Inaba would rather act like a 5 year old then defend his companies products. Makes me wonder, does he even know the tech behind what hes responsible for advertising. From the looks of it, hes just a paid for mouthpiece.
Before he or anybody else comes back with a "neither do you", need i remind you, i'm not the one pre-selling...
Topic: BFL ASIC is bogus - page 4. (Read 22392 times)
Hmm..could be quite right here. I'm a little rusty on my "Incoherent Babbling to English" translation skills. If only Google Translate could help...
+1
I actually lol'd on this one
I think you are mistranslating it. He was clearly speaking of past tense, not future tense, so again, we have no idea what he's trying to say.
Hmm..could be quite right here. I'm a little rusty on my "Incoherent Babbling to English" translation skills. If only Google Translate could help...
Wait...is there seriously a full page of childish insults between Inaba and CJGoodings?
God I love the internet lol
God I love the internet lol
Your inflatable date doesnt count. Wait, had it wrong. Let me guess, you paid bitcoins for your russian bride?
Na, I'm just waiting for the wife to get home so we can go to a movie. It's either poke fun at you or play Skyrim... it's a 50/50 thing at the moment.
Put on your big boy shorts. Mr. important here, supposedly a model member and businessman, and your wasting your time battling a pothead on a forum; says alot about your character.
Wow man! Did you work hard on that one? WAAAAAAAAAA
Dont cry big baby. Your bawlz will drop soon enough.
Using this thread as an example, when people where mentioning everything possibly wrong with your "products" specs, you were nowhere to be found, nor a single response defending your case to date.
Using this thread as an example, when people where mentioning everything possibly wrong with your "products" specs, you were nowhere to be found, nor a single response defending your case to date.
Waaaaaa! I can't back up anything I say so you go do my job for me! WAAAAAAAAA!
Take a pick, theres plenty of threads already out there. All calling out bfl for what it really is, enough "small facts" for you to choose from.
Haha nailed it. "I know you are, but what am I!"
Thats fine, be ignorant, only shows how retarded the pr fuckhead of bfl really is.
Well there you go... it's not half the community and the only way it would "feel the same way you do" is if half of them lived in their parents basement and had an orange saq.
Go on, back up what you say. I'll take anything.. give me one small fact that you have to back up anything you've said.
I predict from you: WAAAAAAAAA
Go on, back up what you say. I'll take anything.. give me one small fact that you have to back up anything you've said.
I predict from you: WAAAAAAAAA
Its not bullshit if half the community feels the same way i do.
PS. WAAHHHHHHHH
PS. WAAHHHHHHHH
It's about as cute as you going around trolling threads with your bullshit that you can't back up, so meh. Go on, lets hear how you cry about things you have absolutely no idea about. I love to hear you cry and whine and pitch a fit.
Real cute, how old are you? 5?
Good of you to admit it early so no one bets with you.
I see somebody pulling a Matthew in the near future.
I just figure with them missing their previous target, a 0.2% chance that they'll miss their current one is pretty low. But of course there's no way to know this for sure. The 500:1 was really just a random number I thought of in order to prove my point that without knowing the odds of a bet, there's no way to know if it is a good bet or not. I didn't think anyone would accept that bet.
With regards to profitability, the 0.2% probability comes from the odds, which are 500:1. If I place a bet saying that an event will occur, and I get 500:1 odds, then if that event happens more often than 0.2% of the time I will be profitable in the long run.
Let's say the event happens 0.3% of the time. Then 997 out of 1000 times I will lose 1 unit, and 3 out of 1000 times I will win 500 units. That's an average profit of 3*500-997=503 units per 1000 bets.
All of this actually started from a comment I made regarding the bet on betsofbitcoin, where my point was that without knowing the odds there's no way to know if the bet is good or not.
With regards to profitability, the 0.2% probability comes from the odds, which are 500:1. If I place a bet saying that an event will occur, and I get 500:1 odds, then if that event happens more often than 0.2% of the time I will be profitable in the long run.
Let's say the event happens 0.3% of the time. Then 997 out of 1000 times I will lose 1 unit, and 3 out of 1000 times I will win 500 units. That's an average profit of 3*500-997=503 units per 1000 bets.
Quote
2) You're estimating that the probability of BFL not meeting their target is greater than 0.2%? That's saying the probability of BFL meeting their goals is less than or equal to 99.8%. So you're saying that you have no idea what the chances are...but you figure you'll cover almost the entire spectrum by stating "greater than 0.2%"
Well, I don't know the probability as such, but I estimate that it's less than 99.8% of them meeting the target.Quote
Say I went into a casino. I walk up to a game that says the odds of winning aren't known, but there is up to a 99.8% you'll lose. Would you really play that game?
No. Without knowing the odds there's no way to know if it would be profitable. If, however, the odds are greater than 500:1, I would take the bet, as it would be profitable in the long run (see previous example).All of this actually started from a comment I made regarding the bet on betsofbitcoin, where my point was that without knowing the odds there's no way to know if the bet is good or not.
Haha yeah, I get it and all. And at least the loss (if you do indeed lose of course) won't be substantial in your case.
Runeks...you're silly
Jump to: