[BBR] Boolberry: Privacy and Security - Guaranteed Since 2014 - page 359.

mbk

member

Activity: 106

Merit: 10

1. Try larger values for thread_delay in config file (ex. 2000). It's in milliseconds.
2. Set device_index to 1 and use 3 threads to mine.

Quote from: antonio8 on July 26, 2014, 10:56:38 AM

Quote from: mbk on July 21, 2014, 08:34:30 AM

Output like this

Code:

2014-Jul-21 12:56:01.052013 [miner 0][OCL 0/0] error:  CL_INVALID_VALUE
2014-Jul-21 12:56:01.054013 [miner 0][OCL 0/0] device index must me between 0 and 4294967295

actually means selected OpenCL platform has 0 GPU devices. It happens if you installed CPU only OpenCL drivers from Intel or AMD. It should be gone after you select nvidia platform. Anyway don't change device_index - it doesn't make any sense. So if you tried everything - reboot.

Quote from: restless on July 21, 2014, 07:40:29 AM

Tried - without restarting (10min for restart....) all combinations with device_index 0,1,2 and platform_index 0,1,2
Same result

PC is i5-2500, 1 750Ti card, win7 x64, 8GB ram drivers 337.88

Hey mbk.

I have 2 rigs. One AMD and one Nvidia.

When I run the miner it picks up only the first card on each machine and gives me the CL_INVALID_VALUE for the other cards. Is there a way to fix this? Also I read about -threads to assign the number of gpus but is there a way to only mine with cards 1,2, and 3 instead of 0,1,2,3?

jperkins

newbie

Activity: 9

Merit: 0

Quote from: crypto_zoidberg on July 26, 2014, 05:47:25 AM

Quote from: jperkins on July 25, 2014, 09:50:42 PM

I'm trying to compile on Ubuntu 12.04 and it fails with the following errors:

Code:

[ 21%] [ 22%] [ 23%] Building CXX object src/CMakeFiles/crypto.dir/crypto/wild_keccak.cpp.o
Building CXX object src/CMakeFiles/crypto.dir/crypto/crypto.cpp.o
cc1plus: error: -Werror=maybe-uninitialized: no option -Wmaybe-uninitialized
cc1plus: error: unrecognized command line option ‘-std=c++11’
Building C object src/CMakeFiles/crypto.dir/crypto/tree-hash.c.o
make[3]: *** [src/CMakeFiles/crypto.dir/crypto/wild_keccak.cpp.o] Error 1
make[3]: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs....
cc1plus: error: -Werror=maybe-uninitialized: no option -Wmaybe-uninitialized
cc1plus: error: unrecognized command line option ‘-std=c++11’
make[3]: *** [src/CMakeFiles/crypto.dir/crypto/crypto.cpp.o] Error 1
Linking C static library libminiupnpc.a
make[3]: Leaving directory `/home/johndoe/boolberry/build/release'
[ 23%] Built target upnpc-static
make[3]: Leaving directory `/home/johndoe/boolberry/build/release'
make[2]: *** [tests/CMakeFiles/crypto-tests.dir/all] Error 2
make[3]: Leaving directory `/home/johndoe/boolberry/build/release'
make[2]: *** [src/CMakeFiles/crypto.dir/all] Error 2
make[2]: Leaving directory `/home/johndoe/boolberry/build/release'
make[1]: *** [all] Error 2
make[1]: Leaving directory `/home/johndoe/boolberry/build/release'
make: *** [build-release] Error 2

Any ideas? Intel platform.

Thanks

what gcc version do you have?

gcc -v returns gcc version 4.8.1 (Ubuntu 4.8.1-2ubuntu1~12.04

antonio8

legendary

Activity: 1400

Merit: 1000

Quote from: mbk on July 21, 2014, 08:34:30 AM

Output like this

Code:

2014-Jul-21 12:56:01.052013 [miner 0][OCL 0/0] error:  CL_INVALID_VALUE
2014-Jul-21 12:56:01.054013 [miner 0][OCL 0/0] device index must me between 0 and 4294967295

actually means selected OpenCL platform has 0 GPU devices. It happens if you installed CPU only OpenCL drivers from Intel or AMD. It should be gone after you select nvidia platform. Anyway don't change device_index - it doesn't make any sense. So if you tried everything - reboot.

Quote from: restless on July 21, 2014, 07:40:29 AM

Tried - without restarting (10min for restart....) all combinations with device_index 0,1,2 and platform_index 0,1,2
Same result

PC is i5-2500, 1 750Ti card, win7 x64, 8GB ram drivers 337.88

Hey mbk.

I have 2 rigs. One AMD and one Nvidia.

When I run the miner it picks up only the first card on each machine and gives me the CL_INVALID_VALUE for the other cards. Is there a way to fix this? Also I read about -threads to assign the number of gpus but is there a way to only mine with cards 1,2, and 3 instead of 0,1,2,3?

maxcan

member

Activity: 117

Merit: 100

Quote from: crypto_zoidberg on July 26, 2014, 06:03:58 AM

what you mean? i can't remember that i deleted my posts in last weeks...

i believe he means that nekomata deleted his post (won't say what was in it though) Cheesy

crypto_zoidberg

hero member

Activity: 976

Merit: 646

Quote from: tifozi on July 26, 2014, 01:30:01 AM

Quote from: maxcan on July 26, 2014, 12:22:28 AM

Quote from: ?? on ??

thats the hard true about this world, most people dont say it but its everywhere... about bbr not being 32-bit compatible, cryptonotecoins require x64 architecture, things evolve.

the "hard true" is that saying that kind of thing is tactless and makes everyone in this thread look bad.

posting such drivel on other coins' threads just casts a bad image on whatever you're promoting.

Quote from: tifozi on July 25, 2014, 11:40:17 PM

This same person has been doing this again and again in this thread, the darkcoin thread, the monero thread and pretty much everywhere else.

well you can't stop people from writing it really.

the devs and PR team have been good about staying out of the board politics, so there shouldn't be any problem.

I understand that. Thanks for the comments. Looks like Dr. Zoidberg deleted his latest comment here in this thread which was quite inflammatory. There are quite a lot of us that respect real developers and do not want this type of fanboyism trickling to the main coin threads. We cannot stop it, but only express our dissatisfaction and hope it appeals to some of these outright trolling.

I think our voices have been heard and we can get back to main discussion here. Thanks again.

what you mean? i can't remember that i deleted my posts in last weeks...

crypto_zoidberg

hero member

Activity: 976

Merit: 646

Quote from: jperkins on July 25, 2014, 09:50:42 PM

I'm trying to compile on Ubuntu 12.04 and it fails with the following errors:

Code:

[ 21%] [ 22%] [ 23%] Building CXX object src/CMakeFiles/crypto.dir/crypto/wild_keccak.cpp.o
Building CXX object src/CMakeFiles/crypto.dir/crypto/crypto.cpp.o
cc1plus: error: -Werror=maybe-uninitialized: no option -Wmaybe-uninitialized
cc1plus: error: unrecognized command line option ‘-std=c++11’
Building C object src/CMakeFiles/crypto.dir/crypto/tree-hash.c.o
make[3]: *** [src/CMakeFiles/crypto.dir/crypto/wild_keccak.cpp.o] Error 1
make[3]: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs....
cc1plus: error: -Werror=maybe-uninitialized: no option -Wmaybe-uninitialized
cc1plus: error: unrecognized command line option ‘-std=c++11’
make[3]: *** [src/CMakeFiles/crypto.dir/crypto/crypto.cpp.o] Error 1
Linking C static library libminiupnpc.a
make[3]: Leaving directory `/home/johndoe/boolberry/build/release'
[ 23%] Built target upnpc-static
make[3]: Leaving directory `/home/johndoe/boolberry/build/release'
make[2]: *** [tests/CMakeFiles/crypto-tests.dir/all] Error 2
make[3]: Leaving directory `/home/johndoe/boolberry/build/release'
make[2]: *** [src/CMakeFiles/crypto.dir/all] Error 2
make[2]: Leaving directory `/home/johndoe/boolberry/build/release'
make[1]: *** [all] Error 2
make[1]: Leaving directory `/home/johndoe/boolberry/build/release'
make: *** [build-release] Error 2

Any ideas? Intel platform.

Thanks

what gcc version do you have?

crypto_zoidberg

hero member

Activity: 976

Merit: 646

Quote from: mbk on July 25, 2014, 07:45:52 PM

OpenCL miner
Merged all updates from the main branch.
Source - https://github.com/mbkuperman/boolberry-opencl
Windows x64 binaries - https://github.com/mbkuperman/boolberry-opencl/releases

Fixed previous binary release too (it was compressed with 7zip instead of zip).

Thank you Mikhail!

crypto_zoidberg

hero member

Activity: 976

Merit: 646

Quote from: enerbyte on July 25, 2014, 05:11:25 PM

where I can get boolberry logo in high resolution?

we have it in repo in resources folder.

clintar

full member

Activity: 212

Merit: 100

To get pool started and get some blocks found, I'm dropping fee at http://cncoin.farm to 0%.

Happy mining!

otila

sr. member

Activity: 336

Merit: 250

Quote from: jperkins on July 25, 2014, 09:50:42 PM

I'm trying to compile on Ubuntu 12.04 and it fails with the following errors:

Code:

cc1plus: error: unrecognized command line option ‘-std=c++11’

Read README.md , at least the first line starting with "Dependencies".

enerbyte

hero member

Activity: 556

Merit: 501

Quote from: clintar on July 26, 2014, 02:20:41 AM

Quote from: enerbyte on July 25, 2014, 05:11:25 PM

where I can get boolberry logo in high resolution?

checkout boolberry source in the resources folder.
https://github.com/cryptozoidberg/boolberry/tree/master/resources

thank you very much! Wink

clintar

full member

Activity: 212

Merit: 100

Quote from: enerbyte on July 25, 2014, 05:11:25 PM

where I can get boolberry logo in high resolution?

checkout boolberry source in the resources folder.
https://github.com/cryptozoidberg/boolberry/tree/master/resources

tifozi

hero member

Activity: 742

Merit: 501

Quote from: maxcan on July 26, 2014, 12:22:28 AM

Quote from: ?? on ??

thats the hard true about this world, most people dont say it but its everywhere... about bbr not being 32-bit compatible, cryptonotecoins require x64 architecture, things evolve.

the "hard true" is that saying that kind of thing is tactless and makes everyone in this thread look bad.

posting such drivel on other coins' threads just casts a bad image on whatever you're promoting.

Quote from: tifozi on July 25, 2014, 11:40:17 PM

This same person has been doing this again and again in this thread, the darkcoin thread, the monero thread and pretty much everywhere else.

well you can't stop people from writing it really.

the devs and PR team have been good about staying out of the board politics, so there shouldn't be any problem.

I understand that. Thanks for the comments. Looks like Dr. Zoidberg deleted his latest comment here in this thread which was quite inflammatory. There are quite a lot of us that respect real developers and do not want this type of fanboyism trickling to the main coin threads. We cannot stop it, but only express our dissatisfaction and hope it appeals to some of these outright trolling.

I think our voices have been heard and we can get back to main discussion here. Thanks again.

Apostle4444

hero member

Activity: 832

Merit: 500

Quote from: 33zer0w0lf on July 25, 2014, 11:49:43 PM

Quote from: istvandv on July 25, 2014, 11:23:56 PM

Quote from: 33zer0w0lf on July 25, 2014, 11:04:56 PM

hit 4 blocks in the last 10 minutes @ Extreme Pool
come join us!

http://boolberry.extremepool.org

does this work with mbk's gpu miner on http ports? which port?

http://boolberry.extremepool.org/#getting_started

http://boolberry.com/howto.html

Whats there Scratchpad details as not on the getting started?

maxcan

member

Activity: 117

Merit: 100

Quote from: ?? on ??

thats the hard true about this world, most people dont say it but its everywhere... about bbr not being 32-bit compatible, cryptonotecoins require x64 architecture, things evolve.

the "hard true" is that saying that kind of thing is tactless and makes everyone in this thread look bad.

posting such drivel on other coins' threads just casts a bad image on whatever you're promoting.

Quote from: tifozi on July 25, 2014, 11:40:17 PM

This same person has been doing this again and again in this thread, the darkcoin thread, the monero thread and pretty much everywhere else.

well you can't stop people from writing it really.

the devs and PR team have been good about staying out of the board politics, so there shouldn't be any problem.

33zer0w0lf

full member

Activity: 224

Merit: 100

Quote from: istvandv on July 25, 2014, 11:23:56 PM

Quote from: 33zer0w0lf on July 25, 2014, 11:04:56 PM

hit 4 blocks in the last 10 minutes @ Extreme Pool
come join us!

http://boolberry.extremepool.org

does this work with mbk's gpu miner on http ports? which port?

http://boolberry.extremepool.org/#getting_started

http://boolberry.com/howto.html

Wolf0

member

Activity: 81

Merit: 1002

It was only the wind.

Quote from: ?? on ??

Quote from: Wolf0 on July 25, 2014, 01:00:19 PM

Quote from: ?? on ??

Quote from: digicoin on July 25, 2014, 12:24:12 PM

Quote from: ?? on ??

So, the download for windows doesn't work for 32 bit?

Thanks for telling me after I tried to download twice and wasted my time. @#%$%@#

How am I supposed to get some #@#$@% coins now?

I need berrycoin

Any plans to get a windows client for 32 bit?

BUY https://www.poloniex.com/exchange/btc_bbr

I still wouldn't have a wallet to transfer the coins to, if I bought some coins at those new exchanges.

And leaving coins on new exchanges can be too risky, with exchanges closing shop and stuff.

There needs to be a download for 32 bit systems for windows

A 32-bit system? If you really don't have a 64-bit system to run it on, you need to get one. We don't support the original 286, either.

too much troubles to change from 32 to 64, so i wont be doing that.

That is asking alot, that I would have to go and get a 64 bit system computer, just to be involved with this coin.

Why other coins work with 32 bit, but boolberrycoin doesn't work with 32 bit?

From what I have read, 32 bit is much more common than 64 bit, so, I guess if you only want a smaller percentage of the market for now, then that is what you get if all you have is download for 64 bit.

Anyways, I recommend that you place a notice on your download page, letting people know that the windows download is only for 64 bit, and doesn't work with 32 bit windows.

Or if you know how to make a 32 bit windows download that will work then why not do that?

Other than that, boolberry isn't one of the sht pos coins, I think, and I like that, and I hate pos coins at this time. So stick with pow. I dont like the name boolberry but berrycoin seems better to me.

Actually, most actual users are running on 64-bit. The majority of cell phones and ATMs and other devices are running 32-bit. Right now, if you don't have 64-bit, you're probably either broke or over 60.

tifozi

hero member

Activity: 742

Merit: 501

This was posted in Darkcoin thread. Pretty uncool.

What is the purpose of this? All this does is bring trolls to this thread and Darkcoin thread. I can't see any benefit of trolling obviously like this. It is not the first time either. This same person has been doing this again and again in this thread, the darkcoin thread, the monero thread and pretty much everywhere else.

Quote from: ?? on ??

if you really did your own research, should have discovered by now darkcoin is a instamine scam with a flawed privacy model, everyone that invested in drk instead of cryptonote coins (Monero, Boolberry, Quazarcoin, etc) will lose money big time.

dump everything already and buy XMR/BBR before its too late.

istvandv

sr. member

Activity: 342

Merit: 250

Quote from: 33zer0w0lf on July 25, 2014, 11:04:56 PM

hit 4 blocks in the last 10 minutes @ Extreme Pool
come join us!

http://boolberry.extremepool.org

does this work with mbk's gpu miner on http ports? which port?

Wolf0

member

Activity: 81

Merit: 1002

It was only the wind.

Quote from: ?? on ??

Quote from: digicoin on July 25, 2014, 12:24:12 PM

Quote from: ?? on ??

So, the download for windows doesn't work for 32 bit?

Thanks for telling me after I tried to download twice and wasted my time. @#%$%@#

How am I supposed to get some #@#$@% coins now?

I need berrycoin

Any plans to get a windows client for 32 bit?

BUY https://www.poloniex.com/exchange/btc_bbr

I still wouldn't have a wallet to transfer the coins to, if I bought some coins at those new exchanges.

And leaving coins on new exchanges can be too risky, with exchanges closing shop and stuff.

There needs to be a download for 32 bit systems for windows

A 32-bit system? If you really don't have a 64-bit system to run it on, you need to get one. We don't support the original 286, either.

Topic: [BBR] Boolberry: Privacy and Security - Guaranteed Since 2014 - page 359. (Read 1210752 times)