Only if bounty manager doing their job wrong.
Not updating stakes after week, don't response for support, dont ban multiaccs when it reported with proofs by community
Topic: Are bounty managers to be blamed? - page 52. (Read 5954 times)
No one can blame, just blame our self in any failure comes in our crypto journey. We as a bounty hunter we are the rights and free to pick bounty. We have the opportunity to research everthing to know about a certain project. Its is our decision to join in a bounty campaign not the team not the manager is responsible in any losses. Yes its make us a upset if the bounty become scam. But just what i said, its our decision
It is not easy for Bounty managers to predict scam. It is better to talk to Bounty manager ad make a solution by which you can contact team of ICO , if it is scam then take help of bounty manager and raise voice against ICO team.
For me we to understand bounty manager if the project is scam. Its true it is difficult to know scam project maybe this is a matter of team work. Instead of blaming managers team members should also help to research the project they are working then advise immediately manager and ICO if found that the project is scam.
Blaming ain't good though both participants have the diligence to investigate whether the ICO they are with can somehow be a scam. But lets assume the bounty manager was hired by the team, it does mean he has the knowledge of who those team are or maybe just the single person from the team which makes him an accomplice in a way.
It is difficult to guess at first and the ICO developers and investors and manager on what scenario will develop the ICO project. Investing and making money is always a risk. ICO will develop and together grow the experience of lawful work of managers and investor confidence.
in the case of fraud, sometimes the manager deserves and is not to be guilty it depends on the reaction or response presented to the participant who asks about the progress of the project it handles, because most managers are blamed are managers who do not respond well to any questions about the progress of the project.
So ones again we have been scammed by another ICO known as Uchit. Now people have started raining insults and curses on the bounty manager that he has led them to be scammed. Despite the numerous apologies from the manager, bounty hunters do not seem to understand. Now my question is, do you think bounty hunters must be blamed when we are scammed because they knew what the ICO was up to, even from the beginning?
No, you are only one to be blame because followed by greed you didn't research project. I like to at least read what is project about and if it looks like there is some catch i usually move to different bounty until I find decent project. And even then you don't know is project real or not, that is very sad(my last bounty impressio run away, closed site, they disappear and they looked like nice project) 
I think that no one will blame bounty hunters in such situation. However, it is not bounty managers bad as well I think, sometimes developers do not inform managing teams about their real plans.
Again problems are scanned and we feel that bounty manager once again seems to be blamed for the same. However thousands of apologises are coming from their side but still again investors and new comers are not in a mood to let them go.
In my opinion i think we should not blame the bounty manager because they are not the one who make bounties they are just like us who also apply and do their tasks.
I think bounty managers shouldn't be blamed, how can they know, if an ICO is a scam or not. Bounty hunters have also got some responsibilities, they have to research well before participating in an ICO.
I agree! The bonus manager will not know if the ICO is cheating or not. Participants in the rewards campaign themselves need to carefully choose the right potential projects to participate in. But the bonus manager is also responsible for contacting the ICO for a proper resolution. 
As the investors can be tricked to believe in a project, announcers and bounty managers too can.
But bounty managers should be responsible in sharing any suspicious progress they know to prevent investors loss as soon as possible.
Rather doing that, here most of the bounty managers keeps on working for the scam project as they are paid to do so.
Knowingly presenting a scam as a legitimate project should also be considered a fraud.
some of your statements I strongly agree, that managers should be responsible for sharing information about suspicious projects to prevent losses from investors, before the losses are too great.But bounty managers should be responsible in sharing any suspicious progress they know to prevent investors loss as soon as possible.
Rather doing that, here most of the bounty managers keeps on working for the scam project as they are paid to do so.
Knowingly presenting a scam as a legitimate project should also be considered a fraud.
but is it true that some managers let it and do not care about it because they have been paid by dev who do to the investors?
So ones again we have been scammed by another ICO known as Uchit. Now people have started raining insults and curses on the bounty manager that he has led them to be scammed. Despite the numerous apologies from the manager, bounty hunters do not seem to understand. Now my question is, do you think bounty hunters must be blamed when we are scammed because they knew what the ICO was up to, even from the beginning?
Trust is necessary here, even the bonus manager is cheated in this situation. No one wants to be fooled. You should sympathize for them. 
The bounty manager should not assume all responsibility, because he cannot clearly know whether the project is scam before starting a project, but I think if the bounty manager is professional enough, then he should be on the project team before starting a bounty. Understand fully and avoid accepting bounties that may be scam.
If the ICO is run properly, then someone from their team will be running the bounty campaign, rather than recruiting a complete stranger. In such cases, the bounty manager shares a huge lot of responsibility with him.
Theres no way that the bounty managers would be blame about it, because they are just told what to the by the project manager or the CEO, and if happens that bounty managers know that the project they are handling is a scam, they will closed it immediately because if they don`t do that this will reflect to their trust.
Bounty managers will never be blamed because there are more involve in the project they launched . We can't blamed them also because they didn't saying any words that they promisely distributed the allocated tokens ,they are depending on the profit earning about there project. So, for me its all about lucky when it comes of projects. 
So ones again we have been scammed by another ICO known as Uchit. Now people have started raining insults and curses on the bounty manager that he has led them to be scammed. Despite the numerous apologies from the manager, bounty hunters do not seem to understand. Now my question is, do you think bounty hunters must be blamed when we are scammed because they knew what the ICO was up to, even from the beginning?
In my point of view.It is possible, that some bounty managers. Could, at a point. Figure Out what is the ICO upto.
It really depends on them if theyre going to find out. or just ignore the fact.
However, in our cases. for which it would really hard for us to figure out if its scam or not. specially if the project is almost perfect.
this could also go to Bounty Managers. It is also possible they really didnt know til the end.
but this should be a lesson to all. Managers and hunters alike are not safe from SCAM Projects.
and there is no one to be blame but the project itseld. we are all victims here.
I support the opinion of most people that bounty managers do not bear the responsibility that they are to blame for the fact that the project is a scum, because they very often also lose a lot of money and time, so it seems to me not right to talk about it.
So ones again we have been scammed by another ICO known as Uchit. Now people have started raining insults and curses on the bounty manager that he has led them to be scammed. Despite the numerous apologies from the manager, bounty hunters do not seem to understand. Now my question is, do you think bounty hunters must be blamed when we are scammed because they knew what the ICO was up to, even from the beginning?
well to me bounty manager not to be blamed because wen the project didn't succeed is not the managers fault because i m from the team please just leave the manager is not his fault. i have witness some project were some manager will deleted from connecting from the team, even to the extent that block him from the telegram group chat.
So ones again we have been scammed by another ICO known as Uchit. Now people have started raining insults and curses on the bounty manager that he has led them to be scammed. Despite the numerous apologies from the manager, bounty hunters do not seem to understand. Now my question is, do you think bounty hunters must be blamed when we are scammed because they knew what the ICO was up to, even from the beginning?
Bounty managers is just like you and me in another words bounty hunter they does not know whether is this ICO a scam or a legit one as long as someone pay them they just do their work. Even in the first place the ICO might be a legit one but there is still a possibility that the ICO turn out to be a scam. If you put the blame on bounty manager you should put the blame to yourself as well not doing due dilligence before joining the ICO. Anyway i am not a bounty manager i am also doing the twitter campaign so i can say i am a victim as well but just want to give some fairness to the bounty managers.
We can't blame Bounty Managers although they have their shortcomings of not carefully choosing a good bounty campaign. They are just like us who take the job of managing the companies bounty campaign. I mean they did not purposely publish an scam ICO even them they don't know if the company will scam us. The one to blame here is the team who runs their ICO. We (bounty hunters) and bounty managers are all just victims here.
I think you had a point on this but on the other hand, we cannot blame also the bounty hunters to be upset and put the blame on the managers because it is the initiative of most hunters to know first the people who run the bounty, as it is proven and have quite a remarkable success most of the campaign with a manager containing good reputation and even a very strict one. Yet they did not do it with their own well but sometimes they accept the job, not for the project but rather maybe for the reward they had offered, anyway this just my opinion and not encourage anyone to believe. Jump to: