Reminding people here that not everyone has the same perspective of the people that seem to be shouting the loudest on this thread. I think that Peter R's work is valuable and I respect his opinion. I support BIP101 because at this time it is still the only implementation of Bitcoin which increases the blocksize. I think that a third alternative will most likely be adopted which I would support as well instead of BIP101 as soon as it is implemented, especially if it represents a middle ground between these two extremes. I do not support censorship and I do not think that XT is a take over or a coup of Bitcoin.
Here is an article I have written on the subject explaining my perspective:
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/why-i-support-bip101-1164464
This is why I think that leaving the block size at one megabyte would not be good for Bitcoin:
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/permanently-keeping-the-1mb-anti-spam-restriction-is-a-great-idea-946236
Topic: Bitcoin XT - Officially #REKT (also goes for BIP101 fraud) - page 157. (Read 378996 times)
Why would someone with the background of Peter R. choose to debate with a bunch of nobodys on the most unrestricted trolling forum the interwebz has to offer. If he really is that guy, I would think his education and intelligence would keep him from ever making an account here.
He has a P.R. job to do
Why would someone with the background of Peter R. choose to debate with a bunch of nobodys on the most unrestricted trolling forum the interwebz has to offer. If he really is that guy, I would think his education and intelligence would keep him from ever making an account here.
I have the utmost respect for Tony Gallippi and the entire BitPay team because they stopped posting and responding on this forum years ago.
I have the utmost respect for Tony Gallippi and the entire BitPay team because they stopped posting and responding on this forum years ago.
Don't worry that's going to happen when the economic incentives will get there as blocks will be filled out. At that point bitcoin core will be left out in the dust, there is absolutely no doubt about this.
I'm quoting this for postery. Can't wait to pull it out of my bag again, and again, and again.
... Peter R.'s Ledger is already mentioned in Nature.
https://bitco.in/forum/threads/ledger-a-journal-about-cryptocurrency-and-blockchain-research.55/#post-1636
That's the difference between Peter R. and irrelevant clowns.
https://bitco.in/forum/threads/ledger-a-journal-about-cryptocurrency-and-blockchain-research.55/#post-1636
That's the difference between Peter R. and irrelevant clowns.
More nonsense appeals to authority.
The most authoritative organisation in the world is the United Nations.
Complete nonsense. The UN is ruled by a majority (of authoritative and less authoritative countries). It is authoritative, but clearly not the most authoritative. Saudia Arabia, North Korea et al. are more authoritative. Thinking before posting is never a disadvantage.
... Peter R.'s Ledger is already mentioned in Nature.
https://bitco.in/forum/threads/ledger-a-journal-about-cryptocurrency-and-blockchain-research.55/#post-1636
That's the difference between Peter R. and irrelevant clowns.
https://bitco.in/forum/threads/ledger-a-journal-about-cryptocurrency-and-blockchain-research.55/#post-1636
That's the difference between Peter R. and irrelevant clowns.
More nonsense appeals to authority.
The most authoritative organisation in the world is the United Nations. And I think the average person can agree: the UN will give a platform to some fully fledged lunatics sometimes (check out the General Assembly just past).
Gavin Andresen could speak at the UN about XT for all I care; the fact that Gavin could arrange such a platform from which to speak does not actually make what he's talking about correct.
vomits his bile
Everybody out there is
Nobody is talking about the ideas of the brg and that mod.
Which is no surprise.
FTFY
While irrelevant laughing clowns are exposing their irrelevance with their laughter ....
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MjNUPhIrt24&spfreload=10
... Peter R.'s Ledger is already mentioned in Nature.
https://bitco.in/forum/threads/ledger-a-journal-about-cryptocurrency-and-blockchain-research.55/#post-1636
That's the difference between Peter R. and irrelevant clowns.
The clowns you refer too are the ones actually working on Bitcoin development which make them more relevant than Peter could ever hope to be.
The clowns I refer to are you and alikes. Gavin (the lead developer before core got compromised) was one of them who made Bitcoin relevant.
At the moment core is compromised and hijacked by stagnators. It won't last. They'll be forced to deliver bigger blocks or to become irrelevant.
By whom?
By market participants that want and need bigger blocks and don't give so much interest anymore about Core implementation.
This minority, no matter how loud it is, is still a minority, therefore if you want bigger blocks better fork off into your own altcoin
Don't worry that's going to happen when the economic incentives will get there as blocks will be filled out. At that point bitcoin core will be left out in the dust, there is absolutely no doubt about this.
vomits his bile
Everybody out there is
Nobody is talking about the ideas of the brg and that mod.
Which is no surprise.
FTFY
While irrelevant laughing clowns are exposing their irrelevance with their laughter ....
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MjNUPhIrt24&spfreload=10
... Peter R.'s Ledger is already mentioned in Nature.
https://bitco.in/forum/threads/ledger-a-journal-about-cryptocurrency-and-blockchain-research.55/#post-1636
That's the difference between Peter R. and irrelevant clowns.
The clowns you refer too are the ones actually working on Bitcoin development which make them more relevant than Peter could ever hope to be.
The clowns I refer to are you and alikes. Gavin (the lead developer before core got compromised) was one of them who made Bitcoin relevant.
At the moment core is compromised and hijacked by stagnators. It won't last. They'll be forced to deliver bigger blocks or to become irrelevant.
By whom?
Gavin hasn't done anything significant in Bitcoin in almost two years.
Yes, unfortunately. The result is visible on the chart since the stagnators are in charge.
But then, Peter R. stepped in and told the geeks something about socionomics and the market:
good one
we sure learned a lot from his 5th grader economics 101 class !
Maybe you should start from there because you don't seem to know much about economics and markets.
vomits his bile
Everybody out there is
Nobody is talking about the ideas of the brg and that mod.
Which is no surprise.
FTFY
While irrelevant laughing clowns are exposing their irrelevance with their laughter ....
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MjNUPhIrt24&spfreload=10
... Peter R.'s Ledger is already mentioned in Nature.
https://bitco.in/forum/threads/ledger-a-journal-about-cryptocurrency-and-blockchain-research.55/#post-1636
That's the difference between Peter R. and irrelevant clowns.
The clowns you refer too are the ones actually working on Bitcoin development which make them more relevant than Peter could ever hope to be.
The clowns I refer to are you and alikes. Gavin (the lead developer before core got compromised) was one of them who made Bitcoin relevant.
At the moment core is compromised and hijacked by stagnators. It won't last. They'll be forced to deliver bigger blocks or to become irrelevant.
By whom?
Gavin hasn't done anything significant in Bitcoin in almost two years.
Yes, unfortunately. The result is visible on the chart since the stagnators are in charge.
But then, Peter R. stepped in and told the geeks something about socionomics and the market:
good one
we sure learned a lot from his 5th grader economics 101 class !
Yes. Bitcoin requires interdisciplinary geniuses. Bitcoin cannot be brought forward alone by twenty year old children without any life experience (todd, buterin, nullc, theymos et al.).
vomits his bile
Everybody out there is
Nobody is talking about the ideas of the brg and that mod.
Which is no surprise.
FTFY
While irrelevant laughing clowns are exposing their irrelevance with their laughter ....
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MjNUPhIrt24&spfreload=10
... Peter R.'s Ledger is already mentioned in Nature.
https://bitco.in/forum/threads/ledger-a-journal-about-cryptocurrency-and-blockchain-research.55/#post-1636
That's the difference between Peter R. and irrelevant clowns.
The clowns you refer too are the ones actually working on Bitcoin development which make them more relevant than Peter could ever hope to be.
The clowns I refer to are you and alikes. Gavin (the lead developer before core got compromised) was one of them who made Bitcoin relevant.
At the moment core is compromised and hijacked by stagnators. It won't last. They'll be forced to deliver bigger blocks or to become irrelevant.
By whom?
By market participants that want and need bigger blocks and don't give so much interest anymore about Core implementation.
This minority, no matter how loud it is, is still a minority, therefore if you want bigger blocks better fork off into your own altcoin
vomits his bile
Everybody out there is
Nobody is talking about the ideas of the brg and that mod.
Which is no surprise.
FTFY
While irrelevant laughing clowns are exposing their irrelevance with their laughter ....
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MjNUPhIrt24&spfreload=10
... Peter R.'s Ledger is already mentioned in Nature.
https://bitco.in/forum/threads/ledger-a-journal-about-cryptocurrency-and-blockchain-research.55/#post-1636
That's the difference between Peter R. and irrelevant clowns.
The clowns you refer too are the ones actually working on Bitcoin development which make them more relevant than Peter could ever hope to be.
The clowns I refer to are you and alikes. Gavin (the lead developer before core got compromised) was one of them who made Bitcoin relevant.
At the moment core is compromised and hijacked by stagnators. It won't last. They'll be forced to deliver bigger blocks or to become irrelevant.
By whom?
By market participants that want and need bigger blocks and don't give so much interest anymore about Core implementation.
'Cause they're Unforgiven II
vomits his bile
Everybody out there is
Nobody is talking about the ideas of the brg and that mod.
Which is no surprise.
FTFY
While irrelevant laughing clowns are exposing their irrelevance with their laughter ....
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MjNUPhIrt24&spfreload=10
... Peter R.'s Ledger is already mentioned in Nature.
https://bitco.in/forum/threads/ledger-a-journal-about-cryptocurrency-and-blockchain-research.55/#post-1636
That's the difference between Peter R. and irrelevant clowns.
The clowns you refer too are the ones actually working on Bitcoin development which make them more relevant than Peter could ever hope to be.
The clowns I refer to are you and alikes. Gavin (the lead developer before core got compromised) was one of them who made Bitcoin relevant.
At the moment core is compromised and hijacked by stagnators. It won't last. They'll be forced to deliver bigger blocks or to become irrelevant.
By whom?
Gavin hasn't done anything significant in Bitcoin in almost two years.
Yes, unfortunately. The result is visible on the chart since the stagnators are in charge.
But then, Peter R. stepped in and told the geeks something about socionomics and the market:
good one
we sure learned a lot from his 5th grader economics 101 class !
vomits his bile
Everybody out there is
Nobody is talking about the ideas of the brg and that mod.
Which is no surprise.
FTFY
While irrelevant laughing clowns are exposing their irrelevance with their laughter ....
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MjNUPhIrt24&spfreload=10
... Peter R.'s Ledger is already mentioned in Nature.
https://bitco.in/forum/threads/ledger-a-journal-about-cryptocurrency-and-blockchain-research.55/#post-1636
That's the difference between Peter R. and irrelevant clowns.
The clowns you refer too are the ones actually working on Bitcoin development which make them more relevant than Peter could ever hope to be.
The clowns I refer to are you and alikes. Gavin (the lead developer before core got compromised) was one of them who made Bitcoin relevant.
At the moment core is compromised and hijacked by stagnators. It won't last. They'll be forced to deliver bigger blocks or to become irrelevant.
By whom?
By market participants that want and need bigger blocks and don't give so much interest anymore about Core implementation.
vomits his bile
Everybody out there is
Nobody is talking about the ideas of the brg and that mod.
Which is no surprise.
FTFY
While irrelevant laughing clowns are exposing their irrelevance with their laughter ....
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MjNUPhIrt24&spfreload=10
... Peter R.'s Ledger is already mentioned in Nature.
https://bitco.in/forum/threads/ledger-a-journal-about-cryptocurrency-and-blockchain-research.55/#post-1636
That's the difference between Peter R. and irrelevant clowns.
The clowns you refer too are the ones actually working on Bitcoin development which make them more relevant than Peter could ever hope to be.
The clowns I refer to are you and alikes. Gavin (the lead developer before core got compromised) was one of them who made Bitcoin relevant.
At the moment core is compromised and hijacked by stagnators. It won't last. They'll be forced to deliver bigger blocks or to become irrelevant.
By whom?
Gavin hasn't done anything significant in Bitcoin in almost two years.
Yes, unfortunately. The result is visible on the chart since the stagnators are in charge.
But then, Peter R. stepped in and told the geeks something about socionomics and the market:
lmao that double bottom 90% pullback coincides with the launch of XT and gavin officially attacking bitcoin with his budy hearn and all their fud, 'stress testing' and social diarrhea
then crediting peter or 21 to impact btc price highlight even more the critical delusions from you n00bs.
vomits his bile
Everybody out there is
Nobody is talking about the ideas of the brg and that mod.
Which is no surprise.
FTFY
While irrelevant laughing clowns are exposing their irrelevance with their laughter ....
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MjNUPhIrt24&spfreload=10
... Peter R.'s Ledger is already mentioned in Nature.
https://bitco.in/forum/threads/ledger-a-journal-about-cryptocurrency-and-blockchain-research.55/#post-1636
That's the difference between Peter R. and irrelevant clowns.
The clowns you refer too are the ones actually working on Bitcoin development which make them more relevant than Peter could ever hope to be.
The clowns I refer to are you and alikes. Gavin (the lead developer before core got compromised) was one of them who made Bitcoin relevant.
At the moment core is compromised and hijacked by stagnators. It won't last. They'll be forced to deliver bigger blocks or to become irrelevant.
By whom?
Gavin hasn't done anything significant in Bitcoin in almost two years.
Yes, unfortunately. The result is visible on the chart since the stagnators are in charge.
But then, Peter R. stepped in and told the geeks something about socionomics and the market:
even MP seems more legit.
Yes, this is the idol of the clowns with their vulgar language here. But you don't represent Bitcoin.
Vulgar
Your self-serving high horse moral judgments are the definition of vulgar
even MP seems more legit.
Yes, this is the idol of the clowns with their vulgar language here. But you don't represent Bitcoin.
vomits his bile
Everybody out there is
Nobody is talking about the ideas of the brg and that mod.
Which is no surprise.
FTFY
While irrelevant laughing clowns are exposing their irrelevance with their laughter ....
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MjNUPhIrt24&spfreload=10
... Peter R.'s Ledger is already mentioned in Nature.
https://bitco.in/forum/threads/ledger-a-journal-about-cryptocurrency-and-blockchain-research.55/#post-1636
That's the difference between Peter R. and irrelevant clowns.
The clowns you refer too are the ones actually working on Bitcoin development which make them more relevant than Peter could ever hope to be.
The clowns I refer to are you and alikes. Gavin (the lead developer before core got compromised) was one of them who made Bitcoin relevant.
At the moment core is compromised and hijacked by stagnators. It won't last. They'll be forced to deliver bigger blocks or to become irrelevant.
By whom?
Gavin hasn't done anything significant in Bitcoin in almost two years.
From where I stand Core is healthy as ever and leading the charge of Bitcoin development. Having just disposed of its most toxic parasite I should expect it to thrive even more in the future!
You do understand Core is composed of more people than the Blockstream crew?
ah finally!
Yes. that's the difference between him and a '50 posts a day spammer' like that brg0815.
Peter might be competent in his own field.
Unfortunately when it comes to Bitcoin he's in way over his head
meh, i doubt he would even be competent in his own field.
he does not seem to practice it in any way and instead spend his life on some internet forum and reddit.. + the GIF lessons 101!!1
vomits his bile
Everybody out there is
Nobody is talking about the ideas of the brg and that mod.
Which is no surprise.
FTFY
While irrelevant laughing clowns are exposing their irrelevance with their laughter ....
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MjNUPhIrt24&spfreload=10
... Peter R.'s Ledger is already mentioned in Nature.
https://bitco.in/forum/threads/ledger-a-journal-about-cryptocurrency-and-blockchain-research.55/#post-1636
That's the difference between Peter R. and irrelevant clowns.
The clowns you refer too are the ones actually working on Bitcoin development which make them more relevant than Peter could ever hope to be.
The clowns I refer to are you and alikes. Gavin (the lead developer before core got compromised) was one of them who made Bitcoin relevant.
At the moment core is compromised and hijacked by stagnators. It won't last. They'll be forced to deliver bigger blocks or to become irrelevant.
Jump to: