True as you say if the project is good then the value of the selling until now persists but we are very difficult to find such a project, we often find projects that run but ultimately the token is not worth it, then we as gift hunters are very disappointed with such circumstances, we expect to go forward all projects can get satisfactory results.
Nothing has changed. This means that you can't magic the results, the bad projects will surely result nothing while good projects will succeed. People will make an investment that they feel or it looks that project is promising. They can't be fooled by now as I believe that they had learned already from their mistake before. Crypto communities are in combat against fake and scam project, it surely they won't succeed and be failed. 
Topic: Bad projects equals Bad results - page 7. (Read 1178 times)
Looks like it's not happening, SPYCE is now trading on BW at 0.012 from its IEO price of 0.03, I don't think it will be like Tachyon protocol or Tokoin bounty, unless the team decide to list on OKEX or Binance
This is the trend now, it's very rare to see a coin trading higher than its IEO when only traded in low volume exchange. I am not so confident with OKEX but with Binance there is a big possibility that it will rise, however, it's hard to tell at the current situation.
Tokoin and Tachyon have investors in it so that the coin is valuable when it is launched on the exchange because the hunter cannot be blamed for his disposal, he knows which coins are good for holding from the bounty.
While other projects have a token destruction after being released or dumped and it is always blamed because hunters sell simultaneously, even though I don't think it's the hunter's fault because hunters can judge which coin is the best.
Here I hope SPYCE can survive like Tokoin and Tachyon which have large volumes on the exchange.
Looks like it's not happening, SPYCE is now trading on BW at 0.012 from its IEO price of 0.03, I don't think it will be like Tachyon protocol or Tokoin bounty, unless the team decide to list on OKEX or Binance While other projects have a token destruction after being released or dumped and it is always blamed because hunters sell simultaneously, even though I don't think it's the hunter's fault because hunters can judge which coin is the best.
Here I hope SPYCE can survive like Tokoin and Tachyon which have large volumes on the exchange.
Tokoin and Taychon are good projects, they have huge volumes and are listed at major exchanges, so the price of tokens don't fall after the distribution of bounty. But there are so many bullshit projects listed on exchanges that don't have volumes, so prices often fall after bounty is distributed. I totally agree with you, bad projects will lead to bad results
It's still depends in the application of the project in crypto world and even it's been very popular during the bounty and crowdfunding still they didn't survived in the market. High value projects will always be a high value when they launch to the market. If they saw a lot of potential of this project, many of investors will surely invest to this and improvement of the project will continue over the years to come which results to a successful project. 
True as you say if the project is good then the value of the selling until now persists but we are very difficult to find such a project, we often find projects that run but ultimately the token is not worth it, then we as gift hunters are very disappointed with such circumstances, we expect to go forward all projects can get satisfactory results.
The thing is projects like Tokoin are very good projects and they are rare. Only good projects can achieve the kind of success they achieved in a bear market. Likes not like other projects are scam or too bad but it's the market conditions that makes it hard for them to succeed.
At least they are listed at the top exchanges in this market. Huobi is one of the largest exchanges so the price of tokens is unlikely to be broken by the bounty hunter. Only bullshit projects listed on small exchanges are afraid of this issue It is very simple. If a project has some investors, in other words, buyers in the marketplace, the price will survive. Most of the projects nowadays lack of investors because of low-quality projects and that is why those projects can not survive. However, do not forget that a project can be easily manipulated and most of the projects owner keep doing that.
Yes luck will be depend everything but not lot quality project right now because now more investors very smart and their do not want invest in every project. A project means competition word so if those project well strong developed activity then their will be successful. 
Tokoin and Taychon are good projects, they have huge volumes and are listed at major exchanges, so the price of tokens don't fall after the distribution of bounty. But there are so many bullshit projects listed on exchanges that don't have volumes, so prices often fall after bounty is distributed. I totally agree with you, bad projects will lead to bad results
I agree with you, top-level projects will always develop their technologies and capabilities and will monitor the price of their token and will try to increase the price of their token as much as possible both through marketing and through their product, but of course there are very few such projects now.
The thing is projects like Tokoin are very good projects and they are rare. Only good projects can achieve the kind of success they achieved in a bear market. Likes not like other projects are scam or too bad but it's the market conditions that makes it hard for them to succeed.
Good projects always end up a good one and a sucessful one but a bad project will never be good enough and always resulted into bad. So we should always DYOR before participating a project and make sure to check its background so we will not end up being scammed or even dumping our coins because of their low value.
The thing is projects like Tokoin are very good projects and they are rare. Only good projects can achieve the kind of success they achieved in a bear market. Likes not like other projects are scam or too bad but it's the market conditions that makes it hard for them to succeed.
This makes me remember Tokoin and tachyon protocol bounty campaign, after hunters are paid they made huge profits from this bounties and still the value are rising and not dumped, so my question is why are other bounties getting ruined after launch? Or after hunters sell their rewards? Probably because they are bad projects, hunters aren't to be blame here isn't it? Good projects will never dumped because hunters sell off
Yes, this is very sure that those projects which has low quality roadmap and did not work for which roadmap they published before IEO is low quality project and when people saw such kind of work they did not buy or sell that tokens. As a result token price fall down.
This makes me remember Tokoin and tachyon protocol bounty campaign, after hunters are paid they made huge profits from this bounties and still the value are rising and not dumped, so my question is why are other bounties getting ruined after launch? Or after hunters sell their rewards? Probably because they are bad projects, hunters aren't to be blame here isn't it? Good projects will never dumped because hunters sell off
In my opinion, bounty hunters are not a factor in reducing prices after listing on exchangers. Bounty hunters usually get paid a few weeks or months after the initial listing and I think tokens or coins whose prices fall after listing are tokens with a low level of investor confidence
You are right. Investing in a bad project is totally waste of money! That's why investors are looking for a good project, which is very rare nowadays! I am spending my time to research to get a better project, this year Tachyon was a perfect project for investment when it's the price was 0.03$! Tokoin is doing good, so, you are right, bounty hunters are not a problem for any project if your project is good!
Well, it's very rare for projects like Tachyon to appear at the moment. however, research continues to be done and hopes that the projects we support provide good results.the comparison of a good project with a bad project now is so far away, so now it's easier for people to fall into projects that don't have potential compared to choosing projects like Tachyon. however, a bad project is a bad result, and a good project is a good result. all these results depend on our quality in choosing projects.
There's an African proverb that says a bad tree produces bad fruits. A bad project cannot be useful to her investors because the team are only interested in what they'll be making out of the project. It's best for one to be very careful in selecting projects to invest or work for.
This makes me remember Tokoin and tachyon protocol bounty campaign, after hunters are paid they made huge profits from this bounties and still the value are rising and not dumped, so my question is why are other bounties getting ruined after launch? Or after hunters sell their rewards? Probably because they are bad projects, hunters aren't to be blame here isn't it? Good projects will never dumped because hunters sell off
Many projects do fail and the price of the coin drops after the rewards are being distributed due to the reason that the bounty hunters are now selling off their tokens to easily get their rewards from the campaign which is their own rights since they have worked hard for that the entire campaign span. Probably, bounty hunters must not be blamed about it because if the project is really attractive, many people will still get interested into pursuing on purchasing or investing into it after the promotion has been done and the bounty hunters have already claimed their part from the campaign. It is just that there is really something wrong with the project which is the idea is not that good or we can just say a low quality project that doesn't suit to the preference of the public because if it is that attractive, even the bounty hunters have dropped the price, many people will still get into it not just because of its price but because of the project itself. But we must not always drop into conclusions that if a certain project have dumped their prices is they are already considered as bad projects which not because there is also other factors that are needed to be seen to conclude that they are really a bad project that makes them to have a bad result after the reward distribution.
Tachyon is listed in exchanges many days ago when bounty campaign conducted. Developer made tried made a stable price because they doing everything very systematically. Which bounty reward isn’t over so that hunters didn’t affected in price. Good projects are surviving we saw that Tokoin and Tachyon.
No mate, Tachyon paid all the committed rewards to its bounty hunters, the bounty was really cool! But Tokoin extended their bounty payment for 12 months, I mean they will be distributing the reward throughout the year! Both are good project but their nature is different in bounty payment.
You are right. Investing in a bad project is totally waste of money! That's why investors are looking for a good project, which is very rare nowadays! I am spending my time to research to get a better project, this year Tachyon was a perfect project for investment when it's the price was 0.03$! Tokoin is doing good, so, you are right, bounty hunters are not a problem for any project if your project is good!
These are good project with high demands , good trading volume, good community, and great idea. That's what is important for a project to survive. Taychoon bounty wasn't much so it shouldn't cause much dip to the price. But tokoin paid very well and later they decided to slash the remaining reward to be paid for a year. It's all about what have mentioned. Good project are not usually affected by hunters dumping token and not or long, they usually receiver quick .
Tokoin and tachyon, are projects that have good selling points, so that hunters who participate in the program will have a large profit. naturally, because hunters are an important factor in introducing the project to the wider community.
Jump to: