Topic: BiblePay | 10% to Orphan-Charity | RANDOMX MINING | Sanctuaries (Masternodes) - page 478. (Read 243386 times)
May 10, 2018, 08:48:12 AM
thesnat21 where you see taskweight 0? i hope that not on that lichsucker web ... that web is only info,not main ... use wallets console window ... all is OK dont worry
May 10, 2018, 07:59:13 AM
i'm seeing the 0 taskweight as well... hopefully its fixed before the next superblock
May 10, 2018, 04:29:57 AM
jaapgay you are example how anybody can to dump coin 
You mean this c-cex dump to 27 satoshi? I removed my buy orders just yesterday, because they were not filled and right after that someone dumps
I think jaapgvk has his sanctuary on sale as there is sell order 38 satoshi on c-cex.
May 10, 2018, 03:34:18 AM
Apart from not being able to do PoDC from my wallet, now I see this in my console
I don't know if it's only me or it's a general problem
Edit: it only happens in the windows qt wallets. In the masternode it shows properly.
PODCupdate works for me (windows qt) but the testvote doesn't work either. Could this be related to the fact that (at least on the pool page) EVERYBODY has a task weight of 0? oOCode:
exec testvote
{
"Command": "testvote",
"file-age": 1525927790,
"file-hash": "0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000",
"contract": "",
"sanctuary_rank": 0,
"pam_hash": "0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000",
"govobjhash": "0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000",
"Addresses": "",
"Amounts": "",
"quorum_hex": "",
"quorum_gobject_trigger_hash": "",
"quorum_error": "Invalid object type 0Governance object is not valid - ce9faa62e5cdc5b602380f223e5480798770b67fe37c79309a76619e6286973d",
"votes_for_my_contract": 0,
"required_votes": 3,
"last_superblock": 45510,
"next_superblock": 45715,
"cpid_count": 0,
"total_magnitude": 0,
"next_superblock_triggered": false,
"vote_result": false,
"vote_error": "Invalid object type 0Governance object is not valid - ce9faa62e5cdc5b602380f223e5480798770b67fe37c79309a76619e6286973d",
"serial": ""
}
I don't know if it's only me or it's a general problem
Edit: it only happens in the windows qt wallets. In the masternode it shows properly.
jaapgay you are example how anybody can to dump coin
Are you serious? How old are you? Like 12? Good Lord have mercy... May 10, 2018, 02:03:24 AM
jaapgay you are example how anybody can to dump coin
May 09, 2018, 11:53:40 PM
Apart from not being able to do PoDC from my wallet, now I see this in my console
I don't know if it's only me or it's a general problem
Edit: it only happens in the windows qt wallets. In the masternode it shows properly.
Code:
exec testvote
{
"Command": "testvote",
"file-age": 1525927790,
"file-hash": "0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000",
"contract": "",
"sanctuary_rank": 0,
"pam_hash": "0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000",
"govobjhash": "0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000",
"Addresses": "",
"Amounts": "",
"quorum_hex": "",
"quorum_gobject_trigger_hash": "",
"quorum_error": "Invalid object type 0Governance object is not valid - ce9faa62e5cdc5b602380f223e5480798770b67fe37c79309a76619e6286973d",
"votes_for_my_contract": 0,
"required_votes": 3,
"last_superblock": 45510,
"next_superblock": 45715,
"cpid_count": 0,
"total_magnitude": 0,
"next_superblock_triggered": false,
"vote_result": false,
"vote_error": "Invalid object type 0Governance object is not valid - ce9faa62e5cdc5b602380f223e5480798770b67fe37c79309a76619e6286973d",
"serial": ""
}
I don't know if it's only me or it's a general problem
Edit: it only happens in the windows qt wallets. In the masternode it shows properly.
May 09, 2018, 04:15:55 PM
Light, everytime that I add some new miners to PurePool, it seems that my Ratio (%) is increased artificially and I see how the old miners decrease their numbers of Shares. Probably your pool is increasing the difficulty due to the 150% threshold that was artificially increased due to the new miners just added.
1) How can I see my current difficulty assigned to my workers by your pool?
1) How can I see my ratio? I know that you have hidden this because most of the accounts were in the safe zone (but not mine).
2) How long does it take the % to stabilize after adding new miners?
Thanks in advance.
1) How can I see my current difficulty assigned to my workers by your pool?
1) How can I see my ratio? I know that you have hidden this because most of the accounts were in the safe zone (but not mine).
2) How long does it take the % to stabilize after adding new miners?
Thanks in advance.
Hi afeno,
my plan is to remove the legacy code for the rating this weekend, as it is no longer needed.
Hadn't seen anything unusual in the last days regarding any miner and this old rating code.
I hadn't seen anything you describe, but the system is rate the miners every hour, so it might be possible in theory and I had missed it. But it would require a miner that is already close to the 150% and then add a miner that is worst then the old one.
But as said, this (theoretical) situation should no longer be a problem after the weekend.
May 09, 2018, 02:05:10 PM
Slightly different topic here -
I am ALMOST certain that at one point - can't remember where I saw this, though - there had been an investigation into making a Ledger Nano app for BBP - and if I remember correctly, the conclusion was that it was super expensive and difficult if we didn't have a grassroots campaign supporting it. But we could get access to the SDK and build it ourselves, I think...what do we think about doing that? I feel like that would be pretty cool exposure for BBP. A small team of people with dev skills could probably knock it out relatively quickly if we thought it was worthwhile.
im asked LEDGER NANO TEAM via email and i received from them PMI am ALMOST certain that at one point - can't remember where I saw this, though - there had been an investigation into making a Ledger Nano app for BBP - and if I remember correctly, the conclusion was that it was super expensive and difficult if we didn't have a grassroots campaign supporting it. But we could get access to the SDK and build it ourselves, I think...what do we think about doing that? I feel like that would be pretty cool exposure for BBP. A small team of people with dev skills could probably knock it out relatively quickly if we thought it was worthwhile.
ANSWER from NANO LEDGE S HW WALLET about BBP
There are a lot of altcoins and as Ledger has limited resources it cannot integrate them all. The conditions to integrate an altcoin are one of the following: - massive general support and high market cap (ex: Ethereum) - development sponsored by the coin's community (ex: Litecoin) - direct developer integration using Ledger's SDK
For information, the "altcoin package" costs 78,000 EUR and includes: - development of altcoin's Nano S / Blue app - altcoin support added to the Ledger Wallet Chrome app - altcoin explorer API development for the backend - 1,000 Ledger Nano S unit with altcoin's logo laser engraving
We can also do only the firmware/software part without the 1,000 Nano S for 20,000 EUR.
This price is valid only for blockchains inheriting from already supported coins (Bitcoin, Peercoin, Ethereum...) If your blockchain is 100% original, then pricing can be much higher.
In any case it's best to join our Slack http://slack.ledger.co to discuss integration with our engineers.
May 09, 2018, 12:49:45 PM
when this coin started i thought that it was one big joke , but i have to say that i underestimated thisone , and still asicresistant , not much coins are that
May 09, 2018, 12:33:39 PM
I was very touched by the fact that such a avid time, where everyone thinks only about how to fill their pockets with money and driven by greed. The team finds time and opportunity to do charity work for the present. Monthly sponsoring of orphans. That's commendable.
Deuteronomy 15:7-8,10-11 English Standard Version (ESV)
7 “If among you, one of your brothers should become poor, in any of your towns within your land that the Lord your God is giving you, you shall not harden your heart or shut your hand against your poor brother, 8 but you shall open your hand to him and lend him sufficient for his need, whatever it may be.
10 You shall give to him freely, and your heart shall not be grudging when you give to him, because for this the Lord your God will bless you in all your work and in all that you undertake. 11 For there will never cease to be poor in the land. Therefore I command you, ‘You shall open wide your hand to your brother, to the needy and to the poor, in your land.’
May 09, 2018, 11:35:33 AM
I was very touched by the fact that such a avid time, where everyone thinks only about how to fill their pockets with money and driven by greed. The team finds time and opportunity to do charity work for the present. Monthly sponsoring of orphans. That's commendable.
May 09, 2018, 11:07:10 AM
Slightly different topic here -
I am ALMOST certain that at one point - can't remember where I saw this, though - there had been an investigation into making a Ledger Nano app for BBP - and if I remember correctly, the conclusion was that it was super expensive and difficult if we didn't have a grassroots campaign supporting it. But we could get access to the SDK and build it ourselves, I think...what do we think about doing that? I feel like that would be pretty cool exposure for BBP. A small team of people with dev skills could probably knock it out relatively quickly if we thought it was worthwhile.
I am ALMOST certain that at one point - can't remember where I saw this, though - there had been an investigation into making a Ledger Nano app for BBP - and if I remember correctly, the conclusion was that it was super expensive and difficult if we didn't have a grassroots campaign supporting it. But we could get access to the SDK and build it ourselves, I think...what do we think about doing that? I feel like that would be pretty cool exposure for BBP. A small team of people with dev skills could probably knock it out relatively quickly if we thought it was worthwhile.
May 09, 2018, 02:44:02 AM
Light, everytime that I add some new miners to PurePool, it seems that my Ratio (%) is increased artificially and I see how the old miners decrease their numbers of Shares. Probably your pool is increasing the difficulty due to the 150% threshold that was artificially increased due to the new miners just added.
1) How can I see my current difficulty assigned to my workers by your pool?
1) How can I see my ratio? I know that you have hidden this because most of the accounts were in the safe zone (but not mine).
2) How long does it take the % to stabilize after adding new miners?
Thanks in advance.
1) How can I see my current difficulty assigned to my workers by your pool?
1) How can I see my ratio? I know that you have hidden this because most of the accounts were in the safe zone (but not mine).
2) How long does it take the % to stabilize after adding new miners?
Thanks in advance.
Hi afeno,
my plan is to remove the legacy code for the rating this weekend, as it is no longer needed.
Hadn't seen anything unusual in the last days regarding any miner and this old rating code.
I hadn't seen anything you describe, but the system is rate the miners every hour, so it might be possible in theory and I had missed it. But it would require a miner that is already close to the 150% and then add a miner that is worst then the old one.
But as said, this (theoretical) situation should no longer be a problem after the weekend.
May 09, 2018, 01:51:09 AM
My windows wallet can't do podc updates either. It didn't do any automatically for more than 24h and if I try to force exec podcupdate it says this:

{
"Command": "podcupdate",
"PODCUpdate": "Processed 0 tasks for CPID 96892ec0fc8a2710fa84f26c9c84cd3e"
}
Edit: I tried "exec podcupdate true" with the same negative result, but surprisingly this worked
exec podcupdate true debuginfowhatever
{
"Command": "podcupdate",
"PODCUpdate": "Processed (1) over 1 CPID(s) successfully."
}
Weird

{
"Command": "podcupdate",
"PODCUpdate": "Processed 0 tasks for CPID 96892ec0fc8a2710fa84f26c9c84cd3e"
}
Edit: I tried "exec podcupdate true" with the same negative result, but surprisingly this worked
exec podcupdate true debuginfowhatever
{
"Command": "podcupdate",
"PODCUpdate": "Processed (1) over 1 CPID(s) successfully."
}
Weird
May 09, 2018, 01:01:03 AM
I see your cpid in exec unbanked, and dont see a problem. We'll have to look at this deeper if it happens again. As far as back-to-back sancs can get back to back payments if their order is established that way.
If no unbanked got paid, isn't that a problem? I didn't get paid either...? I should have gotten ~386 BBP last superblock. I get it though, it is only a handful of people that use unbanked, so it isn't a big priority...
https://explorebiblepay.com/address/BNgMnng7mBtCcnKs8orJT5peWkj6nsCAoG
https://www.biblepay-central.org/en/podc/user/1992796/
For the last superblock, is the budget 1165971.783? It is not 1,161,612.18? That's a difference of 4,359.61... is 4k more being paid out? I get maybe the explorer is truncating some decimals or there is a rounding error, but 4k is a big difference from 1165 vs 1161.
https://explorebiblepay.com/tx/7471bed4c45df129da8c3b0ee19d13c2bd6f80cd70d7be0786dcfe891bce601f
I didn't get an unbanked payment either, so I guess that maybe it's something on the pool-side, since that is handling the unbanked I guess?
CPID: 8791a036b545f35e9ebd9333922738ac
https://www.biblepay-central.org/en/podc/user/1986929/
May 08, 2018, 11:55:03 PM
I see your cpid in exec unbanked, and dont see a problem. We'll have to look at this deeper if it happens again. As far as back-to-back sancs can get back to back payments if their order is established that way.
If no unbanked got paid, isn't that a problem? I didn't get paid either...? I should have gotten ~386 BBP last superblock. I get it though, it is only a handful of people that use unbanked, so it isn't a big priority...
https://explorebiblepay.com/address/BNgMnng7mBtCcnKs8orJT5peWkj6nsCAoG
https://www.biblepay-central.org/en/podc/user/1992796/
For the last superblock, is the budget 1165971.783? It is not 1,161,612.18? That's a difference of 4,359.61... is 4k more being paid out? I get maybe the explorer is truncating some decimals or there is a rounding error, but 4k is a big difference from 1165 vs 1161.
https://explorebiblepay.com/tx/7471bed4c45df129da8c3b0ee19d13c2bd6f80cd70d7be0786dcfe891bce601f
May 08, 2018, 11:29:05 PM
Hey guys, I just noticed something odd. In the last superblock, my ARM wallet for some reason didn't receive anything. It has been working fine for weeks, then at 45510, the UTXOWeight dropped to 0 in the pool superblock view. It is listed as unbanked, the task weight is 100%, it had 211 staked with 1101 RAC. I checked exec testvote and I see that the wallet is in the next superblock, but just curious if anyone has an idea how to diagnose what happened? Seems like a one-off behaviour. Here's a copy of the report from the pool superblock view. Thanks!
45510 5/8/2018 4:28:45 PM cryptocadxyzARM 5b24af355537cdfea716340c3b6745c4 0.135 0 100 1 211 1101 0 1101 3 16
45510 5/8/2018 4:28:45 PM cryptocadxyzARM 5b24af355537cdfea716340c3b6745c4 0.135 0 100 1 211 1101 0 1101 3 16
I did not receive anything for ARM either (unbanked).
Someone said some sanctuaries got back-to-back payment.
Something is amiss.
Also, for orphans, why sell everything in 7 days? Does it make more sense to sell in 28 days (a little bit each day)? Is it too much administrative burden? Can this be scheduled ahead of time at market rate each day? Or is there no difference selling a little each day versus selling the month's worth in 7 days?
I see your cpid in exec unbanked, and dont see a problem. We'll have to look at this deeper if it happens again.
As far as back-to-back sancs can get back to back payments if their order is established that way.
May 08, 2018, 11:03:36 PM
Anyone else seeing that every masternode just got changed to watchdog_expired?
masternode count enabled now returns 8
masternode count enabled now returns 8
Strange - my windows machine returns 8. It dropped right before my eyes.
Going over to my sancs, each of them show 148. So I restarted the windows client and now everything is good again...odd.
May 08, 2018, 10:58:25 PM
Anyone else seeing that every masternode just got changed to watchdog_expired?
masternode count enabled now returns 8
masternode count enabled now returns 8
May 08, 2018, 10:41:52 PM
Hey guys, I just noticed something odd. In the last superblock, my ARM wallet for some reason didn't receive anything. It has been working fine for weeks, then at 45510, the UTXOWeight dropped to 0 in the pool superblock view. It is listed as unbanked, the task weight is 100%, it had 211 staked with 1101 RAC. I checked exec testvote and I see that the wallet is in the next superblock, but just curious if anyone has an idea how to diagnose what happened? Seems like a one-off behaviour. Here's a copy of the report from the pool superblock view. Thanks!
45510 5/8/2018 4:28:45 PM cryptocadxyzARM 5b24af355537cdfea716340c3b6745c4 0.135 0 100 1 211 1101 0 1101 3 16
45510 5/8/2018 4:28:45 PM cryptocadxyzARM 5b24af355537cdfea716340c3b6745c4 0.135 0 100 1 211 1101 0 1101 3 16
I did not receive anything for ARM either (unbanked).
Someone said some sanctuaries got back-to-back payment.
Something is amiss.
Also, for orphans, why sell everything in 7 days? Does it make more sense to sell in 28 days (a little bit each day)? Is it too much administrative burden? Can this be scheduled ahead of time at market rate each day? Or is there no difference selling a little each day versus selling the month's worth in 7 days?
Jump to: