+5.000usd for the same unit that was sold at 1.500usd when the difficulty was MUCH lower. It seems SO WRONG to me....
Note pre-order users paid high risks the chip will ever work or not. Business done right.
This is business done right ?!
Topic: Avalon ASIC users thread - page 192. (Read 438602 times)
Business done right.
This is business done right ?!
+5.000usd for the same unit that was sold at 1.500usd when the difficulty was MUCH lower. It seems SO WRONG to me....
Note pre-order users paid high risks the chip will ever work or not. Business done right.
Yeah, business done right in a ponzi-style fashion. First one to jump in takes the big cut, last ones remain holding the bag (and broken).
I thought AVALON was a serious company.
+5.000usd for the same unit that was sold at 1.500usd when the difficulty was MUCH lower. It seems SO WRONG to me....
Note pre-order users paid high risks the chip will ever work or not. Business done right.
Looks like site is prepared for batch #3. http://store.avalon-asics.com/?product=avalon-asic-unit
When will be buying possible?
When will be buying possible?
+5.000usd for the same unit that was sold at 1.500usd when the difficulty was MUCH lower. It seems SO WRONG to me....
Looks like site is prepared for batch #3. http://store.avalon-asics.com/?product=avalon-asic-unit
When will be buying possible?
When will be buying possible?
The problem is solved, the IP address changes 
I think you just login as "root", with no password.
I have changed it
I think you just login as "root", with no password.
Help!!!
after I setup the ip address , it show " luci - Lua configuration interface"
What shall I do? Who can help me?
after I setup the ip address , it show " luci - Lua configuration interface"
What shall I do? Who can help me?
See the "cgminer" tabs? Check those out.
Can't get in
Help!!!
after I setup the ip address , it show " luci - Lua configuration interface"
What shall I do? Who can help me?
after I setup the ip address , it show " luci - Lua configuration interface"
What shall I do? Who can help me?
See the "cgminer" tabs? Check those out.
Help!!!
after I setup the ip address , it show " luci - Lua configuration interface"
What shall I do? Who can help me?
after I setup the ip address , it show " luci - Lua configuration interface"
What shall I do? Who can help me?
Sorry if I'm asking in the wrong thread but here it goes:
Are there any significant differences between batches #1 and #2? any expected for #3?
Are there any significant differences between batches #1 and #2? any expected for #3?
Batch 2 units cost $140 more, after you account for shipping.
Batch 2 units "might" have 6 module slots instead of 4, but would still ship with only 3 modules initially installed.
A different payment processor is used for each batch.
your utility is very low!
assuming that you are in a stratum pool try to set variable difficulty at 64 to 66, i am not sure about the exact number though :p
assuming that you are in a stratum pool try to set variable difficulty at 64 to 66, i am not sure about the exact number though :p
Where do I set that?
it's usually in the registration of your worker at the pool you use that you can set the initial value, but as far as I understand the pool will adjust according to your work results. So it should only have an impact on the first activities
Thanks, I just found out this option under worker settings, now I set it to 64 and see what's going to happen...
Sorry if I'm asking in the wrong thread but here it goes:
Are there any significant differences between batches #1 and #2? any expected for #3?
Are there any significant differences between batches #1 and #2? any expected for #3?
No batch 2 ASICs have been received AFAIK.
Any differences according to description?
Nothing other than something in an email along the lines of learning from problems they had in batch 1.
Edit: Also, batch 1 were a couple of hundred dollars cheaper.
Wasn't there something about adding an extra slot of time allows?
I'll rephrase that, then:
Nothing confirmed other than something in an email along the lines of learning from problems they had in batch 1.
Sorry if I'm asking in the wrong thread but here it goes:
Are there any significant differences between batches #1 and #2? any expected for #3?
Are there any significant differences between batches #1 and #2? any expected for #3?
No batch 2 ASICs have been received AFAIK.
Any differences according to description?
Nothing other than something in an email along the lines of learning from problems they had in batch 1.
Edit: Also, batch 1 were a couple of hundred dollars cheaper.
Wasn't there something about adding an extra slot of time allows?
Sorry if I'm asking in the wrong thread but here it goes:
Are there any significant differences between batches #1 and #2? any expected for #3?
Are there any significant differences between batches #1 and #2? any expected for #3?
No batch 2 ASICs have been received AFAIK.
Any differences according to description?
Sorry if I'm asking in the wrong thread but here it goes:
Are there any significant differences between batches #1 and #2? any expected for #3?
Are there any significant differences between batches #1 and #2? any expected for #3?
my results:
[MHS av] => 71481.37
[Found Blocks] => 0
[Getworks] => 1493
[Accepted] => 1382251
[Rejected] => 7422
[Hardware Errors] => 2172
[Utility] => 989.77
[Discarded] => 2887
[Stale] => 190
[Get Failures] => 1
[Local Work] => 1462331
[Remote Failures] => 96
[Network Blocks] => 166
[Total MH] => 5989585917.9822
[Work Utility] => 1002.88
[Difficulty Accepted] => 1390275.00000000
[Difficulty Rejected] => 7422.00000000
[Difficulty Stale] => 0.00000000
[Best Share] => 931191
- => SUMMARY
[MHS av] => 71481.37
[Found Blocks] => 0
[Getworks] => 1493
[Accepted] => 1382251
[Rejected] => 7422
[Hardware Errors] => 2172
[Utility] => 989.77
[Discarded] => 2887
[Stale] => 190
[Get Failures] => 1
[Local Work] => 1462331
[Remote Failures] => 96
[Network Blocks] => 166
[Total MH] => 5989585917.9822
[Work Utility] => 1002.88
[Difficulty Accepted] => 1390275.00000000
[Difficulty Rejected] => 7422.00000000
[Difficulty Stale] => 0.00000000
[Best Share] => 931191
Anyone have such high HW errors? What does this indicate?
[Getworks] => 1963
[Accepted] => 27062
[Rejected] => 963
[Hardware Errors] => 866
[Utility] => 30.57
[Discarded] => 3649
[Getworks] => 1963
[Accepted] => 27062
[Rejected] => 963
[Hardware Errors] => 866
[Utility] => 30.57
[Discarded] => 3649
your utility is very low!
assuming that you are in a stratum pool try to set variable difficulty at 64 to 66, i am not sure about the exact number though :p
how big should it be (Utility)?
I have also about 30.5. (vardiff 32)
Edit: With vardiff 64 i get 15.5 Utility
To check your diff1 utility, obviously, 60*Difficulty Accepted/Elapsed
e.g. for SolarSilver above me:
60 * 1160672 / 69956 = 995.49 1diff shares a minute
To verify that: 995.49 * 2^32 / 60 = 71.26GH/s
P.S. don't read this, I'm evil
Edit: N.B. of course utility doesn't map exactly to MH/s - that mathematical relationship is random and converges over a long period of time
So really I should have written above
To verify that: 995.49 * 2^32 / 60 ~= 71.26GH/s
How loud are these things? Also looks like if you have 20amp circuits you can only have 3 units per circuit assuming you don't have a ton of other stuff already plugged in! Then maybe just 2. So much power use...
Avalon unit use 620W @ 120V so it draw 5.17amp/unit. It's not recommended to load a circuit over 80% capacity. So 80% of 20amp = 16amp. 3 units @ 5.17amp = 15.51amp. No problem with 3 units.At 220V and 600W (I don't have the exact spec but the unit should be a little more efficient) it draw 2.73amp/unit so it's possible to connect 5-6 units (13.9-16.38amp) using the same wire gauge.
It might be a good idea for some user to hire an electrician to install a custom circuit.
Disclaimer : I'm not an electrician so double check these numbers with a professional.
Jump to: