If Nicholas Jackson disappoints me further, I will definitely consider Son Heung-min.
That would be an easy switch if Son was forward in the game. Unfortunately he is midfielder and there is so many good midfielders this season. I just can't get rid of any I already have even though my trust in United could cost me big. Rashford to Son looks nice but I wouldn't be surprised if Rashford outscores Son in next couple of games. 
Topic: 🦊 Betnomi.com | FPL Football Pool ⚽ Discussion Thread - page 179. (Read 51559 times)
Son is a great asset if he continues at ST, but it's a bit of a chance right now, so I'm going to wait till after the Sheffield, Arsenal, and Liverpool games to see if he's still playing as ST, then I can easily get him.
I missed that Burnley vs Tottenham game because I was busy watching Chelsea play against Nottingham Forest. The last game I watched Tottenham play was against Manchester United, and Son Heung-min played from the left just as he had played for them in all the games that Tottenham have played in the EPL this season with Richarlison the big flop playing ST. If Son Heung-min scored three goals in his first opportunity of playing ST for the team, then Angelos Postecoglou should let him keep that position that he has earned. If Nicholas Jackson disappoints me further, I will definitely consider Son Heung-min.
Son scored a Hattrick, and 384k managers are already twerking for him. Lol. The number one rule of this game is to not panic. Spurs plays Arsenal and Liverpool after Sheffield united.
Son is a bit of special story, he did not just score a lot of points like Sterling did a week before. He actually played as a striker which is a position much better suited for him then far on the left. Now somebody will say that he played on the left with Kane all the time, but that isn't the same position. With Kane in the team dropping deep, Son was quite central while wings in this new Spurs provide width and have very little goal threat. That position change if permanent could make Son indispensable to our clubs and if I had an easy way to get him into my team or a midfielder I don't longer want in my team I would transfer him in this week.Son is a great asset if he continues at ST, but it's a bit of a chance right now, so I'm going to wait till after the Sheffield, Arsenal, and Liverpool games to see if he's still playing as ST, then I can easily get him.
On side note; With Manchester United's injuries and internal issues, I would struggle to keep both Bruno and Rashford for GW5. I have £2.4 million in the bank to meet any unexpected expenses. Who knows I'm tempted to bring in Son for Rashford.
Son is a bit of special story, he did not just score a lot of points like Sterling did a week before. He actually played as a striker which is a position much better suited for him then far on the left. Now somebody will say that he played on the left with Kane all the time, but that isn't the same position. With Kane in the team dropping deep, Son was quite central while wings in this new Spurs provide width and have very little goal threat. That position change if permanent could make Son indispensable to our clubs and if I had an easy way to get him into my team or a midfielder I don't longer want in my team I would transfer him in this week.
I for once felt Richarlison would be firing on all cylinders now, but he can't even get himself established at the main center striker, and Harry Kane might have left but the arrival of Maddison would make it rather tougher for either of Son or Richarlison whichever of them can't holding the No. 9 position properly because there's no one getting Maddison off that No. 10 role, and if both of them can't make rain goals anymore then perhaps Postecoglou might just pull his wild card up early, I mean with Veliz Alejo, could EPL have another Erling Haaland in sight ??
-snip
That position change if permanent could make Son indispensable to our clubs and if I had an easy way to get him into my team or a midfielder I don't longer want in my team I would transfer him in this week.
That position change if permanent could make Son indispensable to our clubs and if I had an easy way to get him into my team or a midfielder I don't longer want in my team I would transfer him in this week.
thought about that, and close to do it, but I don't like bringing in players after they score much points in previous rounds, it looks quite rookie, and usually doesn't pay-off
with all said, I have goal/attack settled for season, if there is no injuries, but midfield is still under construction, and defense is still fragile
main obstacle is that i pledged to have three Everton players, and they play as shit so far, hope that will change in meantime
I guess it's the curse of the new managers - I'm also incredibly trigger-happy. I'm paying it by a lot already.
I went with van Hecke instead of Tierney after GW1, replacing a 4points player. If I did not do that, in GW2 I'd replace Tierney with Gusto, because James got injured.
Considering that I did not have that transfer available, I did it in GW3 when I wanted to exchange Rashford for Son - which I still did not do.
This is a really good example on how 1 really stupid transfer (neither Lamptey or van Hecke would ever be in my starting team) continuously hurts you going forward. It's a mistake I won't repeat with some experience under my belt.
Perfect example really. Transfers are incredibly important and it helps if you look at free transfer as -4 as well. It is never good to spend it on sideways move and bench positions and almost never on goalkeepers.I went with van Hecke instead of Tierney after GW1, replacing a 4points player. If I did not do that, in GW2 I'd replace Tierney with Gusto, because James got injured.
Considering that I did not have that transfer available, I did it in GW3 when I wanted to exchange Rashford for Son - which I still did not do.
This is a really good example on how 1 really stupid transfer (neither Lamptey or van Hecke would ever be in my starting team) continuously hurts you going forward. It's a mistake I won't repeat with some experience under my belt.
That being said, if you really want some player and you feel he will make your team better in the long run, take that -4 penalty. I even made -12 penalties which paid off really well in the past. Granted that was usually in double game weeks when you have a high chance of immediate payoff.
Son scored a Hattrick, and 384k managers are already twerking for him. Lol. The number one rule of this game is to not panic. Spurs plays Arsenal and Liverpool after Sheffield united.
Son is a bit of special story, he did not just score a lot of points like Sterling did a week before. He actually played as a striker which is a position much better suited for him then far on the left. Now somebody will say that he played on the left with Kane all the time, but that isn't the same position. With Kane in the team dropping deep, Son was quite central while wings in this new Spurs provide width and have very little goal threat. That position change if permanent could make Son indispensable to our clubs and if I had an easy way to get him into my team or a midfielder I don't longer want in my team I would transfer him in this week. 
I guess it's the curse of the new managers - I'm also incredibly trigger-happy. I'm paying it by a lot already.
I went with van Hecke instead of Tierney after GW1, replacing a 4points player. If I did not do that, in GW2 I'd replace Tierney with Gusto, because James got injured.
Considering that I did not have that transfer available, I did it in GW3 when I wanted to exchange Rashford for Son - which I still did not do.
This is a really good example on how 1 really stupid transfer (neither Lamptey or van Hecke would ever be in my starting team) continuously hurts you going forward. It's a mistake I won't repeat with some experience under my belt.
I went with van Hecke instead of Tierney after GW1, replacing a 4points player. If I did not do that, in GW2 I'd replace Tierney with Gusto, because James got injured.
Considering that I did not have that transfer available, I did it in GW3 when I wanted to exchange Rashford for Son - which I still did not do.
This is a really good example on how 1 really stupid transfer (neither Lamptey or van Hecke would ever be in my starting team) continuously hurts you going forward. It's a mistake I won't repeat with some experience under my belt.
Son is the most transfer in so far 384k managers transferred him in for GW 5 isn't it too early for someone who is on an international break? I mean injury concern.
That is always the problem with casual managers, jumping on transfers early and raising/dropping price. Then you have an option to do the smart thing, wait until last moment and just accept you will lose 0.2M while waiting or jump in like the rest of the pack and try to use that price raise to your advantage. Tried both options and I feel like if your team is doing badly then some early transfers aren't that bad since they will raise your squad value. On the other hand if your team is doing well just suck it up and don't risk it.Problem is it will work for you few times and then you will jump on wrong player that gets injured or leaves to Saudi Arabia which will cost you much more in transfer points.
All that is only applicable in first part of the season, in later stages I will never do early transfer, squad value then isn't so important and injuries are happening much more often do to fatigue and fixture congestion.
At last, there are two types of FPL managers: those who want to make early moves to beat the price and those who prefer to wait patiently and gather information before making a transfer. Those managers (1) who worry a lot about the squad value, in my experience, often fall short on points, whereas the latter are constantly on top of their game.
Son scored a Hattrick, and 384k managers are already twerking for him. Lol. The number one rule of this game is to not panic. Spurs plays Arsenal and Liverpool after Sheffield united.
Edit: For instance I just read that Gabriel Jesus has been injured yesterday for Brazil and he was one of the players I was looking to bring in
Gotta feel sorry for the 58k managers who transferred him in after the Manchester united game. 
Son is the most transfer in so far 384k managers transferred him in for GW 5 isn't it too early for someone who is on an international break? I mean injury concern.
That is always the problem with casual managers, jumping on transfers early and raising/dropping price. Then you have an option to do the smart thing, wait until last moment and just accept you will lose 0.2M while waiting or jump in like the rest of the pack and try to use that price raise to your advantage. Tried both options and I feel like if your team is doing badly then some early transfers aren't that bad since they will raise your squad value. On the other hand if your team is doing well just suck it up and don't risk it.Problem is it will work for you few times and then you will jump on wrong player that gets injured or leaves to Saudi Arabia which will cost you much more in transfer points.
All that is only applicable in first part of the season, in later stages I will never do early transfer, squad value then isn't so important and injuries are happening much more often do to fatigue and fixture congestion.
Edit: For instance I just read that Gabriel Jesus has been injured yesterday for Brazil and he was one of the players I was looking to bring in
Salah+ Mitoma = £19m
Rashford+ Saka = £18.6m
Which combo is better?
Rashford+ Saka = £18.6m
Which combo is better?
Rashford and Saka are in form right now. That's the better option if you ask me, because you can't put 12.5 million Salah in your squad without major surgery.
So I guess save him for your Free Hit.
Salah + Mitoma has a combination of 87.9% ICT index and 46 total points from last 4 games.
Rashford + Saka has a combination of 81.3% ICT index and 44 points from last 4 games.
Option B is what I will go for irrespective of their fixtures anyday anytime, it gives you flexibility and you can easily swap between players.
Son is the most transfer in so far 384k managers transferred him in for GW 5 isn't it too early for someone who is on an international break? I mean injury concern.
Salah+ Mitoma = £19m
Rashford+ Saka = £18.6m
Which combo is better?
Rashford+ Saka = £18.6m
Which combo is better?
Rashford and Saka are in form right now. That's the better option if you ask me, because you can't put 12.5 million Salah in your squad without major surgery.
So I guess save him for your Free Hit.
Salah+ Mitoma = £19m
Rashford+ Saka = £18.6m
Which combo is better?
Rashford+ Saka = £18.6m
Which combo is better?
Without checking their fixtures, it will be a very hard call to make for me, because It could easily Salah over Rashford for majority of the time, but so it is with how I would easily pick Saka over Mitoma in equal fixtures too, Saka is on penalties and is certain to be on field all day long as well, so both combo makes up for each other one way or the other, but if the fixtures are even, I might go for the cautiously moderate one of Rashford + Saka, then take that +0.4m advantage to go for an additional upgrade across the squad that could potentially make up for any short coming of the choice, if there happen to be one, or an upgrade that could get me the extra point if both combo were to be an even one.
Which combo is better?
Difficult to choose for me. Rashford+ Saka = £18.6m
Rashford can blank in games and they can completely be kept calm by some defenders. Salah+ Mitoma = £19m
With way Liverpool are playing, Salah will have another successful season for the club, Mitoma is good, but just like Saka and Rashford, some very good defenders can keep him quiet. With Kane gone, any team would struggle to make it through the entire season without Salah. I've never started a season with him, but I always end up with him at the end. Halaand is the only permanent player on my team right now, and things will only change if there is an injury or a City blank week.
A midfield of
Salah+ Mitoma = £19m
Rashford+ Saka = £18.6m
Which combo is better?
I know you asked it as rhetoric question but I really don't know, it depends a lot on fixtures and form as well. If I was picking now I would change Mitoma for Mbuemo or if he is too expensive for your calculation than to Diaby. I would also probably chose Son over Rashford.A midfield of
Salah+ Mitoma = £19m
Rashford+ Saka = £18.6m
Which combo is better?
My biggest problem with Salah is his price point. He is the only one around 12.5M and it is difficult to get him in or out of the team. If you don't like Mitoma, it is easy transfer to Diaby, Mbuemo, March, Eze and bunch of other players. If you don't like Rashford you can go to Son or small downgrade to Diaz, Madison, Fernandez... Getting Salah in or out usually costs 3 transfers which is problematic.
Perhaps I should have rephrased the question as to which combination will outperform at the end of the season.
I agree with you on Salah; he was easy to manage and switch to KDB whenever fixtures were not going well last season, and vice versa, since both players were in the £12-12.5m region. But it's difficult to own him now, and it's much harder to get rid of him without taking a hit. I'd rather stay with one of the many versatile midfield choices available.
With Kane gone, any team would struggle to make it through the entire season without Salah. I've never started a season with him, but I always end up with him at the end. Halaand is the only permanent player on my team right now, and things will only change if there is an injury or a City blank week.
A midfield of
Salah+ Mitoma = £19m
Rashford+ Saka = £18.6m
Which combo is better?
I know you asked it as rhetoric question but I really don't know, it depends a lot on fixtures and form as well. If I was picking now I would change Mitoma for Mbuemo or if he is too expensive for your calculation than to Diaby. I would also probably chose Son over Rashford.A midfield of
Salah+ Mitoma = £19m
Rashford+ Saka = £18.6m
Which combo is better?
My biggest problem with Salah is his price point. He is the only one around 12.5M and it is difficult to get him in or out of the team. If you don't like Mitoma, it is easy transfer to Diaby, Mbuemo, March, Eze and bunch of other players. If you don't like Rashford you can go to Son or small downgrade to Diaz, Madison, Fernandez... Getting Salah in or out usually costs 3 transfers which is problematic.
Math for Salah is actually really simple, you just have to answer yourself one simple question. Will you captain him instead of Haaland in some games? If your answer is no, stay away, his price is so high because of his consistency and safe minutes in top club plus his captain appeal.
I think he is good play after GW9 when Liverpool starts their great fixture run.
There are at least 10 games where Salah has the captaincy advantage over Haaland (and yes.. I only chose him because I would alternate captaincy).I think he is good play after GW9 when Liverpool starts their great fixture run.
By the way, he is currently the only player who has had a scoring touch in all 4 game weeks.
With Kane gone, any team would struggle to make it through the entire season without Salah. I've never started a season with him, but I always end up with him at the end. Halaand is the only permanent player on my team right now, and things will only change if there is an injury or a City blank week.
A midfield of
Salah+ Mitoma = £19m
Rashford+ Saka = £18.6m
Which combo is better?
Liverpool made a start to the season above expectations. However I don't think that they are that good when it comes to their game. They were nearly not on the pitch in the second half of the Chelsea match. And even though the win they got against Newcastle was magnificent I don't think they deserved that win. However I want to add Salah to my squad very much as he managed to make score contribution in some way even in the matches Liverpool played badly. However it isn't possible for me to do this now due to his price.
For me, Liverpool is the team that will score the most goals this season. That is why I captained Salah and why I went with Diaz as well.
They went all-in on the offensive, with 2 of their 3 starting midfielders being players who did not have many defensive duties in their former teams.In offensive part of the game TAA becomes a deep-lying playmaker, which will give more freedom to Szoboszlai and MacAllister.
I agree Liverpool looked ridiculous against Chelsea when Chelsea took the ball, but check for example how we pressed in our last game against Villa.
It takes some time for new players to gel together and I do agree Liverpool will probably have some stupid defeats along the way - but they have the ability to run at you 100+ minutes, with 2 quality offensive players on the bench just waiting to be given the chance to play.
Liverpool made a start to the season above expectations. However I don't think that they are that good when it comes to their game. They were nearly not on the pitch in the second half of the Chelsea match. And even though the win they got against Newcastle was magnificent I don't think they deserved that win. However I want to add Salah to my squad very much as he managed to make score contribution in some way even in the matches Liverpool played badly. However it isn't possible for me to do this now due to his price.
Math for Salah is actually really simple, you just have to answer yourself one simple question. Will you captain him instead of Haaland in some games? If your answer is no, stay away, his price is so high because of his consistency and safe minutes in top club plus his captain appeal.
I think he is good play after GW9 when Liverpool starts their great fixture run.
There are at least 10 games where Salah has the captaincy advantage over Haaland (and yes.. I only chose him because I would alternate captaincy).I think he is good play after GW9 when Liverpool starts their great fixture run.
By the way, he is currently the only player who has had a scoring touch in all 4 game weeks.
Salah and Haaland? That's what I initially put together and then changed it God knows why.
It was the best way to go, too many good 6,5 midfielders were on offer and you could still assemble a good team with both Salah and Haaland.
The only problem I had with this setup is that you basically have a 12,5 player (Salah) who you won't captain that often.
I don’t know if I have to rethink my decision but, I’ve hit the idea of M. Salah being over priced to leave him permanently on my team (except in the case of an injury) but yeah. I don’t find him to be making the points for his price worth. He might be a midfielder but then, his the goal scorer for Liverpool and ought to be coming up with the goals and in turn, points too.It was the best way to go, too many good 6,5 midfielders were on offer and you could still assemble a good team with both Salah and Haaland.
The only problem I had with this setup is that you basically have a 12,5 player (Salah) who you won't captain that often.
I have them both.
But you're right... I also think Salah will be on a roll this season.
His not manifesting like he would.But you're right... I also think Salah will be on a roll this season.
His last goal for Liverpool seemed more like a consolation goal for his time on the pitch. Maybe I have too much expectation on him but his prices enough to deliver like E. Halaand is. Halaand said, his back and we can expect him to be back at goal scoring. Could it be the same for Salah…
I think he is good play after GW9 when Liverpool starts their great fixture run.
Jump to: