On
https://bitcoindominance.com we see a new, improved computation of dominance based on the Real Bitcoin Dominance Index:
The Real Bitcoin Dominance Index calculates Bitcoin's market share among proof of work coins attempting to be money. It excludes all ICOs, stablecoins and other centralized projects.
BAsically, leaving only PoW coins and exluding ICO and Stablecoins (+Ethereum as an options) this index tries to compute only the true decentralised projects. The only one that matters in terms of cryptocurrencies.
Doesn't seem very useful to me. Removing everything but POW coins is just a way for Bitcoin maximalists to feed their biases. It doesn't tell me anything useful about the market in terms of trading and hedging.
The point of measuring dominance is to give a holistic view of global trends in the altcoin market, not to make political statements about decentralization.
Just seems a bit odd to me, and clearly doesn't include all POW coins (which would take forever to research) but instead less a dozen. See:
https://www.crypto51.app/It is almost interesting though, I felt (real) BTC dominance had a good chance of re-testing the 2016 lows around 80% before further downside, but this other chart now makes it look less likely. It shows these lows instead at 83% and dominance already re-testing these levels and facing harsh rejection. The only bullish view for this so-called dominance chart is removing ETH from that index which paints a completely different picture, and does make it took like the Top 11 POW altcoins will face more downside. If the point of that chart is to show that the (generally) older generation of altcoins get swept away by the newer generation, then I guess it's valid, but better ways to represent this imo.
I'd only really be curious to see where the bearish sloping 200 Week MA is on that chart, and whether price is above it also or getting knocked down by it.