Pages:
Author

Topic: Another New Rule On Gambling Adverts Ban Celebrities and Sports Stars - page 9. (Read 1764 times)

full member
Activity: 378
Merit: 167
betfury

I think its the influence of the celebrities that they are trying to lessen the effect. Kids will always learn gambling from peers no matter how we prevent that from happening, eventually they'd find their way to wager something but its still good to have such law. Fans do buy what the celebrities promote.

Indeed, the friend above is true, when there is a collaboration between the employer or the worker (advertising artist) of course there will be times when they are not together, one side will lose income, one side will lose the figure that was ordered. In my country, there are still many who receive such job offers. that and the company's support makes it easy for customers with only 1$ cell phone vouchers. it's not a matter of other matters but the persistence and tolerance of gambling by the company although I personally prefer to use a popular sportbook or casino not locally. of course there are advantages and disadvantages but for a This collaboration is a difficult thing in my opinion, there are 2 groups whose position is threatened in terms of income, especially the artist.
hero member
Activity: 3038
Merit: 617
Committee for Advertising Practice is so quick to impose this law seeing how active the gambling activity in cryptocommunity which celebrities are now getting sponsors. I wonder if becoming a partner like Drake is excluded in this law.

I am not sure where parents insist their kids to gamble? In our culture it is serious issue and its illegal as well.
On a side not would you like your kids to gamble? But celebrities are very influential people they are wise enough to chose what not to promote
Parents do not force their children to gamble but it is their children who discover gambling by themselves.
I don't want to see my kids gamble but even if they do, I hope they don't spend big money and don't get addicted like other people.
As long as we as parents can teach them well and they can understand and accept it too, I think they will know how to behave with gambling.

If it is okay with changing the celebrities then there is almost nothing to be worried to the gambling sites. But it will be worried for the celebrities of those countries who have been working/would have to work as advertiser for the gambling websites. It will be loss only for those celebrities; no one else.
Yes, they will miss one of the opportunities to make big money from the gambling industry considering the gambling industry contributes revenue to celebrities.
But maybe it's the best way for them to avoid pressure from the government because after all, they have to follow government regulations not to advertise gambling.

I think its the influence of the celebrities that they are trying to lessen the effect. Kids will always learn gambling from peers no matter how we prevent that from happening, eventually they'd find their way to wager something but its still good to have such law. Fans do buy what the celebrities promote.
hero member
Activity: 2870
Merit: 574
Vave.com - Crypto Casino
I am not sure where parents insist their kids to gamble? In our culture it is serious issue and its illegal as well.
On a side not would you like your kids to gamble? But celebrities are very influential people they are wise enough to chose what not to promote
Parents do not force their children to gamble but it is their children who discover gambling by themselves.
I don't want to see my kids gamble but even if they do, I hope they don't spend big money and don't get addicted like other people.
As long as we as parents can teach them well and they can understand and accept it too, I think they will know how to behave with gambling.

If it is okay with changing the celebrities then there is almost nothing to be worried to the gambling sites. But it will be worried for the celebrities of those countries who have been working/would have to work as advertiser for the gambling websites. It will be loss only for those celebrities; no one else.
Yes, they will miss one of the opportunities to make big money from the gambling industry considering the gambling industry contributes revenue to celebrities.
But maybe it's the best way for them to avoid pressure from the government because after all, they have to follow government regulations not to advertise gambling.
sr. member
Activity: 2604
Merit: 338
Vave.com - Crypto Casino
I am not sure about this new rule. On one side, betting is like any other industry and all of the retail industries are now using influencers and, even decades ago, they used starts and celebrities in TV campaigns, even before internet. Why should gaming be different? On the other side, it is true that marketing should be directed to the right people and youngsters should not be betting.
I second with you. Youngster look towards their ideal for inspiration and ideas. In our country youngster are great fans of BTS. They dream and talk about them.
What would happen if they would promote g***. so if there is any law passed - I think it is the right decision and that the kids should get themselves involved in creative activists.
It would really be giving out such impact which is definitely true and fact and its been an initiative that they would really be making out decision on banning it because of the reason or possibilities of bad effect or result

whenever their idols do introduce gambling but there are countries which does have that movie and television review or something like that which they would need to approve whether its appropriate
or not or simply make out some warnings whenever they do see that there's something that shouldnt be seen by young audiences.
copper member
Activity: 2380
Merit: 1302
Playbet.io - Crypto Casino and Sportsbook
It seems the casinos need to find other celebrities from different countries than before so they can keep using celebrities in their promotions and don't have to worry about breaking the rules.
Changing the promotion ways is something that the casino should do if the casino wants to keep using celebrities to help it promote itself.
If not, they will find another way that might be more appropriate than before.
Maybe we will see something else from the casino in the promotion.
If it is okay with changing the celebrities then there is almost nothing to be worried to the gambling sites. But it will be worried for the celebrities of those countries who have been working/would have to work as advertiser for the gambling websites. It will be loss only for those celebrities; no one else.
full member
Activity: 1204
Merit: 110
I am not sure about this new rule. On one side, betting is like any other industry and all of the retail industries are now using influencers and, even decades ago, they used starts and celebrities in TV campaigns, even before internet. Why should gaming be different? On the other side, it is true that marketing should be directed to the right people and youngsters should not be betting.
I second with you. Youngster look towards their ideal for inspiration and ideas. In our country youngster are great fans of BTS. They dream and talk about them.
What would happen if they would promote g***. so if there is any law passed - I think it is the right decision and that the kids should get themselves involved in creative activists.
legendary
Activity: 2366
Merit: 1624
Do not die for Putin
I am not sure about this new rule. On one side, betting is like any other industry and all of the retail industries are now using influencers and, even decades ago, they used starts and celebrities in TV campaigns, even before internet. Why should gaming be different? On the other side, it is true that marketing should be directed to the right people and youngsters should not be betting.
full member
Activity: 952
Merit: 105
In this case gambling sites either sports-books or casino will be affected on those country which countries will follow this rule and also the advertiser company, celebrities will also face problem on those country. But those countries which will not allow this rule, will not affect on the users of those country, advertiser of those country and celebrities of those countries.

Ideal is only those not related into crypto gambling like the celebrities of course their manager will accept the offer for their agents just to earn money but with the sports gambling and sports known person it's hard to remove them because they are the image of the sports and of course many people supporting the sports events. To the sports image personalities don't want to lose their reputation too if the gambling platform has issues.
It seems the casinos need to find other celebrities from different countries than before so they can keep using celebrities in their promotions and don't have to worry about breaking the rules.
Changing the promotion ways is something that the casino should do if the casino wants to keep using celebrities to help it promote itself.
If not, they will find another way that might be more appropriate than before.
Maybe we will see something else from the casino in the promotion.
I am not sure where parents insist their kids to gamble? In our culture it is serious issue and its illegal as well.
On a side not would you like your kids to gamble? But celebrities are very influential people they are wise enough to chose what not to promote
sr. member
Activity: 2338
Merit: 365
...

But from another perspective, it doesn't seem easy to do because children under 18 years old may already know how to see the ad. But indeed, the problem of gambling addiction is a very serious problem that needs everyone's attention. They can play gambling but with strict terms and conditions.
Gambling addiction at an early age, is a serious problem that until now is difficult to solve...

why are those who are under 18 years old not allowed to gamble on many gambling sites (crypto or traditional) because at that age on average they are still under the auspices of their parents or are in school. btw, banning influencers (athletes or artists) from promoting gambling sites I think is the right decision although it will not be 100% effective but it is a good rule.
full member
Activity: 378
Merit: 167
betfury

This is somehow difficult to draw the line on determining if the player is indeed 18 years old in registering in the gambling website.

Since players look for convenience, adding a KYC function to a gambling site could either make or break the whole business. But, if they do not implement any KYC function, this would attract underaged players in gambling which is something that must be prevented at all cost.

Prohibiting and banning celebrities can definitely help as any method of mitigating the damage can be helpful. I just hope that it would at least decrease the overall numbers of underaged gamblers around the globe.

If talking about KYC is the standard given by several companies, whether casino, sportsbook or other partners, it is true that the younger generation is only limited to first accessing, understanding and if there is a demo account to try it, I know very well that some people on their social media offer several how to cooperate with anyone who has problems in the Kyc consensus. They facilitate it, as if selling their personal data to a partner. We know that as long as there is money and there is openness on social media, whether it's a special fan group or the like, it's a service. such as this which then provides and supports children under 18 years of age to have access to gambling or to sites provided for those who are old enough. I think they chose the practical one like that, my friend
hero member
Activity: 1554
Merit: 880
pxzone.online
This is somehow difficult to draw the line on determining if the player is indeed 18 years old in registering in the gambling website.
Ofc, users (below 18) might enjoy doing things he used to until he faced a problem on the website and the casino requires him to go kyc for them to uplift the issue, although some casino didnt require kyc but this terms will change over time.

Since players look for convenience, adding a KYC function to a gambling site could either make or break the whole business. But, if they do not implement any KYC function, this would attract underaged players in gambling which is something that must be prevented at all cost.
Its not loss for the business it's their assurance for the authorities not to get rid of them for having no license since most casino dont require kyc have no license.
hero member
Activity: 2268
Merit: 789
For ads purposes, yes, that's a helpful update. If casinos prohibits the registration of users age of 18 and  below then casino ads should follow the same pattern too. Coz ads plays a role to encourage someone to do this and that as shown on an ad, people's ages in ads plays a role too, as it targets its type of users' ages etc.

This is somehow difficult to draw the line on determining if the player is indeed 18 years old in registering in the gambling website.

Since players look for convenience, adding a KYC function to a gambling site could either make or break the whole business. But, if they do not implement any KYC function, this would attract underaged players in gambling which is something that must be prevented at all cost.

Prohibiting and banning celebrities can definitely help as any method of mitigating the damage can be helpful. I just hope that it would at least decrease the overall numbers of underaged gamblers around the globe.
hero member
Activity: 2870
Merit: 574
Vave.com - Crypto Casino
In this case gambling sites either sports-books or casino will be affected on those country which countries will follow this rule and also the advertiser company, celebrities will also face problem on those country. But those countries which will not allow this rule, will not affect on the users of those country, advertiser of those country and celebrities of those countries.

Ideal is only those not related into crypto gambling like the celebrities of course their manager will accept the offer for their agents just to earn money but with the sports gambling and sports known person it's hard to remove them because they are the image of the sports and of course many people supporting the sports events. To the sports image personalities don't want to lose their reputation too if the gambling platform has issues.
It seems the casinos need to find other celebrities from different countries than before so they can keep using celebrities in their promotions and don't have to worry about breaking the rules.
Changing the promotion ways is something that the casino should do if the casino wants to keep using celebrities to help it promote itself.
If not, they will find another way that might be more appropriate than before.
Maybe we will see something else from the casino in the promotion.
legendary
Activity: 2996
Merit: 1054
Leading Crypto Sports Betting & Casino Platform
I think any rule will be useless if gambling can still be found and played everywhere, because even countries that clearly prohibit gambling but people still gamble both young and old. So in this case I personally think that the gambling site company will still operate well even without the frills of stars or celebrities because after all, the rules are only about dealing with celebrities or top sports players and not about sports sponsors. So, basically they can still advertise their company and it will not make teenagers avoid gambling, because the only rule to avoid gambling is from themselves.
A rule is not useless because many people are going to comply with it but yes there will be some that are hard headed and will not follow any rules but they are not a good example. They have the guts and the skill and if ever they caught out, they are ready to get punished.

I think celebrities that advertise a gambling company are a new thing but I haven't seen or heard that a gambling company are doing that on the past so yeah they can always operate normally even if without those gimmicks. They can still gather a lot of customers from a normal advertisement or promotions as long as what is stated is true and if they are offering a good service.

Gamblers always a gambler they will come and play, those extra advertising might be effective to attract newcomers especially those young generations who can access the internet freely, it's the obligation that might also be in the side of those celebrities, if fans will follow them it will hurt those young mindset.

Keeping away from the possible influence is a good way to help to lessen the early addiction of those young adults who already starting
to be curious about this kind of activities.
legendary
Activity: 1708
Merit: 1280
Top Crypto Casino
In this case gambling sites either sports-books or casino will be affected on those country which countries will follow this rule and also the advertiser company, celebrities will also face problem on those country. But those countries which will not allow this rule, will not affect on the users of those country, advertiser of those country and celebrities of those countries.

Ideal is only those not related into crypto gambling like the celebrities of course their manager will accept the offer for their agents just to earn money but with the sports gambling and sports known person it's hard to remove them because they are the image of the sports and of course many people supporting the sports events. To the sports image personalities don't want to lose their reputation too if the gambling platform has issues.
copper member
Activity: 2380
Merit: 1302
Playbet.io - Crypto Casino and Sportsbook
In this case gambling sites either sports-books or casino will be affected on those country which countries will follow this rule and also the advertiser company, celebrities will also face problem on those country. But those countries which will not allow this rule, will not affect on the users of those country, advertiser of those country and celebrities of those countries.
legendary
Activity: 3542
Merit: 1352
Cashback 15%
Given their fame and the amount of influence these guys have, I partly agree that they shouldn't partake in any activity promoting and advertising gambling. Though their target market is obviously the adults which can gamble, there is no way that they can control what the youngsters can see online or in the TV. Most of the time when young people see their idols advertise something, they tend to want it, or copy whatever it is that their idol is doing because they think it can make them look cool. Then again it's really a controversial law because it only targets the gambling sector and not other sectors which may also have a negative effect on the young population (liquors, tobacco-based stuff, etc.)
hero member
Activity: 2590
Merit: 644
This is a good rule in my opinion, sports stars should be a model for next generation and they should be look up as an inspiration for upcoming generation and if they saw them promoting gambling site youths would think that it could be good for them which would ruin their future. I would agree with charity advertisement, shoes, etc. but not gambling advertisements.

I agree, and this would have a big impact on the younger generation because, you know, when they see something popular, they tend to follow it. I don't know what is going on with the youth in this decade because they follow everything, unlike in my time when we just wanted it but didn't really follow it, and unlike today, they will beg their parents to try it. This is really good news in terms of gambling since it could reduce the underage interest in gambling and reduce addictions. I think this also has no big impact on the gambling industry because it only targets the under-18s.
^ As I see, this is a case to case basis because not all younger generations now can afford to gamble and they know how to gamble still they cannot able to do it because they don't have enough funds to try and the reason is they are still relying on the parent. This is how parents should have a responsibility to their children, if they will expose to gambling because of the promotions from the celebrities, educate them about gambling and for sure they know which is good or bad. I will not blame those celebrity advertisements who promote gambling to become a threat to the children from gambling addiction, it should be from the parents on how they will guide their children.
sr. member
Activity: 2226
Merit: 347
I think any rule will be useless if gambling can still be found and played everywhere, because even countries that clearly prohibit gambling but people still gamble both young and old. So in this case I personally think that the gambling site company will still operate well even without the frills of stars or celebrities because after all, the rules are only about dealing with celebrities or top sports players and not about sports sponsors. So, basically they can still advertise their company and it will not make teenagers avoid gambling, because the only rule to avoid gambling is from themselves.
A rule is not useless because many people are going to comply with it but yes there will be some that are hard headed and will not follow any rules but they are not a good example. They have the guts and the skill and if ever they caught out, they are ready to get punished.

I think celebrities that advertise a gambling company are a new thing but I haven't seen or heard that a gambling company are doing that on the past so yeah they can always operate normally even if without those gimmicks. They can still gather a lot of customers from a normal advertisement or promotions as long as what is stated is true and if they are offering a good service.

If that rule is a law, non-compliant people will be punished by the law, I don't think they'll be " hard headed" enough if they know the penalty of the violation, especially if it has a serious penalty. The thing is, the penalty might not be serious enough that gambling sites and advertisers could violate it as they know can afford to pay the penalty.
Neither it would be having big amount violation or would really be in incremental behavior but it would really be that understandable that it would be a huge one considering that Gambling industry is a profitable or big
business which it would really be common sense that penalty would be big.If this would really be law then they wont really be having no option but to abide or obey it specially if that one cost big.
Its sad that celebs wont really able to get attached with gambling  industry which is really a total loss in between the two which is casino and those influencers.
hero member
Activity: 2954
Merit: 672
Message @Hhampuz if you are looking for a CM!
I think any rule will be useless if gambling can still be found and played everywhere, because even countries that clearly prohibit gambling but people still gamble both young and old. So in this case I personally think that the gambling site company will still operate well even without the frills of stars or celebrities because after all, the rules are only about dealing with celebrities or top sports players and not about sports sponsors. So, basically they can still advertise their company and it will not make teenagers avoid gambling, because the only rule to avoid gambling is from themselves.
A rule is not useless because many people are going to comply with it but yes there will be some that are hard headed and will not follow any rules but they are not a good example. They have the guts and the skill and if ever they caught out, they are ready to get punished.

I think celebrities that advertise a gambling company are a new thing but I haven't seen or heard that a gambling company are doing that on the past so yeah they can always operate normally even if without those gimmicks. They can still gather a lot of customers from a normal advertisement or promotions as long as what is stated is true and if they are offering a good service.

If that rule is a law, non-compliant people will be punished by the law, I don't think they'll be " hard headed" enough if they know the penalty of the violation, especially if it has a serious penalty. The thing is, the penalty might not be serious enough that gambling sites and advertisers could violate it as they know can afford to pay the penalty.
Pages:
Jump to: