Topic: Bad projects equals Bad results - page 4. (Read 1179 times)
Tokoin and tachyon, are good projects, and we rarely find projects like this. because even though the campaign program has ended and the prize hunters have received their wages, this project is still ongoing and more and more enthusiasts are interested in owning the second coin of this project.
Most bounty hunters do sell off their tokens once they get paid but it's not a reason for them to take the blame if a project fail. The success of a project depends on its team, usefulness of the project, and also on its investors. If a project is useful, has a good and hardworking team as well as investors that supports and use the project, then that project will surely be successful.
Each project has different potential, I think tychoon and tokoin are good projects that can overcome this problem. Since Tokoin and Tachyon have investors in there to make the coin valuable when it is launched on the exchange because the hunter can't blame his disposal, he knows which coins are good to hold the bonus. . Not all projects have good potential, some projects do not reach their goals, so bounty hunters are at a disadvantage, because they cannot enjoy the fruits of labor when promoting the project.
each and every project have potential, mainly projects will occasionally put away their jobs if their goals grasp been achieved. The argument is a fine throw will not assent to the tokens or goods they enjoy scrupulously ended encompass a adverse cost on the promote or level be inflicted with no price. yeah, projet who doesn't sense about it is a unpleasant mission in my opinion.
That the price of the tokens of a project dump after a bounty(marketing) campaign is not necessarily indicative of the project being a bad one. Agreed that marketing is supposed to create awareness about a project but numerous factors come into play in determining the growth of token price. Sometimes massive interest in the project might occur later on, not necessarily during or immediately after the bounty campaign.
Bad project always bad i want explain Tokoin project.
Do you know there didn't not pay full amount of every bounty hunter? Even part of part that's mean Tokoin was making announcement 1 year need fully payment for bounty. There sent bounty hunter token % of per month so why Tokoin price was falling long time.
Do you know there didn't not pay full amount of every bounty hunter? Even part of part that's mean Tokoin was making announcement 1 year need fully payment for bounty. There sent bounty hunter token % of per month so why Tokoin price was falling long time.
This makes me remember Tokoin and tachyon protocol bounty campaign, after hunters are paid they made huge profits from this bounties and still the value are rising and not dumped, so my question is why are other bounties getting ruined after launch? Or after hunters sell their rewards? Probably because they are bad projects, hunters aren't to be blame here isn't it? Good projects will never dumped because hunters sell off
Tokoin and tachyon both projects are good and it has a good profit in return to the investors until now I see that they are still alive on telegram while having another partnership so it was survive, unlike any other project after running an ICO or IEO then hunters dump their coin the blame was always on the hunter when the price goes dump.
Yep hunters should not blame the dump of the tokens, they just work to promote the project let them sell the token if they want. If the project is good then we don't have to worry the price because it will bounce back and will mooning.
my personal makesup project with the label of DOGEM is future plan on working with terms of development to provide mobile apk with service on tasks of social communication.
the project now is still in preparation terms as expecting to compound of more with funding with different scheme on running modulation. one of those is RAMM scheme with the listing on popular brokerage to offer returns as we manage works on initial tasks on finance.
as the future terms of service deliverance, the offers might be available for pupils of indonesia but we will not expanding work to work on wider field of service reference as focusing to manage extensive expends on appealing of more with different work on following entrance with the briefing tables with team of develoment.
rejecting and denying of worse of envyness by those developer as i am not an communist in indonesia.
greeting,
viva chesster
national patriot of libertarian
the project now is still in preparation terms as expecting to compound of more with funding with different scheme on running modulation. one of those is RAMM scheme with the listing on popular brokerage to offer returns as we manage works on initial tasks on finance.
as the future terms of service deliverance, the offers might be available for pupils of indonesia but we will not expanding work to work on wider field of service reference as focusing to manage extensive expends on appealing of more with different work on following entrance with the briefing tables with team of develoment.
rejecting and denying of worse of envyness by those developer as i am not an communist in indonesia.
greeting,
viva chesster
national patriot of libertarian
actually all projects have the same goal, where they want their project to succeed and many people want to invest in it, but the cause of a project to be bad or not developed after launching due to lack of investors who are interested in their project, so that makes the price of coins more destroyed or even worthless.
If they want to have investors, then their projects must first have quality and get products. Existing investors were too scared of paper-based projects, all of them disappeared after the end of the ICO and left a huge landfill.
I agree with you on bounty hunters aren't the ones to blame if after the promotion and the coin going nowhere. But usually, the bad project can't see why they failed and take it on the others. They try to blame hunters to convince people holding their coin that the faults weren't on them. Pretty pathetic move.
You are right, all bad projects end up giving bad results and this is why investors must wary , do their research and make the best of choices because often time bad projects bring profits on the short term which can be tempting.
Always avoid bad projects, don't just trade all, have a few gems and maintain your portfolio wisely
some bad projects have characteristics that sometimes the project has unclear goals. in fact, some projects do not have the latest news for investors. however, such a project will slowly disappear. there are enough projects like that for now, and to be honest, it's very difficult to avoid them. Always avoid bad projects, don't just trade all, have a few gems and maintain your portfolio wisely
This makes me remember Tokoin and tachyon protocol bounty campaign, after hunters are paid they made huge profits from this bounties and still the value are rising and not dumped, so my question is why are other bounties getting ruined after launch? Or after hunters sell their rewards? Probably because they are bad projects, hunters aren't to be blame here isn't it? Good projects will never dumped because hunters sell off
Value and price don't depend on hunters sell-off or something similar it only depends on development process and other stuff going in exact project/with the exact coin. If the price goes down it is all because the team was not working well enough. 
I think there are two main reasons for the disruption of projects. Firstly, it is probably because the amount of tokens they sold when the ICO started was not enough to continue their project. They can still pay bounty hunters exactly for the tokens they earn. However, it cannot go on any exchange or its price is very low. It can be considered that the project has failed.
The second reason is that they do not know how to control time points so that bounty hunters can use the tokens they receive to trade. I think this is very important. Most bounty hunters will sell their tokens as soon as they receive it. That makes the price of tokens very low and makes the project fail
The second reason is that they do not know how to control time points so that bounty hunters can use the tokens they receive to trade. I think this is very important. Most bounty hunters will sell their tokens as soon as they receive it. That makes the price of tokens very low and makes the project fail
You are definitely right about that, bad projects equal bad results. If we would make more research about that, can see that there were much more projects that could not get any good result from own projects. No doubt these numbers were higher in 2018 than in other years. The main reason is if investors would be interested in the project, this will be successful, on the contrary, it has to die.
Thats always the case for every ICO projects. What is the percentage that these new ones will succeed? Most likely near 90% and only few survived. I witness many projects being expose on many investors and most likely they only invest on known or legit one. Airdrop and bounty is rare for these so the chance those projects rely on promotion on these hunters were probably scam one.
Yes correctly you said! Hunter never be reason for dump in any project.In bounty how many dollars they pay?Maximum 100k,200k or even 500k.But it's never gonna destroy any project if they have real demand & have usecase.But most of the case project failed to gain their funds, lack of investors.That's why project stopped their developing & result is known to all.Token became valueless.
actually all projects have the same goal, where they want their project to succeed and many people want to invest in it, but the cause of a project to be bad or not developed after launching due to lack of investors who are interested in their project, so that makes the price of coins more destroyed or even worthless.
You are right, all bad projects end up giving bad results and this is why investors must wary , do their research and make the best of choices because often time bad projects bring profits on the short term which can be tempting.
Always avoid bad projects, don't just trade all, have a few gems and maintain your portfolio wisely
Indeed. What we can expect on bad projects? of course bad outcome.Always avoid bad projects, don't just trade all, have a few gems and maintain your portfolio wisely
Even the hunters dump their coins after getting the rewards, it should not be a reason for the coins to plunge and never recover back. Because good projects with high demand and real use case would not end up like that. Extensive research can help us to avoid bad projects.
This makes me remember Tokoin and tachyon protocol bounty campaign, after hunters are paid they made huge profits from this bounties and still the value are rising and not dumped, so my question is why are other bounties getting ruined after launch? Or after hunters sell their rewards? Probably because they are bad projects, hunters aren't to be blame here isn't it? Good projects will never dumped because hunters sell off
If I say this is the art of Project, where investors and owners must be prepared with all conditions after the launch of a project. This where they need sharp observations and it is not enough to only study theories and market conditions. Some project needs practice and requires project manager to always be flexible don't fail and to become a success future.
You are right, all bad projects end up giving bad results and this is why investors must wary , do their research and make the best of choices because often time bad projects bring profits on the short term which can be tempting.
Always avoid bad projects, don't just trade all, have a few gems and maintain your portfolio wisely
Always avoid bad projects, don't just trade all, have a few gems and maintain your portfolio wisely
Jump to: