Author

Topic: ASICMINER: Entering the Future of ASIC Mining by Inventing It - page 971. (Read 3917568 times)

legendary
Activity: 1834
Merit: 1094
Learning the troll avoidance button :)
btc on the rise 104 each, i think it might be a drop or an incline ahead, i dont think 104 is stable

wrong thread, no one here cares about 4 btc price changes

Just repost this every once in a while for people who don't check the old pages

ASICMINER Speculation thread
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.2507875

Also reminder send investor questions to TAT and others
full member
Activity: 168
Merit: 100
btc on the rise 104 each, i think it might be a drop or an incline ahead, i dont think 104 is stable
sr. member
Activity: 322
Merit: 252
Wouldn't that take BTC28,000?

Well, at least it's cheaper than candoo's idea of boosting the divs

Did anyone hear the rumours about a forced buyback for 3.64 btc per share? So he ill pay uy 3.64 btc per share as a dividend and thats all forever.

Would cost them around $60M to do....

NOT gonna happen Tongue
donator
Activity: 294
Merit: 250
Some malicious attacker should send out a 0.07 BTC/share dividend to ASICMINER share addresses, and dump their shares as people panic buy on PTs Grin

 Roll Eyes tries to do the math  Cry

Wouldn't that take BTC28,000?
sr. member
Activity: 322
Merit: 252
Some malicious attacker should send out a 0.07 BTC/share dividend to ASICMINER share addresses, and dump their shares as people panic buy on PTs Grin

Why not send out 0.007 and wait for panic sells?  Wink
Will be about 10x cheaper for the attacker and have the same effect..
hero member
Activity: 574
Merit: 500
Some malicious attacker should send out a 0.07 BTC/share dividend to ASICMINER share addresses, and dump their shares as people panic buy on PTs Grin

That's the crazy way round! I'm going to set up some buy walls tomorrow & send everyone 1 Satoshi. Tongue
newbie
Activity: 17
Merit: 0
Well, they are well below the estimated 20%!
I'm not sure how to prove it statistically, but it surely looks like variance is not the sole responsible for the deviation...
vip
Activity: 1316
Merit: 1043
👻
Some malicious attacker should send out a 0.07 BTC/share dividend to ASICMINER share addresses, and dump their shares as people panic buy on PTs Grin
sr. member
Activity: 322
Merit: 252
100% agree, Blockchain.info still didn't fix their API and can only go back (almost) 2 days..
(Thats why the 48 hours pie is the same as the 4 days pie)  Huh





The dotted-line gives a nice visualisation of the last 100 found blocks by Asicminer:)


hero member
Activity: 752
Merit: 500
bitcoin hodler
wtf, hash rate is purely hardware based, and is not affected by the bitcoin/mining economy at all.  Or I've had it all wrong this entire time  Shocked


Hash rate is purely hardware based. ASICMINER (probably) knows their exact hash rate at all times, but the charts we have access to are all estimates of ASICMINER's hash rate, based on the blocks they find and the total bitcoin network difficultly. Since the amount of blocks a solo-miner (like ASICMINER) actually solves is based to some degree on luck, the hashrate we see in the charts is likely to have a great deal more variance than the true ASICMINER hash rate.

At least that's my understanding of it.

you are right. The approximation for three days or a week week should be pretty exact, but 24 hour aproximation is very dependent on luck...
donator
Activity: 294
Merit: 250
wtf, hash rate is purely hardware based, and is not affected by the bitcoin/mining economy at all.  Or I've had it all wrong this entire time  Shocked


Hash rate is purely hardware based. ASICMINER (probably) knows their exact hash rate at all times, but the charts we have access to are all estimates of ASICMINER's hash rate, based on the blocks they find and the total bitcoin network difficultly. Since the amount of blocks a solo-miner (like ASICMINER) actually solves is based to some degree on luck, the hashrate we see in the charts is likely to have a great deal more variance than the true ASICMINER hash rate.

At least that's my understanding of it.
legendary
Activity: 1904
Merit: 1002
wtf, hash rate is purely hardware based, and is not affected by the bitcoin/mining economy at all.  Or I've had it all wrong this entire time  Shocked

"Hash rate estimate"

It is estimate based on blocks found.
full member
Activity: 196
Merit: 100
wtf, hash rate is purely hardware based, and is not affected by the bitcoin/mining economy at all.  Or I've had it all wrong this entire time  Shocked
legendary
Activity: 994
Merit: 1000
Ah, duh... It hadn't occurred to me that the hash rate was an estimate based on total network hash power and blocks found.

Consider me enlightened, thanks.
hero member
Activity: 752
Merit: 500
bitcoin hodler
http://www.asicminercharts.com/live/

Has there been any news as to why we've gone from 37.12 GH/s to 21.89 GH/s?  Friedcat's last post mentioned no more hardware sales, so I wouldn't have expected blades to be taken offline. Are they moving equipment?

I feel like I must be missing some news as nobody seems tweaked by the drop and this forum is known for insta-tweaking.

could be just bad luck
legendary
Activity: 1176
Merit: 1001
CryptoTalk.Org - Get Paid for every Post!
http://www.asicminercharts.com/live/

Has there been any news as to why we've gone from 37.12 GH/s to 21.89 GH/s?  Friedcat's last post mentioned no more hardware sales, so I wouldn't have expected blades to be taken offline. Are they moving equipment?

I feel like I must be missing some news as nobody seems tweaked by the drop and this forum is known for insta-tweaking.

I'm guessing it's mostly variance. The 24-hour average has crossed the 3-day and 7-day averages quite a bit in the last 24 hours, so AM's luck is more likely just evening out. That's a more likely explanation than hash appearing then disappearing (that could be part of it, though, it's not easy to tell).

I have just started mining myself with a couple of USB sticks mostly as an educational exercise. I know my variance is higher as my pools are smaller than AM's solo mine but both pools I've tried have had wild swings of fortune over a few days. I think even at AM's size you need to look at longer timescales than a couple of days to be sure that hash rate is disappearing. And of course because over a week or two you'd expect them to deploying more hardware it only gets harder to tell where they should be at.
donator
Activity: 294
Merit: 250
Was there no update from friedcat last week??
legendary
Activity: 994
Merit: 1000
http://www.asicminercharts.com/live/

Has there been any news as to why we've gone from 37.12 GH/s to 21.89 GH/s?  Friedcat's last post mentioned no more hardware sales, so I wouldn't have expected blades to be taken offline. Are they moving equipment?

I feel like I must be missing some news as nobody seems tweaked by the drop and this forum is known for insta-tweaking.
full member
Activity: 294
Merit: 100
Is the person who updates the Google Spreadsheet for hashrate taking a vacation or has it been dropped?

Busy busy busy Wink

I'm working on an 1, 3 and 7 day average chart, but that 'll take some days..

Asicminer hahsrate is bouncing like crazy these days so it's a bit difficult to estimate the hashrate..

Until I can figure out what's up with the JSON output I'm producing for you -- I've put this up if anyone cares to look at 4 days worth of data:

http://www.dpcapital.net/blockchain/
newbie
Activity: 25
Merit: 0
Is the person who updates the Google Spreadsheet for hashrate taking a vacation or has it been dropped?

Busy busy busy Wink

I'm working on an 1, 3 and 7 day average graph, but that 'll take some days..

Asicminer hahsrate is bouncing like crazy these days so it's a bit difficult to estimate the hashrate..

Thanks for the quick answer.  Was hoping it wouldn't disappear.  Love all the work you do, thank you thank you!
Jump to: