Pages:
Author

Topic: BFL ASIC is bogus - page 3. (Read 22392 times)

legendary
Activity: 1666
Merit: 1057
Marketing manager - GO MP
October 03, 2012, 03:50:37 PM
I was the first who called Pirateat40s Savings and Trust a "classical HYIP scam", right after his OP.
Yet I didn't take part in Matthews bet - get it?  Tongue

Being right about something in Bitcoin-land being a scam is somewhat less than miraculous.  Your performance seem to be somewhat on par with getting heads three times in a row on a coin flip. 

Yes, you are right I fully agree.
However: The performance of the masses here is significantly less efficient than a coin flip. There is the tendency to believe in any proposed business model - a manifestation of wishful thinking.
hero member
Activity: 616
Merit: 500
Portland Bitcoin Group Organizer
October 03, 2012, 03:43:56 PM
It is not my intention to taunt when I tell people to put their money where their mouth is by betting 'disagree' on http://betsofbitco.in/item?id=665 I tell them that to hopefully stop (or at least reduce) the length of the debates on the forum.

No, your intention is this:

Quote
Here is the breakdown of the distribution:
45% goes to the bet winners proportional to their bets.
45% goes to the bet winners proportional to their weighted bets.
5% goes to the user who submitted the bet.
5% goes to the site.


don't forget the sig for posterity

Quote
Non-Existent Device
Lots of Hashes and Stuff
To order send 1000 BTC or so to:
1HNLqLrPEwMk8woA91qwX9sRkatRfQik2T
hero member
Activity: 952
Merit: 1009
October 02, 2012, 06:12:37 AM
It is not my intention to taunt when I tell people to put their money where their mouth is by betting 'disagree' on http://betsofbitco.in/item?id=665 I tell them that to hopefully stop (or at least reduce) the length of the debates on the forum.

No, your intention is this:

Quote
Here is the breakdown of the distribution:
45% goes to the bet winners proportional to their bets.
45% goes to the bet winners proportional to their weighted bets.
5% goes to the user who submitted the bet.
5% goes to the site.
mrb
legendary
Activity: 1512
Merit: 1028
October 02, 2012, 12:48:33 AM
I was the first who called Pirateat40s Savings and Trust a "classical HYIP scam", right after his OP.
Yet I didn't take part in Matthews bet - get it?  Tongue

It is not my intention to taunt when I tell people to put their money where their mouth is by betting 'disagree' on http://betsofbitco.in/item?id=665 I tell them that to hopefully stop (or at least reduce) the length of the debates on the forum.

So, no, I honestly don't get it why you don't participate in a bet like mine, even a symbolic 1 BTC... If one thing, it tells me that you doubt your own claims (or don't care enough?)
legendary
Activity: 4690
Merit: 1276
October 01, 2012, 09:55:54 PM
I was the first who called Pirateat40s Savings and Trust a "classical HYIP scam", right after his OP.
Yet I didn't take part in Matthews bet - get it?  Tongue

Being right about something in Bitcoin-land being a scam is somewhat less than miraculous.  Your performance seem to be somewhat on par with getting heads three times in a row on a coin flip.  None-the-less, good work (seriously) if what you say is accurate, and I don't track things that closely to verify.  You called the BFL think some time ago as evidenced by this thread so if you turn out correct it will be notable in my mind.

legendary
Activity: 1666
Merit: 1057
Marketing manager - GO MP
October 01, 2012, 05:08:38 PM
I was the first who called Pirateat40s Savings and Trust a "classical HYIP scam", right after his OP.
Yet I didn't take part in Matthews bet - get it?  Tongue
legendary
Activity: 1022
Merit: 1001
I'd fight Gandhi.
legendary
Activity: 980
Merit: 1008
October 01, 2012, 04:02:32 PM
NOOOOOOO!!!

legendary
Activity: 1260
Merit: 1000
October 01, 2012, 09:21:32 AM
I don't see how this makes the bet null and void.
legendary
Activity: 1666
Merit: 1057
Marketing manager - GO MP
September 30, 2012, 10:45:57 PM
Well the original premise that the performance figures are too good to be true remains - now even more than ever.

The whole put your money where your mouth thing is a taunt - similar to the thing MNW did with his pirate bet extra potential publicity. They can stick that elsewhere.  Tongue
legendary
Activity: 1064
Merit: 1001
September 30, 2012, 09:37:12 PM
Alright I apologize  Lips sealed

Does not the recent increase in output per device make this bet null and void?

Could also be why Inaba was confident in the bet to begin with Tongue
legendary
Activity: 1792
Merit: 1047
September 30, 2012, 09:22:22 PM
Alright I apologize  Lips sealed

Does not the recent increase in output per device make this bet null and void?
legendary
Activity: 1666
Merit: 1057
Marketing manager - GO MP
September 30, 2012, 08:46:07 PM
Alright I apologize  Lips sealed
legendary
Activity: 1064
Merit: 1001
September 30, 2012, 08:34:57 PM
The Single SC, hashing at 40,000 MH/s will consume more than 114W consistently over a 24H period.


lulz

Ah, let me help you out there. Seems you quoted that sentence out of context.

Looks ok to me, but let me clarify in these terms as well:

You believe, for example, the Single SC will not have a power consumption less than ~114W.  You are, in effect betting:

The Single SC, hashing at 40,000 MH/s will consume more than 114W consistently over a 24H period.  I use this as an example, and we will use the 350 Mhash/Joule as the actual authentication of who wins the bet, but I just wanted to be sure we are talking about the same power consumption metrics.
legendary
Activity: 1666
Merit: 1057
Marketing manager - GO MP
September 30, 2012, 07:00:22 PM
Holy crap guys, BFL just increased their predicted ASIC hash rates...my jaw dropped when I saw this: https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/wait-list-bfl-sc-pre-order-information-monarch-orders-too-89685


The Single SC, hashing at 40,000 MH/s will consume more than 114W consistently over a 24H period.


lulz
legendary
Activity: 1064
Merit: 1001
September 30, 2012, 09:50:58 AM
Holy crap guys, BFL just increased their predicted ASIC hash rates...my jaw dropped when I saw this: https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/wait-list-bfl-sc-pre-order-information-monarch-orders-too-89685
legendary
Activity: 1792
Merit: 1047
September 29, 2012, 11:41:38 PM
Inaba would rather act like a 5 year old then defend his companies products. Makes me wonder, does he even know the tech behind what hes responsible for advertising. From the looks of it, hes just a paid for mouthpiece.

Before he or anybody else comes back with a "neither do you", need i remind you, i'm not the one pre-selling...

Whats there to defend?

DO you know something that WE Don't?

We being the ones that are customers?

WE BEING THE ONES THAT TRY TO KEEP BITCOIN from being taken over by select groups???

Please help us out and stop picking needless fights.

EDIT: This is not just for CJGoodings Smiley its for all trolls



legendary
Activity: 1778
Merit: 1008
September 29, 2012, 10:22:58 PM
Your inflatable date doesnt count. Wait, had it wrong. Let me guess, you paid bitcoins for your russian bride?

hang on - they take bitcoins? Cheesy
legendary
Activity: 1064
Merit: 1001
September 29, 2012, 10:08:29 PM
CJGoodings: since you don't believe in BFL, how about you put your money where your mouth is by betting against http://betsofbitco.in/item?id=665 ? You could double your money if you are right...

Relax guys, CJGoodings is just trolling. He signed his account up at the beginning of September and all of his posts have been troll comments. He's just trying to get a rise out of people.

mrb
legendary
Activity: 1512
Merit: 1028
September 29, 2012, 09:45:23 PM
CJGoodings: since you don't believe in BFL, how about you put your money where your mouth is by betting against http://betsofbitco.in/item?id=665 ? You could double your money if you are right...
Pages:
Jump to: