Topic: Are bounty managers to be blamed? - page 47. (Read 5954 times)
The bounty manager are to be blame in some aspect because of their level of inexperience. Besides, I have advice people on this forum so many time about ICO investment that the experience of a bounty or a campaign manager count cause you can't compare the level of research that Mr Yahoo62278 about an ICO before he decide to manage their project to the research which the new manager will. However, there's nothing unique about the project, why do you guys invest in genuine MozoCoin ICO.
Partially they are to be blamed and the half to the bounty hunters. There are series of ICO around which when you see the template you will know that they are punch of fakes around.
I believe that blaming bounty managers that the project turned out to be a scam is unfair. They, like bounty hunters, do their work, even more than hunters, they also suffer from it. After all, they as well as hunters hope to pay for their work - and the result is one for all. So once again, do not blame the managers.
Well even they are reputable bounty managers it is hard to predict the ICO projects are scam. We cannot blame them and accept that we are in the industry wherein there is no assurance of the projects. That is why we do bounty campaigns at our own risk and move on to the next project.
Unfortunately, I get the impression that some of the bounty managers know that this or that project is fraudulent. Since sometimes the project is scammed, managers simply disappear.
But fortunately, this does not apply to all managers.
But fortunately, this does not apply to all managers.
So ones again we have been scammed by another ICO known as Uchit. Now people have started raining insults and curses on the bounty manager that he has led them to be scammed. Despite the numerous apologies from the manager, bounty hunters do not seem to understand. Now my question is, do you think bounty hunters must be blamed when we are scammed because they knew what the ICO was up to, even from the beginning?
First of all, bounty managers should not be blamed. This happened also way back last year. The campaign is ATLANT. The team had a delay regarding the bounty distribution. It is delay for almost 4 months. The bounty manager earned negative trust because of this. I don't really know what happened but he did not deserve that. They will do they're part, collect data and update the sheet but they are not the one who leads a bounty hunter to a scam. 
In most cases, the bounty manager is not to blame, he is an ordinary worker, and may not know that the team is preparing a scam.
Agree, there is nothing to blame, scam projects are something that participants and managers never want, both are victims in this matter, we blame the manager, the bonus also does not come back to us. Some hunters often lose their temper in this story, when they join, they know the percentage of projects that can succeed and fail, they should accept, instead of blaming, people always need to behave in the right way, that will make things easier and more peaceful, I see many managers very well, they always announce the project is scam very timely and fast, they are more interested in the project than anyone else 
Of course, the manager can not be blamed, we are all people, and we must understand that the manager trusted the team just as we trusted the manager.
Not always. But if they are doing the same mistake over and over then there is something to be considered. I remember that lots of bounty those were managed by well reputed bounty manager were scam ( at least became scam). Then what should we tell about it ?. Is it normal ?
So ones again we have been scammed by another ICO known as Uchit. Now people have started raining insults and curses on the bounty manager that he has led them to be scammed. Despite the numerous apologies from the manager, bounty hunters do not seem to understand. Now my question is, do you think bounty hunters must be blamed when we are scammed because they knew what the ICO was up to, even from the beginning?
Not always the case because there are bounty managers didnt really know on where the project would be heading or the true intention of it unless if hes already being informed that the team that they would scam out investors but most of the time they are just doing their job. They arent even sure on the project that they do handle and come to think of that they are also depending on the tokens that they would earn on handling people throughout the bounty program.Unless if people do see the manager do involved on it then its just worth for them to sue or cursed them out.
NO! Bounty managers must not blame because they don't know the project that they're holding is a scam. The task of a bounty manager is to manage the project's airdrop or bounty campaigns. 
So ones again we have been scammed by another ICO known as Uchit. Now people have started raining insults and curses on the bounty manager that he has led them to be scammed. Despite the numerous apologies from the manager, bounty hunters do not seem to understand. Now my question is, do you think bounty hunters must be blamed when we are scammed because they knew what the ICO was up to, even from the beginning?
I think the bounty manager is not wrong, because the manager is not aware of any project failure. For things like this we should be more patient because by blaspheming or condemning the managar will not solve the problem.
In most cases, the bounty manager is not to blame, he is an ordinary worker, and may not know that the team is preparing a scam.
I think it's not bounty Manager's fault that the project turned out to be fraudulent. He wanted to make money too. He also will not be paid tokens for his work.
It is not easy for Bounty managers to predict scam. It is better to talk to Bounty manager ad make a solution by which you can contact team of ICO , if it is scam then take help of bounty manager and raise voice against ICO team.
I agree on you, first thing to blame is not a solutions to the problems but in the other hand it should have a strategies on how to run the bounty by bounty managers. The prediction is not so clear but definitly encouraging an ICO in the economy.
Yeah, part of the blame goes to the bounty manager because you're signing up trusting his/her reputation to act fairly and distribute the tokens accordingly after the campaigns conclude. These situations vary on a case by case basis. Sometimes, the bounty manager himself/herself gets deceived. In that event, one shouldn't blame him/her when that happens, especially when there is an honest admission given that he/she was deceived. But when the BM is part of the deceit, then he/she should be called out.
It really wasn't easy to predict the outcome especially on the ICO Uchit because they were so transparent that it blinded most of the investors and bounty hunters. Maybe most of us hunters are just looking on the outside we're not doing more research on what's really happening inside the project.
you can't really know what's happening inside the project unless you're somehow involved. All you can check is the team and the idea, hoping that the execution will work out just as expected
if I think they are a group of people who launched a project in an ICO company, but we can not blame them for what happened, because bonus managers will not know if ICO cheats or not. Participants in the prize campaign themselves should carefully choose the right potential project to participate, But the bonus manager is also responsible for contacting ICO for the appropriate resolution.
In this forum, we have studied every project, and according to feeling and confidence then we join the project and register then bounty manager always update, and without us know the project is the scam, so this is our risk and manager also can not give any information about it is because it is equally deceived.
Because investors can be tricked into believing in projects, broadcasters and prize managers can also, But bounty managers should not take full responsibility because they only issue prizes from ICOs who want to publish their coins. should be responsible for sharing the suspicious advances they know to prevent investor losses as soon as possible. It will adversely affect the development of bitcoin itself the more get the disappointment then the investors will go forever.
Jump to: