Sterling is already in your possession. If you need Maddison, Mbeumo to Maddison is a viable option, but this is dependent on your available funds. Do not trade Sterling for Maddison. Having both is preferable. You may want to take of the depreciating assets on your bench ( Stones and Gabrile) before you go bankrupt.
Palmer to Chelsea is completed and he cost only 5.0 - Someone to put on a watch-list. Trofo will not be happy with this transfer i bet
Down the stretch, it will be Maddison over Sterling due to obvious reason that Maddison would always create a lot of chances than Sterling If you consider set pieces and the likes, most of Tottenham plays goes through Maddison, but Sterling current form is something what riding on for sure
I know that, but I'm mainly concerned about Maddison's injury record, which we both know isn't great, and the fact that the Spurs attack is built around him, which means he'll be taking a lot more tackles on his glass legs this season.
Palmer to Chelsea is completed and he cost only 5.0 - Someone to put on a watch-list. Trofo will not be happy with this transfer i bet
Happy about it? Actually, I am happy about it, it is now clear to me that Boehly will not stop from buying everything that is willing to come to Chelsea and sooner he gets you guys bankrupt, sooner you can start to rebuild. Just remember all those players have 7-9 year contracts to avoid FFP and that will hit hard in years to come.
Fun fact I have seen this morning ,Spurs with Poch in 5 years spent less than Chelsea in this transfer window. Did not check it but sounds plausible
Yeah, every rival fan envies the way Chelsea and Todd Boehly do business, which is why Liverpool and Manchester United fans are protesting for a new owner. He's a businessman who discovered a loophole in FFP rules and decided to use it to his advantage to get the team set for the next 5- 8 years, bringing in the best under-21 talents from all over Europe and placing them on life contracts (7- 8 years), it's a huge gamble, but these players' salaries depend on team performance
Fun fact> Spur spending less than Aston villa is the reason they are trophyless in the last two decades. Money gives you trophies and history ask Mancity and PSG.
Transer by itself is really strange. Palmer leaves City because he wants first team football and comes to Chelsea where there is even more competion on that spot.
Fati to Brighton on loan is a good transfer, and someting Chelsea should have done to navigate Nkunku injury. Not buying another player that is good but not good enough to actually carry the team.
Bringing in a prone to injury Fati to replace an injured Nkunku? What is the point of that? He is a highly gifted player, but his injury record is even worse, and that is the only reason Barcelona is allowing him to leave since he is nothing more than a liability to the club, and no serious club wants him either. We already have enough challenges to deal with.
Really happy this is not one of those seasons.
