Pages:
Author

Topic: Big prize for 1 participant in a signature campaign? (Read 1053 times)

full member
Activity: 2268
Merit: 121
Enterapp Pre-Sale Live - bit.ly/3UrMCWI
for example: prize allocation for a campaign (signature) is around 2,000,000 tokens and if the project only has 1 participant in the campaign (signature) and when the project has been completed or not scammed, is it true that the participant will get the sum of all tokens (signatures)?
or maybe not at all,  for other reasons?
The likelihood that there will be only one participant is very small, there must be other participants. In my experience, there were only 26 participants who took part, but only 3 were received until the end. hoping that the existing allocations should be divided into three realities not happening like that, I tried to protest but they said because the number of participants did not reach the minimum, as well as many reasons not listed in the rules.
and immediately send the token amount according to their wishes, we have received the token. better than not accepting tokens.
hero member
Activity: 1106
Merit: 506
I don't think such a thing can happen. I also have never seen a signature campaign project that only has one participant. and if there are fewer signatories to the campaign, the budget allocation will usually be reduced and transferred to other campaigns that have more participants. so the tokens we get are not many. the manager will manage the distribution of tokens properly.
hero member
Activity: 1554
Merit: 503
it seems like if there is only 1 participant, I think he will cancel for the bounty campaign because I have never seen one campaign participant. There must have been hundreds who followed what else could succeed their project could reach thousands of people who participated in that bounty
hero member
Activity: 2954
Merit: 672
Message @Hhampuz if you are looking for a CM!
for example: prize allocation for a campaign (signature) is around 2,000,000 tokens and if the project only has 1 participant in the campaign (signature) and when the project has been completed or not scammed, is it true that the participant will get the sum of all tokens (signatures)?
or maybe not at all,  for other reasons?
It depends from bounty manager, if there will be a small ammount of participants, bounty campaign can be cancelled or invalidated. If project is successful there are will be a lot of bounty hunter, so dont worry about that Wink
Yes. The signature campaign might be cancelled if there is only one participant but if there are few participants that will still promote the project, it's up to the manager if the campaign will still go on. The allocation budget will definitely be reduced enough for them to divide once the campaign has ended.
copper member
Activity: 812
Merit: 6
for example: prize allocation for a campaign (signature) is around 2,000,000 tokens and if the project only has 1 participant in the campaign (signature) and when the project has been completed or not scammed, is it true that the participant will get the sum of all tokens (signatures)?
or maybe not at all,  for other reasons?
It depends from bounty manager, if there will be a small ammount of participants, bounty campaign can be cancelled or invalidated. If project is successful there are will be a lot of bounty hunter, so dont worry about that Wink
hero member
Activity: 1273
Merit: 507
These events are unrealistic and I think that in reality they will not provide the entire bounty pool for just one participant. Because it has a huge impact on the price of the coin when it is listed on the market. It also depends on the supply of the coin so if the supply is low it is certain that the price of the coin will fall and this may cause the project to destroy.
sr. member
Activity: 2660
Merit: 339
It happens in different ways, but I have never seen that only 1 person participated in the signature bounty, I saw when there were 3 people maximum, and in the end these 3 people got their tokens, because I talked with one person who participated in that signature company, and so of course it all depends from the bounty manager and of course from the company that made the bounty, they will decide whether to pay a huge amount of tokens to one person or not.
but I have never seen a signature campaign followed by just one person. I think if the bounty project is devoid of followers the promotion is not running optimally, but if there is then the manager must make payments professionally.
It will never be possible because the project will not even raise any capital for them to be able to meet up, if there are no people to promote them, surely it will be very impossible to raise the marketcap and at the end they will even close the project which will make that one single hunter to lose its time and expectation. When it comes to campaign, I have never seen any project that has less than 20 campaign managers.

The only thing is that if the number of participants does not exceed that 20, they will have upper hand in able to have more but not everything because there are still some criteria that they will use to make payment too such as the number of people they have on their social media handle as usual, so op should erase that.
hero member
Activity: 3024
Merit: 629
I don't think it is possible for a signature campaign to run with one participant, so they will definitely wait for someone else
sign up for a new signature campaign to begin. As long as it doesn't meet the number of participants the signature campaign
wants it might not start. If indeed the prizes offered are large it is not possible to register only one person. Even if there are
projects that are still running with one participant, the projects might be scam.
This is not possible as we know most projects prefer to have many participants (depends on their budget) to advertise the project and spread awareness to crypto community. If ever there's a weird project who will only accept one participant, I think after the duration of the advertisement they will reduce the allocation for the sig campaign since they only hire 1 participant.
full member
Activity: 1048
Merit: 101
In principle, you think correctly. This usually happens but I have never seen such a number of participants. Just do not forget that the project team can always change the rules of the bounty company. And plus one person will not be able to benefit for the ICO and as a result the project will not be able to collect the soft cap.


yes, I also think that it is impossible for the project to only have one participant in the signature campaign, for example there is, I think the team will not continue the project (minimal participants / scammed projects), good projects always have many participants. so the OP can redefine about such a project, in my opinion it includes the criteria of a fraud project.
sr. member
Activity: 1876
Merit: 318
I don't think it is possible for a signature campaign to run with one participant, so they will definitely wait for someone else
sign up for a new signature campaign to begin. As long as it doesn't meet the number of participants the signature campaign
wants it might not start. If indeed the prizes offered are large it is not possible to register only one person. Even if there are
projects that are still running with one participant, the projects might be scam.
legendary
Activity: 1848
Merit: 1009
Next-Gen Trade Racing Metaverse
for example: prize allocation for a campaign (signature) is around 2,000,000 tokens and if the project only has 1 participant in the campaign (signature) and when the project has been completed or not scammed, is it true that the participant will get the sum of all tokens (signatures)?
or maybe not at all,  for other reasons?
If we see the ethics then it should be allocated to only one individual. But in real life scenario this will never happen as if the ICO or project is a real deal then people will definitely join in to promote that project and in other case where the project sounds fishy then only no one will join the bounty campaign so it would either be a big loss for that person or it will eb a shared bounty amongst many individuals.
sr. member
Activity: 2842
Merit: 326
Vave.com - Crypto Casino
They just have to slash the token payable to a single participant in a signature campaign of course the management knows the limitation and implication of paying a whole lot to one person, if he decides to dump the token after listing in an exchange its going to cause a likely dump in the price of the token thus a set back to the success of the project, however I doubt it if we can have a participant in any signature campaign in this forum considering the huge numbers of forum members.
sr. member
Activity: 1512
Merit: 292
www.cd3d.app
See the spreadsheet company signatures for the project Sessia. Due to the fact that many bounty hunters left the company, the rest received quite a large reward, for example,
when compared with their YouTube company or others. Therefore, this is completely possible, and quite logical. The Sessia is not the only precedent of this in the bounty market.
sr. member
Activity: 1372
Merit: 261
No campaign will provide 2,000,000 million worth of altcoin to just one person. And no campaign will be successful if only one person joins the bounty.
First of all 2 million is great especially if the total coin supply is low.
Secondly it can lower the price of an altcoin. Because this token holder can dump a large amount of his reward.

sr. member
Activity: 812
Merit: 260
for example: prize allocation for a campaign (signature) is around 2,000,000 tokens and if the project only has 1 participant in the campaign (signature) and when the project has been completed or not scammed, is it true that the participant will get the sum of all tokens (signatures)?
or maybe not at all,  for other reasons?
I think it depends on who the manager is. if the manager has a good reputation, be honest and be paid according to the allocation. by the way it's impossible for me to have 1 bounty project and only 1 person who participated in the signature campaign. at least, so far I have ever met 10 people participating. Especially the real project, certainly many who participated in the bounty.

If he is the only participant, then, it is his lucky day for having the whole stake for that certain bounty, and it is not his fault, and he earned what he has worked for, and if the token's value is good, then its a life changing for him, he choose to stay despite that no one is believing in that project and doesn't want to earn its signature, so it his reward for believing. Well, for bounty manager, I do hope that he won't add himself and cheat.
sr. member
Activity: 784
Merit: 251
for example: prize allocation for a campaign (signature) is around 2,000,000 tokens and if the project only has 1 participant in the campaign (signature) and when the project has been completed or not scammed, is it true that the participant will get the sum of all tokens (signatures)?
or maybe not at all,  for other reasons?
I think it depends on who the manager is. if the manager has a good reputation, be honest and be paid according to the allocation. by the way it's impossible for me to have 1 bounty project and only 1 person who participated in the signature campaign. at least, so far I have ever met 10 people participating. Especially the real project, certainly many who participated in the bounty.
jr. member
Activity: 109
Merit: 1
for example: prize allocation for a campaign (signature) is around 2,000,000 tokens and if the project only has 1 participant in the campaign (signature) and when the project has been completed or not scammed, is it true that the participant will get the sum of all tokens (signatures)?
or maybe not at all,  for other reasons?
No way that's not true or even going to happen since before the campaign was started they already arrange that if the cap for the participants was not reached automatically reduce the pool, that's the common practice or in the other they just cancel that campaign for the reason of lacking of participants.
full member
Activity: 854
Merit: 101
for example: prize allocation for a campaign (signature) is around 2,000,000 tokens and if the project only has 1 participant in the campaign (signature) and when the project has been completed or not scammed, is it true that the participant will get the sum of all tokens (signatures)?
or maybe not at all,  for other reasons?

Normally the allocated stakes would be divided to participants which would mean more coins for them. But in reality, bounty managers re-proportionate the rewards to smaller portion and add the remaining to other bounty campaigns which are joined by many participants. I have experience joining a signature campaign which only a few joined and the manager decreased the total rewards and added it to their social media campaign which has many participants.
sr. member
Activity: 868
Merit: 251
In principle, you think correctly. This usually happens but I have never seen such a number of participants. Just do not forget that the project team can always change the rules of the bounty company. And plus one person will not be able to benefit for the ICO and as a result the project will not be able to collect the soft cap.

sr. member
Activity: 1680
Merit: 262
for example: prize allocation for a campaign (signature) is around 2,000,000 tokens and if the project only has 1 participant in the campaign (signature) and when the project has been completed or not scammed, is it true that the participant will get the sum of all tokens (signatures)?
or maybe not at all,  for other reasons?
for example there is only one participant, there are rules, right? for example accounts with certain levels starting from jr. member to legendary, there is a calculation each for stake every week. So, even though the total prize allocation will be 2,000,000 tokens, only one participant will still be given prizes according to the account calculation and also the stake that is earned every week based on the rules of the bounty. if possible the project is successful and there is a bonus so the rest of the tokens are given everything, it is the right of the team. The point is that each participant will receive a reward according to the account and stake they get.
Pages:
Jump to: