Topic: ❃❃ ▶▷ BETCOIN.ag ◁◀ ❃❃#Signature Campaign-High Pay, Monthly Bonus, Special Award - page 3. (Read 151885 times)

Exactly. Because he was openly threatened and abused (just like all other betcoin.ag sig. users) by you, other crypto-games affiliates, and crypto-games manager Lutpin.

I talked to him the reason he left is because he was tired of this trolls on this thread talking about betcoin.ag reputation and he can't Ignore them he was a bit stressed also.
Also look @the post above mine you will find more.

same reason he removed his signature.  to preserve his reputation.

You only proved yourself to be a bully to an another person you know.


Tell me again why he's leaving ..

Actually, just before removing his signature and retiring from campaign he said this:



https://archive.is/gn6Zm 

Actually, he did so because he was threatened constantly if he was to remain, by you, crypto-games affiliates, and Lutpin - an underage scholar and manager of crypto-games.net that
is currently on DT. All this in order not to help jasonort or anyone else, but to try to eliminate crypto-games.net competition





So don't try to be anything else than a bully and a paid gun that you are.

Rossilinp offered to remove signature and leave campaign if anyone could prove Betcoin was dishonest.

Literally 10 minutes later he removed signature and announced he was leaving campaign.

Dear rosinpl thanks for accepting me. It will a honor to promote the signature of betcoin. Its feels nice to be part of this signature.

100% He's a liar.
He's just a jr. Member and pretending like he knows everything what's happening around.
Trolls like him is the reason " roslinpl " Left his post of campaign manager.
When i asked him what's the reason for saying farewell to the job of campaign manager,
he replied trolls are always posting nonsense and he can't always reply to them.
After all he got a life to live not just this forum.

Of course Twitchy is going to spam this thread.  He's been not only spamming my thread, but spamming EVERY single post that I make.  There's multiple instances where Twitchy's made wrong assumptions of me and went on with it.

Here's how some of my players feel about his posts in my thread yet he continues to spam for malicious reasons, and he's even acknowledged to me he's purposely being malicious and "attacking" me.







When a player of mine posted this:


He immediately quoted a review that he made over 1 year ago in an attempt to shame him.  But that was 1 year ago, so clearly that means his opinion of the poker room has changed.



And also another example of Twitchy attacking my players.  When one of my players made this comment in the SWC thread, a totally valid comment:


Twitchy sarcastically assumed he was "shilly" and then used one of his alternates/co-conspirator to give him a bad feedback, the same alternate he used to give me a bad feedback after he already gave me a malicious false feedback awhile ago.






Some more of my players telling him to stop spamming my service thread and their opinions of him:



If he has Asperger's or any other mental disability, he shouldn't be in the position he's in, cause his hit or miss tactics of calling out people and businesses could really hurt someone.  His obnoxiousness and mental instability pretty much outweighs his "scam alerts."  

There's more players who've spoken out about him, and people have said stuff to me in private about him which I won't post, but the reason he started to upset me was not because of his issues with Betcoin and Betsoft.  I personally believe Betsoft was incredibly unethical in the way they handled the Jasonort situation.  But he continues to attack my rakeback program by spamming the Betsoft issue and bringing up old poker room issues (that he had gotten wrong anyway).


Some evidence of Twitchy having alternates:







His actions aren't any better than the recipients of his accusations.  He abuses the little power that he's gained from sitting at the computer nearly 24/7 and calling out businesses with his hit or miss tactics.  

He clearly knew that the CardsChat review of Betcoin Poker had already been removed, but he continued posting it everywhere as if it was still valid.  Anyone with common sense could see that that review was virtually gibberish.



He infers that the reason it was removed was because Betcoin bribed them, but he's got absolutely no proof.  And even if Betcoin did bribe them, that just means he's posting the review of a company that accepts bribes as if it has merit.

He assumes that just because some players are outraged at him, it is the work of Betcoin.  That is not true, the reason I began noticing him was because he continued to spam my thread, and lately with casino related issues that has nothing to do with my rakeback service nor the poker room.

PS: There's a lot more cases in the past where Twitchy had been adamant that he's correct and it turned out that his assumption was wrong.  

This just proves that you have no idea what you're talking about. Learn the meaning of words before you use them.


en.wikipedia.org


where did you register your bussiness ? Dont avoid the question


https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=874254 "Avoid this service. They cannot protect you with their "€90 for 1 year assistance service". You won't be protected by joining through their affiliate links either."

Liar, liar , pants on fire.


Now you do. 

Hello,

sorry for a late reviews but I was extremely busy and wasn't able to stay close to my PC during the last day.


All accounts has been reviewed.


Have a great day,
best regards.

The criminal laws and the false and misleading statements on their website approved that betcoin.ag is a fraud.


No. please explain?


Where did betcoin.ag register their business?


Game Protect is a non-profit organisation.


Thank you for the info, was not aware of.

I think you will be responded by the campaign manager after stage 8 is over.

He's Quite busy in counting the posts of users for the payment.
But not sure that you will be accepted or not.

EDIT : You might have to wait because i got a news that campaign manager has left the job.

So you might have to wait 1-2 weeks until everything is solved.

Thank you

If you sue someone who has not committed any tort against you then such case would get dismissed, and the dismissal would get upheld on appeal. This is true regardless of the fact that you can sue anyone for any reason whatsoever.

I dont receive anything PM , Betcoin.AG Let me know pls , thanks .

I can sue anyone who publicly committed the criminal offense of fraud, I do not need to be a victim of it.

Gladly, criminal laws and civil rights work based on facts and not on "thoughts". Imagine what a chaos it would be if they would depend on thoughts? This would at least require to introduce a thought police...  

Unless they defraud you, you do not have standing to sue them for fraud.

I don't think that betcoin has been proven to be a fraud, but would rather say that I strongly believe that betcoin is a fraud (scam).

Who approved betcoin ? Do you know the meaning of the word  ?

If we're gonna talk about criminal offences; where did you register your bussiness ? Did you report taxes on that income ?  Tax evasion is a criminal offence

A negative rating is only appropriate if you were either scammed by said person, or you strongly believe that said person is a scammer (see the description of negative ratings on everyone's trust page). I would argue that you should not leave a negative rating against someone unless they meet a fairly broad definition of scammer. 

This kind of activity implies that sockpuppets are being used, although it is also possible that these people are players who frequent betcoin and enjoy playing on their site (even the most scammy/unfair casinos/sites will have these types of people).

I also don't think the removing a paid signatures would necessarily prevent people from making these types of comments, nor would it prevent betcoin from paying bonuses for these types of comments. It would however make this kind of activity less transparent. It also appears that betcoin is not outright scamming all of their players, but is rather selectively scamming only some of their players (those that win their jackpots), so it is always possible that some of the people making these kinds of comments legitimately believe what they are saying.

I disagree. If someone is advertising a site that is an outright scam, then it is possible that someone could deposit funds to said site, and end up getting scammed.

Someone who were to leave negative trust because they are advertising a scammy business should be given some amount of grace period in order to do their own independent research and discuss said advertising. I think it is fairly clear that Lutpin is trying to make a name for himself, is trying to show that he is able to do whatever he wants in regards to leaving trust, and is a reflection of his immaturity.