ASICMINER Speculation Thread - page 69.

blo8i

hero member

Activity: 960

Merit: 502

Quote from: superduh on November 19, 2013, 01:07:06 PM

Quote from: eastpk on November 19, 2013, 01:03:59 PM

Quote from: blo8i on November 19, 2013, 01:02:16 PM

any div confirms?

Its Tuesday - Div's are usually posted on Wednesdays.

'

this happens every week now so it seems. people get days mixed up.

haha i am soo sorry, i just got a 0.000256 in, and i dontknwo where it is from, so if this was the div, i would be super sad.

superduh

hero member

Activity: 602

Merit: 500

Quote from: eastpk on November 19, 2013, 01:03:59 PM

Quote from: blo8i on November 19, 2013, 01:02:16 PM

any div confirms?

Its Tuesday - Div's are usually posted on Wednesdays.

'

this happens every week now so it seems. people get days mixed up.

eastpk

member

Activity: 120

Merit: 10

WINSTARS - We are changing the face of gambling

Quote from: blo8i on November 19, 2013, 01:02:16 PM

any div confirms?

Its Tuesday - Div's are usually posted on Wednesdays.

blo8i

hero member

Activity: 960

Merit: 502

any div confirms?

bitcoin.newsfeed

sr. member

Activity: 378

Merit: 250

So guys, what is your estimated time of arrival for internal deployment and why?

End of the year? January?

Quote from: friedcat on August 22, 2013, 01:14:24 AM

How are things going regarding your business plan? Did you account for the sudden network hashrate increase? How is the international expansion of ASICminer coming along?
The business plan is unchanged. The network hashrate increase was still under our projection. The total hash target originally set for the end of this year would probably achieved earlier.

Do you think that FC is going to use Gen1 with "container design"? Now we have working immersion cooling, containers and gen1 chips, so why is AM waiting again?

sonikku13

full member

Activity: 134

Merit: 100

Quote from: ?? on ??

is havelock the only place this stuff is now trading? other than otc?

thanks

796.com has a PT, as the guy above me stated, and Litecoininvest.com has a LTC PT for ASICMINER too.

jimmothy

hero member

Activity: 770

Merit: 509

Quote from: ?? on ??

is havelock the only place this stuff is now trading? other than otc?

thanks

796.com has a passthrough. But most volume is on havelock afaik.

JimiQ84

sr. member

Activity: 406

Merit: 250

since june updates are monthly, around 20th

maxl

full member

Activity: 221

Merit: 100

I don´t know.
I think we will get new infos around the 20th, because the last updates were always at this time of the month.

superduh

hero member

Activity: 602

Merit: 500

why is fc so quite lately Sad

ex-trader

sr. member

Activity: 298

Merit: 250

Quote from: damiano on November 16, 2013, 02:35:28 PM

Quote from: ex-trader on November 16, 2013, 02:07:54 PM

The only thing that stops scammers is proper due diligence on the issuers by the exchanges.

Would you agree then Burnside is partially to blame?

I didn't follow Labcoin, so don't know the specifics, but at the very least I'd expect the exchange to have proved the identity of the borrowers with addresses, passports and photos. For a completely new company raising money, there is little that can be checked on the company itself, as there's nothing much to do due diligence on (historic records, performance etc) and therefore the risk of the 'idea' is for the investor to determine.

However the investors in Labcoin should know exactly who the issuers were so that they and the authorities can pursue them - that is 100% the responsibility of the exchange. I don't know if this is the case or not.

velacreations

sr. member

Activity: 476

Merit: 250

Quote from: ?? on ??

But why is this in a AsicMiner thread?

I have no idea, to be honest. I guess the original point was about AM making an exchange with listings fees as a deterrent to scammers. My point was that a listing fee doesn't really do that, or maybe it just cuts out the smaller scammers (that investor due diligence would likely do anyway).

Quote from: damiano on November 16, 2013, 02:35:28 PM

Would you agree then Burnside is partially to blame?

He's certainly guilty of listing a scam operation on his exchange, but I don't think anyone can blame him for the actions of the scammers.

damiano

legendary

Activity: 1246

Merit: 1000

103 days, 21 hours and 10 minutes.

Quote from: ex-trader on November 16, 2013, 02:07:54 PM

The only thing that stops scammers is proper due diligence on the issuers by the exchanges.

Would you agree then Burnside is partially to blame?

ex-trader

sr. member

Activity: 298

Merit: 250

The only thing that stops scammers is proper due diligence on the issuers by the exchanges.

KS

sr. member

Activity: 448

Merit: 250

Quote from: velacreations on November 16, 2013, 10:40:16 AM

I wonder if a 30 btc listing fee would have prevented the Labcoin scam?

Probably not. What's 30BTC when you expect 7000BTC in return?

velacreations

sr. member

Activity: 476

Merit: 250

I wonder if a 30 btc listing fee would have prevented the Labcoin scam?

Lohoris

hero member

Activity: 630

Merit: 500

Bitgoblin

Quote from: ewibit on November 14, 2013, 03:28:45 PM

Quote from: KS on November 14, 2013, 12:51:11 PM

There is a listing fee. Make it 30BTC like at MPex, or more since that's the only fee. Scammer friendly exchange. Sad

@this time:
make a listing fee
Make it 0.50BTC to prohibit Scammers...

?

How in hell having a 0.50BTC fee would "prohibit Scammers"?

KS

sr. member

Activity: 448

Merit: 250

Quote from: jimmothy on November 14, 2013, 05:15:05 PM

Quote from: KS on November 14, 2013, 04:57:46 PM

Quote from: Vycid on November 14, 2013, 03:57:16 PM

Quote from: KS on November 14, 2013, 12:51:11 PM

Quote from: bitcoin.newsfeed on November 14, 2013, 12:39:29 PM

Yes, so zero profit for company. So why is the mining company investing resources,time,people,focus on something like this, if we don't have competitive hashing chips ... i really don't get it.
...

There is a listing fee. Make it 30BTC like at MPex, or more since that's the only fee. Scammer friendly exchange. Sad

You must be joking. 30 BTC is well over $10k these days.

MPex charges 30BTC for trading accounts, why not make it so for listings too? (Or 100, or 1000BTC? It's a one time fee on an "unseizable" exchange.)

mpex.co/faq.html
"...I will be required to pay 30 BTC as fees for registering this account..."

mpex is a failure of an exchange and anyone who uses it deserves to lose at least 30btc..

And I don't think FC ever said they would be developing any decentralized exchange but that the exchange (either colored coins or mastercoin) was out of alpha and they would consider moving the entire DB to the blockchain. I could be wrong and they might actually be developing a decentralized exchange of their own which would be a waste of time but I doubt this is the case.

MPex's revenue are, ironically or not, perfectly in line with the owner's philosophy, IMO. He's the one laughing all the way to the bank Wink

RE the decentralized exchange, it might simply be a better way for FC to manage shares and let the users and the PT operators manage the various comings and goings. Depending on the investment, it might not be a bad solution (I don't think it's viable as a trading platform, but this might be another useful feature).

KS

sr. member

Activity: 448

Merit: 250

Quote from: ewibit on November 14, 2013, 05:07:42 PM

Quote from: KS on November 14, 2013, 04:57:46 PM

MPex charges 30BTC for trading accounts, why not make it so for listings too? (Or 100, or 1000BTC? It's a one time fee on an "unseizable" exchange.)

mpex.co/faq.html
"...I will be required to pay 30 BTC as fees for registering this account..."

like club of Vladimir?
Wink

Only needs 2.1 or the right listings Grin

jimmothy

hero member

Activity: 770

Merit: 509

Quote from: KS on November 14, 2013, 04:57:46 PM

Quote from: Vycid on November 14, 2013, 03:57:16 PM

Quote from: KS on November 14, 2013, 12:51:11 PM

Quote from: bitcoin.newsfeed on November 14, 2013, 12:39:29 PM

Yes, so zero profit for company. So why is the mining company investing resources,time,people,focus on something like this, if we don't have competitive hashing chips ... i really don't get it.
...

There is a listing fee. Make it 30BTC like at MPex, or more since that's the only fee. Scammer friendly exchange. Sad

You must be joking. 30 BTC is well over $10k these days.

MPex charges 30BTC for trading accounts, why not make it so for listings too? (Or 100, or 1000BTC? It's a one time fee on an "unseizable" exchange.)

mpex.co/faq.html
"...I will be required to pay 30 BTC as fees for registering this account..."

mpex is a failure of an exchange and anyone who uses it deserves to lose at least 30btc..

And I don't think FC ever said they would be developing any decentralized exchange but that the exchange (either colored coins or mastercoin) was out of alpha and they would consider moving the entire DB to the blockchain. I could be wrong and they might actually be developing a decentralized exchange of their own which would be a waste of time but I doubt this is the case.

Topic: ASICMINER Speculation Thread - page 69. (Read 808757 times)