Topic: [Awesome Miner] - Powerful Windows GUI to manage and monitor up to 200000 miners - page 287. (Read 703547 times)

How can you make BTG work with mining pool hub profit switching?

It's correct that you only need to enable the profit switching in the Properties of your External Miner.

You can right click on the miner, select View Details and go to the Profit Switching tab. You will then see what the profit is for each of the pools on the miner and you can also use this information to verify that Awesome Miner is doing what it should.

Thank you for your answer.
So external profit switching just starts as it is enabled in external miner cfg, correct?
If so, maybe AM never changed any priority yet, since current algo is still considered the most profitable.
Thanks.

Thanks for sharing the details.

The first screenshot is correct. This is the only configuration you need to do to enable the External Profit Switcher. The External Profit Switching feature operates by changing priorities of existing pools of an already running External Miner. See the documentation link for more details.

The other concepts like Managed Profit Miner and the configuration of Managed Profit Switching in the Options dialog are only for GPU and CPU mining - not for ASIC mining.

yeah BTG does not show up under benchmark

Yes, miner is listed as external miner, awesome miner can access its api and see it working.
Some pictures follow (if I will be able to add them :-) ).  I'm using latest release, premium.




Thank you!

How can you make BTG work with mining pool hub profit switching?

Do you have any plans to support the upcoming SQRL miner and/or acorns?

Even without acorn support at first, simply supporting SQRL miner because it has the ethlargement pill built in will be a major boost in ease of use. I have had so much trouble dealing with getting the pill launched and exited properly upon profit switching, all too often I'll RDP into a rig thats mining X16 and find the pill still launched even though I have multiple kill commands programmed. I just want to be done with this dependency already, and given that theyre supposedly going to pass along the benefits to GDDR5 cards with SQRL miner, its going to be the best ETH miner by a longshot, so the sooner you can support it, the better.

As far as the acorns go, I'm sure that will add a fair bit of complexity to support thoroughly, but at least from the outset it shouldnt be too difficult to just stand out of its way and let the SQRL miner handle that end.

https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/zealotenemy-z-enemy-nvidia-gpu-miner-ver262-kawpow-ravencoin-3378390

Z-Enemy 1.17 already

-  Major performance improvements: 5-10% for X16R & X16S, XDNA (hex), x17, Bitcore(BTX), c11, Sonoa, Renesis, Aergo
-  Lower end cards like 1050/1060 will see additional few %  (yes, a bonus)
-  The miner no longer depends on memory, it allows to run memory clock at +0 or -500 MHz without performance loss.

Is the miner added as an External Miner in Awesome Miner? See instructions for the External Profit Switcher here:
https://support.awesomeminer.com/support/solutions/articles/35000086088-profit-switching-for-asic-mining

If you get any error message, can you please attach a screenshot where also the miner list is visible? Thanks!

Thanks! The plan is to include this one in the next update of Awesome Miner, planned for tomorrow (Wednesday).

https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/zealotenemy-z-enemy-nvidia-gpu-miner-ver262-kawpow-ravencoin-3378390

Z-Enemy 1.17 already

-  Major performance improvements: 5-10% for X16R & X16S, XDNA (hex), x17, Bitcore(BTX), c11, Sonoa, Renesis, Aergo
-  Lower end cards like 1050/1060 will see additional few %  (yes, a bonus)
-  The miner no longer depends on memory, it allows to run memory clock at +0 or -500 MHz without performance loss.

Err???
Um, just verified with mine -- individual reboot does work. Picked 1 out of 2x 721's on a controller, clicked its reboot button and it did. Picked 1 out of a string of 4x 741's, clicked reboot button and it did. The other miners in the chains were unaffected. Same with 841's so no idea what Canaan is talking about...

I only want to give my opinion about deep statistics.

I am not a user of the cloud service, although I would not mind paying if the price does not rise.

As indicated by moobidoo, upload statistics data of all subscribers in your own cloud can be bestial in your hosting account, unless it limits for example statistics to the last 3 months. And if it is a problem as indicated by Moobidoo link for example Dropbox, I have a business of 1tera.

An alternative to reduce costs in storage if at the end you store the statistical data, it is of course compress that data and cache to 4 -12 hours. It does not have to be real-time statistics. The frisking as you know, reduces the requests to the database and only reads a txt with the information, and this file is updated every X hours. I would reduce the threat and process, although it would not be bad to link it to an external Dropbox account in my particular case.

AM the program, has Database installed, could even the same in localhost display it in a browser window, and be the same equipment that has installed the AM who would store the data. But I understand that it can be a service of added value to the cloud service.

I do not use Cloud, because I have everything in the same place, in my house of three floors, in the basement, and I can put even more miners, I manage everything by RDP, and if something fails under a plant and restart. That's why I have not hired that service, but if you include those detailed statistics, the more details the better, it will be what will make me and other users pay the cloud service in the end, in my case only for the statistics.

In the telegram group that I have about AW, we have talked a lot, and we would not mind paying an amount per month for having that information, because in the end I will recover it by making better decisions. Especially towards online services and even on loose coins. It is important to have a vision of everything.

I know that you have it in mind, and that someday we may be surprised with a new version of the cloud with statistics, that same day, I will hire the service, I do not mind paying and it is not a high payment. And the added value should be no more cost, you would enter more because you would sell more cloud services.

I do not insist anymore with this, I see that we are all in agreement and it only depends on you how and when. I hope you surprise us with something good that makes you even stand out more about your competition, if you have one.