Topic: BERNIE SANDERS, WEIRDO IN CHIEF - page 34. (Read 41823 times)

----------------------------------
Insanity...

it is a great story .. you were great i think..

yes.. we are really sick and tired of seeing these both parties..  something must be changed..

 

Nice one.

we are not in the contest as for this us elections.. on countrary, we are in the freak show seeing its candidates..

No need to ask why, because he said he wants to run a clean campaign, and he is doing exactly that...

That's because Bernie has this little thing called integrity...

^ has nothing to do with the policies of the candidate. Just to spread fear. Fear of minorities. Fear of the word socialism without knowing anything about it. Not that sanders is a socialist. And that's why many young voters support him. They aren't afraid of looking up what socialism and democratic socialism mean. And aren't as isolated and closed minded as older generations. Keep that mentality and things like these will become more common in the future: http://www.bbc.com/news/magazine-32821678

 

Bill clinton, ex US president will campaign for his wife, wife who called Trump sexist. Why should the life of an ex US president be off limit for bernie?

Exclusive–Paula Jones: Hillary Clinton ‘Two Faced,’ ‘Liar,’ ‘Cares Nothing About Women at All’
http://www.breitbart.com/2016-presidential-race/2016/01/03/exclusive-paula-jones-hillary-clinton-two-faced-liar-cares-nothing-about-women-at-all/


Everything is off limit with this dude. I believe he is not in it to win. He NEVER attacks harpy clinton. If you are a bernie supporter you should ask why, but you won't.

http://www.foxnews.com/story/2006/04/21/sen-clinton-gives-10000-to-dem-candidates-in-march.html

The link is from foxnews, don't click on it if you need to stay in your safe space.

Since you haven't included an opinion on this, should I assume you disagree with it?  Sounds quite sensible to me.  You actually do have larger problems than a former president's sex life.  What exactly are you taking issue with?  Or is it just that you're so desperate to smear the guy with something because you fear his chances of winning, you've taken to posting any headline that mentions his name and anything to do with sex?

Bernie Sanders: Bill Clinton’s Sexual History Not Fair Game


Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.) says attacks against former President Bill Clinton’s sexual history are not fair game for politicians looking to defeat his wife and Democratic primary front-runner Hillary Clinton.

“I think, you know, we have enormous problems facing this country, and I think we got more things to worry about than Bill Clinton’s sexual life,” Sanders said Sunday on ABC’s “This Week.”

Republican primary front-runner Donald Trump has recently made the sexual allegations against Clinton an issue in the White House race.

Sanders said Trump would be better off focusing on serious issues facing the nation, like climate change.


http://thehill.com/blogs/ballot-box/presidential-races/264608-sanders-bill-clintons-sexual-history-not-fair-game

^ Bad article. Technically correct. Those countries are welfare states. Not socialist. But same thing with bernie. His policies are not socialist. Most if not all. They are for a larger welfare state than america has now. Problem is america is so far to the right of the spectrum that most others are left wing and called socialist. Even if they aren't. Something like co-determination in germany would make american heads explode. And that's not socialism either.


If you vote for him you want what he offers. Isn't that how it's supposed to work?

Denmark Tells Bernie Sanders It's Had Enough Of His 'Socialist' Slurs


The Danes apparently have grown weary of Sen. Bernie Sanders insulting their country. Denmark is not a socialist nation, says its prime minister. It has a "market economy."

Sanders, the Democratic presidential candidate who calls himself a socialist, has used Denmark as the example of the socialist utopia he wants to create in America. During the Democrats' first debate last month, he said "we should look to countries like Denmark, like Sweden and Norway, and learn from what they have accomplished for their working people."

While appearing in New Hampshire in September, Sanders said that he had "talked to a guy from Denmark" who told him that in Denmark, "it is very hard to become very, very rich, but it's pretty hard to be very, very poor."

"And that makes a lot of sense to me."

So because something makes sense to him, he has the right to force that system on people who don't want it? Isn't that what he's saying?

But we digress. This is about Danes being offending by Sanders using the word "socialist" to describe their form of government. And who can blame them, especially when the free world has had enough of national socialists and Soviet socialists and North Korean socialists and Cuban socialists?

While speaking at Harvard's Kennedy School of Government, the center-right Danish Prime Minister Lars Lokke Rasmussen said he was aware "that some people in the U.S. associate the Nordic model with some sort of socialism."

"Therefore," he said, "I would like to make one thing clear. Denmark is far from a socialist planned economy. Denmark is a market economy."

Rasmussen acknowledged that "the Nordic model is an expanded welfare state which provides a high level of security to its citizens," but he also noted that it is "a successful market economy with much freedom to pursue your dreams and live your life as you wish."

To that we'll add that Sweden, another of Sanders' inspirations, has for decades quietly moved away from its cradle-to-grave form of government welfare. And the Swedes are better off for having done so, just as the Danes will continue to be better off as their government overhauls its welfare state.

If Sanders is going to continue to use these nations to guide his governing philosophy, he should base his policy positions on what they really are, not what he thinks they are or wants them to be. These countries have learned a harsh lesson. They don't deserve to be Berned again.


http://news.investors.com/blogs-capital-hill/110915-779664-denmark-tells-bernie-sanders-to-stop-calling-it-socialist.htm

Perhaps Sanders is gaining votes in the states which are having early primaries, and this might have made Hillary (and her Arab supporters) nervous. Anyway... I believe that Sanders will be a much better candidate when compared to Clinton, if Donald Trump becomes the GOP candidate. Sanders will be able to gain more neutral voters.

Clinton goes for the jugular after data breach

The front-runner prepped for a policy discussion, but after the data breach, she’s ready for a different kind of debate.



In a shift of strategy hours before the third Democratic debate, Hillary Clinton’s campaign went for Bernie Sanders’ jugular, accusing his team of stealing valuable campaign data, misrepresenting what happened and inflicting “damage here that cannot be undone.”

The offensive came after the Sanders camp admitted its staffers reviewed, searched and saved data from Clinton’s voter file made accessible briefly Wednesday because of a data breach -- and it represented a complete shift of tone in the Democratic race where the hits have remained impersonal and focused on the issues.


“This was not an inadvertent glimpse into our data,” campaign manager Robby Mook charged on a conference call with reporters Friday night. “The staffers did not make a mistake -- they made 25 intentional searches of our data.” He said the breach struck at the heart of the campaign’s data “that took millions of dollars and hundreds of thousands of volunteer hours to build. The voter file...is the fundamental basis of our strategy.”

And Clinton’s team was angry that Sanders tried to fundraise off the incident by acting like he was a victim of the Democratic National Committee. “Stop politicizing and work to ensure that what took place is remedied,” Mook said, even dropping that Sanders campaign may have broken the law.

The offensive play didn’t end there.

Clinton spokesman Brian Fallon followed with more personal attacks, accusing Sanders’ team of undertaking a “deliberate effort to muddy the waters as to what is going on here” and said their top campaign officials were leaving “wiggle room in their answers” as to whether they have retained any data that was accessed during the 40-minute breach.

The attacks from Clinton’s top campaign officials represented a rare moment of punching down against a candidate who is trailing them in national polls by more than 20 points, and foreshadowed an about-face in her debate strategy.

Until Friday, Clinton aimed to push Sanders aside by diminishing him as one-note candidate incapable of handling the demands of a crisis-a-day presidency. Clinton insiders had pointed with alarm to a recent campaign trip to Baltimore, where a Sanders spokeswoman warned reporters “don’t ask about ISIS today.”

“Compared to the other candidates, her bandwidth on the issues is extraordinary,” said Terry Shumaker, a loyal Clinton ally who chaired Bill Clinton’s two presidential campaigns in New Hampshire. “She’s done 18 town halls in New Hampshire and I think I’ve been to all of them. I have not seen a question yet that she hasn’t been able to master.”

The proposals Clinton highlighted in the walk-up to the debate had no binding theme other than showing off her ability to handle multiple issues simultaneously.

On Monday, she announced a plan to cut fees for immigrants seeking citizenship at a national immigration conference in Brooklyn. In Minneapolis Tuesday, the former secretary of state gave a foreign policy address building out her three-part plan to defeat ISIL. Less than 24 hours later, Clinton arrived in Omaha to campaign with billionaire Warren Buffett and talk tax reform, backing the Buffett Rule that would make individuals earning over $1 million pay 30 percent of their income in federal taxes.

“That’s the sort of thing that someone should be able to count on from the president, and that’s the sort of thing she can do,” campaign spokeswoman Christina Reynolds said, referring to Clinton’s ease in toggling between national and international issues. She declined to comment on Sanders.

Sanders’ campaign dismissed Clinton’s policy tour leading up to the Manchester debate as the moves of a candidate lacking an overarching message. “Is this the attempt to be spontaneous this week?” said Sanders spokesman Michael Briggs, scoffing at the implication that Sanders is a one-dimensional candidate.

“He’s answered questions on ISIS over and over and over again, and frankly has a better answer than some other people do,” Briggs said. “He’s been out there talking about the Middle East, regime change, terrorism, and judgment in foreign policy. Is her vote for the Iraq War the foreign policy they want to talk about?” Sanders has repeatedly charged that Clinton’s 2002 vote in favor of the invasion of Iraq led to the rise of ISIL and Al Qaeda in the region.

But when his spokeswoman warned reporters “don’t ask about ISIS today” as Sanders toured the neighborhood where Freddie Gray was killed in police custody, Clinton’s allies pounced.

Campaign surrogate Jennifer Cunningham, a partner at the consulting firm SKDKnickerbocker who sits on Clinton’s New York leadership council, posted a Washington Post article about Sanders’ “one-dimensional campaign” on Twitter, and wrote, “Great guy. Wrong office. Wrong time.”

Until the data breach ramped up tension, Cunningham’s comment was a rare direct shot at Sanders by a Clinton ally. Indeed, her campaign sees no upside in overtly targeting a liberal popular with the party’s base.

But the ghosts of 2008 also have them on high alert about being taken by surprise by Sanders’ near-native son status in New Hampshire, where he is currently leading by double digits in the polls, and his war chest of $26.2 million. In Iowa, Sanders remains within striking distance -- Clinton leads by just 9 points.

“The goal for her is to continue to do what she’s done: be strong on foreign policy, be strong on domestic policy and don’t let them land any punches,” said South Carolina Democratic Party chair Jaime Harrison, whose state will host the next debate in January. “It is up to Bernie Sanders and Martin O’Malley to land something. She can be above the fray, in a defensive posture, and use some of her time to beat up on the Republicans.”

With the energy of the race on the Republican side, however, Democrats have low expectations about the enthusiasm level for a Donald Trump-less debate showdown on the Saturday night before Christmas -- even with the drama of a major data breach unfolding as the candidates and their staffers traveled to Manchester.

“There’s a Democratic debate on Saturday?” political strategist and longtime Clinton ally James Carville half-joked. “You’ve got people at Trump rallies saying, ‘light someone on fire.’ It’s hard to get attention. There’s so much over there that’s so compelling.”


http://www.politico.com/story/2015/12/clintons-offense-will-be-personal-216962


--------------------------------------------------
That is why he has to be taken down.

^ yes. could have handled this without much fuss. This way it brings more attention to his campaign. And probably more followers. The establishment should have just continued with the no coverage of sander's campaign, very few debates, debates when no one will watch them strategy. Otherwise clinton may lose.

I don't understand why Clinton is getting so upset about Sanders. Till now, Sanders have failed to breach the Hillary firewall of African-American, Hispanic and LGBT voters, who make up the vast majority of the Democrat primary voters. His support is confined to the Blue-collar Non Hispanic White voters. So why Hillary is trying to elbow Sanders?

Bernie Sanders campaign manager blasts DNC for holding campaign 'hostage'


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hRB4rii3pRw

http://www.dailykos.com/stories/2015/12/18/1461437/-DNC-suspends-Sanders-campaign-s-voter-file-access-after-data-breach


-----------------------------------------------
Time for the bernies to vote for clinton, your queen bee...