Topic: Bitcoin puzzle transaction ~32 BTC prize to who solves it - page 172. (Read 215479 times)

As I see it, it's just 7 divided in half.
https://privatekeys.pw/keys/bitcoin/1286578769303513282484122055652087865031528491989721159806724034905757349938#7fffffffffffffffffffffffffffffff5d576e7357a4501ddfe92f46681b20a0

Guys I'm still waiting for my answer, since I revealed the exact range of my public key, it is no use if anyone can tell me the range.

03cefd304a9a8da40666e97b2d9650e31a71a9a9fcd29a24724d31a2fabbc8ea0e

I just want you to drop the second digit from my private key having just my public key above.

---

I'm a bit lost after reading your reply, what is this exactly
7fffffffffffffffffffffffffffffff5d576e7357a4501ddfe92f46681b20a4

And this one?
7fffffffffffffffffffffffffffffff5d576e7357a4501ddfe92f46681b209d

Why did you post 2 random keys with only 7 keys difference between them?
I'm asking this because my private key has 7 in it, can you just tell me where did you get the 2 private keys above?

---

To the rest of you guys, don't fight and argue, there are hundreds if bitcoins waiting for you to collect, you can show your skills by collecting them.😉

If you look at the messages and ECC knowledge level of batareyka, you can easily figure that he is neither proficient in maths not in programming. For those who have been hammering around EC they can easily point out that EC has countless ways to surprise you when you think you got it but the very next level discovery shuts you down. I am convinced he has just found one of those surprises and didn't tried to reconfirm it. Whatever subtraction, addition, multiplication & division you do, Modular arithmetic will shut you down and at the end you are nowhere. Finally you don't get offended with Questions, the world we see today is a result of questioning.

He made a pretty serious claim, but provided no evidence.  As long as he is silent, he exposes himself in a bad light, but at the same time he is offended by others ...

Maybe he just think he found it. As he is not willing to explain what he really found, who knows?

Agree.  But suddenly he really found such a way but does not understand how to apply it?

I'm pretty sure that someone who can manage to obtain the range of the private key out of the public key can find a method to get such private key, don't you think so?

@batareyka
If you really have a way to find out the range in which the private key is from the public key, then contact me.  I will show you how using this method of yours you can get a private key from any public.

guys, we don't talk about knowing the first bit, but finding it using an algorithm. It's pointless to spit out a public key when you know the private key that generates it. Take the pub key of puzzle #120 and post the first bit (discard the 0s MSB , of course). If you manage to find that bit you can extend the algo to find out all the other remaining bits.

Sure : follow the same logic / algorithm that you applied when you discovered that the first bit is 1.
Nobody poses such an algorithm as we speak, modular math on prime fields forbids it.

Here is a pubkey 03995B8A5AD00A205BFB9837014E2978273B816CFB29CA9644AB6D44977C006C64

The first bit of the private key is 1

I will even give you range 2^144-2^145

Come on break the ECC with that bit.....

I will break my word and answer once and only to you because you resorted to insults that are not justified.
In order .
1. I told you that it is impossible to assign a range to the 66th key with hash160 (I do not know such a technique). And there is no open key to number 66.
2. You want to get an algorithm, because you think that there is a grail behind it. There is no grail behind him either.
3. You resorted to searching for my messages for the entire period in order to slander me and justify your supremacy, that you are right and I am still a fraud, which will very much calm your dryness.
It is your right to do so.
But if you read my messages, you noticed that I asked there if I know two different private keys that form the same public key and everything is the same up to the address, whether it is possible to damage the integrity of the curve. I received the answer that no. But everyone immediately, as now, was bombarded with questions, how did you find it, tell us and things like that, when I refused, everyone started calling me a fraud, just like now. Surely the human essence, if it does not get what it wants, then it resorts to insults.
Then I had to ask the moderator to delete the message because there was a very large amount of slander and insults. Now it turns out that this is exactly what should be done.
4. As for why I didn't write for so long, everything is simple.
After the slander, I took a break and had lunch on my soul.
and if you notice again, my last message was January 19, 2022, a month later, the war began.
So I live in a country where war has been going on for more than 500 days.
Somehow it was not as written between shelling and bombs.
Now I have calmed down a bit, so I decided to look at the forum and write, and everyone has already seen what happened.
On the one hand, you are being bombarded, on the other hand, they are insulting you. An ideal picture of the universe.

PS
There will be no further answers. Anyone who wants can write anything, even insults in my direction, if it will make him feel better and he will please his pride, please.
If the moderator deems it necessary, he can delete my posts so that they do not give rise to further insults in my direction and deviation of the forum topic from the main goal.

Thank you to everyone who understood my answer.
All my posts written above in no way intended to offend or humiliate any of the forum members or visitors.
Thanks for the peace everyone.

Not to be a smart pants, but the question is silly and the answer will follow the question :  #66 lies somewhere between 0x20000000000000000 and 0x3ffffffffffffffff .



Totally agree with GoldTiger69 and albert0bsd here! One single bit position will break ECC!

you ignored my question, which proves that you cannot answer it plausibly.



Currently you are just one of hundreds of messiahs and wannabe bitcoin crackers who just post nonsense. Probably on top of that an awkwardly programmed forum bot. Until you prove otherwise, you remain a "smartass". Here are some posts of you before Jan/19th/2021:

https://bitcointalksearch.org/user/batareyka-3342959

Just as an aside, here are your posts: other than the current one since yesterday, you last posted in January 2019. One read through your questions 2.5 years of radio silence before you speak up again here in this thread. A rogue who thinks evil

Not meening offending, just being honest. Good luck in improving your chat bot algorithm

@mcdouglasx: Hey man, please don't be offended by my request, but can you please give me the pubkeys that your script generate out of this pubkey?  

0343b7d69e8372746596980d678d6cdecbffb2927916b3dbd3bc3d27bf5366b166

You can send me a DM with the results, I'm trying to make a test.

Thanks in advance, cheers!.

or what is more trully:

batareyka and sssergy2705 -> two nicks but one person

Then he must be the one who solved #120 and #125; otherwise, he is missing on the "prizes"

But he correctly identified the range.
https://privatekeys.pw/key/0000000000000000000000008000000000000000000000000000000000000023#public

Exactly, to determine the range, it mean determine one single bit position and that with the correct math operations can solve any key, so it is hard to believe

If you can determine the range of the private key from it's public key, ECC is broken. So, I don't believe that, yet.