Topic: Are bounty managers to be blamed? - page 50. (Read 5956 times)
Some of the bounty campaigns are very nicely managed. But at the same time, some of the campaigns are being managed in a very unprofessional manner. The participants are facing a lot of problems due to the incompetence of some of the managers.
We can say the bounty manager has to blame for an unsuccessful project but it's only a small percentage, to tell you honestly bounty hunter has also something to blame because some are just completing their task without also thinking what are the other things to do to promote their project. So if the project explains what happens then everyone could understand also their side, it is not good if the people blaming each other for a failure.
Yes indeed we do not throw errors, and we should also be able to think that no one will blame the bounty hunters in such situations. However, it's not a bad manager either, I think, sometimes developers do not tell the managers about their real plans.
There are two types of mangers, one which are newbies and representing their team on this forum and another are reputed mangers which are working for a long time. If newbies make a mistake then we can't blame them but if a campaign is declared scam under a reputed manger then we may need to think as many participants join seeing the name of the manger and if campaign doesn't pay then the mangers are the person we can blame.
We can say the bounty manager has to blame for an unsuccessful project but it's only a small percentage, to tell you honestly bounty hunter has also something to blame because some are just completing their task without also thinking what are the other things to do to promote their project. So if the project explains what happens then everyone could understand also their side, it is not good if the people blaming each other for a failure.
Actually, we cannot blame the bounty manager when the ICO is a scam or failed. They are also same as us, as the victim of the scams. they also work for free. Probably, they are also wrong that they analyze and accept the wrong ICO and spread them to gain many bounty participants. But, we are better not to blame them if they are not mistaken.
The choice to participate or not in the bounty campaign of a project chooses each for themselves (and bounty hunter and bounty Manager). But don't tell me that bounty Manager is not to blame. How do you know on what terms he signed a contract with the project, maybe he received payments in Fiat and he does not risk anything...
So ones again we have been scammed by another ICO known as Uchit. Now people have started raining insults and curses on the bounty manager that he has led them to be scammed. Despite the numerous apologies from the manager, bounty hunters do not seem to understand. Now my question is, do you think bounty hunters must be blamed when we are scammed because they knew what the ICO was up to, even from the beginning?
Bounty hunters plays a role of gambler when joining ico pojects campaigns because 90% of projects today are made to scam people and dont care about the victims,so about youre question if the bounty hunters to be blamed or either the manager,the answer is no because most of the time both of you are victims
It is not fault of the bounty managers since they are jusr paid to make bounty thread, the managers dont hold what the ceo or the team thinks.
I'm not sure that bounty managers know much more than we do. What's the point of the bounty if you know in advance about her failure? I am sure that someone pay with dollars, but this is not all. In rare cases, the manager is complicit.
I'm not sure that bounty managers know much more than we do. What's the point of the bounty if you know in advance about her failure? I am sure that someone pay with dollars, but this is not all. In rare cases, the manager is complicit.
Some bounty managers are in one way or the other have links with the projects and knows what will happen and does not tell anyone about what will happen at the end.
What I've seen until now is that sometimes bounty managers start the bounty even without asking the ICO team, I know this by Sylon, I will never do bounty where he is registered as manager. Yes, he gives his spreadsheet to the ICO team but they've never asked of bounty and don't have allocation for it.
Bounty managers need to be responsible. In many of the active bounties, the spreadsheet hasn't been updated for the last 3-4 weeks and the manager has failed to provide any information on whether the campaign is active or not.
They are not to be blamed but for me, they should've done their research before accepting a bounty project. This only not reflects just the bounty managers but as for bounty hunters as well. We should be wary about the bounties that we are involved with.
Different of course there are situations. At the initial stage, it is sometimes almost impossible to determine the bounty of ISO fraudsters, or not. If there is a skam, the manager becomes a hostage to the situation, because all accusations are piled on him, although he is not at all to blame.
On the other hand, if the manager already sees that the project is a scam and just keeps silent in the branch, then of course this is a bad manager.
On the other hand, if the manager already sees that the project is a scam and just keeps silent in the branch, then of course this is a bad manager.
in the case of fraud, sometimes the manager deserves and is not to be guilty it depends on the reaction or response presented to the participant who asks about the progress of the project it handles, because most managers are blamed are managers who do not respond well to any questions about the progress of the project.
The bounty manager does not even know it's a scam project
. They are also cheated (they may be paid in advance) but not all of their faults
. They are also cheated (they may be paid in advance) but not all of their faults
If stuck on a scam bounty project, cannot blame bounty manager for granted. Fraudsters are getting smarter in hiding the fraud mode. After all, did not you decide to join the bounty project yourself? why did not you look before?
So ones again we have been scammed by another ICO known as Uchit. Now people have started raining insults and curses on the bounty manager that he has led them to be scammed. Despite the numerous apologies from the manager, bounty hunters do not seem to understand. Now my question is, do you think bounty hunters must be blamed when we are scammed because they knew what the ICO was up to, even from the beginning?
I think no one to be blamed,bounty manager and bounty hunters have no power to predict the ICO whether its scam or not, no likes to be scammed, everyone must do research,lets all accept, being scammed is part of a risk.
Bounty managers are not always in better position than normal guys to predict scam. They probably do research, since they don´t get paid if it is scam.
Bounty manager can't escape from his responsibilities. The fact that he was also scammed is not a reason to completely acquit him and place all blame on him.
It is increasingly difficult to understand from the beginning if an ICO can be a scam. I select the bounty campaigns to which I participate after having studied them very well, but in recent times it has happened to me not to be paid because some program that seemed good, turned out to be a scam. I hope that as soon as possible a general regulation of the market will take place to protect everyone
What do you think about trying to pick bounty campaigns that have already raised a lot of money and are late stage?
Jump to: