It is super interesting when people say Haaland under performed last season. He scored 27 goals in 31 matches he played. Keep in mind also that 2 of those matches were just cameo subs after getting back from injury so 27 goals from 29 matches. I think there is a lot of top players that would kill to under perform in that fashion. Problem is people expect him to score hat-trick at least twice per month
The 'problem' is that he only scores goals. He doesn't get assists, he doesn't contribute to build-up play, he doesn't track back..
He plays in a team that has the best creators in the world and doesn't really tire himself with defensive effort. He is fresh all game, waiting for that one chance to score.
In such situations, you'd argue whether 27 in 29 is actually that great. A 20-goal striker that gets you 7-10 assists, leads the press and helps in creative part of the game would maybe be a better choice.
Don't get me wrong BTW, I think Haaland is perfect for City. I just don't feel that his numbers are *that* great.
___________________________________
icopress, come on man.. 15 points from GK? You're having a great round again with Wissa coming on instead of Pedro as well.
