Topic: Being a Smart Person or Strategic - page 68. (Read 16937 times)
Of these two things in my opinion very important role to be a successful person, of course a good strategy is in the smart people, because being a smart person only.. without a strategy or targets that are prepared certainly intelligence will be in vain. Both of these certainly must always coexist in every effort we do to lead to success and achieve a satisfactory profit.
Is it enough to be smart with just nothing to lean on and go on with your life? Because i feel that there are a lot of people who doesn't know how to handle their money with regards to see in the future. Is it enough to be smart and not be strategical or somewhat a person who has a lot of experience. Who would you choose?
For me it is required to be a master of both things like of course you can not have experience if you are not going to try and some people would think it's a waste of their time if they are doing what they know already like repeating their work over and over again. So it should be in a balance.
For me it is required to be a master of both things like of course you can not have experience if you are not going to try and some people would think it's a waste of their time if they are doing what they know already like repeating their work over and over again. So it should be in a balance.
I would prefer Smart person because we all know that being a smart person is like having a lot of wisom and knowledge. And if you have a smart attitude you will have many strategic thinkings that will make you to earn more or to win in a certain game. Being a smart person is a advantage because you have the positive and good mind.
Therefore I feel that if a person wants to be successful in life he should be smart and have the knowledge of the field he works. If he has the experience he can make good strategies for his business.
I think there are different kinds of smarts, and ultimately it comes down to your goals. Someone who is a mathematical genius may not be 'smart' with their money, and could end up broke.
I'd rather be strategic because through that, I believe that I can be smart in many ways. Through strategies with good foundation, I will be able to stablish good ideas and build a better and wiser future.
Being stragetic is my choice. Smart person can think of a good idea to a given task but a strategic person can think of a faster way to finish a given task.
for me smart people would be smart to strategize well but people who are not smart even though he can strategize, but people who are not smart will not have a strategy with good like smart people.
No ! Stratigic is more advance than smart . If you smart you need to learn the stratigic, right ?? Thats the advantage of bieng stratigic to smart person. So for me, stratigic is the best .
Is it enough to be smart with just nothing to lean on and go on with your life? Because i feel that there are a lot of people who doesn't know how to handle their money with regards to see in the future. Is it enough to be smart and not be strategical or somewhat a person who has a lot of experience. Who would you choose?
For me it is required to be a master of both things like of course you can not have experience if you are not going to try and some people would think it's a waste of their time if they are doing what they know already like repeating their work over and over again. So it should be in a balance.
For me it is required to be a master of both things like of course you can not have experience if you are not going to try and some people would think it's a waste of their time if they are doing what they know already like repeating their work over and over again. So it should be in a balance.
theres a saying that experience is the best teacher
and i agree with that
I am agree too. If you have an experience and you're already in the game it's easier for you to play. But for me, being smart or having strategy in gambling, it really depends on what kind of gamble you will be letting and what sports to play. I think they both benefit,there is an important role in gambling and really use.
If I were to choose which trait I would have if I didn't have one of these, I'd choose strategic over being just plainly smart. I know someone who is just plainly smart because he is by the book so that's why he is smart and always follow what he read on the book feels like he is not open to what can happen or what might possibly happen because he feels he knows everything, it's too plain and blunt. I'd prefer strategic because I can get away with anything and can think of a solution right away no matter what the circumstances are.
Is it enough to be smart with just nothing to lean on and go on with your life? Because i feel that there are a lot of people who doesn't know how to handle their money with regards to see in the future. Is it enough to be smart and not be strategical or somewhat a person who has a lot of experience. Who would you choose?
For me it is required to be a master of both things like of course you can not have experience if you are not going to try and some people would think it's a waste of their time if they are doing what they know already like repeating their work over and over again. So it should be in a balance.
For me it is required to be a master of both things like of course you can not have experience if you are not going to try and some people would think it's a waste of their time if they are doing what they know already like repeating their work over and over again. So it should be in a balance.
theres a saying that experience is the best teacher
and i agree with that
What does being smart means? One can be smart and he can act very strategic, but if the luck is not with him and he's not luck, he can't do anything on crypto market. You should be luck first.
And then you should be able to investigate the market opportunities without getting bored.
I am a contradict with your opinion because being a smart is.just become smart only and you dont know how to solve problems in real life. We are talking about the reality and i believe that being strategic person is being a hardworking and tough to every problem that you faced. So i think we should go for strategic rather than a smart. And then you should be able to investigate the market opportunities without getting bored.
Is it enough to be smart with just nothing to lean on and go on with your life? Because i feel that there are a lot of people who doesn't know how to handle their money with regards to see in the future. Is it enough to be smart and not be strategical or somewhat a person who has a lot of experience. Who would you choose?
For me it is required to be a master of both things like of course you can not have experience if you are not going to try and some people would think it's a waste of their time if they are doing what they know already like repeating their work over and over again. So it should be in a balance.
I agree with you we need to be smart and strategic because we need that to our daily life some people don't mind anything as long they earn money they not use it right. And some of people being strategic even they not earn lot of money and they use it right. For me it is required to be a master of both things like of course you can not have experience if you are not going to try and some people would think it's a waste of their time if they are doing what they know already like repeating their work over and over again. So it should be in a balance.
If a person is smart he would also be strategic. Both characrerisitic is needed in order to become successful. Because it's not really enough to become smart. It would need implementation that requires strategy.
I will second you. I believe both these qualities are just like two pillars. You need to rely on both of them in order to make the foundation strong. You need to work on both of these qualities in order to become a successful man in life. You will be needing both of these things throughout your life.If a person is smart he would also be strategic. Both characrerisitic is needed in order to become successful. Because it's not really enough to become smart. It would need implementation that requires strategy.
I will second you. I believe both these qualities are just like two pillars. You need to rely on both of them in order to make the foundation strong. You need to work on both of these qualities in order to become a successful man in life. You will be needing both of these things throughout your life.strategic people are wise/smart people, there are lots of kinds of intelligence that make a man smart. But if you compare people who live by the book or should i say those people who typically good in class but sucks in real life against those people who are smart enough to outsmart people in real situation, i choose those strategic ones than those who attain their knowledge solely in school.
As a person who studies a lot and reads a lot of books, I disagree with you. Those street-smart people can succeed in the beginning, like ones who are bluffing a lot in poker for example, but like in a big poker tournament they rarely make it to the final round. Eventually the one who really knows how to play wins.
Well intelligence canbe in different forms. It can be as you said, street smart, or it can be academic, textbook kind of intelligence. A strategic person would have to be smart to come up with strategies so i obviously think that between the two, being smart is the better thing to be
Is it enough to be smart with just nothing to lean on and go on with your life? Because i feel that there are a lot of people who doesn't know how to handle their money with regards to see in the future. Is it enough to be smart and not be strategical or somewhat a person who has a lot of experience. Who would you choose?
For me it is required to be a master of both things like of course you can not have experience if you are not going to try and some people would think it's a waste of their time if they are doing what they know already like repeating their work over and over again. So it should be in a balance.
For me it is required to be a master of both things like of course you can not have experience if you are not going to try and some people would think it's a waste of their time if they are doing what they know already like repeating their work over and over again. So it should be in a balance.
It's better to be strategic than to be smart. Being strategic means u have the skills to execute something that you have come up with. What is being smart if you can not put it into action. #happylang
That remains to be seen, though
In real life anything is possible, so I wouldn't draw conclusions out of the blue. That is to say if you lack sharpness of mind, all your strategies will be dull and dumb by definition. I mean the ones that will be actually working for you since you won't be able to come up with anything more sophisticated for being dumb (the opposite of being smart). On the other hand, to live a decent life, you often don't need any strategy at all beyond just being prudent and, yes, smart enough. But if you are smart and work out a decent strategy which you follow through, you will obviously fare a lot better than without any. As the saying goes, you can get much further with a kind word and a gun than with just a kind word. Strategy be your gun here
strategic people are wise/smart people, there are lots of kinds of intelligence that make a man smart. But if you compare people who live by the book or should i say those people who typically good in class but sucks in real life against those people who are smart enough to outsmart people in real situation, i choose those strategic ones than those who attain their knowledge solely in school.
As a person who studies a lot and reads a lot of books, I disagree with you. Those street-smart people can succeed in the beginning, like ones who are bluffing a lot in poker for example, but like in a big poker tournament they rarely make it to the final round. Eventually the one who really knows how to play wins.
Is it enough to be smart with just nothing to lean on and go on with your life? Because i feel that there are a lot of people who doesn't know how to handle their money with regards to see in the future. Is it enough to be smart and not be strategical or somewhat a person who has a lot of experience. Who would you choose?
For me it is required to be a master of both things like of course you can not have experience if you are not going to try and some people would think it's a waste of their time if they are doing what they know already like repeating their work over and over again. So it should be in a balance.
For me it is required to be a master of both things like of course you can not have experience if you are not going to try and some people would think it's a waste of their time if they are doing what they know already like repeating their work over and over again. So it should be in a balance.
It's better to be strategic than to be smart. Being strategic means u have the skills to execute something that you have come up with. What is being smart if you can not put it into action. #happylang
Is it enough to be smart with just nothing to lean on and go on with your life? Because i feel that there are a lot of people who doesn't know how to handle their money with regards to see in the future. Is it enough to be smart and not be strategical or somewhat a person who has a lot of experience. Who would you choose?
For me it is required to be a master of both things like of course you can not have experience if you are not going to try and some people would think it's a waste of their time if they are doing what they know already like repeating their work over and over again. So it should be in a balance.
For me it is required to be a master of both things like of course you can not have experience if you are not going to try and some people would think it's a waste of their time if they are doing what they know already like repeating their work over and over again. So it should be in a balance.
It's better to be strategic than to be smart. Being strategic means u have the skills to execute something that you have come up with. What is being smart if you can not put it into action. #happylang
Is it enough to be smart with just nothing to lean on and go on with your life? Because i feel that there are a lot of people who doesn't know how to handle their money with regards to see in the future. Is it enough to be smart and not be strategical or somewhat a person who has a lot of experience. Who would you choose?
For me it is required to be a master of both things like of course you can not have experience if you are not going to try and some people would think it's a waste of their time if they are doing what they know already like repeating their work over and over again. So it should be in a balance.
For me it is required to be a master of both things like of course you can not have experience if you are not going to try and some people would think it's a waste of their time if they are doing what they know already like repeating their work over and over again. So it should be in a balance.
Being smart for me has the potential to reach all your dreams because you can do all things by using your brain.So I can make my life turn to a prosperity life also if I used to be smart.It depends upon our moves and strategy to get it quick.I beleived that if you moved fast you finished it quickly.And you see already the outcome of your work.
What does being smart means? One can be smart and he can act very strategic, but if the luck is not with him and he's not luck, he can't do anything on crypto market. You should be luck first.
And then you should be able to investigate the market opportunities without getting bored.
And then you should be able to investigate the market opportunities without getting bored.
Why should you be lucky first? Everything in life takes skill. If someone relies on luck even if they win then it will not be as beneficial as someone who earns with hard work.
i think that better to be a strategic person, strategic is predicting all of unknown situation and already make up a plan. but being smart not gonna take you anywhere, even lot of people said that smart people learn from book. we need some act than only reading a book. you need experience not only knowledge, but you can earn knowledge from experience. so thats why i think that strategic is better than smart person.
Jump to: