❃❃ ▶▷ BETCOIN.ag ◁◀ ❃❃#Signature Campaign-High Pay, Monthly Bonus, Special Award - page 4.

kotwica666

legendary

Activity: 2282

Merit: 1035

Quote from: TwitchySeal on July 29, 2016, 11:55:07 PM

Quote from: kotwica666 on July 29, 2016, 11:41:39 PM

-snip-

why did you remove signature? You joined july 7th, you could of been getting paid i think, right?

As for your BIG PROBLEM, if you'd been watching my case for months, how did you miss all the evidence I've posted? Or Betcoins response (or lack of)?

Edit: If you'd like to make a direct accusation or question, I'd be happy to respond directly to it, about any issue I've brought up including evidence I've presented. Something Betcoin clearly is not willing to do.

I remove my signature just because i dont have time to fight with so big branch like gambling industry - i have more then 30 screenshots against other casino (most similar name that is possible.. Wink

but after one month of fight i just give up..

The fact that it is professional action, and what you do, reminds me of it. I hope you earn good for the operation of this account ..

Edit. Maybe i will say more: everyday my gambling budget is between 100 - 300 euro .. i just dont have time to talk about mistakes. If something smells like this action i just left it.

TwitchySeal

legendary

Activity: 2716

Merit: 2093

Join the world-leading crypto sportsbook NOW!

Quote from: kotwica666 on July 29, 2016, 11:41:39 PM

-snip-

why did you remove signature? You joined july 7th, you could of been getting paid i think, right?

As for your BIG PROBLEM, if you'd been watching my case for months, how did you miss all the evidence I've posted? Or Betcoins response (or lack of)?

Edit: If you'd like to make a direct accusation or question, I'd be happy to respond directly to it, about any issue I've brought up including evidence I've presented. Something Betcoin clearly is not willing to do.

kotwica666

legendary

Activity: 2282

Merit: 1035

Quote from: TwitchySeal on July 29, 2016, 10:02:14 PM

Quote from: ajareselde on July 29, 2016, 09:55:03 AM

For example - from Theymos : "Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction. Advertise here."

If betcoin.ag was to advertize using paid forum ads (which is highly likely) , which one of you will threaten Theymos or BadBear with negatives for advertising them ?!

Fwiw, a staff member actually joined this campaign recently. I called them out for it in meta (for not doing the research) and they left within a few days.

If Betcoin were allowed to advertise anywhere on this forum, I would call out whoever was responsible. (like I have here)

As i watch "your case" from months, there is one BIG problem: There still is word against word, so in other words it is PAT. There is no option to say who is good and who is bad. ..and i think you know that.. and what is worst - you use that!

I'm here to tell people that gambling that's very big business, and many "trustworthy" people will want to show how good they are.

Most important thing for all Bitcointalk users: Don't trust nobody online! If someone is trying to show that is trying to protect you.. in other words - he just want to fuck you up more!

kotwica666

legendary

Activity: 2282

Merit: 1035

Im sure that this conversation is between players.. more - between experienced players! In my private opinion this is fight between competition and most 'accounts' are involved in advertisement campaigns on bitcointalk.

"Dirty games around."

Lutpin - with all respect - everyone easily can check that you are alt account of CryptoGames - so competition! How the hell you can be objective part of this disscussion?

Edit: Just to realize you: You broke the basic rules of ethic. Just think about that..

Ps. We should disscuss that in PM, but you didn't answer my message.

TwitchySeal

legendary

Activity: 2716

Merit: 2093

Join the world-leading crypto sportsbook NOW!

Quote from: ajareselde on July 29, 2016, 09:55:03 AM

For example - from Theymos : "Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction. Advertise here."

If betcoin.ag was to advertize using paid forum ads (which is highly likely) , which one of you will threaten Theymos or BadBear with negatives for advertising them ?!

Fwiw, a staff member actually joined this campaign recently. I called them out for it in meta (for not doing the research) and they left within a few days.

If Betcoin were allowed to advertise anywhere on this forum, I would call out whoever was responsible. (like I have here)

Lutpin

copper member

Activity: 1904

Merit: 1874

Goodbye, Z.

Quote from: ajareselde on July 29, 2016, 09:55:03 AM

If betcoin.ag was to advertize using paid forum ads (which is highly likely) , which one of you will threaten Theymos or BadBear with negatives for advertising them ?!

Neither. Betcoin.AG is in their current state not allowed to advertise on the forum.

Quote from: theymos on July 29, 2016, 07:43:58 PM

Quote from: Betcoin.AG on July 29, 2016, 04:01:10 PM

5 @ 0.9

Sorry, but you currently have negative trust from my perspective, so I will not accept your bid.

TwitchySeal

legendary

Activity: 2716

Merit: 2093

Join the world-leading crypto sportsbook NOW!

Quote from: Quickseller on July 29, 2016, 01:21:13 PM

2) There is nothing in advertising betcoin by "normal" users that makes them a scammer.

I hate to use the word "scammer" because it usually results in a debate over the definition of the word.

But, advertising for Betcoin at this point can only be due to ignorance (intentional or not) or blatant disregard for the consequences of your decisions in exchange for money.

Quote from: Quickseller on July 29, 2016, 01:21:13 PM

There is no reason that someone should trust betcoin simply because some random user is advertising for them.

Imo it's not the actual signature wearing that makes this campaign worth over BTC6 a month to Betcoin. It's the way (many of) the sig campaign members will say or do anything to impress Betcoin who, in turn, rewards them with bonuses privately. It creates this false "yay Betcoin, we are #1" hype among members who are mostly not even players on the site.

Quote from: Quickseller on July 29, 2016, 01:21:13 PM

3) If 2 was untrue, then there is no reason why participants should be allowed to continue to wear their signatures until the end of the payment period. You should either receive negative trust for wearing an advertisement or you don't.

I agree with you in principle, but I also think Lutpin is making the right choice on a human level by giving fair warning and allowing people to get paid and go find another more ethical campaign. If he were to just drop the hammer mid-month there would be even 10x more drama than there is now.

Quote from: poptok1 on July 29, 2016, 01:29:28 PM

By throwing that "name" you just lost the game, sir Roll Eyes

Ok, gg then, idiot.

poptok1

hero member

Activity: 1638

Merit: 756

Bobby Fischer was right

Quote from: TwitchySeal on July 29, 2016, 12:42:47 PM

Keep reading idiot.

Here, i'll help you.

Quote from: FruitsBasket on July 29, 2016, 01:41:21 AM

Quote from: jasonort on July 29, 2016, 12:44:55 AM

Quote from: TwitchySeal on July 27, 2016, 05:55:51 PM

"deleted all my posts" This is a lie! This post is still there so what are you talking about?
Are you calling me an idiot, for not knowing about some meaningless post from this morning? I dont know from witch third country you are coming from but in my State those kinds of names are against the law of defamation. 3years in prison is proposed by codex.
Learn what eristic is and come back to the world, when you are ready to interact with other human beings.
By throwing that "name" you just lost the game, sir Roll Eyes

NOTE
By quoting this jasonort guy, you may bring him harm. He ASKED not to being quoted for a reason, maybe his deal with betsoft will be broken? You want to ruin his thing?
Please turn of emotions, OK? Those are for women...

Quickseller

copper member

Activity: 2996

Merit: 2374

Quote from: cartell0 on July 29, 2016, 01:06:17 PM

Quote from: Quickseller on July 29, 2016, 07:26:41 AM

Quote from: Lutpin on July 29, 2016, 07:19:21 AM

Retaliation feedbacks are one of the worst things you can do, they completely destroy a persons credibility...

Says the person who leaves retaliatory negative feedback Cheesy

I think it is ridiculous to say that participants will receive negative feedback after "they get paid next". It is either appropriate to advertise for them or not, regardless of the timing of payment for advertising.

I don't think anyone should advertise for betcoin, however I would not go as far as to say that anyone who advertises for them is a scammer, I think anyone who advertises for them would lack credibility in my eyes though.

Then why the fuck Cryptodevil leaves ridiculous negative feedback to members who are engaged in some sort of ponzi schemes? Its already mentioned to use your 'caveat emptor' above the investor based games section?

I think the participants who will still advertise this shit scam Betcoin.ag they definitely deserve a negative feedback in a way to inform other people that the site is not trusted at all, in contradiction to the signature they are wearing.

Dont be a fucking hypocrite Quickseller! Lutpin is doing the right thing as cryptodevil does in the investor based section.
Betcoin.ag is no less than those ponzi biz sites!

1) I said that I don't think that anyone should be advertising betcoin.

2) There is nothing in advertising betcoin by "normal" users that makes them a scammer. There is no reason that someone should trust betcoin simply because some random user is advertising for them. If you have significant amounts of influence in the industry of the company you are advertising then it would be different.

3) If 2 was untrue, then there is no reason why participants should be allowed to continue to wear their signatures until the end of the payment period. You should either receive negative trust for wearing an advertisement or you don't.

4) cryptodevil gives out negative trust because, at best, he does not agree with what people are saying in the ponzi section. More or less all of the people cryptodevil has left negative trust against are in any way scammers.

cartell0

newbie

Activity: 54

Merit: 0

Quote from: Quickseller on July 29, 2016, 07:26:41 AM

Quote from: Lutpin on July 29, 2016, 07:19:21 AM

Retaliation feedbacks are one of the worst things you can do, they completely destroy a persons credibility...

Says the person who leaves retaliatory negative feedback Cheesy

I think it is ridiculous to say that participants will receive negative feedback after "they get paid next". It is either appropriate to advertise for them or not, regardless of the timing of payment for advertising.

I don't think anyone should advertise for betcoin, however I would not go as far as to say that anyone who advertises for them is a scammer, I think anyone who advertises for them would lack credibility in my eyes though.

Then why the fuck Cryptodevil leaves ridiculous negative feedback to members who are engaged in some sort of ponzi schemes? Its already mentioned to use your 'caveat emptor' above the investor based games section?

I think the participants who will still advertise this shit scam Betcoin.ag they definitely deserve a negative feedback in a way to inform other people that the site is not trusted at all, in contradiction to the signature they are wearing.

https://i.imgur.com/dPi2UeO.jpg

Dont be a fucking hypocrite Quickseller! Lutpin is doing the right thing as cryptodevil does in the investor based section.
Betcoin.ag is no less than those ponzi biz sites!

TwitchySeal

legendary

Activity: 2716

Merit: 2093

Join the world-leading crypto sportsbook NOW!

Quote from: poptok1 on July 29, 2016, 10:54:52 AM

Quote from: DarkStar_ on July 29, 2016, 10:10:28 AM

Your actually going to use the jasonort quote as valid feedback? Funny, since there is also this post, which betcoin has still not responded to, and banned people for bumping it. https://www.betcoin.ag/setting-record-straight
Lets see, he wrote

Quote

I am contractually bound not to comment in regards to BetSoft.

That post was likely made as part of the contract, to get his settlement.

He(jasonort) also asked politely not to be quoted on outside forums...
...so much for the respect of others requests I guess.
If you read his post, you can clearly feel that this guy has nothing against
Betcoin, he is still using it, he gives thanks to the crew for helping etc.
Only bad thing he has to say about Betcoin is its PR management.
jasonort-case is closed.Finished with success so stop spamming with it.

Keep reading idiot.

Here, i'll help you.

Quote from: FruitsBasket on July 29, 2016, 01:41:21 AM

Quote from: jasonort on July 29, 2016, 12:44:55 AM

Quote from: TwitchySeal on July 27, 2016, 05:55:51 PM

Betcoin.ag has just erased my entire post on their forums. I gave them every opportunity to explain their side of this. I did not throw them under the bus. I was civil. And now they erase my post and just expect me to disappear? Game on.

I think you should perform action against them, you should fight them into court since the amount u have won is alot and should no matter what be paid to you. Betcoin.ag is a scam company, they only pay small winnings.

TwitchySeal

legendary

Activity: 2716

Merit: 2093

Join the world-leading crypto sportsbook NOW!

Quote from: roslinpl on July 29, 2016, 07:32:22 AM

Quote from: Lutpin on July 29, 2016, 07:26:40 AM

Is that the reason why you stopped working for them?

I'm leaving because I'm sick of trolls and people like you who help the trolls to troll.

Quote from: jasonort on July 06, 2016, 07:03:01 PM

I want to thank Betcoin.ag staff for helping me come to a resolution with BetSoft on the matter of my spin on "The Glam Life". I have said in my forum posts on bitcointalk.org and other places that my issue was with BetSoft and not Betcoin. Andrew and the staff at Betcoin.ag have always been good to me, and have continued to support me in this matter with BetSoft. They were unfortunately caught in the middle of this situation as the BetSoft slots are played directly on BetSoft servers, and they not Betcoin.ag decide the payouts for the slots. Andrew has helped to connect me with BetSoft, and today we have come to a mutually agreed upon settlement. This settlement is confidential, so please don't ask the details. I will continue to play with Betcoin.ag, and hold no ill feelings towards them, quite the contrary. I look forward to continuing my relationship with Betcoin.ag and feel very good about their actions in helping me to resolve this matter.

You're leaving for the same reason you removed their signature. To avoid damaging your reputation.

giagge

legendary

Activity: 1134

Merit: 1001

Quote from: Betcoin.AG on November 03, 2015, 02:45:37 PM

HOW TO JOIN:

To join our campaign click the reply button and write a post where you will include an information "that you would like to join".
You don't have to write your current post count, Bitcoin address or anything else only to express interest in joining.

Soon after that you will be automatically forwarded to the recruitment process, in which campaign manager will choose only the best posters.
You will receive an answer to accept or reject your candidacy and further instructions via a forum's private message.

I'd like to join the signature campaign .

borgobio

full member

Activity: 238

Merit: 100

I'd like to join the campaign Cheesy

poptok1

hero member

Activity: 1638

Merit: 756

Bobby Fischer was right

Quote from: DarkStar_ on July 29, 2016, 10:10:28 AM

Your actually going to use the jasonort quote as valid feedback? Funny, since there is also this post, which betcoin has still not responded to, and banned people for bumping it. https://www.betcoin.ag/setting-record-straight
Lets see, he wrote

Quote

I am contractually bound not to comment in regards to BetSoft.

That post was likely made as part of the contract, to get his settlement.

He(jasonort) also asked politely not to be quoted on outside forums...
...so much for the respect of others requests I guess.
If you read his post, you can clearly feel that this guy has nothing against
Betcoin, he is still using it, he gives thanks to the crew for helping etc.
Only bad thing he has to say about Betcoin is its PR management.
jasonort-case is closed.Finished with success so stop spamming with it.

DarkStar_

legendary

Activity: 2772

Merit: 3284

Quote from: ajareselde on July 29, 2016, 09:55:03 AM

For example - from Theymos : "Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction. Advertise here."

If betcoin.ag was to advertize using paid forum ads (which is highly likely) , which one of you will threaten Theymos or BadBear with negatives for advertising them ?!

No one, because the bottom of the forum ad says

Quote from: roslinpl on July 29, 2016, 07:32:22 AM

I'm leaving because I'm sick of trolls and people like you who help the trolls to troll.

Quote from: jasonort on July 06, 2016, 07:03:01 PM

I want to thank Betcoin.ag staff for helping me come to a resolution with BetSoft on the matter of my spin on "The Glam Life". I have said in my forum posts on bitcointalk.org and other places that my issue was with BetSoft and not Betcoin. Andrew and the staff at Betcoin.ag have always been good to me, and have continued to support me in this matter with BetSoft. They were unfortunately caught in the middle of this situation as the BetSoft slots are played directly on BetSoft servers, and they not Betcoin.ag decide the payouts for the slots. Andrew has helped to connect me with BetSoft, and today we have come to a mutually agreed upon settlement. This settlement is confidential, so please don't ask the details. I will continue to play with Betcoin.ag, and hold no ill feelings towards them, quite the contrary. I look forward to continuing my relationship with Betcoin.ag and feel very good about their actions in helping me to resolve this matter.

Your actually going to use the jasonort quote as valid feedback? Funny, since there is also this post, which betcoin has still not responded to, and banned people for bumping it. https://www.betcoin.ag/setting-record-straight
Lets see, he wrote that he is bound by a contract to not talk about Betsoft.
That post you quoted was likely made as part of the contract, to get his settlement.

STAGE 10 SPECIAL BONUS

It's a pleasure to announce that Lutpin has a special bonus for everyone who will participate during the Stage 10
of Betcoin.ag Signature Campaign.

A nice, shiny -VE Trust rating

The trust rating runs all day, everyday, and can be seen by anyone using Depth 2+ on bitcointalk!

ajareselde

legendary

Activity: 1722

Merit: 1000

Satoshi is rolling in his grave. #bitcoin

For example - from Theymos : "Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction. Advertise here."

If betcoin.ag was to advertize using paid forum ads (which is highly likely) , which one of you will threaten Theymos or BadBear with negatives for advertising them ?!

uki

legendary

Activity: 1358

Merit: 1000

cryptojunk bag holder

I was away for more or less two weeks and now I came back and saw that roslin is leaving as a campaign manager. First of all, very sad to see you leave, as you are an excellent campaign manager. Secondly, what happens to the campaign in the next stage?

roslinpl

legendary

Activity: 2212

Merit: 1199

Quote from: Lutpin on July 29, 2016, 07:26:40 AM

Is that the reason why you stopped working for them?

I'm leaving because I'm sick of trolls and people like you who help the trolls to troll.

Quote from: jasonort on July 06, 2016, 07:03:01 PM

I want to thank Betcoin.ag staff for helping me come to a resolution with BetSoft on the matter of my spin on "The Glam Life". I have said in my forum posts on bitcointalk.org and other places that my issue was with BetSoft and not Betcoin. Andrew and the staff at Betcoin.ag have always been good to me, and have continued to support me in this matter with BetSoft. They were unfortunately caught in the middle of this situation as the BetSoft slots are played directly on BetSoft servers, and they not Betcoin.ag decide the payouts for the slots. Andrew has helped to connect me with BetSoft, and today we have come to a mutually agreed upon settlement. This settlement is confidential, so please don't ask the details. I will continue to play with Betcoin.ag, and hold no ill feelings towards them, quite the contrary. I look forward to continuing my relationship with Betcoin.ag and feel very good about their actions in helping me to resolve this matter.

Quickseller

copper member

Activity: 2996

Merit: 2374

Quote from: Lutpin on July 29, 2016, 07:19:21 AM

Retaliation feedbacks are one of the worst things you can do, they completely destroy a persons credibility...

Says the person who leaves retaliatory negative feedback Cheesy

I think it is ridiculous to say that participants will receive negative feedback after "they get paid next". It is either appropriate to advertise for them or not, regardless of the timing of payment for advertising.

I don't think anyone should advertise for betcoin, however I would not go as far as to say that anyone who advertises for them is a scammer, I think anyone who advertises for them would lack credibility in my eyes though.

Topic: ❃❃ ▶▷ BETCOIN.ag ◁◀ ❃❃#Signature Campaign-High Pay, Monthly Bonus, Special Award - page 4. (Read 151880 times)