Topic: [BBR] Boolberry: Privacy and Security - Guaranteed Since 2014 - page 76. (Read 1210779 times)

why isnt anyone putting more pressure on bittrex on the main board to explain this delisting. It was not a volume issue seems weird there was no explanation anywhere.

how to open some reasonable dialogue with them. they are a great exchange usually. Never seen them pull this before.

With Wallet problems.... for me GUI works great.
Downloaded GUI wallet and added seed nodes  (right click on BB shortcut on desktop, go to properties and paste those seednodes in Target section)

"C:\Program Files\Boolberry\qt-boolb.exe" --seed-node 88.197.53.159:10101

The recent profit reduction many times, hope this project to force, more or more gains

Hi.. anyone know where I can get a working GUI wallet plz? 
Thx

Glad to see Boolberry still alive. I'm sure this would be the perfect time to buy. Given the opportunity to do so. My heart goes out to you guys goxxed by Polo. Better days ahead I'm sure.

I make it 4444.444444444444 satoshis each

Cheers Jon 

what is that in satoshis?

if anyone wants to sell 45K BBR for 2 btc  hit me up, ive pretty good trust but we can also use escrow

Nobody from Shittrex has provided a reason for the delist. Nor, did they reach out to anyone here to have it addressed. Aeon and XDN also suffer from the same DB issue and both are still trading there. Maybe they just have a bias towards Boolberry. Who really knows and who really cares? Their exchange is shitty af. I'm honestly tired of trading there anyways, its a sight for sore eyes.

After this unwarranted delisting I've pulled all my BTC from Shittrex and won't be trading there ever again. I suggest everyone else do the same. We need to look to other exchanges as Shittrex is on it's way out as a major exchange anyways. When these exchanges start imposing withdrawal limits on traders and make them verify ID to have them lifted thats when traders need to move their business elsewhere. Even the grandfathered accounts with the 1337BTC withdrawal limit are being disabled until account verification.

Besides, their order books are overran with bots, the charts and order depths have been broken for over a year, their support is shit, their interface is circa 1999 and their execution time horrible. I see no long term hope for Bittrex. Other traders are already realizing this and have started to pull their funds off there before their accounts become disabled. This delisting was a great opportunity for users to withdraw funds from there without having to deal with their limits or verifications.

The bigger issue at hand is the Boolberry that's frozen on Croponiex. A good portion of the coins in circulation are still stuck on Craponiex. We need to form a concerted effort to force them to release the funds that are stuck there. They don't respond to support tickets and their IRC is dead. I know multiple traders who've had both pending BTC and BBR withdrawals for over 6 months now with no response on their support tickets..

We're looking into new exchanges, although most of the credible ones require substantial listing fees. If anyone is interested in helping out on that front send me a PM. The codebase requires off-line signing for most exchanges, so we're working to get that implemented as soon as possible.

For now, in order to avoid the same situation as Craponiex - everyone should be storing their funds locally. Here's a guide on how to get started with a local wallet: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wywMfiaeW5o

let's hit nova exchange up they may list it.

I hear cz is still reachable and returned a big chunk someone donated him. So that's quite cool.

Perhaps we need to ask him how many btc it will cost to get it in working order?

I hope bittrex will relist this for free once the db issue is solved because it was not delisted for lack of volume.

OSX terminal wallet seeding (cli command not listed on xbb boolberry site): open -a qt-boolb --args --seed-node 5.9.44.154:10101

Donate: 1EqfakDf6g3HzZDMUr6prC66YBsdBW26L5KQBsDcBxqvWH2BJsbWk6dBhQCyTTDhu8RQxAheM1cmUR1 sEZXnBiLAH5sJ94E

Bittrex has removed Boolberry from trading.  The wallets still enabled so if you have coins you better move them to your local wallet before they take the wallet offline.  I grabbed a little more before the market was removed just in case it makes a comeback.  If not then I'm out some btc but I'm willing to take that risk.

Hey Newton90, the plan is to reach out to additional exchanges and help them understand what considerations Boolberry needs to work on their servers, while simultaneously making it easier for Boolberry to be used at all, which will improve its ability to be listed on other exchanges

Thats not even a conspiracy, thats what the blockchain is for. The ticker name change had the exact effect I was hoping for at the time. I offered to show you the tx id.

5f4c5c776d347b47998f60acd55664023dcfe166c9496bb7750a2ca6b3fabb08



I said I would do that, and I did that, and I did other things, and when things failed, I told people exactly what went wrong. The primary thing that went wrong was that all of the developers I worked with got Boolberry codebase changes to work on one platform, say, Windows, but couldn't get it to work on OSX and Linux without segmentation faults. We stopped releasing code changes because people wanted to compile from source. I expect you and your developers to encounter the same issues. I inspired you and others to come back to this project, no matter how that inspiration formed. I reached out to clintar and he's been awesome, no matter who is the self proclaimed steward of the project.

If your main criticism of me is not enough focus on the code, (I mean, I think that should be the main criticism) then you, b4h4mu7, should stop getting distracted on less relevant nuances in the past, and focus on the code yourself, because otherwise, unlike me and my great ROI for a lottttt of people and subsequently expanded business, what will you have to show for it? An audit?

if btrx delisted next question is:

when boolberry list on other exchange or relist on bittrex?

Ah the "legendary" icebreaker. One of the shittiest trolls on this forum. Glad to have you here, it's always entertaining trying to make sense of the garbage you spew out..  If you had the reading comprehension of a 6th grader, you would understand that none of my funds are on Polo. I'm trying to help others that have messaged me about getting their funds off there you dumb inbred trailer trash scum. I know reading isn't your best attribute, mainly due to years of inbreeding (not your fault) but I went ahead and bolded the area to make things easier for you. All these years of sub-par trolling to boost your $100 investments and you still haven't made it out of your parents basement.. it's a shame.

I know Monero guys are in bed with Crapoliex, so this conversation is a non-starter. Welcome to the real world, where businesses are accountable for their actions. I know its hard to understand that concept since you live in a fantasy world where businesses don't exist (parents basement).
https://news.bitcoin.com/class-action-lawsuit-exchange-kraken/

BTW for anyone interested in learning more about "icebreaker" here's a portrait of it:

Wow. Thats a eye opener. You know what, it takes balls to invest in small project. So no balls. All those BTC and rest started as small stupid no dev no interest projects.
Also better just stick to the bank, it gives 0.4% interest and it is granted and secured, even BTC can become worthless in future. 

You got a job. You got old and non flexible and this is what a job usually does. Im a noob here, but not in financial world. Exchanges do get all kind of pervileges over the market. Advantages over inside news are true. See for yourself, charts wont lie. Its a no brainer. 

Everything is dead, except you here looking for oportunitis, why are you here than? It certenly not because of defending exchanges or one of the goose claiming is dead project.
Compering fiat and crypto in a way that get a job, work for fiat (which gets printed as many they want) is no no uderstanding what are we all here. Its for the future of value. Get it, i dont think so.

Oh for exchanges, no answer from them for more than 2 weeks, no open comunication to anyone, no rules, no gudelines, so much of theirs customer care they have. Exchanges will get regulated and that is a dead to the freedom of crypto. Decentralised exchanges will take their way.

Stop kicking a dead animal. If Boolberry is a true zombie coin, if it keeps coming back, will you be please here with us mister big, with other ETC/DCR

Wow.  Listen to this noob telling us what he thinks feels about how Polo and Trex should be run.

Clue: exchanges exist to make a profit, not protect your shitcoin abandonware from market forces.

Polo has always worked perfectly for me.  Your problems with them are purely self-imposed; IE you picked the wrong horse and it lost the race.

Here's the suggestion you asked for:

Stop whining about "legal action."  Slap yourself (hard and across the face) for even indulging in lazy fantasies of effortless redemption.

Write off "your" BBR.  They are not only worthless tokens of a dead project, they stopped being yours when you put them on Polo.

Learn from this expensive lesson.  All us old timers have (often several times  ).

Stop looking for free money from gambling and thirsting after Quick Crypto Gains.

Get a job, improve your earning potential with more training/education, and earn as much fiat as possible.

Then put that fiat into legitimate coins with active development instead of hopeless long-shot basket cases.  Stick with BTC/LTC/XMR/ETC/DCR, and hodl.

Show the community the rest of the transcript where Ryan posts the address and you provide the transaction ID related to that specific address. That will constitute as proof that you were solely responsible for the ticker change. A simple support ticket inquiry doesn't mean anything, neither does some random transaction ID. If you really were that gullible to spend 1.5BTC to change the ticker of the coin when there are so much other things to focus on, it further proves my point that you have no idea what you're doing trying to take over stewardship of these types of projects (software).

Yes, I did donate to cz because he is more of an asset to this project in retirement than you ever were during your one year pump and dump. He's the only reason why this coin isn't at 1 Satoshi. It should also be noted that I have held BBR well before you ever knew what it was, so don't take credit for me coming into this project. I realized the nonsense you were pulling early on that's why I donated to cz, not you. I'm glad I did, because at least I got my funds back, unlike the poor souls who donated to you. I can't blame cz for not contributing since nobody here besides me bothered to fund him, so he had to take up contract work to survive. Had he of received that 10BTC or whatever plus you received we wouldn't even be having this conversation.

The best thing you can do now for this community is send rapeghost his funds back along with anyone else that donated to you, for the disaster that you created through mismanagement of donations. I'll just leave it at that.

I couldn't move them off the 1.5btc. Want to see the transaction id as well?

Haven't lied about anything. You picking up the baton is only because I brought interest to this community. Cryptozoidberg is what the community actually needs, don't push your frustrations on me. Myself and my developers got blocked on several issues, primarily cross platform issues. The code is on github in my repository, blockchain development company's repository, and javajared's repository. Several people forked it.

First of all, donations didn't only come from that person.

Second of all, there were several people in this very community that actually were working with me, and agreed with my use of funds.

Thirdly, Boolberry needed infrastructure to run this code on, servers are part of development. Funds were pooled, its not an argument, they paid for server costs which are part of development. Rapeghost did not have infrastructure available for us.

Fourth, I'm not sure you know what you are talking about. Paying Bittrex is a valid criticism, your criticism is that we didn't pay, and you were dead wrong about that. Why do you think your other arguments are more accurate?

Fifth, yeah this is fun talking to you, but there is no 10 bitcoin. As demonstrated, and described, it was used for the benefit of Boolberry development. Have fun debating that, but I tried to get you involved specifically to avoid this exact criticism. You were silent, and kept donating to zoidberg for god knows why. He kept it parked, we didn't.

Sixth, if you want to carry the baton, be a community leader, get the database fixed and get it listed. Its not helpful for you to squirrel on about this.

Seventh, and I just bought 1.3% of the float. Woot woot. Specifically, funds that I manage for investors because they saw how accurate I am in seeing opportunity. The Boolberry project was the trial run, people are pleased. Like, institutional investors literally love it. They like how blockchains never really die, how we can buy up stuff without really tipping off the markets, and then come in and attempt to improve the markets because the underlying asset is open sourced and can be run by anyone. People don't even get crypto and here we are doing this crazy thing with precise control. There is another story here that you are neglecting and it doesn't matter there's still opportunity here, massive opportunity so just focus on that. Blockchain Development Company is a management company for several funds, and it also hires software engineers to come onto crypto projects and make them valuable. When blockchains are involved, that involves the community. We weren't able to get consensus in Boolberry's community, and thats okay, I'm not going to waste my time in the middle of the most epic altcoin rally in history. It is not possible for me to use their money to settle some arbitrary donation criticism, it wasn't even possible for me to use their money to fund the development, only the management fees earned from them. If actually aligned economic incentives are somehow controversial to you, instead of more like a blueprint, then this is the wrong project because the developer you actually respect has been collecting a 1% tax from the network with little to show for it for two years.