Author

Topic: ASICMINER: Entering the Future of ASIC Mining by Inventing It - page 1268. (Read 3917029 times)

hero member
Activity: 667
Merit: 500
Doesnt ASICMINER have enough hashpower to solo mine for awhile ?

sure does but i can see why they don't want to take the variance risk in the short term..  we have maybe 2-3 weeks here unless BFL blows up
full member
Activity: 238
Merit: 100
Doesnt ASICMINER have enough hashpower to solo mine for awhile ?
hero member
Activity: 667
Merit: 500
pretty sure the stated plan is to balance the hashrate between a group of pools..

Well, that's my point. That's the plan, but it hasn't happened with the first 2 TH/s, so what will make it happen with the next 10TH/s? He's got a working pool and shareholders wanting an ROI, if BTCGuild works, there's no incentive to contact any other pool ops. Maybe he's working on it. No, let me rephrase that, hopefully he's working on it.

I just don't want this to be Deepbit circa Winter-Spring 2011 version 2. We had about ten threads a day on a conspiracy roll about how Deepbit was double-spending. It got so bad Tycho had to make a bounty (I think piuk collected it) for double-spend tracking.

i think it is too early to say, we are not even 48 hours old yet..   they know btcguild works for sure now and is serving as a testbed for them nicely..   not sure what you expect,  i definitely don't expect them to throw hashes at every little pool,  so maybe some of the "known" working hash rate goes to slush or something now and they pull some more just fired devices onto btcguild, etc etc..

give the guys a few days here, this is quite the project.


hero member
Activity: 658
Merit: 500
10$ who guesses who the next ddos victim is? Lol
hero member
Activity: 900
Merit: 1014
advocate of a cryptographic attack on the globe
pretty sure the stated plan is to balance the hashrate between a group of pools..

Well, that's my point. That's the plan, but it hasn't happened with the first 2 TH/s, so what will make it happen with the next 10TH/s? He's got a working pool and shareholders wanting an ROI, if BTCGuild works, there's no incentive to contact any other pool ops. Maybe he's working on it. No, let me rephrase that, hopefully he's working on it.

I just don't want this to be Deepbit circa Winter-Spring 2011 version 2. We had about ten threads a day on a conspiracy roll about how Deepbit was double-spending. It got so bad Tycho had to make a bounty (I think piuk collected it) for double-spend tracking.

Excellent point. ROI is contingent on bitcoin remaining strong which means the network itself isn't attacked successfully so it is in our interest even as greedy shareholders to distribute the load even though it will take extra time.
sr. member
Activity: 350
Merit: 250
give mtred some hashes, stratum without fee!  Wink

How long will it stay up though?
hero member
Activity: 607
Merit: 500
give mtred some hashes, stratum without fee!  Wink
legendary
Activity: 1750
Merit: 1007
pretty sure the stated plan is to balance the hashrate between a group of pools..

Well, that's my point. That's the plan, but it hasn't happened with the first 2 TH/s, so what, pray tell, will make it happen with the next 10TH/s? He's got a working pool and shareholders wanting an ROI, if BTCGuild works, there's no incentive to contact any other pool ops. Maybe he's working on it. No, let me rephrase that, hopefully he's working on it.

I just don't want this to be Deepbit circa Spring-Summer 2011 version 2. We had about ten threads a day on a conspiracy roll about how Deepbit was double-spending.

On the bright side, BTC Guild should not be in danger of hitting 51% even if all 12 TH/s is pointed at it.  The network pre-ASICMINER was ~25 TH/s.  With ASICMINER at 12, it would be 37 TH/s.  Pre-ASICMINER BTC Guild speed was 4 TH/s, which would put us at 16 out of 37 assuming all speed was pointed at and kept on BTC Guild.  While it's "close", it's still missing 3 TH/s (a relatively HUGE amount of hashing power).

It's 43%, which is a high amount, and certainly a number I'd prefer to stay under (too much of an attack target), but given the size of the network these days, it's far off from the time that Deepbit actually had >51%.
hero member
Activity: 588
Merit: 500
Congratulations to ASICMINER!
And thank you for your very significant contribution towards making the Bitcoin network more secure.
Unfortunately, the large consolidation of hashpower under a single administrative entity creates peril, not security. Doubly so with the hashpower assigned to one of the largest mining pools.  The consequence is that there are fewer operations which must be seized, coerced, or hacked in order to undermine the operation of the network.

Congratulations are in order, indeed— but its regrettable that more hasn't been done to mitigate the risk to the Bitcoin ecosystem (getting devices sold ASAP, splitting operations to reduce the incentives to capture it, mining solo, p2pool, or on smaller pools) yet.  I hope more independent parties come online before continued consolidation (rightfully) undermines confidence in Bitcoin technology.

Agreed on the sentiment, I should've added a postscript that all praise and thanks is underlied by two assumptions: that their temporary superpowers are just that, temporary, and that during any window of exclusivity they will be used for good and not for evil.

legendary
Activity: 1012
Merit: 1000
donator
Activity: 1419
Merit: 1015
pretty sure the stated plan is to balance the hashrate between a group of pools..

Well, that's my point. That's the plan, but it hasn't happened with the first 2 TH/s, so what will make it happen with the next 10TH/s? He's got a working pool and shareholders wanting an ROI, if BTCGuild works, there's no incentive to contact any other pool ops. Maybe he's working on it. No, let me rephrase that, hopefully he's working on it.

I just don't want this to be Deepbit circa Winter-Spring 2011 version 2. We had about ten threads a day on a conspiracy roll about how Deepbit was double-spending. It got so bad Tycho had to make a bounty (I think piuk collected it) for double-spend tracking.
hero member
Activity: 667
Merit: 500
I'm very happy my pool was chosen for the stress test, but I do share the above concerns and hope after the testing is done it is split among pools.  For stress testing, it makes sense to use a single pool so you have a consistent point of comparison when encountering problems.  I'm sure once the units are confirmed to work we'll see them move around and diversify.

Unfortunately for friedcat, he's in the unenviable position of needing to not freak out the other miners on smaller pools and the Bitcoin community as a whole while also ensuring his shareholders get the most bang for their buck. If I were a betting Bitcoiner, I'd say the latter is probably going to drive him to putting all 12 TH/s on BTCGuild, regardless of your concern. I would encourage the other pool ops and maybe even the P2Pool dev(s) to get in touch with him and you about cleaning up Stratum however it needs to to work with the new units being brought online relatively quickly.


pretty sure the stated plan is to balance the hashrate between a group of pools..
donator
Activity: 1419
Merit: 1015
I'm very happy my pool was chosen for the stress test, but I do share the above concerns and hope after the testing is done it is split among pools.  For stress testing, it makes sense to use a single pool so you have a consistent point of comparison when encountering problems.  I'm sure once the units are confirmed to work we'll see them move around and diversify.

Unfortunately for friedcat, he's in the unenviable position of needing to not freak out the other miners on smaller pools and the Bitcoin community as a whole while also ensuring his shareholders get the most bang for their buck. If I were a betting Bitcoiner, I'd say the latter is probably going to drive him to putting all 12 TH/s on BTCGuild, regardless of your concern. I would encourage the other pool ops and maybe even the P2Pool dev(s) to get in touch with him and you about cleaning up Stratum however it needs to to work with the new units being brought online relatively quickly.
hero member
Activity: 752
Merit: 500
bitcoin hodler
awesome!! I'm really glad that I invested (even if it was just a little bit) I would expect that the shares will be sold for 100 bucks in no time
sr. member
Activity: 476
Merit: 250
so an update should be here "soon" I hope.
I hope the update will arrive after they have deployed all they can with materials currently on hand.

And no sooner.

Get them critters hashing!   Smiley
sr. member
Activity: 305
Merit: 250
Pre Update

The deploying is in process. We are stress testing on btcguild with a portion of  our devices. The current computation power is close to 2TH/s.

We have been working day and night and still are. The real update will be given in a few hours.

He posted this message about 4 hours ago... so an update should be here "soon" I hope.
sr. member
Activity: 476
Merit: 250
I hope to see some pics if you can find any time to make them Cheesy
That would be Awesome! Tongue


Yes, that would be nice.

But I'm entirely happy to let them sleep a while before they even think about it.

IMO, the only 'pic' which matters for now is:
2,295.70 GH/s - https://www.btcguild.com/halloffame.php
legendary
Activity: 1162
Merit: 1000
DiabloMiner author
I wonder if we'll get to 100 pages before friedcat returns to the thread to update us.
hero member
Activity: 607
Merit: 500
excellent! now i am convinced that ASIC era is here!
thanks guys, l really hope to get an ASIC some day from you  Smiley
sr. member
Activity: 322
Merit: 252
Nice Friedcat!  Grin (and the rest of the team of course!)

I hope to see some pics if you can find some time to make them Cheesy
That would be Awesome! Tongue
Jump to: