Market dominance is a shitty indicator, we all know why: it is based on market prices. After
Bitwise report, where we learnt that many exchanges faked volumes, and ultimately prices themselves, we cannot ignore anymore those flaws.
Still dominance can point in the right directions to intresting thoughts about markets in a broader way.
Market dominance just broke the peak during Dec '17 (price) ATH, and at 65,2% it is now at the highest levels since April 2017.
Another way of looking at the same phenomenon is the following: relative price movements of shitcoins versus BTC over the last 3M
1BTC=1BTC
Elsewhere: red, red everywhere.
Some obscure random shitcoin in the green, but just a statistical error, I guess.
This is truly remarkable.
In the past we saw BTC having a beta<1 (if you think at a CAPM middle), during bulls run alt rose more than bitcoin (volatility weighted) while in bear market alts downperformed BTC (alt lose more in bear market than BTC).
This time is different and in this market BTC is growing more than alts.
I propose four reasons why market dominance is going north, I ask you your toughs.
I list there in the order of market relevance, in my opinion:
- Technology has progressed, people studied and has understood better how cryptos work, so they came to the right conclusion shitcoins are indeed...shitcoins. Shitcoins value proposition has since faced and now they are clearly revealed for what they have always been: (kind of elaborate) exit scams by fraudster to transfer your bitcoin in their wallets.
- We are on the verge of an epochal bull run caused by institutional money on the brink on entering cryptocurrencies. Of course the main gateways for this to happen is Bitcoin. I can't see them diversifying their investment into other bitcoins in the near future both because lack of regulations, lack of liquidity and above all security and scrutiny on this coins.
- Libra is coming to the market, this half fit, half cryptocurrency coin will be a huge success because it is going to be incredibly successfully where many other projects, bitcoin included, have dramatically failed: adoption. Bitcoin will survive this, of course, but shitcoin basing their value propositions on “micropayments” (read BCH and minor forks) are facing doomsday.
- As suggested in the comments, Bitcoin is approaching halving. This has historically been a price-positive events. Also there are theoretical reasons why this should still be the case, as suggested by PlanB in his article Modeling Bitcoin's Value with Scarcity. As the halvening effect is probably not fully priced yet, people are trying to front-run the effect. This positive effect is limited to bitcoin only, that’s why altcoins aren’t following.
- The more Bitcoin performs versus shitcoins, the more the random investors will be keen on buying bitcoins and abstain to shift to shitcoins, because Bitcoin IS the asset performing. SO kind of self-fulfilling mechanism/shelling point where you don't want to convert your bitcoin into other assets
What are your toughs?
EDIT: Just realised this thread is also the topic of
my first ever merited post on BitcoinTalk. After almost one year and 700 merits later I think that post aged well!