Topic: [BBR] Boolberry: Privacy and Security - Guaranteed Since 2014 - page 62. (Read 1210749 times)

i got the latest from gitHub, but i am still having problems syncing/connecting.

I am getting this error still: "...Remote node have longer checkpoints zone( 773500) that local (550000)That means that current software is outdated"
And every single connection attempt gives this: "2017-Dec-04 11:55:59.216567 [P2P2]Connect failed to 138.201.116.10:10101
2017-Dec-04 11:56:03.261687 [P2P2]Connecting to 46.246.35.137:10101(white=0, last_seen: d13.h5.m53.s54)..."

Do I just need to let it run for a few days?

edit: also this, which looks bad
2017-Dec-04 12:04:58.198227 [P2P1]ERROR c:\users\clintar\documents\visual studio 2013\projects\boolberry-zoidberg\src\p2p\net_node.inl:452[nodetool::node_server >::do_handshake_with_peer::::operator ()][136.243.249.132:10101 OUT]COMMAND_HANDSHAKE invoked, but process_payload_sync_data returned false, dropping connection.

edit2: and this
2017-Dec-04 12:15:30.966408 [P2P0]Connecting to 139.59.226.16:10101(white=0, last_seen: d3.h23.m19.s28)...
2017-Dec-04 12:15:36.171318 [P2P0][139.59.226.16:10101 OUT]COMMAND_HANDSHAKE Failed
2017-Dec-04 12:15:36.171318 [P2P0][139.59.226.16:10101 OUT]Failed to HANDSHAKE with peer 139.59.226.16:10101

Hello everyone, a new BBR pool was born here https://bbr.luckypool.io/#
Stats: 180Mh/s, ~200 block mined.

Features:

• Mine to exchange
• Fixed diff
• Maturity Depth: 10
• Min payout: 1 BBR, automatic payment every 10 minutes
• Low fee: 0.5%
• Discord support

Happy mining

oh, wow!

Yea, just login to Stock Exchange and transfer your coins there, that's what I did

Bye the way - lookin good for BBR, thank you developers, and a bow

0===[:::::Boolberry::::>

I have my coins on Bittrex  Is it possible to move my coins to any other exchanges?

Please try updating to latest release and see if it resolves your issue. I've seen that error before when trying to use binaries from the boolberry.com website as it hasn't been updated since 2014-09-25 (according to https://sourceforge.net/projects/boolberry/).

Latest releases are available here:
https://github.com/clintar/boolberry/releases

Alternatively, you can compile from source just make sure you have correct dependencies. Two most current repositories:
https://github.com/cryptozoidberg/boolberry
https://github.com/clintar/boolberry/

Also, please take note that the network hashrate is the highest its ever been. You'll have much better luck mining on a pool than mining solo. A list of pools is available here:
http://explorer.mining.blue/en/#pools

Willing to sell 33000 Boolberries at a flat $10 each coin. DM if interested 

Btw would like to see more exchanges. Like cryptopia binance and others. Good Luck 

2017-Dec-03 16:54:51.887541 [P2P4][136.243.249.132:10101 OUT]Remote node have longer checkpoints zone( 773500) that local (70000)That means that current software is outdated, please updated it.Current heigh lay under checkpoints on remote host, so it is not possible validate this transactions on local host, disconnecting.
2017-Dec-03 16:54:51.918792 [P2P4]ERROR c:\jenkins\workdir\boolberry\src\p2p\net_node.inl:451[nodetool::node_server >::do_handshake_with_peer::::operator ()][136.243.249.132:10101 OUT]COMMAND_HANDSHAKE invoked, but process_payload_sync_data returned false, dropping connection.

I am unable to sync past  360 days.
says in purple words... my software not current and needs to be updated.
who has the most up to date version.

seems not very fair for only a few to be able to continue mining
I want to solo mine with the daemon/wallet. not pool.

it is good for the network also.

anyway any input will help. thanks.

I adjusted the vardiff difficulty on mining.blue. See if that helps.

My reds hashing fine at http://mining.blue/# . But nvidia is underperforming because of huge quantity of "share does not validate on cpu". ccminer is not so good for BBR so my greens work elsewhere.

Why is only half to 1/4 of my hash showing at the pools? I have my bat file done correctly too.
http://mining.blue/#    is the worst.

Biryukov and Khovratovich designed the Equihash algorithm in use by Zcash. AFAIK their latest design MTP-Argon2, or Mekle Tree Proof, was designed as a successor to Equihash with the primary function of providing an Egalitarian mining solution. Fabien reviewed this algorithm and redesigned it to be hardened against all known attack vectors along with optimized proof sizes, which is known as Itsuku. Initial spec is 2GB but in any case, even with 64GB of RAM there wont be much speedup, since the limiting factor is bandwidth and not space.

Relative Papers and work:
Equihash - https://eprint.iacr.org/2015/946
MTP - https://arxiv.org/pdf/1606.03588v1.pdf
MTP Attack - https://eprint.iacr.org/2017/497
Marc Bevand's blog - http://blog.zorinaq.com/attacks-on-mtp/

Arnaud Larroche and Baptiste Colin are two of Fabien's students at MINES ParisTech. They're the ones who wrote the Python implementation.
https://github.com/baptistecolin/itsuku

Who is Biryukov, Khovratovich, Arnaud, and Baptiste

Anyone we know b4h4mu7?

I like that it'll be a fork

securing the majority hashrate of this chain is easy, for now, so this is good

I'm with you here. Regardless of individual motive assuming a position back in the top 100 is an obvious advantage.

I have been holding since near the start so I will not be letting go until we are back up with xmr.

However many new investors with all varying degrees of loyalty to the projects they put money into will only look inside the top 100 and often the top 20

We want to be back inside that investment arena asap.

I say that even though mine are mostly held in polo against my will so if they do not release them before the fork date I will be pretty unhappy.

Also I must say that what b4h4mu7 has done has been quite awesome ... well done for someone taking the incentive here. I wish there were some people like that in some other communities im with where i hold a significant amount of coins.

I did like the name boolberry - i thought i sounded quite classy but this new name is not too bad either.

Thanks! As far as development we're just about done with the majority of it. However, some areas of research are improving (sometimes weekly) and as a result our developers need to review design improvements then translate them into code.

On that note - I'm thrilled to announce that today, the first area of our research efforts to reach maturity has been published to the International Association for Cryptologic Research (IACR).

"Itsuku: a Memory-Hardened Proof-of-Work Scheme"
https://eprint.iacr.org/2017/1168


Thanks everyone for the kind words regarding the announcement! It's been a lot of work and effort this year to get to the point where we could share it with the community. Any and all questions are welcomed. I'll go through and answer all them in a larger condensed post when I get some free time. Also, feel free to throw some FUD at me or the project. I haven't entertained that in a while

Agreed. No need for market manipulation here. Those with orders up that want to exit will make room for new holders, it's simply how things work.

Hi teknohog,

The Ship of Theseus query is warranted, my rebuttal would be that as long as we stay true to the core improvements originally pioneered by Boolberry then everything else is an upgrade. Other crypto projects have done the same although I can't think of many that have improved as much as we have. Moreover, as long as your coins are transferable through the hardfork, it would also further reinforce this theory. I guess a relevant analogy would be like restoring a classic car. Even though one would upgrade and modernize certain areas it would still be the same vehicle. Although in this case its more like an aftermarket performance upgrade i.e. adding Supercharger/Blower etc.

To avoid confusion we reached out to the original dev of the abandon project DBL and acquired the subreddit r/doubloon from him along with permission rights to the name. I know it sounds ridiculous but in the unregulated crypto space this is how things work. The Github header "These are not the Doubloons you're looking for" points to our subreddit.
We've also been in communication with the group doing the DBL reboot and they've indicated that their reboot will be under a different name.
https://github.com/RazorLove/doubloons
https://www.reddit.com/r/doubloon/

Also, the project formerly known as Doubloon[BOAT] who didn't bother to reach out to the original dev in the first place before choosing the name, has been renamed to Boat[BOAT] which is reflected on coinmarketcap. Moving forward there won't be any confusion.
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.24626351

All that said, other CN projects have rebranded i.e. ducknote -> darknote -> digitalnote with upgrades to their codebase although none have made major improvements to the underlying protocol like we have. It's worth noting is that this project itself was rebranded from HoneyPenny to Boolberry.

Lastly, just to clarify - we explored the concept of launching this as a separate project, one with no hardfork. The most obvious problem is that over the last 7 months, the research and development team have been compensated in BBR so it makes sense for us to approach this as a fork to the new codebase rather than a fresh project. Our intentions here have always been to reestablish this project as the benchmark privacy project by advancing the technology beyond any competitors. This direction was the quickest way to achieve that goal.

looks like there can be confusion as they are also planning a reboot.

the first thing I did was check to see if it was coinmarketcap still and it isn't, but it may be in the future.