Author

Topic: Bitcoin puzzle transaction ~32 BTC prize to who solves it - page 309. (Read 253699 times)

copper member
Activity: 700
Merit: 120
Gamdom
Hi guys,

In continuation to this thread: https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/brute-force-on-bitcoin-addresses-video-of-the-action-1305887

While playing around with my bot, I found out this mysterious transaction:

https://blockchain.info/tx/08389f34c98c606322740c0be6a7125d9860bb8d5cb182c02f98461e5fa6cd15

those 32.896 BTC were sent to multiple addresses, all the private keys of those addresses seem to be generated by some kind of formula.

For example:

Address 2:

KwDiBf89QgGbjEhKnhXJuH7LrciVrZi3qYjgd9M7rFU74sHUHy8S
1CUNEBjYrCn2y1SdiUMohaKUi4wpP326Lb
Biginteger PVK value: 3
Hex PVK value: 3

Address 3:

KwDiBf89QgGbjEhKnhXJuH7LrciVrZi3qYjgd9M7rFU76rnZwVdz
19ZewH8Kk1PDbSNdJ97FP4EiCjTRaZMZQA
Biginteger PVK value: 7
Hex PVK value: 7

Address 4:

KwDiBf89QgGbjEhKnhXJuH7LrciVrZi3qYjgd9M7rFU77MfhviY5
1EhqbyUMvvs7BfL8goY6qcPbD6YKfPqb7e
Biginteger PVK value: 8
Hex PVK value: 8

Address 5:

KwDiBf89QgGbjEhKnhXJuH7LrciVrZi3qYjgd9M7rFU7Dq8Au4Pv
1E6NuFjCi27W5zoXg8TRdcSRq84zJeBW3k
Biginteger PVK value: 21
Hex PVK value: 15

Address 6:

KwDiBf89QgGbjEhKnhXJuH7LrciVrZi3qYjgd9M7rFU7Tmu6qHxS
1PitScNLyp2HCygzadCh7FveTnfmpPbfp8
Biginteger PVK value: 49
Hex PVK value: 31

Address 7:

KwDiBf89QgGbjEhKnhXJuH7LrciVrZi3qYjgd9M7rFU7hDgvu64y
1McVt1vMtCC7yn5b9wgX1833yCcLXzueeC
Biginteger PVK value: 76
Hex PVK value: 4C

Address 8:

KwDiBf89QgGbjEhKnhXJuH7LrciVrZi3qYjgd9M7rFU8xvGK1zpm
1M92tSqNmQLYw33fuBvjmeadirh1ysMBxK
Biginteger PVK value: 224
Hex PVK value: E0

Address 9:

KwDiBf89QgGbjEhKnhXJuH7LrciVrZi3qYjgd9M7rFUB3vfDKcxZ
1CQFwcjw1dwhtkVWBttNLDtqL7ivBonGPV
Biginteger PVK value: 467
Hex PVK value: 1d3

Address 10:

KwDiBf89QgGbjEhKnhXJuH7LrciVrZi3qYjgd9M7rFUBTL67V6dE
1LeBZP5QCwwgXRtmVUvTVrraqPUokyLHqe
Biginteger PVK value: 514
Hex PVK value: 202

Address 11:

KwDiBf89QgGbjEhKnhXJuH7LrciVrZi3qYjgd9M7rFUGxXgtm63M
1PgQVLmst3Z314JrQn5TNiys8Hc38TcXJu
Biginteger PVK value: 1155
Hex PVK value: 483

Address 12:

KwDiBf89QgGbjEhKnhXJuH7LrciVrZi3qYjgd9M7rFUW5RtS2JN1
1DBaumZxUkM4qMQRt2LVWyFJq5kDtSZQot
Biginteger PVK value: 2683
Hex PVK value: a7b

Address 13:

KwDiBf89QgGbjEhKnhXJuH7LrciVrZi3qYjgd9M7rFUspniiQZds
1Pie8JkxBT6MGPz9Nvi3fsPkr2D8q3GBc1
Biginteger PVK value: 5216
Hex PVK value: 1460

Address 14:

KwDiBf89QgGbjEhKnhXJuH7LrciVrZi3qYjgd9M7rFVfZyiN5iEG
1ErZWg5cFCe4Vw5BzgfzB74VNLaXEiEkhk
Biginteger PVK value: 10544
Hex PVK value: 2930

and so on...

until the addresses 50 (1MEzite4ReNuWaL5Ds17ePKt2dCxWEofwk) it was already cracked by someone.

Any ideas what's the formula behind the generation of these addresses?

Address 2, pvk decimal value: 3
Address 3, pvk decimal value: 7
Address 4, pvk decimal value: 8
Address 5, pvk decimal value: 21
Address 6, pvk decimal value: 49
Address 7, pvk decimal value: 76
Address 8, pvk decimal value: 224
Address 9, pvk decimal value: 467
Address 10, pvk decimal value: 514
Address 11, pvk decimal value: 1155
Address 12, pvk decimal value: 2683
Address 13, pvk decimal value: 5216
Address 14, pvk decimal value: 10544
Address 15 and after, pvk decimal value: ?

The prize would be ~32 BTC Smiley

EDIT: If you find the solution feel free to leave a tip Smiley 1DPUhjHvd2K4ZkycVHEJiN6wba79j5V1u3

Just want to know that if someone already solved this or not
I'm just curious to know that if someone solved it,did he receive the prize? Or it's just a scam
jr. member
Activity: 138
Merit: 2
So basically stealing someone's Bitcoin? What if you had that 32 BTC and someone stole it from you, what is wrong with you guys? This is such a shitty community that you guys would call someone's own hard-earned Bitcoin a "prize" and even bounty it. You are the reason Bitcoin has such a bad wrap.

Tap on the matte canteen. Read the topic from the beginning, then come back here, remove your miserable post and beg forgiveness.

I have no idea what the phrase means, and no I won't. It's not your money nor do you deserve it.
The owner of these Bitcoins spent them to low entropy private keys on purpose in order to test the security of the Bitcoin system.  He wants everyone to try and take them.  He then issued a spend transaction from some of the addresses in order to test the security of low entropy private keys with spend transaction.   He did all of this on purpose in order to test the system.  For helping with this test people are being paid for their efforts.  This is not stealing it is people being paid for a service.

Learn to first read and understand a thread before you dump a steaming pile of your uninformed dumb ass opinion on it.

So there is proof of this? It makes sense I just don't see any proof of who owns the bitcoins and don't feel like searching through a huge thread to find a needle in a haystack. Can you actually provide something useful? All I see is random info without anything to back it up except a simple-minded insult?
You are not insulted ,but simply do not understand your message to the Creator and those people who are trying to find the keys to the wallets.By the way, you say why take someone else's? But Satoshi himself said who owns (will find),will capture the private key and bitcoins ,so that bitcoins belong to everyone ,not just someone specifically.
member
Activity: 244
Merit: 43
So basically stealing someone's Bitcoin? What if you had that 32 BTC and someone stole it from you, what is wrong with you guys? This is such a shitty community that you guys would call someone's own hard-earned Bitcoin a "prize" and even bounty it. You are the reason Bitcoin has such a bad wrap.

Tap on the matte canteen. Read the topic from the beginning, then come back here, remove your miserable post and beg forgiveness.

I have no idea what the phrase means, and no I won't. It's not your money nor do you deserve it.
The owner of these Bitcoins spent them to low entropy private keys on purpose in order to test the security of the Bitcoin system.  He wants everyone to try and take them.  He then issued a spend transaction from some of the addresses in order to test the security of low entropy private keys with spend transaction.   He did all of this on purpose in order to test the system.  For helping with this test people are being paid for their efforts.  This is not stealing it is people being paid for a service.

Learn to first read and understand a thread before you dump a steaming pile of your uninformed dumb ass opinion on it.

So there is proof of this? It makes sense I just don't see any proof of who owns the bitcoins and don't feel like searching through a huge thread to find a needle in a haystack. Can you actually provide something useful? All I see is random info without anything to back it up except a simple-minded insult?
member
Activity: 245
Merit: 17
jr. member
Activity: 59
Merit: 3
Folks, can anyone suggest please any good and precise big numbers equation solver? Software or online, doesn't really matter...

There are so many and it depends on what kind of equation do you have?

1 + 2 = x   Cheesy Cheesy Cheesy

Simple linear equation, man, with one unknown, but using a big numbers in its full format.
I've managed to create a formula to narrow a keyspace till within 12-12000000, but it works for the addresses from 1 to 52, then numbers become huge and error is big too, hence i need some software which will be capable to handle such a big numbers and be able to perform precise calculations.
member
Activity: 245
Merit: 17
Folks, can anyone suggest please any good and precise big numbers equation solver? Software or online, doesn't really matter...

There are so many and it depends on what kind of equation do you have?
jr. member
Activity: 59
Merit: 3
Folks, can anyone suggest please any good and precise big numbers equation solver? Software or online, doesn't really matter...
newbie
Activity: 18
Merit: 1
okay, if there's no secrets on private keys for bitcoin puzzle wallets,(if choosed randomly)

how it's puzzle wallet then? it's not puzzle, it's just searching for luck for the one random of keys between trillions of keys.
we can't solve , because there;s no secret in it, but we can keep searching and try our luck, is not?

Your question could be answered by reading the very first post in this thread.  Do that.  Did you do that?  I am betting not.

Perhaps the title of the thread should really be "Mysterious Bitcoin Transaction" but instead it is "Bitcoin puzzle transaction".


i did not read that bro, sorry if i am wrong,
can you share the link of it, i am interested to read.

but the creater of the bitcoin puzzle transaction had told us, there's no pattern on keys on puzzle wallets no secrets ,but just a random numbers/keys is not it?
legendary
Activity: 2646
Merit: 1138
All paid signature campaigns should be banned.
okay, if there's no secrets on private keys for bitcoin puzzle wallets,(if choosed randomly)

how it's puzzle wallet then? it's not puzzle, it's just searching for luck for the one random of keys between trillions of keys.
we can't solve , because there;s no secret in it, but we can keep searching and try our luck, is not?

Your question could be answered by reading the very first post in this thread.  Do that.  Did you do that?  I am betting not.

Perhaps the title of the thread should really be "Mysterious Bitcoin Transaction" but instead it is "Bitcoin puzzle transaction".
legendary
Activity: 1988
Merit: 1077
Honey badger just does not care
This puzzle is very strange. If it's for measuring the world's brute forcing capacity, 161-256 are just a waste (RIPEMD160 entropy is filled by 160, and by all of P2PKH Bitcoin). The puzzle creator could improve the puzzle's utility without bringing in any extra funds from outside - just spend 161-256 across to the unsolved portion 51-160, and roughly treble the puzzle's content density.

If on the other hand there's a pattern to find... well... that's awfully open-ended... can we have a hint or two? Cheesy

I am the creator.

You are quite right, 161-256 are silly.  I honestly just did not think of this.  What is especially embarrassing, is this did not occur to me once, in two years.  By way of excuse, I was not really thinking much about the puzzle at all.

I will make up for two years of stupidity.  I will spend from 161-256 to the unsolved parts, as you suggest.  In addition, I intend to add further funds.  My aim is to boost the density by a factor of 10, from 0.001*length(key) to 0.01*length(key).  Probably in the next few weeks.  At any rate, when I next have an extended period of quiet and calm, to construct the new transaction carefully.

A few words about the puzzle.  There is no pattern.  It is just consecutive keys from a deterministic wallet (masked with leading 000...0001 to set difficulty).  It is simply a crude measuring instrument, of the cracking strength of the community.

Finally, I wish to express appreciation of the efforts of all developers of new cracking tools and technology.  The "large bitcoin collider" is especially innovative and interesting!

Just a reminder for those who joined us here lately ...

This guy, saatoshi_rising, is certainly the creator since he moved the range  161-256 as promised on July 11th 2017
 

Thnx, by the way has anyone tried using AWS for this?


okay, if there's no secrets on private keys for bitcoin puzzle wallets,(if choosed randomly)

how it's puzzle wallet then? it's not puzzle, it's just searching for luck for the one random of keys between trillions of keys.
we can't solve , because there;s no secret in it, but we can keep searching and try our luck, is not?

Just read the thread instead of asking same questions over, and over, and over again. Once upon a time it was not clear what this transactions is all about and this "puzzled" people, from this came the Title of this thread. After some years everything was cleared and creator of the transaction confirmed what community already concluded about it. "Puzzle" is for historical reasons, not meaning something can be solved like normal puzzle.
newbie
Activity: 18
Merit: 1
This puzzle is very strange. If it's for measuring the world's brute forcing capacity, 161-256 are just a waste (RIPEMD160 entropy is filled by 160, and by all of P2PKH Bitcoin). The puzzle creator could improve the puzzle's utility without bringing in any extra funds from outside - just spend 161-256 across to the unsolved portion 51-160, and roughly treble the puzzle's content density.

If on the other hand there's a pattern to find... well... that's awfully open-ended... can we have a hint or two? Cheesy

I am the creator.

You are quite right, 161-256 are silly.  I honestly just did not think of this.  What is especially embarrassing, is this did not occur to me once, in two years.  By way of excuse, I was not really thinking much about the puzzle at all.

I will make up for two years of stupidity.  I will spend from 161-256 to the unsolved parts, as you suggest.  In addition, I intend to add further funds.  My aim is to boost the density by a factor of 10, from 0.001*length(key) to 0.01*length(key).  Probably in the next few weeks.  At any rate, when I next have an extended period of quiet and calm, to construct the new transaction carefully.

A few words about the puzzle.  There is no pattern.  It is just consecutive keys from a deterministic wallet (masked with leading 000...0001 to set difficulty).  It is simply a crude measuring instrument, of the cracking strength of the community.

Finally, I wish to express appreciation of the efforts of all developers of new cracking tools and technology.  The "large bitcoin collider" is especially innovative and interesting!

Just a reminder for those who joined us here lately ...

This guy, saatoshi_rising, is certainly the creator since he moved the range  161-256 as promised on July 11th 2017
 

Thnx, by the way has anyone tried using AWS for this?


okay, if there's no secrets on private keys for bitcoin puzzle wallets,(if choosed randomly)

how it's puzzle wallet then? it's not puzzle, it's just searching for luck for the one random of keys between trillions of keys.
we can't solve , because there;s no secret in it, but we can keep searching and try our luck, is not?
full member
Activity: 282
Merit: 114
It is still called "the 32 BTC prize"  but the prize is really more than 100 BTC ... 

From where you have this calculations? Cheesy

on 2015-01-15 18:07:14 the total prize was  ----------------------------> 32.896 BTC

on 2017-04-21 18:08:01 #1 to #52 were spent   (-1.378 BTC )--------> 31.518 BTC

on 2017-07-11 04:53:52  #161 to #256 where spent  (- 20.16BTC)  and
      cases from #53 to #160 where multiplied by 10 --------------------> 115.02 BTC  (new prize)

At this day, we are left with:
              0.62            + 0.64            + 0.66 + 0.67 + 0.68 + 0.69
+ 0.71 + 0.72 + 0.73 + 0.74            + 0.76 + 0.77 + 0.78 + 0.79
+ 0.81 + 0.82 + 0.83 + 0.84            + 0.86 + 0.87 + 0.88 + 0.89
+ 0.91 + 0.92 + 0.93 + 0.94            + 0.96 + 0.97 + 0.98 + 0.99
+ 1.01 + 1.02 + 1.03 + 1.04 + 1.05 + 1.06 + 1.07 + 1.08 + 1.09 + 1.10
+ 1.11 + 1.12 + 1.13 + 1.14 + 1.15 + 1.16 + 1.17 + 1.18 + 1.19 + 1.20
+ 1.21 + 1.22 + 1.23 + 1.24 + 1.25 + 1.26 + 1.27 + 1.28 + 1.29 + 1.30
+ 1.31 + 1.32 + 1.33 + 1.34 + 1.35 + 1.36 + 1.37 + 1.38 + 1.39 + 1.40
+ 1.41 + 1.42 + 1.43 + 1.44 + 1.45 + 1.46 + 1.47 + 1.48 + 1.49 + 1.50
+ 1.51 + 1.52 + 1.53 + 1.54 + 1.55 + 1.56 + 1.57 + 1.58 + 1.59 + 1.60

= 102.66 BTC



Thank you ... I think I was tired yesterday, because: the logic from 100 - 160 is already over 60BTC :-)
full member
Activity: 282
Merit: 114
So basically stealing someone's Bitcoin? What if you had that 32 BTC and someone stole it from you, what is wrong with you guys? This is such a shitty community that you guys would call someone's own hard-earned Bitcoin a "prize" and even bounty it. You are the reason Bitcoin has such a bad wrap.

Tap on the matte canteen. Read the topic from the beginning, then come back here, remove your miserable post and beg forgiveness.

I have no idea what the phrase means, and no I won't. It's not your money nor do you deserve it.
The money is who first finds the key. If I find him first - I deserved him ... hard work on finding him. So end up fucking and accept that you are a poor man who has his whole life groaning and has not done anything in life and has no chance to find the key, because he has nothing ... because he groans and groans instead of earning anything ... and that's what you do not deserve anything ... and life is just in this respect, because it will not be yours!
legendary
Activity: 2646
Merit: 1138
All paid signature campaigns should be banned.
It is still called "the 32 BTC prize"  but the prize is really more than 100 BTC ... 

From where you have this calculations? Cheesy

on 2015-01-15 18:07:14 the total prize was  ----------------------------> 32.896 BTC

on 2017-04-21 18:08:01 #1 to #52 were spent   (-1.378 BTC )--------> 31.518 BTC

on 2017-07-11 04:53:52  #161 to #256 where spent  (- 20.16BTC)  and
      cases from #53 to #160 where multiplied by 10 --------------------> 115.02 BTC  (new prize)

At this day, we are left with:
              0.62            + 0.64            + 0.66 + 0.67 + 0.68 + 0.69
+ 0.71 + 0.72 + 0.73 + 0.74            + 0.76 + 0.77 + 0.78 + 0.79
+ 0.81 + 0.82 + 0.83 + 0.84            + 0.86 + 0.87 + 0.88 + 0.89
+ 0.91 + 0.92 + 0.93 + 0.94            + 0.96 + 0.97 + 0.98 + 0.99
+ 1.01 + 1.02 + 1.03 + 1.04 + 1.05 + 1.06 + 1.07 + 1.08 + 1.09 + 1.10
+ 1.11 + 1.12 + 1.13 + 1.14 + 1.15 + 1.16 + 1.17 + 1.18 + 1.19 + 1.20
+ 1.21 + 1.22 + 1.23 + 1.24 + 1.25 + 1.26 + 1.27 + 1.28 + 1.29 + 1.30
+ 1.31 + 1.32 + 1.33 + 1.34 + 1.35 + 1.36 + 1.37 + 1.38 + 1.39 + 1.40
+ 1.41 + 1.42 + 1.43 + 1.44 + 1.45 + 1.46 + 1.47 + 1.48 + 1.49 + 1.50
+ 1.51 + 1.52 + 1.53 + 1.54 + 1.55 + 1.56 + 1.57 + 1.58 + 1.59 + 1.60

= 102.66 BTC

Thanks for that calculation!  10 brownie points!
member
Activity: 245
Merit: 17
It is still called "the 32 BTC prize"  but the prize is really more than 100 BTC ... 

From where you have this calculations? Cheesy

on 2015-01-15 18:07:14 the total prize was  ----------------------------> 32.896 BTC

on 2017-04-21 18:08:01 #1 to #52 were spent   (-1.378 BTC )--------> 31.518 BTC

on 2017-07-11 04:53:52  #161 to #256 where spent  (- 20.16BTC)  and
      cases from #53 to #160 where multiplied by 10 --------------------> 115.02 BTC  (new prize)

At this day, we are left with:
              0.62            + 0.64            + 0.66 + 0.67 + 0.68 + 0.69
+ 0.71 + 0.72 + 0.73 + 0.74            + 0.76 + 0.77 + 0.78 + 0.79
+ 0.81 + 0.82 + 0.83 + 0.84            + 0.86 + 0.87 + 0.88 + 0.89
+ 0.91 + 0.92 + 0.93 + 0.94            + 0.96 + 0.97 + 0.98 + 0.99
+ 1.01 + 1.02 + 1.03 + 1.04 + 1.05 + 1.06 + 1.07 + 1.08 + 1.09 + 1.10
+ 1.11 + 1.12 + 1.13 + 1.14 + 1.15 + 1.16 + 1.17 + 1.18 + 1.19 + 1.20
+ 1.21 + 1.22 + 1.23 + 1.24 + 1.25 + 1.26 + 1.27 + 1.28 + 1.29 + 1.30
+ 1.31 + 1.32 + 1.33 + 1.34 + 1.35 + 1.36 + 1.37 + 1.38 + 1.39 + 1.40
+ 1.41 + 1.42 + 1.43 + 1.44 + 1.45 + 1.46 + 1.47 + 1.48 + 1.49 + 1.50
+ 1.51 + 1.52 + 1.53 + 1.54 + 1.55 + 1.56 + 1.57 + 1.58 + 1.59 + 1.60

= 102.66 BTC
legendary
Activity: 2646
Merit: 1138
All paid signature campaigns should be banned.
So basically stealing someone's Bitcoin? What if you had that 32 BTC and someone stole it from you, what is wrong with you guys? This is such a shitty community that you guys would call someone's own hard-earned Bitcoin a "prize" and even bounty it. You are the reason Bitcoin has such a bad wrap.

Tap on the matte canteen. Read the topic from the beginning, then come back here, remove your miserable post and beg forgiveness.

I have no idea what the phrase means, and no I won't. It's not your money nor do you deserve it.
The owner of these Bitcoins spent them to low entropy private keys on purpose in order to test the security of the Bitcoin system.  He wants everyone to try and take them.  He then issued a spend transaction from some of the addresses in order to test the security of low entropy private keys with spend transaction.   He did all of this on purpose in order to test the system.  For helping with this test people are being paid for their efforts.  This is not stealing it is people being paid for a service.

Learn to first read and understand a thread before you dump a steaming pile of your uninformed dumb ass opinion on it.
member
Activity: 244
Merit: 43
So basically stealing someone's Bitcoin? What if you had that 32 BTC and someone stole it from you, what is wrong with you guys? This is such a shitty community that you guys would call someone's own hard-earned Bitcoin a "prize" and even bounty it. You are the reason Bitcoin has such a bad wrap.

Tap on the matte canteen. Read the topic from the beginning, then come back here, remove your miserable post and beg forgiveness.

I have no idea what the phrase means, and no I won't. It's not your money nor do you deserve it.
full member
Activity: 282
Merit: 114
So basically stealing someone's Bitcoin? What if you had that 32 BTC and someone stole it from you, what is wrong with you guys? This is such a shitty community that you guys would call someone's own hard-earned Bitcoin a "prize" and even bounty it. You are the reason Bitcoin has such a bad wrap.

Tap on the matte canteen. Read the topic from the beginning, then come back here, remove your miserable post and beg forgiveness.
member
Activity: 244
Merit: 43
So basically stealing someone's Bitcoin? What if you had that 32 BTC and someone stole it from you, what is wrong with you guys? This is such a shitty community that you guys would call someone's own hard-earned Bitcoin a "prize" and even bounty it. You are the reason Bitcoin has such a bad wrap.
full member
Activity: 282
Merit: 114
It is still called "the 32 BTC prize"  but the prize is really more than 100 BTC ... 

From where you have this calculations? Cheesy
Jump to: