Topic: Bitcoin implants? - page 10. (Read 11428 times)

Well isn't the idea of having a phone with your wallet app physical enough? What I mean is that isn't it the idea of having a wallet app to be portable and you can use it anywhere?  Also mobile phones are enough because they show your transactions, they show what you have, you can send or receive money. Putting it in your body might make it worse in terms of features.

How about ur wallet, physical wallet? Why going to blood & gore stuff if u don't need too?
I don't like idea of implants, its too physical when its no reason to.

Today this idea seems fantastic. But I think that in nearly future such kind of ideas can be real. I don't want to think about all ramifications of this implants. In all movies such things hadn't a good end.

I don't like this idea. I don't want chip anyway in my body under my skin. First of all people adopt bitcoin because they want to be free from banks. If a have any kind of implant device in my body except this which is relevant with my health like as  a pacemaker I would be free from banks but slave of the bitcoins.

put it this way
if they have to ask a street busker who has to play a bamboo flute to get enough pocket change to feed himself. he doesnt really know himself how it works, otherwise he would be rich. as for the story of the doorman saying the tenant helped thieves carry his possessions to the thieves car.. im more inclined to say the door man drugged the tenant and called his mates round to raid the apartment while the tenant was passed out. telling a little fib the next day to counteract his own involvement.

it doesnt make you lucid/articulate and able to function normally minus freewill, it is a roofie/super drunk drug. it makes you passive and not fight back. like being stoned and just wanting to chillout/relax/sleep. not become a robotic mind controlled zombie.

the reason its used is that unlike a roofie that requires you to get acquainted enough with a person to hand them a drink, you can blow it in their face just passing by, and within a minute they are drowzy and drunk

even when drunk via alcohol. i could easily say "hey mate we got a taxi home but the driver needs to be paid. whats your debit card number." allowing the drunk person to, while inebriated type in their number. because even when drunk that seems rational/normal thing if you see yourself in a taxi.. ofcourse the person sitting with you sees what buttons you press to later take your card once the taxi has drove off

this doesnt mean loss of free-will while remaining coherently/lucidly. its just being so drunk your easily sold on something that sounds rational.
however if i said to a drunk person you need to empty your bank account or carry your tv down the stairs to my car. thats a different story, most drunks would laugh and say "f-u i just wanna sleep" and then leave the thief to carry it themselves.

as for telling your password to a crypto wallet.. if the password is short enough for an inebriated drunk to spell it out.. then the entropy is not that huge anyway.

---

but this is why i still think wallets need to lock privkeys to something tamper proof and use public keys and signatures as the only publicly transmitted info.

EG BitID as the 2FA for services where the service shows a unique message and you reply with signature of that message that can be verified to a public key registered to you.

retailers see your public key and give your hardware wallet all the unspents of it. and your hardware wallet signs a tx, to only send the signed tx back to the retailer. thus the hardware wallet doesnt need an internet connection or desktop client with addons to act as a middleman

Wow, that stuff would work great for divorce. Instead of paying alimony you just blow some powder in your ex-wife's face and tell her to jump off a bridge. LOL 

This is what im telling about earlier on which the risk of being stolen or robbed by some people is still there and as you mentioned they could easily lure you out to give all your bitcoin with the possible ways that will work like what you said on blowing a drug or any other like robbed you out with the use of other harmful things.

doesnt quite work like that but im guessing you have been watching a tv show that mentions it, possibly about conmen, gypsies and psychics

I walk to the beach. I already said that. If someone wants your money they will figure out how to get it.

I don't think that's a very good idea, because having a chip that contains most of your bitcoin keys implemented into your body opens up a lot of possibility for hacks and money theft , they can walk past you scan your hand and then walk away since you said all the you have to do is pass it over a scanner and the money is paid 

I think that's probably a gradual implementation of the mark of the beast. I just read revelation 13:11-14:1-20 and I hope you're not in any way suggesting this so that a (world super power) may arise to use against the saints.

That's basically 6th Sense technology by https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YrtANPtnhyg .

When you say a chip,it sounds vague and makes it less technical to support your concept.A microprocessor with memory registers makes sense.

Does that mean I will live with a constant fear of getting my ears sliced ? Not sure if I'm okay with it.How do you send bitcoins ? Where do you type the amount ? How does your chip connect to the internet everywhere you go ?

A lot of complications is all I see.

What happens when your private key is compromised? Do you have to cut it out of your body?

Same goes for these weirdos who get bitcoin address tattoos.addresses ain't designed to last.

given the impact of bitcoin, I guess have a bad effect and impact both. it makes a lot of transactions fast on the internet, in addition, very many people who can be independent when bitcoin know, in fact, many unemployed who now has his own business. but, it also had a devastating impact, because it makes the traffic of illegal transactions increased.

Im thinking of this kind of stuff too on which we could really easily make transactions with bitcoin with just the use of our own body (Ex. Arms) but as you said the security would surely increase but the risk of being robbed out is still there specially when someone knows that you are bringing your own bitcoin wallet.Someone could easily take you down and steal all the bitcoins you have.

A payment chip in your right hand or forehead is not the mark of the Anti-Christ if the currency behind it is optional and not something that you are forced to use. Since when did any government or anybody tried to force you to use Bitcoin?

Now imagine if someone rich thought it would be a brilliant idea to store their millions in a microchip inserted into say, their hand.

Cue machete wielding man slashing off hand to attempt a brute force crack.

How do you get to the beach? Car/bike, just lock it up in the vehicle you used to get to the beach. You can also just buy a swimsuit and get this sown into the clothing. Why do you have to get implants? I can already see the marketting campaign for this, "Never lose your wallet again, just hide it inside your body" ^hmmmm^ The thieves will quickly catch on to this, and they will CUT you after they have scanned you, to get to your wallet. No thank, leave this to the attention seekers. ^LoL^

As I said, there are many other ways to do this that would not require you to cut into your flesh and risk infections and rejection.   

I'm not agree with this idea. Everything that was implanted to our body is very risky in our health and maybe one of the 'cause of our death. What is the use of our brains if we couldn't invent the software or even hardware for the security of our bitcoins. That was a good idea than implanting bitcoins.

I can't imagine it happening, for me it's disgusting to insert foreign objects into the body like cyborg and it may not be good for the body. although for the protection of bitcoin i guess it's not better to do