~Hence, good projects come up with good strategies to limit massive dips, even though they can't completely prevent it.
Yes at least it can be prevented, so there is no more reason that bounty hunters are causing dumps. The development team should have prepared a good strategy to prevent the dump, didn't they also plan the bounty campaign? they should also prepare strategies to strengthen the market. 
Topic: Bad projects equals Bad results - page 5. (Read 1178 times)
This makes me remember Tokoin and tachyon protocol bounty campaign, after hunters are paid they made huge profits from this bounties and still the value are rising and not dumped, so my question is why are other bounties getting ruined after launch? Or after hunters sell their rewards? Probably because they are bad projects, hunters aren't to be blame here isn't it? Good projects will never dumped because hunters sell off
Some projects have a buy back strategy which prevent hunters from dumping and causing negative price effect. I remember REMME, an old project which placed about 1000ETH buy wall just so hunters do not make it dump hard on IDEX wayback. Tachyon really did well, even mooned hard after Bounty distribution and hunters who rushed to sell regretted. Hence, good projects come up with good strategies to limit massive dips, even though they can't completely prevent it.
Risk can be defined as an uncertain event or condition that results in a positive or negative effect on a project's objectives. Whereas, an issue can be defined as an event or condition that has already happened and has impacted or currently impacting the project objectives. The biggest challenge faced by all organisations that wish to use project management in crypto market.
That's true, I can also remember tachyon , even after hunters sold, the coin price value kept increasing same with tokoin so in my opinion, I don't think bounty hunters are the cause of a project dump, normally the effect of BTC is seen on these project but some without good use even when BTC is stable they keep loosing price value even without the token being shared to bounty hunters.
The title is written is true.
However, this only applies to this year's campaign. Last year, good and bad projects provided that their development team could create FOMO and listings on the famous exchange at that time, even bad projects can make you earn lots of money.
However, this only applies to this year's campaign. Last year, good and bad projects provided that their development team could create FOMO and listings on the famous exchange at that time, even bad projects can make you earn lots of money.
This makes me remember Tokoin and tachyon protocol bounty campaign, after hunters are paid they made huge profits from this bounties and still the value are rising and not dumped, so my question is why are other bounties getting ruined after launch? Or after hunters sell their rewards? Probably because they are bad projects, hunters aren't to be blame here isn't it? Good projects will never dumped because hunters sell off
Bounty hunters have a small percentage of all project tokens issued. And in my opinion this is a big mistake, that hunters destroy the development of the company by selling their tokens. Most likely the project and its technological value does not have much significance for development and the need for the economy, that is, utility for users.
indeed, we rarely find bounty projects that can survive as owned by tokoin and tachyon. maybe the answer that comes in will be, because both of these projects have good management products and management. thus providing great results for its users. namely bounty hunters and investors
Its a common issues to most projects after they paid the bounties prices may slightly depreciate or deeply depreciated due to large volume of sell-offs however some of them quickly recover in the next few days and slowly meeting the demands. Early stage of projects are more on speculation rather than product driven prices, too early to judge as they say.
You are definitely right about that, bad projects equal bad results. If we would make more research about that, can see that there were much more projects that could not get any good result from own projects. No doubt these numbers were higher in 2018 than in other years. The main reason is if investors would be interested in the project, this will be successful, on the contrary, it has to die.
The quality of the project can only speak interest from investors. If he is interested in it, they will invest money, and accordingly, the project will be alive and will work, and will not die a couple of days after it goes on the exchange.
The project you mentioned is a real project that has real investors, no manipulation and no IEO on bad exchanges. Many bad project campaigns that make the hunter bounty unlucky after they have campaigned for months only valued dust coins. Both campaigns of the project that prove there is still a good campaign on the bounty thread until now.
Allocation for bounty hunters is usually 1 to 2 percent of the total supply, which I think does not really affect the market, maybe a little bit it will cause some temporary decrease in price but if the project is really good it will surely recover. If traders make an interest in their coin I guess it will have a good volume, it is the team jobs to do good marketing to attract more traders. But what is happening in most projects now is they are going to list on sh*t exchange, attack by bot maybe the team dump also, and the project is completely rekt which is unfortunate for hunters. Tokensale is not really a thing now, except those IEO from top exchanges which is still good.
Bounties rewards are always small if the project failed to see huge demand, these projects will easily lose value, tachyon and Tokoin are able to withstand anything even in bad market because they have many investors who are willing to buy
these two projects are really very good showing themselves even in bad conditions at the market. I would say that these are the only projects that should be hold for a long time and not sell from bounty rewards
This is not entirely true as we've seen shit projects get a lot of hype and reach new highs but legitimate projects suffer from lack of exposure and continue to struggle.
it is important to know that bounty hunters are not the brains behind falling coin prices. the fall in the price of coins or tokens generated from the project either occurs because the project investor himself, or someone from the team who has many tokens. so, I don't think prize hunters can be blamed as the brains behind the incident.
This makes me remember Tokoin and tachyon protocol bounty campaign, after hunters are paid they made huge profits from this bounties and still the value are rising and not dumped, so my question is why are other bounties getting ruined after launch? Or after hunters sell their rewards? Probably because they are bad projects, hunters aren't to be blame here isn't it? Good projects will never dumped because hunters sell off
You shouldn’t be blaming the hunters here. That Tokoin and Tachyon are successful projects doesn’t mean that the hunters didn’t sell their coins, they did sell their coin. You have to understand that when bounty hunters join a campaign they are doing it to get paid and not to get a share in the campaign. They help in promoting the campaign so that they can get investors. So, hunters promote and investors buy the tokens.These are two different people. The team that are running the campaign should as well be good at what they do to be able to retain their investors, because if they are not, they will lose them. So I hope I have made this clear, there is no need for you to be blaming the hunters in this kind of situation.
Bounties rewards are always small if the project failed to see huge demand, these projects will easily lose value, tachyon and Tokoin are able to withstand anything even in bad market because they have many investors who are willing to buy
these two projects are really very good showing themselves even in bad conditions at the market. I would say that these are the only projects that should be hold for a long time and not sell from bounty rewards 
~~~
~~~And as for SPYCE, i think they will be fine because participants are limited to each campaign, so the fear of hunters dumping has been eliminated.
That is what I believe in the SPYCE project because it has a participant limit so there will not be so much dumping, I participated in a signature campaign and believe this token will have a good impact on the market, and tomorrow SPYCE will be listed on Probit.
And usually SPYCY / KRW pairs will always impact well with large volumes.
This makes me remember Tokoin and tachyon protocol bounty campaign, after hunters are paid they made huge profits from this bounties and still the value are rising and not dumped, so my question is why are other bounties getting ruined after launch? Or after hunters sell their rewards? Probably because they are bad projects, hunters aren't to be blame here isn't it? Good projects will never dumped because hunters sell off
It probably because these projects have something to contribute to the market and they are not abandoned by its developer after they paid the participants. The future of a certain project lies into the hand of the developers if they don't want to make it successful and fully runs their project, it surely they will go. The intention of these projects (Tokion and Tachyon) might be good and it attracts investors to help it maintain its market price, unlike the others.
Bounties rewards are always small if the project failed to see huge demand, these projects will easily lose value, tachyon and Tokoin are able to withstand anything even in bad market because they have many investors who are willing to buy
Jump to: