If this should happen, I don't think the team will even be happy paying the full reward as they will think they didn't achieve enough in the campaign. However, let's assume it occurs, the first thing the bounty manager will do is to reduce the allocation of that campaign, then secondly checking the other campaigns with huge participants and increasing the allocation. In some cases, the allocation might be reduced and the token kept without being re-allocated to other campaigns.
I have never seen such, but should it happen, the bounty manager will do justice to it.
Topic: Big prize for 1 participant in a signature campaign? - page 7. (Read 1039 times)
Actually, in a lot of campaigns there is a participation limit. So if there are less than 100 participants in the signature campaign, reward will be reduced by 50 percent or something like that. In 99 percent of cases, project will reduce the reward.
for example: prize allocation for a campaign (signature) is around 2,000,000 tokens and if the project only has 1 participant in the campaign (signature) and when the project has been completed or not scammed, is it true that the participant will get the sum of all tokens (signatures)?
or maybe not at all, for other reasons?
or maybe not at all, for other reasons?
That would make that signature participant a whale instantly, but I doubt if bounty manager will give everything to that one participant, it's unlikely and unheard of in the bounty community, the manager can change the rules anytime, this is their privilege, like all the others are saying they will deduct and put all the other to other campaigns for equal distribution.
It depends on the team and bounty manager, in some cases - yes, they will pay all the tokens to you.
In other cases they will reduce the pay and say that is because you are the only one there.
The best way would be to ask bounty manager this question.
In other cases they will reduce the pay and say that is because you are the only one there.
The best way would be to ask bounty manager this question.
Very rarely if a signature campaign is only attended by one participant, but even if that happens I think the bounty manager will adopt the best policy whether payments will be made according to the signature fund allocation or the bounty manager will only pay half of the funds allocated for bounty for these participants, but I think if there is a signature campaign with only One participant, I'm sure the bounty manager will cancel / stop the signature campaign and allocate funds for other campaigns such as content, social media or translation.
for example: prize allocation for a campaign (signature) is around 2,000,000 tokens and if the project only has 1 participant in the campaign (signature) and when the project has been completed or not scammed, is it true that the participant will get the sum of all tokens (signatures)?
or maybe not at all, for other reasons?
or maybe not at all, for other reasons?
This participant will get all the tokens that have been promised. However, we return to the rules made and the Bounty manager's policy will determine. But in my opinion, it is very funny because the participants there is only one and that I have never met.
But if that happens, let alone the project is not fake and successful. It will make a lot of money and he is very lucky.
Not sure if there's already things that happened , maybe in some instance there's few lucky hunters who shared big stakes but not alone entirely.
for example: prize allocation for a campaign (signature) is around 2,000,000 tokens and if the project only has 1 participant in the campaign (signature) and when the project has been completed or not scammed, is it true that the participant will get the sum of all tokens (signatures)?
or maybe not at all, for other reasons?
or maybe not at all, for other reasons?
In regardless to your question, most of the bounty campaign now has the rules of they can change it without any reason, and sometimes they also have that below 100 participants the allocation would be lessen to 25% only, something like that. In short, if there is no rules like this to the bounty campaign all allocation for that campaign is possible to be given to one participants only, and if they hit the hard cap as well.
for example: prize allocation for a campaign (signature) is around 2,000,000 tokens and if the project only has 1 participant in the campaign (signature) and when the project has been completed or not scammed, is it true that the participant will get the sum of all tokens (signatures)?
or maybe not at all, for other reasons?
The managers will surely change its allocation since the participants are that low, if by managers discretion or the participant itself is well versed on the forum and can get enough traffic then it could be. or maybe not at all, for other reasons?
for example: prize allocation for a campaign (signature) is around 2,000,000 tokens and if the project only has 1 participant in the campaign (signature) and when the project has been completed or not scammed, is it true that the participant will get the sum of all tokens (signatures)?
or maybe not at all, for other reasons?
or maybe not at all, for other reasons?
This participant will get all the tokens that have been promised. However, we return to the rules made and the Bounty manager's policy will determine. But in my opinion, it is very funny because the participants there is only one and that I have never met.
But if that happens, let alone the project is not fake and successful. It will make a lot of money and he is very lucky.
for example: prize allocation for a campaign (signature) is around 2,000,000 tokens and if the project only has 1 participant in the campaign (signature) and when the project has been completed or not scammed, is it true that the participant will get the sum of all tokens (signatures)?
or maybe not at all, for other reasons?
I think if a project only has 1 participant, the ratio is 1 to 100. The reason is there are so many prize hunters in the crypto world, plus if the project is interesting, logical, and will end up successful. I assume not only 1 participant.or maybe not at all, for other reasons?
If that happens, all 1 prize will be obtained by the participant, according to the agreement and rules on the project that was followed.
for example: prize allocation for a campaign (signature) is around 2,000,000 tokens and if the project only has 1 participant in the campaign (signature) and when the project has been completed or not scammed, is it true that the participant will get the sum of all tokens (signatures)?
or maybe not at all, for other reasons?
or maybe not at all, for other reasons?
I think it depends on their developers choice, they may worry and change their option with giving that participant only 5% or less from the total token allocations.
Just imagine if they give it all(2m tokens) and then that participant sells it all, wouldn't it totally affect the price?
Of course, this will not happen. The creators of the project will not allow this. if a large number of tokens fall into the hands of one user, this is very dangerous for the stability of the price of the coin itself.
In my opinion, that participant should have all the reward. But I think that in such a case, the bounty manager and the team members will reduce the amount of the reward. And I don't think they're going to give such a high reward to a single participant.
for example: prize allocation for a campaign (signature) is around 2,000,000 tokens and if the project only has 1 participant in the campaign (signature) and when the project has been completed or not scammed, is it true that the participant will get the sum of all tokens (signatures)?
or maybe not at all, for other reasons?
If the project has only one participant in the signature campaign, then that project is definitely a bad project and the participants do not need to spend too much time working with them. Most signature campaigns always have at least 50 participants and if there's a larger number then that's definitely a project that you should be more interested in because that project can help you earn a lot of money. I personally only participate in clear projects and always check before joining or maybe not at all, for other reasons?
Well i think the bounty manager will change the rules and maybe the prize pool for signature will cut because of lack of participant or another factor. But i never see a project with less than 5 participants on signature campaign.
Such projects are just closed as they don't have enough participants and sometimes the participant gets few tokens as a reward while mostly they get nothing for promoting the campaign.
Surprising as the project did not even attract 10 participants so them even being paid is good. Most projects just give a very less reward or nothing in most cases. Earlier big projects give participants joining on the last day as well the same amount of tokens as one is paid for the whole week/whole project.
Yep, I have witnessed similar situations before, not this extreme one, where there is only one participant, but there have been less than 10. And naturally, the campaign manager did deduct the original allocation, but the sig participants were still paid a lot regardless that deduction.
Surprising as the project did not even attract 10 participants so them even being paid is good. Most projects just give a very less reward or nothing in most cases. Earlier big projects give participants joining on the last day as well the same amount of tokens as one is paid for the whole week/whole project.
Ask your manager, if there's a rule from their original post that says 'they have the rights and reserve to change rules or so' that will depend on his decision.
If he finds okay with sending all that reward to the one and only signature campaign participant then be grateful. But if it's his decision together with the devs to just give a portion then respect their decision.
What will be the rule then? That he's the only one on the list of signature campaign. Remember there is amount of tokens allocated to signature participants, which can't be changed at the end. It's absolutely wrong to be given a portion If he finds okay with sending all that reward to the one and only signature campaign participant then be grateful. But if it's his decision together with the devs to just give a portion then respect their decision.
Yep, I have witnessed similar situations before, not this extreme one, where there is only one participant, but there have been less than 10. And naturally, the campaign manager did deduct the original allocation, but the sig participants were still paid a lot regardless that deduction.
The project is not good if it is not attracting participants if there is only one participant then it's not attractive for bounty hunter, I have not seen crowdfunding that only got one participant, bounty hunters will always look for a good project and leave their current campaign.
and if happens that there is only one participant, they can decide to deduct the prize.
for example: prize allocation for a campaign (signature) is around 2,000,000 tokens and if the project only has 1 participant in the campaign (signature) and when the project has been completed or not scammed, is it true that the participant will get the sum of all tokens (signatures)?
or maybe not at all, for other reasons?
I think it is difficult for it to happen. If the project is good and successful, it will attract a lot of participants. Or if there is only 1 participant, I think that project will cut the budget or maybe not at all, for other reasons?
Yep, I have witnessed similar situations before, not this extreme one, where there is only one participant, but there have been less than 10. And naturally, the campaign manager did deduct the original allocation, but the sig participants were still paid a lot regardless that deduction.
Jump to: