Topic: [Awesome Miner] - Powerful Windows GUI to manage and monitor up to 200000 miners - page 412. (Read 703113 times)

I frequently use the JSON from WTM for pulling statistics. However, I have found quite a few new coins that do not show up in WTM. I'd like to still pull in the difficulty data for these coins, is there a way to actively do this? I understand how to create a coin, but that just statically sets the difficultly.

For me it does not save any hashrate from the 2nd ALGO. So if I want to mine with "Claymore Dual 11" the best combination like Etherium+Blake2s it is not possible because on benchmark this combination is saved with $0.00 additional for blake2s.


Can this be fixed ?

What is the command to single out a single GPU on Excavator, i found it does Neoscrypt 2x higher than my ccminer, so wanted to use it as part of profit switching, but want to be able to specify which GPU's to use it on only like i do on ccminer (-d 1) in command line

Found out why this happens - when you disable Ethereum for Claymore Dual. It still shows up in the benchmarking window, but benchmarking any dual algorithms then fails because it disables the Etherum main pool. Strangely benchmarking single Etherum still works though (even though it shouldn't even display the miner when its disabled).

Can't benchmark any dual algorithms. I'm getting "No pools specified" every time. Benchmarking single Ethereum works.

You are right , I also did this to find the fastest miner for an algo, by moving up or down in the list the miner and benchmarking again.

Now that excavator was introduced, I benchmarked excavator on all agos that are enabled on excavator and I noticed that excavator is faster on 5 algos than all the other miners. I enabled only that 5 algos for excavator and and disabled all the other algos from excavator with less hashrate.

The advantage is that I know that any time in the future, when I would benchmark I will always have these 5 algos faster for excavator and it is not necessary to benchmark with the same algo all the other  miners again like NiceHash does. You might notice that Nicehash Benchmarking is 10 times slower (takes a lot to benchmark rigs with 8 or 16 GPUS copared to AM ). So, the suggestion you have will increase a lot the benchmarking time (that is really not optimized right now, because it should have a different execution time for different algos).

I do not think that I have to wait every time 5 times more time to know each time that the order is the same and only the best hashrate is saved, but indeed I really think it would be useful to have an option like "Test all miners and pick the fastest miner for each algo", right ?

Now, the question remains what do we do when we benchmark today and we have  the values saved and when we benchmark again 2 weeks later the values are different. The values also lead to wrong algos ordering because new hashrates changed the ordering, making some algos more profitable.

What do you think ?

 

Awesome Miner version 4.4.4

- Improved failure detection for pools included in the profit switcher, to faster detect failures between the profit switching intervals
- Possible to manually reset the list of failed pools for a miner, to have the profit switcher consider them again. The feature can be access from the View Details dialog where the failed pools are listed.
- Excavator miner will only connect to a single pool (or two pools for dual mining)

Is it possible to set intensity of a miner for only 1 or 2 algorithms instead of all of them.
I added --intensity on the edit profit profile page

I have been checking out awesomeminer and like what i see.

However, the implementation for Excavator is not optimal. For all the supported excavator algos, except neoscrypt, excavator should run with two threads. The current implementation only runs with one thread leading to lower than optimal hashrates.

Is there a way for me to edit the way awesomeminer generates the .json file for excavator?

Can't benchmark any dual algorithms. I'm getting "No pools specified" every time. Benchmarking single Ethereum works.

Hi,

It may be a bug or something I did wrong but one thing is not working for me.
I share the same profit profile with two miner. When it comes to mining with exacavator (in Lyra in this case), one does it well, the other one keep trying to mine eth or eth+pasc, eth+sia, ...
Even when I ujust leave MPH checked it goes on NH.
I leave you some screenshots ask me if you want an API report or other details.
Except that exverything is working well, it could always be better of course, like checking the real hashrate on the pool, the balance on the pools and so compare the estimate revenue with the pool revenue. And simplify the benchmarking, it should be easyer to test different miners soft on the same algo to keep the best one.

Keep going your software is a really good alternative  

Hi,

There is no support for setting power limit via the rules today. I do have plans to improve the clocking profile concept for more flexibility (especially for mixed GPU environments), and making this feature available via the Rules is a good idea as well. Thanks for your feedback.