[BBR] Boolberry: Privacy and Security - Guaranteed Since 2014 - page 13.

concha

newbie

Activity: 1

Merit: 0

git cloned fresh from master, then trying to compile on ubuntu 16.04 with cmake version 3.2.2, gcc (Ubuntu 5.4.0-6ubuntu1~16.04.10) 5.4.0 20160609, and boost Version: 1.58.0.1ubuntu1 I get:

In file included from /boolberry/contrib/epee/include/net/http_client.h:42:0,
from /boolberry/tests/exchange_tests/main.cpp:4:
/boolberry/contrib/epee/include/gzip_encoding.h: In constructor ‘epee::net_utils::content_encoding_gzip::content_encoding_gzip(epee::net_utils::i_target_handler*, bool, int)’:
/boolberry/contrib/epee/include/gzip_encoding.h:59:8: warning: variable ‘ret’ set but not used [-Wunused-but-set-variable]
int ret = 0;
^
/boolberry/contrib/epee/include/gzip_encoding.h: In member function ‘virtual bool epee::net_utils::content_encoding_gzip::update_in(std::__cxx11::string&)’:
/boolberry/contrib/epee/include/gzip_encoding.h:172:9: warning: variable ‘res’ set but not used [-Wunused-but-set-variable]
bool res = true;
^
Linking CXX executable exchange_test
/tmp/cce8Fu8j.ltrans3.ltrans.o: In function `epee::net_utils::content_encoding_gzip::~content_encoding_gzip()':
Sad

.text+0x60): undefined reference to `inflateEnd'
Sad

.text+0x6c): undefined reference to `deflateEnd'
/tmp/cce8Fu8j.ltrans3.ltrans.o: In function `epee::net_utils::content_encoding_gzip::~content_encoding_gzip() [clone .lto_priv.663]':
Sad

.text+0xd0): undefined reference to `inflateEnd'
Sad

.text+0xdc): undefined reference to `deflateEnd'
/tmp/cce8Fu8j.ltrans3.ltrans.o: In function `epee::net_utils::content_encoding_gzip::update_in(std::__cxx11::basic_string, std::allocator >&)':
Sad

.text+0x1913): undefined reference to `inflate'
Sad

.text+0x1bc4): undefined reference to `inflateReset'
Sad

.text+0x1bdd): undefined reference to `inflate'
Sad

.text+0x1c00): undefined reference to `inflate'
/tmp/cce8Fu8j.ltrans13.ltrans.o: In function `epee::net_utils::http::http_simple_client::analize_cached_header_and_invoke_state() [clone .constprop.6]':
Sad

.text+0xbf5): undefined reference to `inflateInit_'
Sad

.text+0xc0c): undefined reference to `deflateInit_'
Sad

.text+0xde3): undefined reference to `inflateInit2_'
Sad

.text+0xe0a): undefined reference to `deflateInit2_'
collect2: error: ld returned 1 exit status
tests/CMakeFiles/exchange_test.dir/build.make:95: recipe for target 'tests/exchange_test' failed
make[3]: *** [tests/exchange_test] Error 1
make[3]: Leaving directory '/boolberry/build/release'
CMakeFiles/Makefile2:798: recipe for target 'tests/CMakeFiles/exchange_test.dir/all' failed
make[2]: *** [tests/CMakeFiles/exchange_test.dir/all] Error 2
make[2]: Leaving directory '/boolberry/build/release'
Makefile:126: recipe for target 'all' failed
make[1]: *** [all] Error 2
make[1]: Leaving directory '/boolberry/build/release'
Makefile:20: recipe for target 'build-release' failed
make: *** [build-release] Error 2

avheapres

jr. member

Activity: 80

Merit: 1

Quote from: eneariken on October 10, 2018, 03:07:37 PM

Quote from: waciolk on October 10, 2018, 03:00:51 PM

Hi all, I'm interested in BitMart bounty program. I have heard that campaign is one of the most reliable one.

Look at BitMart bitmart.com you could get 20 free BMX by simply registering and win up to 20,000 BMX by simply inviting friends

Sounds so appealing, I will go to bitmart.com.

eneariken

newbie

Activity: 66

Merit: 0

Quote from: waciolk on October 10, 2018, 03:00:51 PM

Hi all, I'm interested in BitMart bounty program. I have heard that campaign is one of the most reliable one.

Look at BitMart bitmart.com you could get 20 free BMX by simply registering and win up to 20,000 BMX by simply inviting friends

waciolk

jr. member

Activity: 66

Merit: 3

Hi all, I'm interested in BitMart bounty program. I have heard that campaign is one of the most reliable one.

ruk55

newbie

Activity: 26

Merit: 0

Payment time when?
https://www.picz.in.th/images/2018/10/07/hKn9pJ.jpg

Molenta

newbie

Activity: 84

Merit: 0

Hey Johnny, being here for every update. Please update the first site on Bitcointalk. Pictures are not shown correct.

lencor

newbie

Activity: 9

Merit: 0

How install wallet on ubuntu 16.04?

hashappliance

copper member

Activity: 51

Merit: 0

One last thing:

In addition to twitter, we will be making announcement through our telegram channel at:

https://t.me/boolberry

(This is the best option for people that only want to be notified of important announcements)

We also have a Boolberry general chat:

https://t.me/boolberry_bbr

and a mining specific chat (for all levels!):

https://t.me/BBR_miners

Official Twitter account:

https://twitter.com/BoolberryBBR

Thank you again!

Johnny

hashappliance

copper member

Activity: 51

Merit: 0

Hello Boolberrians!

Here is a short guide and real test results from the V0.3.0.80 Wallet on Medium:

https://medium.com/@BoolberryBBR/boolberry-v0-3-0-80-release-notes-96cdab3a6084

Also a link to the twitter post:

https://twitter.com/BoolberryBBR/status/1047731843171147776

In the August update, we made some lofty promises of 1 hour (down from 24 hours +/-), but today's test shows 22 minutes for full blockchain synchronization!

So another 3X improvment on top of what we had promised. Should be nostalgic for anyone that was here back in 2014!

More coming soon!

Johnny

Join us on Telegram:

https://t.me/boolberry_bbr

crypto_zoidberg

hero member

Activity: 976

Merit: 646

Hello friends!

As it was promised in last dev update - new release:

https://github.com/cryptozoidberg/boolberry/releases/tag/v0.3.0.80

* Massive refactoring of the synchronization protocol
* Multiple performance optimizations
* GUI integration simplified and optimised

Hope you'll like it!

hashappliance

copper member

Activity: 51

Merit: 0

Update:

The "Burning Bug" as reported by a member of the Monero community has been patched and merged to master.

https://github.com/cryptozoidberg/boolberry/commit/57063dbcbeb0f2ab9269988ec7cfca04d74d0346

Additionally, we have scanned the Boolberry blockchain, and confirmed that this hypothetical attack was not exploited.

Exchanges, please compile from the updated source files:

https://github.com/cryptozoidberg/boolberry

Thank you.

Johnny

oldcoinguru

full member

Activity: 176

Merit: 100

Quote from: hashappliance on September 21, 2018, 01:53:45 AM

Here is the link to the August Dev update on medium:

https://medium.com/@BoolberryBBR/boolberry-bbr-monthly-progress-report-august-391d00e2616a

We are working with a couple of new exchanges, and waiting to get responses. We will keep you apprised as these discussions progress. Also, we also have quite a bit of exciting news to announce in the next several weeks, we have code named the next generation of improvements "Project Z."

We will announce on twitter when phase III of the roadmap on boolberry.com is updated, so that everyone is made aware at the same time.

Make sure you follow us on Twitter: https://twitter.com/BoolberryBBR

Cheeers!

JohnnyT

Thanks for the update.

igotek

hero member

Activity: 2058

Merit: 608

Online Security & Investment Corporation

investing Boolbery... I hope it will double and i get $$$$$$$$

hashappliance

copper member

Activity: 51

Merit: 0

Here is the link to the August Dev update on medium:

https://medium.com/@BoolberryBBR/boolberry-bbr-monthly-progress-report-august-391d00e2616a

We are working with a couple of new exchanges, and waiting to get responses. We will keep you apprised as these discussions progress. Also, we also have quite a bit of exciting news to announce in the next several weeks, we have code named the next generation of improvements "Project Z."

We will announce on twitter when phase III of the roadmap on boolberry.com is updated, so that everyone is made aware at the same time.

Make sure you follow us on Twitter: https://twitter.com/BoolberryBBR

Cheeers!

JohnnyT

sowle

newbie

Activity: 20

Merit: 0

Quote from: tybiboune on September 10, 2018, 10:52:01 AM

okay I narrowed down to one error.... "could not find boost_atomic"
...using boost 1.54, as recommended

Hi, tybiboune! I'm using Boost 1.66 now on Ubuntu 17.10 with gcc 7.2.0 and Boolberry builds quite well with it. If you didn't solve the issue, I suggest you building Boost 1.66 from sources.
Here's how it can be done:

Code:

wget https://dl.bintray.com/boostorg/release/1.66.0/source/boost_1_66_0.tar.gz
tar -xvf boost_1_66_0.tar.gz
cd ~/boost_1_66_0
./bootstrap.sh --with-libraries=system,filesystem,thread,date_time,chrono,regex,serialization,atomic,program_options,locale
./b2

If everything is okay then “The Boost C++ Libraries were successfully built!” message will appear.
Then you need to set BOOST_ROOT environment variable to reflect correct Boost path. For example, you may put this line to your ~/.bashrc file:

Code:

export BOOST_ROOT=/home/user/boost_1_66_0

Make sure it was actually set:

Code:

user@ubuntu:~/boost_1_66_0$ env | grep boost
BOOST_ROOT=/home/user/boost_1_66_0

After that, cmake hopefully will run with no issues.

tybiboune

jr. member

Activity: 313

Merit: 8

okay I narrowed down to one error.... "could not find boost_atomic"

...using boost 1.54, as recommended

tybiboune

jr. member

Activity: 313

Merit: 8

Hi everybody!
I'm so sorry, but I don't have the energy to read through 400+ pages of contributions... Cheesy

I'm trying to install the wallet and miners on my fresh new Ubuntu 18 install, but I'm facing some issues...

make command gives me a "Cmake error at FindBoost.cmake:1947 : Unable to find de requested Boost libraries."

I installed the boost libraries actually, so I guess I missed something...

Would anyone help, please?

Thanks in advance!

EDIT : to be precise, the missing libs are the following:
boost_filesystem
boost_thread
boost_date_time
boost_chrono
boost_regex
boost_serialization
boost_atomic
boost_program_options

crypjunkie

full member

Activity: 193

Merit: 100

Lot's of talk of Masternodes, not sure i'm getting this correct here but what is it we would use the master node service for on BBR? Anyone? Pretty sure we have no need for it.

crypto_zoidberg

hero member

Activity: 976

Merit: 646

Quote from: crypto_zoidberg on August 31, 2018, 05:08:37 PM

Hi Folk!

We now started to test a bunch of optimization on synchronization speed (especially for owners of relatively old HDD, spinning ones). It led to massive protocol code changes, so we now testing everything on testnet.
If some of you got bored you can join us with this, by compiling your daemon from git hub branch "sync_optimization" and h in the testnet-mode:

Code:

git checkout sync_optimization
cmake -D TESTNET=TRUE ..
make -j daemon
src/boolbd

Then run it and see if it finally got synchronized.
You can remove data files (from data dir which is by default in "C:\Users\username\AppData\Roaming\boolb" on windows machine or in /Users/roky/Library/Application Support/Boolb on mac machine on Macos) and try to resync it many times, interrupting it, power off the computer or doing something else stressful.
If you see red lines in output which started from word "Error" let me know please!

Thanks for helping us to be better! We appreciate it!

Zoidberg

crypto_zoidberg

hero member

Activity: 976

Merit: 646

Code:

*
*
    *
   ***
    *

Topic: [BBR] Boolberry: Privacy and Security - Guaranteed Since 2014 - page 13. (Read 1210699 times)