Topic: [Awesome Miner] - Powerful Windows GUI to manage and monitor up to 200000 miners - page 195. (Read 703148 times)

Could anyone tell me why I have 45+ algorithms that are disabled? I have an nVidia 1060 GPU.

I am using Managed Profit Switching pools, when I goto benchmark I see a link saying View excluded entries(45)

When I click that link I get this screen

I'm currently investigating how to design a solution that is flexible enough for most scenarios. The main goal will not be to try to replicate the AM CU features, but to offer more flexibility how to set the Difficulty and a few other properties of a Coin via external sources.

What I'm looking at is a way to specify a data source API URL (coin statistics provider, block explorer, exchange, wallet RPC, pool API or any other data source) in combination with a JSON expression how to find the property of interest in the data response. Basically a way of loading almost any value from almost any API URL. Awesome Miner will not be able to understand the JSON data responses from any data source, but if you specify something like "coinInfo.difficulty", Awesome Miner could lookup and use any value inside the data response.

I'm still exploring this topic so I will not be able to share much more details at the moment.


The problem here is that I don't own the data and I'm only allowed to consume it inside Awesome Miner itself. Otherwise I would like to have a service that combined everything and exposed it to Awesome Miner.

I'm currently investigating how to design a solution that is flexible enough for most scenarios. The main goal will not be to try to replicate the AM CU features, but to offer more flexibility how to set the Difficulty and a few other properties of a Coin via external sources.

What I'm looking at is a way to specify a data source API URL (coin statistics provider, block explorer, exchange, wallet RPC, pool API or any other data source) in combination with a JSON expression how to find the property of interest in the data response. Basically a way of loading almost any value from almost any API URL. Awesome Miner will not be able to understand the JSON data responses from any data source, but if you specify something like "coinInfo.difficulty", Awesome Miner could lookup and use any value inside the data response.

I'm still exploring this topic so I will not be able to share much more details at the moment.

The problem here is that I don't own the data and I'm only allowed to consume it inside Awesome Miner itself. Otherwise I would like to have a service that combined everything and exposed it to Awesome Miner.

Let me ask if how can I setup the miner with awesome miner If I want to mine solo?
I have a full node sample ravencoin how can I setup awesome miner to mine through localhost as URI?

I just want to ask this because I'm getting an error and I can't make it work with trex miner.

it is as easy or difficult as obtaining it from the explorer of each coin, just like AM CU, which scrape each Explorer, but only supports 3 or 4, but when they have been updated, the scrape is no longer valid, it must be redefined to I can read.

You can not get the Yimp hashnet and difficulty data as CTM does, because that YIMP also has a delay when it comes to obtaining the data, and at the end there is a very large lag. CC if you get the data of the explorer, or at least that seems because it is usually very accurate to what the explorer of each currency, but fails in the prices and can not choose so many exchanges, it takes a long time to read the new prices .

If you obtain the data of everything through the APIs, we obtain the data of everything. That is to say, for this currency, the data of the currency of X supplier, and the price data of X supplier. In the currency tab, with double click on Tabs coins, and by default deactivated and with notices to read the information on the subject.

It would not be crazy to make your own api, mixing the data, and read that api from your server, so CC or CTM would not fall every so often.

Very great work so far Patrike!!!

AM doesn't add us-east in the address of Monero on MPH in the predefined online services.  I've already changes the algo for Cryptonight V4.


Here is with XMRig:

 * ASSEMBLY     auto:intel
 * POOL #1      stratum+tcp://cryptonight-hub.miningpoolhub.com:17024 variant r
 * API BIND     0.0.0.0:4028
 * COMMANDS     hashrate, pause, resume
[2019-03-16 15:52:12] [stratum+tcp://cryptonight-hub.miningpoolhub.com:17024] DNS error: "unknown node or service"
[2019-03-16 15:52:13] READY (CPU) threads 4(4) huge pages 4/4 100% memory 8192 KB
[2019-03-16 15:52:18] [stratum+tcp://cryptonight-hub.miningpoolhub.com:17024] DNS error: "unknown node or service"

Hello Patrike, this is the second time I'm going to suggest the same thing. It's not because of taste or usability. It is by absolute necessity.

There is a big problem with CTM, if right now you look with CTM its difficulty and even hashnet of XVG, VEIL, BCI, for example those three, you will see that they are out of reality. It gives very different numbers to reality. The best thing that CTM has is the amount of exchange and the prices that also get them well. For example in Grin29 I had to correct their mistakes with 2.1 of profit.

However CC currency data such as difficulty, nethas, rewards, is usually much more accurate, but in prices and exchanges does not have the level of CTM. The problem with CC is that it keeps the price of the coins too long and adds fewer exchanges.

I am almost in the situation of deactivating CTM forever, but there are many currencies that it offers, but the data usually gives them badly. For example, I have been mining BCI with the CTM data but I was not really getting the difficulty data. I think CTM gets this data from other pools instead of the explorer, but CC does get the data from the explorer, but it does poorly with the exchanges.

I know you said it could be confusing for some users, I know, but it can always be explained and disabled by default.


+1

It would be ideal for each currency, can choose the data of the currency (difficulty, hashnet, reward, blocking) of one provider and the prices and exchanges of another, that for each currency. In this way advanced users would have more control, because now both CC and CTM have advantages and disadvantages, and what I propose is that for advanced users to choose data and prices from different sites.

Please, look what I said, XVG, BCI, VEIL, XZC, are just some examples. Allow this function, which is activated from options in advanced, and that when activated, in the coins tab, by double clicking on a coin, have two selectors, one for the data and another for the price, if I choose for CTM prices I can choose between the exchanges. So I would have the best of each provider.

Right now the two fail for different reasons

CC, Against: fewer currencies, prices updated every so often, few exchanges to choose. virtues, the key data of the currency such as difficulty, hashnet, reward gets them perfect

CTM, currency data is a disaster, take data from other pools like zergpool, imagine the quality of data. But it does an excellent job in exchanges and updated prices very frequently and many exchanges.


I hope you have it in mind, for me the problem has become something personal, especially CTM, there are times that Karl even bothers if you correct too many coins, and I can not be constantly correcting the coins to this man.

I hope you think about it and see it as a great step forward, the better the data we manage, and how we can use it. Best results

Right now, with the price with so much waiting in CC makes me lose money
Right now with the lack of control of the data of the CTm currencies makes me lose money

If I mix the data, I have everything perfect.

Well, I'm the man with the suggestions.

There is a situation that I can not avoid, I give you a REAL example so that you understand it and see if the suggestion is interesting or not.

There are coins that have little hash, are in their final phase or are coins that are only profitable up to a certain hash. The real example would be Xfox or AZART. I have them added and I have even measured the profit, but what happens to me is that when it enters into auto profit and the currency is the first one in profits, all my rigs enter at the same time. But when they all enter, the profit goes down so much that it stops being profitable, and that soon causes a change. Then again AZART becomes profitable again, and everything goes into the auto profit mode, and again the profir falls because it is too much hash.

The suggestion would be, when defining the pool of the currency, that there would be a field that tells AM how many maximum rigs can be in that currency. For example AZART I would put 2, therefore only 2 rigs would enter to mine that currency, the rest would not enter. If I left it blank, it would behave as usual.

When we play with shitcoins this happens many times, I enter and cause the fall of profit, because everything comes in. Being able to specify the maximum number of RIGS (any of which I have), that would give me more control when mining these small coins and not cause the profit myself and also cause excessive changes.

It can be done by creating different groups pools assigned to each rig, but that would make the management of AM more difficult and more difficult. I hope you like the suggestion that comes in handy to mine these coins that are in their final phase or that give few rewards and when a hash is exceeded, they stop being profitable. Is that right now the only thing I do is disable them, but I would like to control it with an option like the one I have indicated.

I do not know if the rules could do the same, I looked and I think not.

I hope you understand and I hope you consider it.

Hello Patrike, this is the second time I'm going to suggest the same thing. It's not because of taste or usability. It is by absolute necessity.

There is a big problem with CTM, if right now you look with CTM its difficulty and even hashnet of XVG, VEIL, BCI, for example those three, you will see that they are out of reality. It gives very different numbers to reality. The best thing that CTM has is the amount of exchange and the prices that also get them well. For example in Grin29 I had to correct their mistakes with 2.1 of profit.

However CC currency data such as difficulty, nethas, rewards, is usually much more accurate, but in prices and exchanges does not have the level of CTM. The problem with CC is that it keeps the price of the coins too long and adds fewer exchanges.

I am almost in the situation of deactivating CTM forever, but there are many currencies that it offers, but the data usually gives them badly. For example, I have been mining BCI with the CTM data but I was not really getting the difficulty data. I think CTM gets this data from other pools instead of the explorer, but CC does get the data from the explorer, but it does poorly with the exchanges.

I know you said it could be confusing for some users, I know, but it can always be explained and disabled by default.

It would be ideal for each currency, can choose the data of the currency (difficulty, hashnet, reward, blocking) of one provider and the prices and exchanges of another, that for each currency. In this way advanced users would have more control, because now both CC and CTM have advantages and disadvantages, and what I propose is that for advanced users to choose data and prices from different sites.

Please, look what I said, XVG, BCI, VEIL, XZC, are just some examples. Allow this function, which is activated from options in advanced, and that when activated, in the coins tab, by double clicking on a coin, have two selectors, one for the data and another for the price, if I choose for CTM prices I can choose between the exchanges. So I would have the best of each provider.

Right now the two fail for different reasons

CC, Against: fewer currencies, prices updated every so often, few exchanges to choose. virtues, the key data of the currency such as difficulty, hashnet, reward gets them perfect

CTM, currency data is a disaster, take data from other pools like zergpool, imagine the quality of data. But it does an excellent job in exchanges and updated prices very frequently and many exchanges.


I hope you have it in mind, for me the problem has become something personal, especially CTM, there are times that Karl even bothers if you correct too many coins, and I can not be constantly correcting the coins to this man.

I hope you think about it and see it as a great step forward, the better the data we manage, and how we can use it. Best results

Right now, with the price with so much waiting in CC makes me lose money
Right now with the lack of control of the data of the CTm currencies makes me lose money

If I mix the data, I have everything perfect.