ASICMINER: Entering the Future of ASIC Mining by Inventing It - page 973.

SmiGueL

sr. member

Activity: 322

Merit: 252

Quote from: matt_boyd on June 17, 2013, 08:34:42 AM

Just a quick question for a noob, this is my first week of receiving dividends, and I was wondering is this the total: http://www.asicminercharts.com/live/ the bottom one of course, or are there other factors involved?

Thanks for any replies in advance!

That's (as far as I know) indeed the total of the mined coins in the last 5 days.

The hardware sale payments are on other addresses

And they're pretty 'unknown' until wednesday, right before the dividend payment.

matt_boyd

sr. member

Activity: 246

Merit: 250

Just a quick question for a noob, this is my first week of receiving dividends, and I was wondering is this the total: http://www.asicminercharts.com/live/ the bottom one of course, or are there other factors involved?

Thanks for any replies in advance!

velacreations

sr. member

Activity: 476

Merit: 250

Quote from: notme on June 17, 2013, 07:49:23 AM

Quote from: velacreations on June 17, 2013, 02:07:59 AM

Quote from: Jere.Jones on June 17, 2013, 12:39:35 AM

Take a look at the full transaction: https://blockchain.info/tx/d4730360f7e41291204df378cf2003c6a928c6e2ccefa88515081e519e89a6fd

Judging by the input addresses (foul language vanity addresses?) and the output addresses (a who's who of bitcoin businesses, good and bad), I'd speculate that this transaction is (or will be) part of a bad press campaign.

I'm a little offended that I didn't make the list...
Angry

Who the fuck are you?

what, you don't know?

canth

legendary

Activity: 1442

Merit: 1001

Keyser Soze

notme

legendary

Activity: 1904

Merit: 1002

Quote from: velacreations on June 17, 2013, 02:07:59 AM

Quote from: Jere.Jones on June 17, 2013, 12:39:35 AM

Take a look at the full transaction: https://blockchain.info/tx/d4730360f7e41291204df378cf2003c6a928c6e2ccefa88515081e519e89a6fd

Judging by the input addresses (foul language vanity addresses?) and the output addresses (a who's who of bitcoin businesses, good and bad), I'd speculate that this transaction is (or will be) part of a bad press campaign.

I'm a little offended that I didn't make the list...
Angry

Who the fuck are you?

8fold

sr. member

Activity: 391

Merit: 250

Quote from: empoweoqwj on June 17, 2013, 04:16:17 AM

Get a life, you only have one Roll Eyes

I used to believe in reincarnation... but that was a looong time ago. In a previous life.

empoweoqwj

hero member

Activity: 518

Merit: 500

If someone's idea of a "spending time usefully" is inventing abusive vanity addresses and listing bitcoin entities as output addresses, the only firm conclusion you can possibly draw is .... they don't have any friends. Get a life, you only have one Roll Eyes

tkone

full member

Activity: 168

Merit: 100

Quote from: velacreations on June 17, 2013, 02:07:59 AM

Quote from: Jere.Jones on June 17, 2013, 12:39:35 AM

Take a look at the full transaction: https://blockchain.info/tx/d4730360f7e41291204df378cf2003c6a928c6e2ccefa88515081e519e89a6fd

Judging by the input addresses (foul language vanity addresses?) and the output addresses (a who's who of bitcoin businesses, good and bad), I'd speculate that this transaction is (or will be) part of a bad press campaign.

I'm a little offended that I didn't make the list...
Angry

lol,
still though really interesting TX i wonder if we will ever find out what this is all about!

velacreations

sr. member

Activity: 476

Merit: 250

Quote from: Jere.Jones on June 17, 2013, 12:39:35 AM

Take a look at the full transaction: https://blockchain.info/tx/d4730360f7e41291204df378cf2003c6a928c6e2ccefa88515081e519e89a6fd

Judging by the input addresses (foul language vanity addresses?) and the output addresses (a who's who of bitcoin businesses, good and bad), I'd speculate that this transaction is (or will be) part of a bad press campaign.

I'm a little offended that I didn't make the list...
Angry

str4wm4n

legendary

Activity: 1611

Merit: 1001

Jere.Jones

full member

Activity: 121

Merit: 100

Quote from: der_meister on June 17, 2013, 12:24:37 AM

Strange tx Grin

Take a look at the full transaction: https://blockchain.info/tx/d4730360f7e41291204df378cf2003c6a928c6e2ccefa88515081e519e89a6fd

Judging by the input addresses (foul language vanity addresses?) and the output addresses (a who's who of bitcoin businesses, good and bad), I'd speculate that this transaction is (or will be) part of a bad press campaign.

der_meister

full member

Activity: 155

Merit: 100

Strange tx Grin

davos

member

Activity: 106

Merit: 10

Quote from: ianp on June 16, 2013, 04:52:02 PM

Quote from: Rival on June 16, 2013, 04:05:26 PM

There is no need to respond. The only change to their percentage of the global hash will come from those gpu miners who decide to turn off their machines because they are no longer profitable at $100 /btc. I do not anticipate that this number will be very large, as it will be more than made up over time by additional ASIC miners coming into the game.

Well, they can't keep up 1.5 blocks per hour without increasing their hashing power.

Are you suggesting AM should adjust to a dividend every # of blocks instead of weekly?

ianp

full member

Activity: 294

Merit: 100

Quote from: Rival on June 16, 2013, 04:05:26 PM

There is no need to respond. The only change to their percentage of the global hash will come from those gpu miners who decide to turn off their machines because they are no longer profitable at $100 /btc. I do not anticipate that this number will be very large, as it will be more than made up over time by additional ASIC miners coming into the game.

Well, they can't keep up 1.5 blocks per hour without increasing their hashing power.

tinus42

hero member

Activity: 784

Merit: 501

Quote from: shawshankinmate37927 on June 16, 2013, 10:44:03 AM

Quote from: tinus42 on June 16, 2013, 09:44:50 AM

What if a shareholder dies and one of their descendants wants to sell the share or have the e-mail address changed?

I'm thinking it should be the shareholder's responsibility to ensure that the private key to his/her registered bitcoin address is transferred to his/her beneficiary upon death along with instructions on how to get a hold of friedcat so he can update his database once the beneficiary has proven they now control the bitcoin address that the shares are currently registered to.

I've laid an intelligence trap for my descendants. If they don't care doing a proper investigation they don't deserve any of my Bitcoins. Instead you lot will inherit my coins when I die. Wink

Rival

hero member

Activity: 504

Merit: 502

There is no need to respond. The only change to their percentage of the global hash will come from those gpu miners who decide to turn off their machines because they are no longer profitable at $100 /btc. I do not anticipate that this number will be very large, as it will be more than made up over time by additional ASIC miners coming into the game.

ianp

full member

Activity: 294

Merit: 100

7 blocks until retarget.. ~1 hour or so.. I'm really curious to see how ASICMiNER will respond.

wo0x

full member

Activity: 127

Merit: 100

Quote from: tkone on June 15, 2013, 10:48:44 PM

they obviously have enough power to have 99% of network, they just not doing that, because that wouldnt be fair to the rest of bitcoin network,

Do I miss a main point when I suspect asicminer wants to keep the hashing network stable, what means no single party should be able do have more than 50% of hash rate!?!?

That is ABSOLUTELY no point of fairness but of survival - for Bitcoin and therefor for Asicminer as well.

But it might be the explanation, that so lots of devices are SOLD instead of adding them to the ASICminer pool: They will stabilize the hashrate distribution, so no one else will gain majority.

Best",
wo0x

sngwinner

full member

Activity: 432

Merit: 100

Yes and at that point bit fountain owned the newly formed ASIC Miner in entirety and sold pieces of it to individuals. It sold shares of AM not bit fountain. See the difference?

tinus42

hero member

Activity: 784

Merit: 501

Quote from: helixone on June 16, 2013, 10:38:26 AM

Quote from: tinus42 on June 16, 2013, 10:26:02 AM

Quote from: shawshankinmate37927 on June 16, 2013, 10:22:21 AM

Quote from: mustyoshi on June 16, 2013, 10:14:25 AM

How many shares does ASICMiner keep for themselves, and how many are for the public?

From the OP:

"Currently ASICMINER shareholders holds 163,962 shares, while Bitfountain shareholders holds 236,038 shares."

A share in ASICMINER is actually a share in Bitfountain.

This is absolutely not true. Bitfountain, a private company, is the majority shareholder in ASICMINER.

-helixone

It says in the first line from the first post of this thread: "ASICMINER is a virtual identity totally held by investors of the Bitfountain company." That implies that you invest in Bitfountain when you buy a share. The word "totally" is key.

Topic: ASICMINER: Entering the Future of ASIC Mining by Inventing It - page 973. (Read 3917568 times)