Big prize for 1 participant in a signature campaign? - page 8.

ajaymukund

member

Activity: 784

Merit: 10

https://streamies.io/

Quote from: BRODIN on September 07, 2019, 04:42:19 PM

for example: prize allocation for a campaign (signature) is around 2,000,000 tokens and if the project only has 1 participant in the campaign (signature) and when the project has been completed or not scammed, is it true that the participant will get the sum of all tokens (signatures)?
or maybe not at all, for other reasons?

Fixed pool ready projects are good projects, they are very interested in effective marketing and if the signature campaign has only 1 person, they will cancel that campaign and put tokens into other campaigns.
because the UBC project (Ubcoin market) has previously sent the entire pool token to the signature for exactly 20 participants.
and that caused the token's price to suddenly drop and now the value of the business only hovers at $ 343k.

Oyarebu

member

Activity: 258

Merit: 32

Quote from: ?? on ??

Quote from: BRODIN on September 07, 2019, 04:42:19 PM

for example: prize allocation for a campaign (signature) is around 2,000,000 tokens and if the project only has 1 participant in the campaign (signature) and when the project has been completed or not scammed, is it true that the participant will get the sum of all tokens (signatures)?
or maybe not at all, for other reasons?

From my experience, the bounty manager can decide what is the best option and the final decision is up to his discretion. If the single bounty hunter is eligible to take all reward on the signature campaign then why not? Who decides which part of the bounty allocation will be distributed to the single or multiple bounty hunters?

Personally i don't think the bounty manager has the sole power to make such decision because, many of these campaigns have their own rules which must be adhere to before bounty rewards can be distributed. The minimal numbers of.participants that is required for the campaign, sometimes when the numbers are not meant the campaign will be close, there will be no distribution. In addition, the team project hold these tokens or coins till the end of the campaign before distribution.

cahbagus555

member

Activity: 756

Merit: 12

Quote from: BRODIN on September 07, 2019, 04:42:19 PM

for example: prize allocation for a campaign (signature) is around 2,000,000 tokens and if the project only has 1 participant in the campaign (signature) and when the project has been completed or not scammed, is it true that the participant will get the sum of all tokens (signatures)?
or maybe not at all, for other reasons?

It could be that the developer team or the bounty manager will change the allocation for the signature if there is only 1 participant. For the developer team or investor, it is very dangerous if the participant holds the entire allocation because it can affect prices in the market

coin-investor

hero member

Activity: 2940

Merit: 593

Leading Crypto Sports Betting & Casino Platform

Quote from: BRODIN on September 07, 2019, 04:42:19 PM

for example: prize allocation for a campaign (signature) is around 2,000,000 tokens and if the project only has 1 participant in the campaign (signature) and when the project has been completed or not scammed, is it true that the participant will get the sum of all tokens (signatures)?
or maybe not at all, for other reasons?

The bounty manager or the developer can change the rules anytime, as stated in their rules, there's a possibility that they might slash or deduct the allocation and transfer it to other campaigns, so far I have not read any campaign that has only one signature participants I doubt if the project will succeed with only limited promotion.

Bounty manager do not want one single participant to accumulate big amount,

ajaymukund

member

Activity: 784

Merit: 10

https://streamies.io/

Quote from: BRODIN on September 07, 2019, 04:42:19 PM

for example: prize allocation for a campaign (signature) is around 2,000,000 tokens and if the project only has 1 participant in the campaign (signature) and when the project has been completed or not scammed, is it true that the participant will get the sum of all tokens (signatures)?
or maybe not at all, for other reasons?

That will never happen. because when they put out a pool for a campaign, they need a minimum of 50 to 100 participants. If that goal is not met, they will reduce the number of tokens to be fairer for other bounty hunters.

mendra_2009

full member

Activity: 429

Merit: 100

Quote from: BRODIN on September 07, 2019, 04:42:19 PM

for example: prize allocation for a campaign (signature) is around 2,000,000 tokens and if the project only has 1 participant in the campaign (signature) and when the project has been completed or not scammed, is it true that the participant will get the sum of all tokens (signatures)?
or maybe not at all, for other reasons?

Of course not, the allocation definitely will be reduced maybe into around 90% from the total allocation amount. If they paying only 1 bounty participants with full allocation amount they definitely loss. Because they like giving blind salary to the 1 bounty participant and they got nothing.
1 signature participants is very less to make an awareness in this forum

10c

full member

Activity: 658

Merit: 100

BuyAnyLight - Blockchain LED Marketplace

I do not think that this is possible. most likely campaign managers will reduce reward and set some kind of fix token limit per person

ivaf

full member

Activity: 980

Merit: 109

Quote from: BRODIN on September 07, 2019, 04:42:19 PM

for example: prize allocation for a campaign (signature) is around 2,000,000 tokens and if the project only has 1 participant in the campaign (signature) and when the project has been completed or not scammed, is it true that the participant will get the sum of all tokens (signatures)?
or maybe not at all, for other reasons?

In this case, it is useless to speculate what will happen. The decision will be made by the project team. Of course, in a good way, they should give everything to the one (sole) participant. But any other decision can be made. In the bounty, nothing depends on the participant; the organizer can change any rule at any time.

CryptopreneurBrainboss

legendary

Activity: 2380

Merit: 4265

eXch.cx - Automatic crypto Swap Exchange.

Quote from: BRODIN on September 07, 2019, 04:42:19 PM

for example: prize allocation for a campaign (signature) is around 2,000,000 tokens and if the project only has 1 participant in the campaign (signature) and when the project has been completed or not scammed, is it true that the participant will get the sum of all tokens (signatures)?
or maybe not at all, for other reasons?

Some campaign have specific requirements before a type of bounty will be eligible for distribution. If you observe the terms and conditions you will notice something like e.g If the campaign doesn't get enough participants or doesn't meet their minimum limit of accepted participants, a particular percentage of the bounty allocation will be removed etc. And the most common terms which is "The manager has the right to stop/adjust the campaign at any given time".

Therefore, before the signature campaigns even come to an ends, it would be stopped by the campaign manager and most time, fund will be moved to other categories like Twitter or Facebook campaigns. No manager will operating a signature campaign with just 1 member so technically the scenario you highlighted above isn't possible.

mersal

member

Activity: 1204

Merit: 38

Quote from: BRODIN on September 07, 2019, 04:42:19 PM

for example: prize allocation for a campaign (signature) is around 2,000,000 tokens and if the project only has 1 participant in the campaign (signature) and when the project has been completed or not scammed, is it true that the participant will get the sum of all tokens (signatures)?
or maybe not at all, for other reasons?

As per the stakes calculation yes,the one participant needs to be give all the bounty allocation on the other hand chances of that project to attain the soft cap value with only one person advertising it is merely zero so he won't be give anything if it failed to reach the soft cap value.

Novatech8

member

Activity: 700

Merit: 27

Sovryn - Brings DeFi to Bitcoin

Quote from: bgaf on September 07, 2019, 09:59:02 PM

In my opinion, if that happened on a campaign then the Manager will probably put some discretion on its announcement that if certain participants didn't reached their target for participants then the rewards will be deducted. Actually its quite unfair for that single if his the only participant then it will be reduced due to none joiners of that campaign. Well, the Manager must give him at least a bonus for being faitful Cool

Only a very bad bounty project will have one bounty hunter promoting the project,even scam and fake bounties are been promoted by multiple bounty hunters but having one bounty hunter doing all the job is still zero for the project so it doesn't make sense to pay all the bounty rewards to a single bounty hunter

Ss4sukE

jr. member

Activity: 406

Merit: 3

It's quite strange, because as far as I know a good project has many participants, but if the project only has 1 participant, I doubt that. if the likelihood of the project succeeding automatically the person is very lucky to get a lot of tokens, but the problem is the team will not allow that to happen, at least at the end of the campaign there will be a cut in the allocation of prizes.

Stanlo

full member

Activity: 952

Merit: 110

Quote from: BRODIN on September 07, 2019, 04:42:19 PM

for example: prize allocation for a campaign (signature) is around 2,000,000 tokens and if the project only has 1 participant in the campaign (signature) and when the project has been completed or not scammed, is it true that the participant will get the sum of all tokens (signatures)?
or maybe not at all, for other reasons?

I don't think so,even some bounty projects that have too low participants promoting the projects always end up distributing half of the max bounty allocation,Gowithmi did the same thing too

dirgayeah

full member

Activity: 868

Merit: 103

*Indonesian Professional Translator and BM*

In common case, the allocation already setup if the participant are less from the target. Mostly they are reduce it 50%. Very rare to find project which is paid the participant fully.

Galley

member

Activity: 1274

Merit: 14

Usually, in the rules of participation of a bounty company, the condition for changing the awards depending on the number of participants is announced, or at least any possible change is announced. And one member of a subscription company is generally an out of the ordinary event. In good companies, this does not happen.

Samboo

member

Activity: 434

Merit: 10

www.thegeomadao.com

I do not think only a participant and a few participants can get all bounty pool allocated under Signature. They may provide any excuses in that case. They may reduce bounty pool by some percent in that case. They may refer some portion of bounty pool under Signature to other campaigns like telegram, facebook, twitter.

Botnake

hero member

Activity: 2856

Merit: 667

Everything is based on rules, if the rule completely says it is, then the team has no choice but to award the reward to a single signature campaign participants. However, I have never witness this kind of scenario in the past, good projects usually attracts a lot of bounty participants especially the signature campaign where there's less participants to divide a good portion of the total allocation.

shoreno

full member

Activity: 1750

Merit: 118

i already joined several campaigns and i already see alot of campaigns or thier rules rather but i never seen anything like that ( the one that you mentioned on the op ) instead what is more common is that the rewards are already divided per user depending on thier rank and depending on the work that they have done but i think there is no such thing that one user or few more user can divide the total allocations for the campaign because the unsused funds will always be returned by the manager to its rightful owner .

r32godzilla

hero member

Activity: 1360

Merit: 506

Quote from: BRODIN on September 07, 2019, 04:42:19 PM

for example: prize allocation for a campaign (signature) is around 2,000,000 tokens and if the project only has 1 participant in the campaign (signature) and when the project has been completed or not scammed, is it true that the participant will get the sum of all tokens (signatures)?
or maybe not at all, for other reasons?

Yes, this probably should happen if bounty participant earn all stakes in the campaign.
But, I have an experience that it may not be so. For example Ellcrys didn´t want to distribute all allocated rewards to only 10 participants. So in the most cases they will reduce the number of rewards, if there are only few participants.

DonFacundo

full member

Activity: 1344

Merit: 102

It will reduce the payment if only one bounty hunter participate in signature campaign. I'm sure the team don't want to give all rewards for one person because he can dump the token for sure.

Topic: Big prize for 1 participant in a signature campaign? - page 8. (Read 1019 times)