Some of the rest hashpower will be sold, some of them will be deployed in the weeks following the next week. The larger portion of them will still be deployed by ourselves.
Since we already had 7.5 TH/s deployed, it seems like you are deploying 7.5 TH/s this week. Is that the weekly goal for deployment, 7.5 TH/s? Or do you plan more for next week?
Friedcat & co own more of AM than all of us put together. They have all the motivation in the world to deploy as fast as is safely possible. You and everyone else here armchair-speculating about their activities and second-guessing the roadblocks and speed they have helps NO ONE.
It is pretty obvious that Friedcat believes that 7.5 TH/s is a reasonable estimate for the fastest they can possibly deploy. If he could go faster, do you not think that he would? 7.5 TH/s is *750* hashing boards that have to be mounted, powered up, firmware-flashed, pointed to the pool and debugged. If the racks aren't fully in place, that's ~37 racks that have to be built. And that isn't even talking about cooling. At least one in 100 is going to have a short that requires diagnostics. "Plan for more next week?" lol. Give him a fucking break. I highly doubt any of them plan to do anything except 15 hour days 7 days a week for the next MONTH. Honestly I'd rather them slow it down a little bit as needed because tired people make mistakes, and mistakes could cost thousands.
As far as the other people asking what happened to the other ~5.8 TH/s from the original 12, they ran into power issues. Powering 750 hashing boards is no easy feat. They had timed the expansion of their power capacity with the delivery of the next 50 TH/s, rather perfectly I might add. So now they both have more power and they have the 50TH/s. So theoretically they can bring online 55.7 TH/s now, although we are selling so it won't be quite that much.
/rant
I am just wondering what the goals and plan is, as so many things have changed. Friedcat said that more would be deployed following this week, and I think a lot of us want to know what the plan is.
Is it really unreasonable to ask for details on the deployment rates?