Bitcoin no doesn't work like that.
You are describing a ponzi scheme.. bitcoin is not a ponzi scheme.
No, what I'm describing is every investment on this planet, from shares to real estate to precious metals.
From the very basic definition of an investment, which has the final goal of generating either income or appreciation, I think we both know appreciation means a rise in value.
Now excuse my English but how the f* word would something increase in value if there isn't somebody paying more than you have paid for?
You are likely not technically incorrect to say that there is price appreciation when someone chooses to pay more for any item, and at the same time there is importance in appreciating that some asset classes have greater levels of fundamental value than others, so if you are spinning a ponzi scheme angle, then it can sometimes end up coming off as not being a very genuine way of capturing ongoing value that is being built in bitcoin and not always reflected in the price. We cannot know for sure value versus price, but surely price does tend to be amongst the strongest of indicators of value... even though in some assets the price will fluctuate greatly based on a variety of factors beside merely fundamental value... so in that regard, some folks will advantage from being able to understand and appreciate value that is not necessarily reflected in spot price.
I don't see the car that I bought for 30k and I could barely sell for 10k increasing in value, I don't see bitcoin cash increasing in value and I don't see houses in Detroit increasing value, maybe because nobody pays more and more for them?
Of course, different asset classes, products or services are going to have differing price movement dynamics that can depend upon a lot of factors that are particular to that asset class, product or service. Bitcoin is pretty unique in terms of its having had created a paradigm shifting phenomenon that had never been seen previously and of course there are some forces at play that go beyond it's mere short-term utility, and even likely inspires reflections upon whether it may be a vehicle that facilitates the greatest wealth transfer in history.. and surely we could be in the early stages of that, and no "greatest wealth transfer" in history is going to go without either a battle or even confusion regarding what is bitcoin's contribution to society - or its use case, which can increasingly inspire folks to pay more and more attention to it, but not necessarily agree upon its value or even agree upon whether there might be needs to push it's price up or to push it down, and even with the great overleveraging that had blown up for several entities, including but not limited to Tera/Luna, Celsius, Voyager and even some of the bitcoin miners, - there are ramifications when bitcoin is being used in various kind of financialization ways that go beyond retail bets, but likely creates excitement for traders too.. and even excitement for long term holders to increase their position or just to get an entry point into BTC.
Bitcoin has value in and of itself, and there are a lot of ways that can be shown and argued.
Bitcoin's properties were the same when Bitcoin was 1$ and will be the same when it will be 1 million.
From 60k to 2k nothing has changed, neither in the protocol nor in the way it works, what happened is that the basic laws of a free market kicked in and when the supply out with the demand then the price goes down. Just how the opposite happened for years when people were willing to pay more for one bitcoin with each passing day.
I don't have any major disagreement with you on this point - even though of course, it does not hurt to point out that many of us likely know that there are some ongoing interesting aspects of bitcoin in which bitcoin's network effects continue to build, there is a kind of Lindy Effect that continues to make bitcoin stronger with blocks being produced every 10 minutes.. tick tock, the next block.. there is a kind of ongoing power in that in which bitcoin is likely getting ongoingly stronger with the passage of time.
Sure you are free to have your theories about bitcoin being pumped and that it is price is above value and all of those kinds of ways of looking at it, but in the end, for your own good, it would be better that you at least maintain some kind of ongoing investing stake in it - sooner rather than later.. ..
Because ....it will appreciate in value, right?
And how would I profit from this without somebody offering me more than what I paid for one coin?
Bitcoin remains a good hedge, and sure the basic premise is that it is likely to go up in value with the passage of time and people are likely going to continue to be willing to pay more and more for it. But you also get value from having more options available to you that empower you in terms of being able to hold and transmit value and even potentially have a lot of privacy too, even if the BTC price might not go up in price.
You have to figure out your own reasons for investing into BTC and what kind of allocation to make into it, and if you ONLY think about price, you may well be missing some of the other ideas regarding how powerful Bitcoin is to be able to communicate value without having to go through a third party intermediary or having to risk having your funds frozen or debased - and surely there is some devils in the details regarding how some of the systems in bitcoin are going to continue to develop in which third-party intermediaries might lose a decent amount of power over your finances when you have abilities to transmit value apart from them (in whole or in part) - including considering that historically, we had been able to transact value with physical cash, and even physical cash is being attacked in terms of sometimes not being available or used.. and of course fiat (not just physical cash) is being debased on an ongoing basis too.
We are looking at this matter differently because I am not presuming that any bitcoin investment theory is merely going to put poor countries back to the position that they were previously.
I didn't focus that reply solely on you but rather on the 40 pages and nearly one thousand posts on the same topic about Salvador which claim Salvador will get rich because they are buying coins now and those will appreciate in value. But in order for them to profit from their investment, again, they will need someone to buy that stash from them at a higher price, right?
Nope. They can still advantage in a lot of ways by investing into bitcoin and using bitcoin, and surely bitcoin is likely to continue to go up in value/price, but it is not an absolute condition precedent that bitcoin has to go up in price in order to profit from it... Furthermore, one of the great things about bitcoin is that you can develop all kinds of strategies to be empowered by bitcoin without necessarily having to have the BTC price go up, but an almost inevitable side benefit (kind of a perk in which you can both have your cake and eat it too) remains that bitcoin is likely to go up in price/value whether we need it to or not, and in that way HODLers of bitcoin end up profiting in those additional ways that come from that likely ongoing price appreciation.
Another way of framing it is that you can do the right thing and get rich at the same time, as long as you do not get too fucking greedy in the process, so in that regard, you really do not have to invest a lot, just invest reasonably and prudently, and surely there are advantages to being somewhat aggressive, but being aggressive is not necessary either if you are bearish about the asset, you will likely still advantage from investing into bitcoin and maybe those who do not gamble too much or become too obsessed about it will end up doing better because they will not end up overleveraging themselves in terms of their investment into bitcoin.
Back to the Sango coin,
this thing doesn't match anything in the whitepaper
Market Coins 20.00% 4,200,000,000
Land Offering 10.00% 2,100,000,000 10 years locking period
Citizenship Offering 10.00% 2,100,000,000 5 years locking period
E-Residence Offering 10.00% 2,100,000,000 3 years locking period
So god knows what's happening there.
Yep.. it seems that they are not getting too much investment into it so far, and surely people will be nervous about long locking periods, unless the issuer inspires them to have confidence that Sango coin will not end up playing out as a rug pull.