Regarding all conspiracy theories:
- Why would someone that intentionally want to scam the community, setup a complicated scheme for three airdrops?
- Why would a scammer that intentionally wants to cash out leave a large portion of the coins untouched?
- Why would that person bother about handing over the website to a foundation and setup a wallet with 1 MM AUR for future expenses?
- Why does this person or group burn the remaining AUR instead of waiting to dump the remainder?
and there are more questions one can ask themselves. I admit the airdrop did not turn out a 100% succes, maybe the contrary. But every method has it's flaws. In the aviation industry everything is doubled, tripled, checked and still once in a while a plane crashes... What to expect from a method that was never tested and had to be caried out on short term...
Regarding security;
The current codebase was choosen for security reasons because MentalCollatz applied a fix to the DGB 4.x codebase that makes 51% attacks very unlikely. With this retarget fix a miner would need majority on multiple algos at once.
Thats also one of the reasons for 61 seconds blocktime, it's a prime and therefore prevents time repetitive flaws we do not even know of.
I read a lot about stealing or copying code even in other coins anns. When someone says AUR copied the algo he obviously has no knowledge about coin mechanics. The algo is the way the data is secured on the blockchain. For BTC that is SHA256d and for Litecoin that is Scrypt, besides those two a lot of other hashing methods are developed and used. So basicaly no coin copies the algo. The algo is a published method of securing.
Next to that there is a retargetting system, BTC used the average of 2015 blocks to calculate the next difficulty, but that was too long for the altcoin scene. AUR uses Kimoto gravity well till now (yes, copied code but proven and when used properly rock solid). The new codebase uses what DGB calls Digishield, a much faster responding retargetting method develloped by DGB and I discussed personally with Jared to use that. I also asked Mental for known flaws and he responded "not that I know of with the latest additions"
To clear up the questions:
- Why would someone that intentionally want to scam the community, setup a complicated scheme for three airdrops?
Money/bitcoin- Why would a scammer that intentionally wants to cash out leave a large portion of the coins untouched?
Future Money/Bitcoin- Why would that person bother about handing over the website to a foundation and setup a wallet with 1 MM AUR for future expenses?
To legitimize what he has stolen, attempt to play innocent- Why does this person or group burn the remaining AUR instead of waiting to dump the remainder?
To legitimize what he has stolen, attempt to play innocentIt's not complicated at all to create a airdrop. EASY MONEY and there are more questions one can ask themselves. I admit the airdrop did not turn out a 100% succes, maybe the contrary. But every method has it's flaws. In the aviation industry everything is doubled, tripled, checked and still once in a while a plane crashes... What to expect from a method that was never tested and had to be caried out on short term...
You took the meaning of a airdrop literally as someone using a real plane ? lol
Digibyte used a freelance developer MentalCollatz to solve their problems.
When it comes to premines you are guilty until proven innocent especially when the developer was anonymous.
There is no need to defend the scammer , he did you no favors and made it harder for the team to make it a success as you will always have to deal with this in the future. You should be angry and demand he reveals his true self.