Bitcoin XT - Officially #REKT (also goes for BIP101 fraud) - page 156.

coalitionfor8mb

jr. member

Activity: 42

Merit: 1

Quote from: Zarathustra on October 05, 2015, 01:47:15 PM

I agree. Bitcoin will remain boring as long as the stream blockers are successful to "prolong the stalemate, which is the preferred outcome of Team Core".

Bitcoin will remain sustainable to survive long enough and be heard of from the Echoes Of Time.

https://lh3.googleusercontent.com/proxy/746UIteHVdfM5LPG7UQXKPgIRs86i-qz4z3IMS-1TNFZNF0ctdj7fiiR8irefYIl17VGxhfIPdQy8b3nHc-koyTtQA=w506-h285-n

brg444

hero member

Activity: 644

Merit: 504

Bitcoin replaces central, not commercial, banks

Quote from: Zarathustra on October 05, 2015, 01:47:15 PM

Quote from: brg444 on October 05, 2015, 01:29:38 PM

Quote from: Zarathustra on October 05, 2015, 01:19:34 PM

Quote from: hdbuck on October 05, 2015, 12:02:47 PM

Quote from: knight22 on October 05, 2015, 11:46:33 AM

Quote from: brg444 on October 05, 2015, 11:33:11 AM

Quote from: knight22 on October 05, 2015, 11:28:51 AM

Quote from: brg444 on October 05, 2015, 11:12:39 AM

Quote from: knight22 on October 05, 2015, 10:55:26 AM

Don't worry that's going to happen when the economic incentives will get there as blocks will be filled out. At that point bitcoin core will be left out in the dust, there is absolutely no doubt about this.

I'm quoting this for postery. Can't wait to pull it out of my bag again, and again, and again. Cheesy

As you which but I won't have any merit on this prediction as it is just 5th grader economics 101 class so there is nothing really impressive there.

Sure, let's see you on the other side Wink

Although knowing how little honor you shills have I wouldn't be surprised if you don't show your face here ever again.

Huh? What is honourable about using a system that doesn't deliver and does't fits the market needs?

You prick, bitcoin delivers perfectly and fits its market marvelously.

Yes, 'perfectly' as long as the stream blockers are successful to "prolong the stalemate, which is the preferred outcome of Team Core" (ICEBREAKER)

https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.12067133

Boring

I agree. Bitcoin will remain boring as long as the stream blockers are successful to "prolong the stalemate, which is the preferred outcome of Team Core".

Zarathustra

legendary

Activity: 1162

Merit: 1004

Quote from: brg444 on October 05, 2015, 01:29:38 PM

Quote from: Zarathustra on October 05, 2015, 01:19:34 PM

Quote from: hdbuck on October 05, 2015, 12:02:47 PM

Quote from: knight22 on October 05, 2015, 11:46:33 AM

Quote from: brg444 on October 05, 2015, 11:33:11 AM

Quote from: knight22 on October 05, 2015, 11:28:51 AM

Quote from: brg444 on October 05, 2015, 11:12:39 AM

Quote from: knight22 on October 05, 2015, 10:55:26 AM

Don't worry that's going to happen when the economic incentives will get there as blocks will be filled out. At that point bitcoin core will be left out in the dust, there is absolutely no doubt about this.

I'm quoting this for postery. Can't wait to pull it out of my bag again, and again, and again. Cheesy

As you which but I won't have any merit on this prediction as it is just 5th grader economics 101 class so there is nothing really impressive there.

Sure, let's see you on the other side Wink

Although knowing how little honor you shills have I wouldn't be surprised if you don't show your face here ever again.

Huh? What is honourable about using a system that doesn't deliver and does't fits the market needs?

You prick, bitcoin delivers perfectly and fits its market marvelously.

Yes, 'perfectly' as long as the stream blockers are successful to "prolong the stalemate, which is the preferred outcome of Team Core" (ICEBREAKER)

https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.12067133

Boring

I agree. Bitcoin will remain boring as long as the stream blockers are successful to "prolong the stalemate, which is the preferred outcome of Team Core".

brg444

hero member

Activity: 644

Merit: 504

Bitcoin replaces central, not commercial, banks

Quote from: Zarathustra on October 05, 2015, 01:19:34 PM

Quote from: hdbuck on October 05, 2015, 12:02:47 PM

Quote from: knight22 on October 05, 2015, 11:46:33 AM

Quote from: brg444 on October 05, 2015, 11:33:11 AM

Quote from: knight22 on October 05, 2015, 11:28:51 AM

Quote from: brg444 on October 05, 2015, 11:12:39 AM

Quote from: knight22 on October 05, 2015, 10:55:26 AM

Don't worry that's going to happen when the economic incentives will get there as blocks will be filled out. At that point bitcoin core will be left out in the dust, there is absolutely no doubt about this.

I'm quoting this for postery. Can't wait to pull it out of my bag again, and again, and again. Cheesy

As you which but I won't have any merit on this prediction as it is just 5th grader economics 101 class so there is nothing really impressive there.

Sure, let's see you on the other side Wink

Although knowing how little honor you shills have I wouldn't be surprised if you don't show your face here ever again.

Huh? What is honourable about using a system that doesn't deliver and does't fits the market needs?

You prick, bitcoin delivers perfectly and fits its market marvelously.

Yes, 'perfectly' as long as the stream blockers are successful to "prolong the stalemate, which is the preferred outcome of Team Core" (ICEBREAKER)

https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.12067133

Boring

Zarathustra

legendary

Activity: 1162

Merit: 1004

Quote from: hdbuck on October 05, 2015, 12:02:47 PM

Quote from: knight22 on October 05, 2015, 11:46:33 AM

Quote from: brg444 on October 05, 2015, 11:33:11 AM

Quote from: knight22 on October 05, 2015, 11:28:51 AM

Quote from: brg444 on October 05, 2015, 11:12:39 AM

Quote from: knight22 on October 05, 2015, 10:55:26 AM

Don't worry that's going to happen when the economic incentives will get there as blocks will be filled out. At that point bitcoin core will be left out in the dust, there is absolutely no doubt about this.

I'm quoting this for postery. Can't wait to pull it out of my bag again, and again, and again. Cheesy

As you which but I won't have any merit on this prediction as it is just 5th grader economics 101 class so there is nothing really impressive there.

Sure, let's see you on the other side Wink

Although knowing how little honor you shills have I wouldn't be surprised if you don't show your face here ever again.

Huh? What is honourable about using a system that doesn't deliver and does't fits the market needs?

You prick, bitcoin delivers perfectly and fits its market marvelously.

Yes, 'perfectly' as long as the stream blockers are successful to "prolong the stalemate, which is the preferred outcome of Team Core" (ICEBREAKER)

https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.12067133

coalitionfor8mb

jr. member

Activity: 42

Merit: 1

Quote from: VeritasSapere on October 05, 2015, 12:37:32 PM

Quote from: coalitionfor8mb on October 05, 2015, 12:03:02 PM

The whole idea of transacting on blockchain is to keep it open, transparent and accessible. Without necessary measures (like block size limit) intended to prevent it from bloating, sinking and eventually getting locked in those large data-centers, Bitcoin won't be any more attractive than today's fiat. As it stands now, Bitcoin does deliver as advertised.

If the blocks became consistently full Bitcoin will not work as advertised. I do know that we are on the same page in regards to this point at least.

Why not? There is nothing in Bitcoin advertisements about blocks being half-empty!

http://www.wired.com/wp-content/uploads/blogs/wiredenterprise/wp-content/uploads/2013/12/honeybadger-660x495.jpg

Riding blockchain without the block-size-limit is like driving an automobile without brakes. Grin

Carlton Banks

legendary

Activity: 3430

Merit: 3080

Quote from: Zarathustra on October 05, 2015, 11:05:49 AM

Quote from: Carlton Banks on October 05, 2015, 10:57:00 AM

Quote from: Zarathustra on October 05, 2015, 09:05:10 AM

... Peter R.'s Ledger is already mentioned in Nature.

https://bitco.in/forum/threads/ledger-a-journal-about-cryptocurrency-and-blockchain-research.55/#post-1636

That's the difference between Peter R. and irrelevant clowns.

More nonsense appeals to authority.

The most authoritative organisation in the world is the United Nations.

Complete nonsense. The UN is ruled by a majority (of authoritative and less authoritative countries). It is authoritative, but clearly not the most authoritative. Saudia Arabia, North Korea et al. are more authoritative. Thinking before posting is never a disadvantage.

I understand the Nature journal isn't immune from giving a platform to total nonsense also. I'll refer you to your own advice Cheesy

knight22

legendary

Activity: 1372

Merit: 1000

--------------->¿?

Quote from: brg444 on October 05, 2015, 12:03:05 PM

Quote from: knight22 on October 05, 2015, 11:46:33 AM

Quote from: brg444 on October 05, 2015, 11:33:11 AM

Quote from: knight22 on October 05, 2015, 11:28:51 AM

Quote from: brg444 on October 05, 2015, 11:12:39 AM

Quote from: knight22 on October 05, 2015, 10:55:26 AM

Don't worry that's going to happen when the economic incentives will get there as blocks will be filled out. At that point bitcoin core will be left out in the dust, there is absolutely no doubt about this.

I'm quoting this for postery. Can't wait to pull it out of my bag again, and again, and again. Cheesy

As you which but I won't have any merit on this prediction as it is just 5th grader economics 101 class so there is nothing really impressive there.

Sure, let's see you on the other side Wink

Although knowing how little honor you shills have I wouldn't be surprised if you don't show your face here ever again.

Huh? What is honourable about using a system that doesn't deliver and does't fits the market needs?

We can start discussing it when you accept that the "market need" is not some half-baked VISA competitor, until then.... back to your homeworks Wink

You can't dictate what those needs are and clearly there is a need for what you are suggesting.

brg444

hero member

Activity: 644

Merit: 504

Bitcoin replaces central, not commercial, banks

Quote from: VeritasSapere on October 05, 2015, 12:37:32 PM

Quote from: coalitionfor8mb on October 05, 2015, 12:03:02 PM

The whole idea of transacting on blockchain is to keep it open, transparent and accessible. Without necessary measures (like block size limit) intended to prevent it from bloating, sinking and eventually getting locked in those large data-centers, Bitcoin won't be any more attractive than today's fiat. As it stands now, Bitcoin does deliver as advertised.

If the blocks became consistently full Bitcoin will not work as advertised. I do know that we are on the same page in regards to this point at least.

Durrr. Wrong.

If blocks become full then de minimis transactions will either have to pay to play or leave their place to monetary transactions of more value.

VeritasSapere

hero member

Activity: 546

Merit: 500

Quote from: coalitionfor8mb on October 05, 2015, 12:03:02 PM

The whole idea of transacting on blockchain is to keep it open, transparent and accessible. Without necessary measures (like block size limit) intended to prevent it from bloating, sinking and eventually getting locked in those large data-centers, Bitcoin won't be any more attractive than today's fiat. As it stands now, Bitcoin does deliver as advertised.

If the blocks became consistently full Bitcoin will not work as advertised. I do know that we are on the same page in regards to this point at least.

coalitionfor8mb

jr. member

Activity: 42

Merit: 1

Quote from: hdbuck on October 05, 2015, 12:02:47 PM

Quote from: knight22 on October 05, 2015, 11:46:33 AM

Quote from: brg444 on October 05, 2015, 11:33:11 AM

Quote from: knight22 on October 05, 2015, 11:28:51 AM

Quote from: brg444 on October 05, 2015, 11:12:39 AM

Quote from: knight22 on October 05, 2015, 10:55:26 AM

Don't worry that's going to happen when the economic incentives will get there as blocks will be filled out. At that point bitcoin core will be left out in the dust, there is absolutely no doubt about this.

I'm quoting this for postery. Can't wait to pull it out of my bag again, and again, and again. Cheesy

As you which but I won't have any merit on this prediction as it is just 5th grader economics 101 class so there is nothing really impressive there.

Sure, let's see you on the other side Wink

Although knowing how little honor you shills have I wouldn't be surprised if you don't show your face here ever again.

Huh? What is honourable about using a system that doesn't deliver and does't fits the market needs?

You prick, bitcoin delivers perfectly and fits its market marvelously.
Again, holding the private keys is the only thing that really matters for authentic bitcoiners.

If you count "private" access to blockchain among those "keys", then yeah, it's all that matters!

brg444

hero member

Activity: 644

Merit: 504

Bitcoin replaces central, not commercial, banks

Quote from: knight22 on October 05, 2015, 11:46:33 AM

Quote from: brg444 on October 05, 2015, 11:33:11 AM

Quote from: knight22 on October 05, 2015, 11:28:51 AM

Quote from: brg444 on October 05, 2015, 11:12:39 AM

Quote from: knight22 on October 05, 2015, 10:55:26 AM

Don't worry that's going to happen when the economic incentives will get there as blocks will be filled out. At that point bitcoin core will be left out in the dust, there is absolutely no doubt about this.

I'm quoting this for postery. Can't wait to pull it out of my bag again, and again, and again. Cheesy

As you which but I won't have any merit on this prediction as it is just 5th grader economics 101 class so there is nothing really impressive there.

Sure, let's see you on the other side Wink

Although knowing how little honor you shills have I wouldn't be surprised if you don't show your face here ever again.

Huh? What is honourable about using a system that doesn't deliver and does't fits the market needs?

We can start discussing it when you accept that the "market need" is not some half-baked VISA competitor, until then.... back to your homeworks Wink

coalitionfor8mb

jr. member

Activity: 42

Merit: 1

Quote from: knight22 on October 05, 2015, 11:46:33 AM

Quote from: brg444 on October 05, 2015, 11:33:11 AM

Quote from: knight22 on October 05, 2015, 11:28:51 AM

Quote from: brg444 on October 05, 2015, 11:12:39 AM

Quote from: knight22 on October 05, 2015, 10:55:26 AM

Don't worry that's going to happen when the economic incentives will get there as blocks will be filled out. At that point bitcoin core will be left out in the dust, there is absolutely no doubt about this.

I'm quoting this for postery. Can't wait to pull it out of my bag again, and again, and again. Cheesy

As you which but I won't have any merit on this prediction as it is just 5th grader economics 101 class so there is nothing really impressive there.

Sure, let's see you on the other side Wink

Although knowing how little honor you shills have I wouldn't be surprised if you don't show your face here ever again.

Huh? What is honourable about using a system that doesn't deliver and does't fits the market needs?

The whole idea of transacting on blockchain is to keep it open, transparent and accessible. Without necessary measures (like block size limit) intended to prevent it from bloating, sinking and eventually getting locked in those large data-centers, Bitcoin won't be any more attractive than today's fiat. As it stands now, Bitcoin does deliver as advertised.

hdbuck

legendary

Activity: 1260

Merit: 1002

Quote from: knight22 on October 05, 2015, 11:46:33 AM

Quote from: brg444 on October 05, 2015, 11:33:11 AM

Quote from: knight22 on October 05, 2015, 11:28:51 AM

Quote from: brg444 on October 05, 2015, 11:12:39 AM

Quote from: knight22 on October 05, 2015, 10:55:26 AM

Don't worry that's going to happen when the economic incentives will get there as blocks will be filled out. At that point bitcoin core will be left out in the dust, there is absolutely no doubt about this.

I'm quoting this for postery. Can't wait to pull it out of my bag again, and again, and again. Cheesy

As you which but I won't have any merit on this prediction as it is just 5th grader economics 101 class so there is nothing really impressive there.

Sure, let's see you on the other side Wink

Although knowing how little honor you shills have I wouldn't be surprised if you don't show your face here ever again.

Huh? What is honourable about using a system that doesn't deliver and does't fits the market needs?

You prick, bitcoin delivers perfectly and fits its market marvelously.
Again, holding the private keys is the only thing that really matters for authentic bitcoiners.

Fork off man im sick of you corporatist wannabes. Friggin parasites. Angry

knight22

legendary

Activity: 1372

Merit: 1000

--------------->¿?

Quote from: brg444 on October 05, 2015, 11:33:11 AM

Quote from: knight22 on October 05, 2015, 11:28:51 AM

Quote from: brg444 on October 05, 2015, 11:12:39 AM

Quote from: knight22 on October 05, 2015, 10:55:26 AM

Don't worry that's going to happen when the economic incentives will get there as blocks will be filled out. At that point bitcoin core will be left out in the dust, there is absolutely no doubt about this.

I'm quoting this for postery. Can't wait to pull it out of my bag again, and again, and again. Cheesy

As you which but I won't have any merit on this prediction as it is just 5th grader economics 101 class so there is nothing really impressive there.

Sure, let's see you on the other side Wink

Although knowing how little honor you shills have I wouldn't be surprised if you don't show your face here ever again.

Huh? What is honourable about using a system that doesn't deliver and does't fits the market needs?

Zarathustra

legendary

Activity: 1162

Merit: 1004

Quote from: brg444 on October 05, 2015, 11:19:12 AM

Quote from: VeritasSapere on October 05, 2015, 11:14:20 AM

Reminding people here that not everyone has the same perspective of the people that seem to be shouting the loudest on this thread. I think that Peter R's work is valuable and I respect his opinion. I support BIP101 because at this time it is still the only implementation of Bitcoin which increases the blocksize. I think that a third alternative will most likely be adopted which I would support as well instead of BIP101 as soon as it is implemented, especially if it represents a middle ground between these two extremes. I do not support censorship and I do not think that XT is a take over or a coup of Bitcoin.

Here is an article I have written on the subject explaining my perspective:
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/why-i-support-bip101-1164464

This is why I think that leaving the block size at one megabyte would not be good for Bitcoin:
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/permanently-keeping-the-1mb-anti-spam-restriction-is-a-great-idea-946236

I wish I could censor you outta my thread, you're so damn boring

q.e.d.
and you are also posting in his thread.
That's exactly the mentality of the censors.
O nausea! nausea! nausea!

brg444

hero member

Activity: 644

Merit: 504

Bitcoin replaces central, not commercial, banks

Quote from: knight22 on October 05, 2015, 11:28:51 AM

Quote from: brg444 on October 05, 2015, 11:12:39 AM

Quote from: knight22 on October 05, 2015, 10:55:26 AM

Don't worry that's going to happen when the economic incentives will get there as blocks will be filled out. At that point bitcoin core will be left out in the dust, there is absolutely no doubt about this.

I'm quoting this for postery. Can't wait to pull it out of my bag again, and again, and again. Cheesy

As you which but I won't have any merit on this prediction as it is just 5th grader economics 101 class so there is nothing really impressive there.

Sure, let's see you on the other side Wink

Although knowing how little honor you shills have I wouldn't be surprised if you don't show your face here ever again.

knight22

legendary

Activity: 1372

Merit: 1000

--------------->¿?

Quote from: brg444 on October 05, 2015, 11:12:39 AM

Quote from: knight22 on October 05, 2015, 10:55:26 AM

Don't worry that's going to happen when the economic incentives will get there as blocks will be filled out. At that point bitcoin core will be left out in the dust, there is absolutely no doubt about this.

I'm quoting this for postery. Can't wait to pull it out of my bag again, and again, and again. Cheesy

As you which but I won't have any merit on this prediction as it is just 5th grader economics 101 class so there is nothing really impressive here.

brg444

hero member

Activity: 644

Merit: 504

Bitcoin replaces central, not commercial, banks

Quote from: VeritasSapere on October 05, 2015, 11:14:20 AM

Reminding people here that not everyone has the same perspective of the people that seem to be shouting the loudest on this thread. I think that Peter R's work is valuable and I respect his opinion. I support BIP101 because at this time it is still the only implementation of Bitcoin which increases the blocksize. I think that a third alternative will most likely be adopted which I would support as well instead of BIP101 as soon as it is implemented, especially if it represents a middle ground between these two extremes. I do not support censorship and I do not think that XT is a take over or a coup of Bitcoin.

Here is an article I have written on the subject explaining my perspective:
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/why-i-support-bip101-1164464

This is why I think that leaving the block size at one megabyte would not be good for Bitcoin:
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/permanently-keeping-the-1mb-anti-spam-restriction-is-a-great-idea-946236

I wish I could censor you outta my thread, you're so damn boring

Zarathustra

legendary

Activity: 1162

Merit: 1004

Quote from: knight22 on October 05, 2015, 10:55:26 AM

Quote from: brg444 on October 05, 2015, 10:22:17 AM

Quote from: knight22 on October 05, 2015, 10:11:11 AM

Quote from: brg444 on October 05, 2015, 09:57:57 AM

Quote from: Zarathustra on October 05, 2015, 09:52:21 AM

Quote from: brg444 on October 05, 2015, 09:12:49 AM

Quote from: Zarathustra on October 05, 2015, 09:05:10 AM

Quote from: brg444 on October 05, 2015, 08:45:32 AM

Quote from: Zarathustra on October 05, 2015, 08:37:43 AM

Quote from: brg444 on October 05, 2015, 07:19:58 AM

vomits his bile

Everybody out there is ~~talking~~ laughing about the ideas of Peter R.
Nobody is talking about the ideas of the brg and that mod.
Which is no surprise.

FTFY

While irrelevant laughing clowns are exposing their irrelevance with their laughter ....

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MjNUPhIrt24&spfreload=10

... Peter R.'s Ledger is already mentioned in Nature.

https://bitco.in/forum/threads/ledger-a-journal-about-cryptocurrency-and-blockchain-research.55/#post-1636

That's the difference between Peter R. and irrelevant clowns.

The clowns you refer too are the ones actually working on Bitcoin development which make them more relevant than Peter could ever hope to be.

The clowns I refer to are you and alikes. Gavin (the lead developer before core got compromised) was one of them who made Bitcoin relevant.
At the moment core is compromised and hijacked by stagnators. It won't last. They'll be forced to deliver bigger blocks or to become irrelevant.

By whom?

By market participants that want and need bigger blocks and don't give so much interest anymore about Core implementation.

This minority, no matter how loud it is, is still a minority, therefore if you want bigger blocks better fork off into your own altcoin Wink

Don't worry that's going to happen when the economic incentives will get there as blocks will be filled out. At that point bitcoin core will be left out in the dust, there is absolutely no doubt about this.

Yes, either that, or the stagnators are successful to "prolong the stalemate, which is the preferred outcome of Team Core" (ICEBREAKER)

https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.12067133

Topic: Bitcoin XT - Officially #REKT (also goes for BIP101 fraud) - page 156. (Read 378996 times)