Back to the original topic ...
First, novelty is bad. Novelty does not increase the real value and utility of Bitcoin. As long as the main selling point for Bitcoin is its novelty, its adoption will never grow beyond the nerds in their parents' basements. The only way Bitcoin can grow is by killing the novelty.
Second, if there is any centralization of mining, it is only temporary. Anyone can get into ASIC mining. Right now you can buy the Block Erupter USB sticks -- they only cost 1 BTC, and thousands are being sold. Someday, BFL will ship their Jalapenos. There are several companies that are designing ASICs and soon will be selling chips that others will incorporate into mining hardware that will be bought by everyone.
Finally, even though ASICMINER mines 1/3 of the bitcoins, shutting them down would not shut down Bitcoin. There is no problem of lack of decentralization here. Your fears are unfounded.
Call it romance then instead of novelty. There is a reason why you, I and allot of other people spend so much time in a digital currency. Because they feel they are part of it, and help it grow.
Once you are relegated to never ever in your life be able to produce even one single coin, you feel no part in creating it.
Your must be bad a math, because what you posted is actually pure novelty. Those USB sticks where started to be sold once they generated less in one year what they even cost to purchase.
Would you spend 1000$ to make 10$ a year?
There are tons of ways better to make an investment, and buying ASIC devices right now is a huge bad deal. Unless you buy 10,000$ or 100,000$ in ASIC devices, and plan to hook them as soon as next month.
By the time those Jalapenos hit the main stream market, they will generate barely nothing at all. Their users will never pay them off, ever. You see? The company knows this, this is why they are selling them.
Also, you all fail to see, that as far as I know, Bitcoin belongs to China now.
Don´t you think there aren´t people with money in China? Not to mention people that can get chinese chips faster than you or I will ever get. If they are the only ones in the world capable of producing the chips that produce the globals Internet currency, then we have a problem. Its far from a global e-currency, if one single part of the world has a huge market advantage over the rest.
You could say the rest about standard computers right? Well no. Because when Bitcoins appeared the whole world had computers already, and the market is stable. ASIC are new, and are just hitting the market, so they will be steadily controlled, in particular because they only fulfill one purpose, make Bitcoins.
Please notice that has nothing to do with China or Chinese, which have the right to produce bitcoins like everyone else. But its like saying the Federal bank or the machine that prints money is in China.
The problem is with Bitcoins. The protocol is flawed. Standard computing fails. And if we cannot use standard computing to produce a currency which is supposed to be used in standard computing then "Houston, we have a problem."
You do not buy or trade with ASIC devices either right?