Topic: Bitcoin XT - Officially #REKT (also goes for BIP101 fraud) - page 165. (Read 378996 times)
September 26, 2015, 04:35:07 PM
Those xt just crashed the market how can a team has two vision and instead to ask community to choose they tryed to force us into darkness.Its time to the real satoshi nakamoto returns and take this project ahead ,before those team kill it.
September 26, 2015, 03:46:37 PM
I suppose this thread refuses to die just like BIP101 is refusing to die. Since it represents both hope and fear for different people.
BIP101 is at this point the deadest it could possibly be. I can also run a node with funky rules that will never be activated and claim it's not dead.The point is, with the current load in the network (under 1MB blocks still) people in some places already have hard time keeping up when running full nodes continuously due to the fact that data needs to be transmitted multiple times between many peers. So in the case of XT, if the new rules become active and blocks get even slightly bigger, you won't be able to run that wonderful XT client anymore. You are effectively voting yourselves out of Bitcoin.
That's the irony of it, that's why it has ">>(e)X(i)T" in its logo, go check it out!
Of course, people always have a choice, but paradoxically within that choice is also an option to give it away.
Being able to validate the blockchain is an important part of Bitcoin's original core value proposition, it needs to stay that way.
September 26, 2015, 03:35:30 PM
I suppose this thread refuses to die just like BIP101 is refusing to die. Since it represents both hope and fear for different people.
BIP101 is at this point the deadest it could possibly be. I can also run a node with funky rules that will never be activated and claim it's not dead.Yeah but that is academic. When we say dead we mean... really dead for all practical purposes. Not going to happen. XT only seems like it could happen if Mike was actually a man and did as he said, do it in a mining minority with a checkpoint. But he's a little bitch, so it won't happen. He wants to keep on "influencing" actual Bitcoin.
September 26, 2015, 03:15:09 PM
I suppose this thread refuses to die just like BIP101 is refusing to die. Since it represents both hope and fear for different people.
BIP101 is at this point the deadest it could possibly be. I can also run a node with funky rules that will never be activated and claim it's not dead.
September 26, 2015, 09:21:46 AM
But too bad. We're not going to stop. If you don't like it, fork off ...
Too bad. We're not going to stop. If you don't like it, fork off.
lol how old are you even?
tss we are not phrokers. you and your XTshill buddies are.
this smells the poor 16yo troll running out of arguments.
so yea, ph0rk off.
September 26, 2015, 06:47:43 AM
I suppose this thread refuses to die just like BIP101 is refusing to die. Since it represents both hope and fear for different people.
BIP101 is at this point the deadest it could possibly be. I can also run a node with funky rules that will never be activated and claim it's not dead.
September 26, 2015, 06:19:21 AM
It's all about the Blockchain, people, the Blockchain!!! Don't lose sight of it.
He who holds the "keys" makes the rules.
He who holds the "keys" makes the rules.
September 26, 2015, 03:43:59 AM
But too bad. We're not going to stop. If you don't like it, fork off ...
Too bad. We're not going to stop. If you don't like it, fork off.
September 26, 2015, 02:14:34 AM
I suppose this thread refuses to die just like BIP101 is refusing to die. Since it represents both hope and fear for different people.
September 25, 2015, 06:43:31 PM
I think it is time for this thread to die.
You also thought it was time for the 1MB cap to die.
And you thought it was time for Blockstream and theymos's positions of recognized expertise and extant authority to die.
So pardon me when I dismiss your latest attempt to control the narrative as yet another failed attempt at self-serving wrongheadedness.
I'm not surprised your preference is we not continue to milk you Gavinista lolcows.
But too bad. We're not going to stop. If you don't like it, fork off and join the other 5 or 6 zero-percenters online at Frap.doc's Lonely Island of Disgruntled Gavinwhores.
September 25, 2015, 06:15:10 PM
Also, if your plan is still to make it as cheap as possible for people to run nodes.
The plan is to keep it permissionless.
At the current level it we have already maxed out average home connections.
What's your plan?
To not make it twice as bad by maxing out the blocksize too.
"We've hit one wall already, so we should definitely aim for this second one and speed up. That's bound to make everything better".
We maxed out both the current 1MB block size limit and the average home internet connections at the same time.
I have to disagree with this. We are nowhere near maxing out the limit.
You caught me there! There is still room to grow, it seems...
I'm glad that the level of "precision thinking" is rising on this forum.
September 25, 2015, 06:05:10 PM
Also, if your plan is still to make it as cheap as possible for people to run nodes.
The plan is to keep it permissionless.
At the current level it we have already maxed out average home connections.
What's your plan?
To not make it twice as bad by maxing out the blocksize too.
"We've hit one wall already, so we should definitely aim for this second one and speed up. That's bound to make everything better".
We maxed out both the current 1MB block size limit and the average home internet connections at the same time.
I have to disagree with this. We are nowhere near maxing out the limit.
While the blocks aren't being filled to 1MB (https://blockchain.info/charts/avg-block-size) there are still usually a lot of unconfirmed transactions.
Not a concern. They'd get confirmed right away with a proper fee.
September 25, 2015, 05:49:01 PM
Also, if your plan is still to make it as cheap as possible for people to run nodes.
The plan is to keep it permissionless.
At the current level it we have already maxed out average home connections.
What's your plan?
To not make it twice as bad by maxing out the blocksize too.
"We've hit one wall already, so we should definitely aim for this second one and speed up. That's bound to make everything better".
We maxed out both the current 1MB block size limit and the average home internet connections at the same time.
I have to disagree with this. We are nowhere near maxing out the limit.
While the blocks aren't being filled to 1MB (https://blockchain.info/charts/avg-block-size) there are still usually a lot of unconfirmed transactions.
September 25, 2015, 05:43:25 PM
Also, if your plan is still to make it as cheap as possible for people to run nodes.
The plan is to keep it permissionless.
At the current level it we have already maxed out average home connections.
What's your plan?
To not make it twice as bad by maxing out the blocksize too.
"We've hit one wall already, so we should definitely aim for this second one and speed up. That's bound to make everything better".
We maxed out both the current 1MB block size limit and the average home internet connections at the same time.
I have to disagree with this. We are nowhere near maxing out the limit.
September 25, 2015, 05:42:28 PM
^ can anyone tell this guy I have him on ignore just in case he's speaking to me ? 
September 25, 2015, 05:35:23 PM
I think it is time for this thread to die.
Not one poster here (on either side of the debate) was convinced of an opposing opinion, which is hardly surprising.
See you on the next topic.
Not one poster here (on either side of the debate) was convinced of an opposing opinion, which is hardly surprising.
See you on the next topic.
It was never about convincing anyone but proclaiming Core victory over XT
September 25, 2015, 04:51:30 PM
I think it is time for this thread to die.
Not one poster here (on either side of the debate) was convinced of an opposing opinion, which is hardly surprising.
See you on the next topic.
Not one poster here (on either side of the debate) was convinced of an opposing opinion, which is hardly surprising.
See you on the next topic.
It was never about convincing anyone but proclaiming Core victory over XT
September 25, 2015, 04:41:01 PM
I think it is time for this thread to die.
Like XT?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uHXfEJD6DUk&feature=youtu.be&t=8m48s
When Trace Mayer decides to abandon neutrality and tears Gavin a new one like that, I think it's time to wake up and smell the coffee.
September 25, 2015, 04:35:10 PM
Also, if your plan is still to make it as cheap as possible for people to run nodes.
The plan is to keep it permissionless.
At the current level it we have already maxed out average home connections.
What's your plan?
To not make it twice as bad by maxing out the blocksize too.
"We've hit one wall already, so we should definitely aim for this second one and speed up. That's bound to make everything better".
We maxed out both the current 1MB block size limit and the average home internet connections at the same time.
There is nowhere to go at the moment if you are willing to preserve the fundamental properties of the network.
Bitcoin is the biggest network of its kind for now that allows you to have full access to the blockchain from an average household PC and internet connection.
That's the whole purpose it was created in the first place.
That's the whole purpose it was created in the first place.
FTFY
Having access to the blockchain =! Running a node.
The key word is "permissionless" access.
The home networks are ubiquitous and are even raised to the status of the "basic human rights" in some countries.
I think it is time for this thread to die.
Not one poster here (on either side of the debate) was convinced of an opposing opinion, which is hardly surprising.
See you on the next topic.
Not one poster here (on either side of the debate) was convinced of an opposing opinion, which is hardly surprising.
See you on the next topic.
Pretty much.
I'm glad that rushing for the (e)X(i)T has finally stopped.
Let's see what other surprises Bitcoin has prepared for us.
legendary
Activity: 1302
Merit: 1008
Core dev leaves me neg feedback #abuse #political
September 25, 2015, 04:17:18 PM
I think it is time for this thread to die.
Not one poster here (on either side of the debate) was convinced of an opposing opinion, which is hardly surprising.
See you on the next topic.
Not one poster here (on either side of the debate) was convinced of an opposing opinion, which is hardly surprising.
See you on the next topic.
Jump to: