100 shares on BF for 2.3? Are people crazy? wtf?
Look at all the stocks and most have only taken a 10% hit tops, but AM is where most people have their money that they wanna get out so it's taken the largest undeserved hit.
Topic: ASICMINER: Entering the Future of ASIC Mining by Inventing It - page 1005. (Read 3917568 times)
Look at all the stocks and most have only taken a 10% hit tops, but AM is where most people have their money that they wanna get out so it's taken the largest undeserved hit.
100 shares on BF for 2.3? Are people crazy? wtf?
Look at all the stocks and most have only taken a 10% hit tops, but AM is where most people have their money that they wanna get out so it's taken the largest undeserved hit.
100 shares on BF for 2.3? Are people crazy? wtf?
What's the roadmap to increasing the hashrate ?
Current hashrate is now less than 30%, more like 20%.
Current hashrate is now less than 30%, more like 20%.
No, that's exactly like just buying BTC and not spending them.
If you spend them for another BTC-producing asset is irrelevant relative to BTCUSD.
If you spend them for another BTC-producing asset is irrelevant relative to BTCUSD.
I accept your argument that the btc:usd rate doesn't affect return. However, the cost of entry to the product has lowered, making it affordable to more people. I would expect that to drive sales up.
Imagine the corollary. If btc:usd went up to $1000, a blade would now cost $49,990 cash price. How many do you think AM will sell per week at those prices?
I guess that this kind of "market" would auto-adjust, and if the price of BTC would go up too much, people who wanted to spend less would just either buy a minor product (i.e. USB miner) or buy shares such as PTs or virtual mines.
So, yes, sales could be slightly affected by such a thing, but not as much as someone might imagine.
Another way of looking at it is the blades are a lot cheaper now as measured in $ so perhaps sales will actually go up?
They are priced in BTC, they produce BTC, the BTCUSD rate is irrelevant here.No, if you are long on btc it's clearly a bargain.
If you spend them for another BTC-producing asset is irrelevant relative to BTCUSD.
I accept your argument that the btc:usd rate doesn't affect return. However, the cost of entry to the product has lowered, making it affordable to more people. I would expect that to drive sales up.
Imagine the corollary. If btc:usd went up to $1000, a blade would now cost $49,990 cash price. How many do you think AM will sell per week at those prices?
No affect on the demand of BLADE...as long as the return of BLADE maintaining the same level.
only things will affect is who buys the BLADE ,and how to buy the BLADE.
if a BLADE cost $49990 ,its return remains the same, then its potential buyers will switch to rich one ,or group buy.
Another way of looking at it is the blades are a lot cheaper now as measured in $ so perhaps sales will actually go up?
They are priced in BTC, they produce BTC, the BTCUSD rate is irrelevant here.No, if you are long on btc it's clearly a bargain.
If you spend them for another BTC-producing asset is irrelevant relative to BTCUSD.
I accept your argument that the btc:usd rate doesn't affect return. However, the cost of entry to the product has lowered, making it affordable to more people. I would expect that to drive sales up.
Imagine the corollary. If btc:usd went up to $1000, a blade would now cost $49,990 cash price. How many do you think AM will sell per week at those prices?
I like how TAT.ASICMINER is pretty much holding up. 
Lophie is back again with the weird connections and questions. 
Guys considering that GPU mining was returning only ~40%ish considering electricity cost. Do you think during this slumpy week for the exchange rate that many miners will pause mining which would boost ASICMINER network hashrate% and therefore... more profit BTC_BTC?
Guys considering that GPU mining was returning only ~40%ish considering electricity cost. Do you think during this slumpy week for the exchange rate that many miners will pause mining which would boost ASICMINER network hashrate% and therefore... more profit BTC_BTC?
Why would they? That would be just stupid, they just need to hope price rebound back and hold onto coins. They just cannot sell them for immediate profit
I rest my case
Lophie is back again with the weird connections and questions.
Guys considering that GPU mining was returning only ~40%ish considering electricity cost. Do you think during this slumpy week for the exchange rate that many miners will pause mining which would boost ASICMINER network hashrate% and therefore... more profit BTC_BTC?
Guys considering that GPU mining was returning only ~40%ish considering electricity cost. Do you think during this slumpy week for the exchange rate that many miners will pause mining which would boost ASICMINER network hashrate% and therefore... more profit BTC_BTC?
Why would they? That would be just stupid, they just need to hope price rebound back and hold onto coins. They just cannot sell them for immediate profit
Lophie is back again with the weird connections and questions.
Guys considering that GPU mining was returning only ~40%ish considering electricity cost. Do you think during this slumpy week for the exchange rate that many miners will pause mining which would boost ASICMINER network hashrate% and therefore... more profit BTC_BTC?
Guys considering that GPU mining was returning only ~40%ish considering electricity cost. Do you think during this slumpy week for the exchange rate that many miners will pause mining which would boost ASICMINER network hashrate% and therefore... more profit BTC_BTC?
Asicminer price at bitfunder is bargain now compare to TAT and at btct.co price
Price is the same on both exchanges 2.3 vs 2.315 If it's not, someone will grab a profit to make sure it is.
Asicminer price at bitfunder is bargain now compare to TAT and at btct.co price
The panic sells on BTC/USD market caused some panic on share price aswell. Cheap shares for everyone but me. :/
Wonder if the market is going the right way and going to be a busy day from a trading view
And you'll succeed Fab I believe in you
The panic sells on BTC/USD market caused some panic on share price aswell. Cheap shares for everyone but me. :/
Another way of looking at it is the blades are a lot cheaper now as measured in $ so perhaps sales will actually go up?
They are priced in BTC, they produce BTC, the BTCUSD rate is irrelevant here.No, if you are long on btc it's clearly a bargain.
If you spend them for another BTC-producing asset is irrelevant relative to BTCUSD.
Another way of looking at it is the blades are a lot cheaper now as measured in $ so perhaps sales will actually go up?
They are priced in BTC, they produce BTC, the BTCUSD rate is irrelevant here.it's little bit relevant as BFL sells asics priced in USD, electricity is in USD and GPUs are in USD
Another way of looking at it is the blades are a lot cheaper now as measured in $ so perhaps sales will actually go up?
They are priced in BTC, they produce BTC, the BTCUSD rate is irrelevant here.No, if you are long on btc it's clearly a bargain.
Another way of looking at it is the blades are a lot cheaper now as measured in $ so perhaps sales will actually go up?
They are priced in BTC, they produce BTC, the BTCUSD rate is irrelevant here.If I spend 5% on electricity and management fees and that covers volatility of Bitcoin price in the range of 5%-15% then it is okay. But when the price plummets from $120 - $90 that means it went down 20%+ which means I would have to sell more BTC to cover the expenses.
the BTCUSD rate is ALWAYS relevant. The effect was just way minimal unless a big swing like what is happening nowadays occurs.
Another way of looking at it is the blades are a lot cheaper now as measured in $ so perhaps sales will actually go up?
They are priced in BTC, they produce BTC, the BTCUSD rate is irrelevant here.Jump to: