hero member
Activity: 2590
Merit: 644
~snip~

Do you know when you are on single wifi connection in house and somebody watches or searches a keyword then anyone connected to that network will start receiving the advertisement automatically because sometime ads are IP tracked and they release on every device that's connected.

^ I did not know this!
So possible that the ads will prone to the children that they will come curious and try the ads.
But I disagree with this, this is not their concern, it should be us (as a parent) who watch and guide our children's future. So at this point, if we know that the celebrity has an advert for a gambling platform, just keep away this to your children and tell them gambling is not good and they should not be addicted to it, awareness could be fine too.
sr. member
Activity: 2226
Merit: 347
I find it really funny, IDK why but internet is so simple these days and youngsters are so developed that they are always one step ahead of us. Don't take me in wrong way but children are very smart now and no matter what you do to stop such advertisement they pop in somehow.

Do you know when you are on single wifi connection in house and somebody watches or searches a keyword then anyone connected to that network will start receiving the advertisement automatically because sometime ads are IP tracked and they release on every device that's connected.

We have made simple accessible universe for ourselves but at the same time we have made complex optimisation process.

I think branding is different stuff, they should focus on the ad media networks logics.
No one would able to browse it out or would able to see those ads if it would be totally be prohibited or be blocked with those celebrities which had been used on gambling ads.
Just like on what others been saying on here that its still a considerable act since we know on who would be the one will benefit or would be avoided out which is the youth
or young minds but you did have a point that kids or youngster nowadays are smart and since that almost everyone is connected to net then its really something hard
to avoid these things completely.
full member
Activity: 1092
Merit: 227
I find it really funny, IDK why but internet is so simple these days and youngsters are so developed that they are always one step ahead of us. Don't take me in wrong way but children are very smart now and no matter what you do to stop such advertisement they pop in somehow.

Do you know when you are on single wifi connection in house and somebody watches or searches a keyword then anyone connected to that network will start receiving the advertisement automatically because sometime ads are IP tracked and they release on every device that's connected.

We have made simple accessible universe for ourselves but at the same time we have made complex optimisation process.

I think branding is different stuff, they should focus on the ad media networks logics.
full member
Activity: 1204
Merit: 110
It does not seem clear to me what this new rule mean. It does not seem to be a ban on using sports personalities,,, just to not let them target Under 18s (which for me is a very very fair rule).

Role models like it or not live in a different time,,, but they can post their half naked bodies on IG and Under18s can see that easily (or use Google on their own of course).
I think that is a good move.
We all know that Celebrities already have so many things which bother them - so they don't want to take a burden of any trouble on them. MAybe they are allowed to do this. They would keep themselves away from trouble.
newbie
Activity: 53
Merit: 0
they will find a way to get those stars in the ads lol in some other way...
sr. member
Activity: 2604
Merit: 338
Vave.com - Crypto Casino
It does not seem clear to me what this new rule mean. It does not seem to be a ban on using sports personalities,,, just to not let them target Under 18s (which for me is a very very fair rule).

Role models like it or not live in a different time,,, but they can post their half naked bodies on IG and Under18s can see that easily (or use Google on their own of course).
Hum - that is a valid point but that again goes in their personal domain. Their half naked body would not affect youngster to do that since they would be aware of their culture - but showing someone that this hobby is productive will surely have some impact on kids. And the society where different ethnicity live together this would have a bad impact.
You cant really say that it wont really be make not some effect considering on how influential social media is and when it comes to exposure then its no surprising that audience ages or viewers cant really be filtered out

which means there's always a tendency and its indeed even on simple google search where images something like this or connected to it would really be likely to seen therefore having such ban wont really be that
much effective but its really that a very fair rule which had been said above but of course with such changes there would really be someone to be affected.
full member
Activity: 1050
Merit: 110
It does not seem clear to me what this new rule mean. It does not seem to be a ban on using sports personalities,,, just to not let them target Under 18s (which for me is a very very fair rule).

Role models like it or not live in a different time,,, but they can post their half naked bodies on IG and Under18s can see that easily (or use Google on their own of course).
Hum - that is a valid point but that again goes in their personal domain. Their half naked body would not affect youngster to do that since they would be aware of their culture - but showing someone that this hobby is productive will surely have some impact on kids. And the society where different ethnicity live together this would have a bad impact.
hero member
Activity: 2338
Merit: 953
Temporary forum vacation
It does not seem clear to me what this new rule mean. It does not seem to be a ban on using sports personalities,,, just to not let them target Under 18s (which for me is a very very fair rule).

Role models like it or not live in a different time,,, but they can post their half naked bodies on IG and Under18s can see that easily (or use Google on their own of course).
hero member
Activity: 2814
Merit: 618
Leading Crypto Sports Betting & Casino Platform
snip
I think the casino has begun to think about the new law while they are still looking for what needs to be added to their rules. The existence of new laws makes casinos need to change their way of promoting and chances are they will try different ways than before. What is clear, celebrities hired by the casino will lose a source of income that may be large.

Do you know any casino's who actively want to implement this new law.  Since many casinos are not regulated and not licensed, they are not bound to obey each and every law. Many casinos won't implement this new laws.

Also celebrities won't be much effected as will get other opportunities to gain money.
hero member
Activity: 1610
Merit: 507
snip
I think the casino has begun to think about the new law while they are still looking for what needs to be added to their rules. The existence of new laws makes casinos need to change their way of promoting and chances are they will try different ways than before. What is clear, celebrities hired by the casino will lose a source of income that may be large.
legendary
Activity: 1414
Merit: 1002
= jasad =
The whole point of government is about control, that isn't the debate. It's if the current move by the government is "effective or not". I believe it might be effective.

To truly protect children from early exposure to anything about gambling, would you like it more if the government bans all kinds of advertising coming from casinos and all other kinds of gambling? I believe the government's ban on using celebrities and sports stars is actually a fair compromise.
I agree with you that the point is about to control children being addicted at early age. And I think government become successful in this regards as early ages people will not be able to play/stay away from gambling. Moreover, addiction on gambling at the early age will not increase and it will have to decrease.
Although government keep controlling children away from gambling site always have chance and way for them active on several gambling platform actually with gambling site without need KYC. Almost all countries is not support with children created ID card before 18 years old but when have gambling platform free access and available playing without KYC easy for them active on gambling platform, I think with government controlling need procedure with KYC requirements for all gambling site have allowed on some countries as legal site.
hero member
Activity: 2884
Merit: 794
I am terrible at Fantasy Football!!!
It is of course good for trust to have a celebrity promote a gambling site. You get a lot of customers that way. I sometimes wonder what those famous people get for such a commercial, since huge amounts are involved in the gambling world. It's quite difficult to put a ban on that, many countries are not even interested in this kind of thing. The priorities are different there. Countries that have to deal with a gambling commission have become somewhat stricter over the years.
If a law like this begins to get popular around the world then casinos will have to begin to plan around how to deal with this, after all if a star is big enough then even if a country bans this particular star to promote a casino due to having a lot of popularity with the young, the casino can always use the star for their promotional efforts in other countries and hire a different star with a different profile to promote their casino at that country, so this will require to rewrite the promotional contracts of some stars, but casinos will find a way to deal with this as they always do.
hero member
Activity: 2268
Merit: 789
Previously gambling sites and gambling company only look into the fiat investment and fiat withdraw. But after the reach of crytocurrency to next level, it was a quite enough to the involving of crytocurrency as the mode of playing and withdrawn. The important one of cryto gambling was, we get more cryto as a winning bet. Then by just holding the coin, we can earn huge from that cryptocurrency.
You are trying to say a lame fact. We will win same type of currency. If we deposit and place bet on fiat we will get fiat too if we win and if we deposit cryptocurrency then we will get cryptocurrency for the winnings. So, it is a basic way though several sites convert the cryptocurrency into fiat after making the deposit.

There are some gambling websites that offer free exchanges at their disposal where you can quickly convert your cryptocurrencies to fiat; and the other way around.

Do remember that a gambling website that prohibits sports celebrities and sports stars are only adhering to the rule implemented. But I think this sanction should be met in the middle- there has to be some sort of compromise in order to fully accept this kind of regulation. While I do understand that they are trying to protect young kids from being easily influenced in gambling, this not the only way in order to prevent them from gambling, in general.
copper member
Activity: 2380
Merit: 1302
Playbet.io - Crypto Casino and Sportsbook
The whole point of government is about control, that isn't the debate. It's if the current move by the government is "effective or not". I believe it might be effective.

To truly protect children from early exposure to anything about gambling, would you like it more if the government bans all kinds of advertising coming from casinos and all other kinds of gambling? I believe the government's ban on using celebrities and sports stars is actually a fair compromise.
I agree with you that the point is about to control children being addicted at early age. And I think government become successful in this regards as early ages people will not be able to play/stay away from gambling. Moreover, addiction on gambling at the early age will not increase and it will have to decrease.
Pages:
Jump to: