BitcoinAverage.com - bitcoin price index - page 6.

Newar

legendary

Activity: 1358

Merit: 1001

https://gliph.me/hUF

Well, ain't that timely?

https://www.lakebtc.com/p/7015?locale=en

Quote

Maker-taker and FREE trading

10/11/2014 01:27

Written by LakeBTC.com

Dear Users,

As promised, LakeBTC is adjusting the fee structures by introducing the maker-taker model. And, to get more users try it out, we are offering an unprecedented low trading and withdrawals rates during the promotional period. You may get 0.05% or FREE trading, 0.1% for USD withdrawal, and 0.0001 BTC for bitcoin withdrawals.

For details, please check out our fee structure page at https://www.lakebtc.com/s/fees?locale=en

Quote

Trading - Taker 0.2%

Trading - Maker

0%, if your past-30 day volume exceeds 2000 BTC.
0.05%, if you retweet or reply with your UID in bitcointalk or reddit. See below for details.
0.15%, otherwise.

Newar

legendary

Activity: 1358

Merit: 1001

https://gliph.me/hUF

You probably missed it, but BTCChina was mentioned in July in this thread. https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=270190.msg7936557#msg7936557
They dropped them for a while already apparently: http://www.coindesk.com/bitcoin-exchange-btc-china-eliminates-trading-fees/

Regarding LakeBTC: after reading the interview with their CEO, I think they are less shady than btc-e, so why not?
http://cointelegraph.com/news/112112/a-ban-should-target-risky-products-and-foul-players-not-bitcoin-itself-lakebtc-ceo-thomas-xie

The only thing I'm not clear about is their Dark pool. They say the orders don't show on the orderbook, but it's not clear to me if they show in their history. I have asked in their thread.

Edit: They do show in the history:

https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.9163423

Quote from: LakeBTC on October 11, 2014, 08:14:14 AM

Quote from: Newar on October 11, 2014, 08:03:16 AM

Quote from: LakeBTC on July 24, 2014, 04:43:41 AM

Quote from: Mieehayii on July 23, 2014, 10:14:10 PM

Quote

dark pool: https://www.lakebtc.com/p/2472?locale=en

how does it works? would the orders within the dark pool to be priority?

no. all orders get matched in the same way. dark pool orders are not displayed in public orderbook - that's the only difference.

Just to clarify: Do they show in the history?

yes they do. they get matched with all other orders and once executed, they show in the history like everybody else.

BitcoinAverage

full member

Activity: 147

Merit: 102

BTCChina are now ignored until this is resolved in v2 of our backend/API

BitcoinAverage

full member

Activity: 147

Merit: 102

Quote from: Newar on October 09, 2014, 01:15:26 PM

Quote from: BitcoinAverage on October 09, 2014, 04:32:16 AM

We wanted to ask the community if they have had any dealings with LakeBTC.com. They have extremely large volume for a new exchange and I don't know a single trader (and i know a few) that have used them.

https://www.lakebtc.com/api_v1/ticker

Just wanted to put the feelers out before integrating them into our system, it seems they paid Coindesk to integrate them into their index or have some other deal.

Note: Yes they do have fees for trades.

How come you are so cautious when you still have BTC China listed? How many traders do you know on that 0% fee exchange?

BTCChina never used to have 0% fees, this is why they are still included in v1, yes we need to remove them, but in v2 they aren't included.

Adding a new exchange i would like to check, i know many people using btcchina and okcoin, but none that use lakebtc.

As for 0% fee exchanges in general we are looking at including them all, but only using for example 25% of their volume for weighting. We would like to do a poll with the community to gauge what people would think is a fair %, and if the idea is ok with the majority.

Newar

legendary

Activity: 1358

Merit: 1001

https://gliph.me/hUF

Quote from: BitcoinAverage on October 09, 2014, 04:32:16 AM

We wanted to ask the community if they have had any dealings with LakeBTC.com. They have extremely large volume for a new exchange and I don't know a single trader (and i know a few) that have used them.

https://www.lakebtc.com/api_v1/ticker

Just wanted to put the feelers out before integrating them into our system, it seems they paid Coindesk to integrate them into their index or have some other deal.

Note: Yes they do have fees for trades.

How come you are so cautious when you still have BTC China listed? How many traders do you know on that 0% fee exchange?

BitcoinAverage

full member

Activity: 147

Merit: 102

We wanted to ask the community if they have had any dealings with LakeBTC.com. They have extremely large volume for a new exchange and I don't know a single trader (and i know a few) that have used them.

https://www.lakebtc.com/api_v1/ticker

Just wanted to put the feelers out before integrating them into our system, it seems they paid Coindesk to integrate them into their index or have some other deal.

Note: Yes they do have fees for trades.

BitcoinAverage

full member

Activity: 147

Merit: 102

Quote from: tspacepilot on September 06, 2014, 10:44:28 PM

Very cool on the widget generator. I write my own code so I won't need it personally but I really like all the work you guys are doing. By the way, is there anything that funds the project? I haven't really seen ads on the site so if they're there, they're pretty unobtrusive.

No funds, only from ads, we could really do with some to push things forward!

Newar

legendary

Activity: 1358

Merit: 1001

https://gliph.me/hUF

Quote from: tspacepilot on September 06, 2014, 10:44:28 PM

Very cool on the widget generator. I write my own code so I won't need it personally but I really like all the work you guys are doing. By the way, is there anything that funds the project? I haven't really seen ads on the site so if they're there, they're pretty unobtrusive.

With AdblockPlus 2.x (that has the "allow unobtrusive ads" feature) I see two ads, plus the referral link to BitVPS. I click them on a regular basis Wink

tspacepilot

legendary

Activity: 1456

Merit: 1081

I may write code in exchange for bitcoins.

Very cool on the widget generator. I write my own code so I won't need it personally but I really like all the work you guys are doing. By the way, is there anything that funds the project? I haven't really seen ads on the site so if they're there, they're pretty unobtrusive.

BitcoinAverage

full member

Activity: 147

Merit: 102

A widget generator for those unable to use the API themselves is available for testing:

https://bitcoinaverage.com/widget.htm

tspacepilot

legendary

Activity: 1456

Merit: 1081

I may write code in exchange for bitcoins.

Quote from: Newar on August 24, 2014, 03:45:41 AM

Quote from: tspacepilot on August 22, 2014, 02:41:11 PM

[...] How did you figure out they were using coinbase?

http://blog.coinbase.com/post/88679063982/coinbases-api-brings-bitcoin-ticker-to-google

Thanks!

Another question: I saw that btc price on bitcoinaverage went all the way to 0 for one moment yesterday. Does anyone know what that's about?

Newar

legendary

Activity: 1358

Merit: 1001

https://gliph.me/hUF

Quote from: tspacepilot on August 22, 2014, 02:41:11 PM

[...] How did you figure out they were using coinbase?

http://blog.coinbase.com/post/88679063982/coinbases-api-brings-bitcoin-ticker-to-google

tspacepilot

legendary

Activity: 1456

Merit: 1081

I may write code in exchange for bitcoins.

Quote from: MICRO on July 24, 2014, 04:53:02 PM

Quote from: tspacepilot on July 24, 2014, 04:36:55 PM

Quote from: BitcoinAverage on July 11, 2014, 04:57:35 AM

BitcoinAverage's historical data is being used by http://libratax.com/ for their accounting software, referencing us for their 'fair market value'

Nice!

I also notice that google recently added a btc price to it's currency conversion service. Do you know if they're using your api or calculating it some other way?

They are using Coinbase for price index .

Too bad, not that coinbase is bad, but bitcoinaverage seems like a better option for an overall view. How did you figure out they were using coinbase?

BitcoinAverage

full member

Activity: 147

Merit: 102

Quote from: mmeijeri on August 21, 2014, 01:32:54 PM

The Bitstamp problem appears to have been fixed.

Its slightly up in the air but most requests are coming back fine.

mmeijeri

hero member

Activity: 714

Merit: 500

Martijn Meijering

The Bitstamp problem appears to have been fixed.

Jazkal

sr. member

Activity: 319

Merit: 250

Quote from: BitcoinAverage on August 02, 2014, 02:40:53 PM

Quote from: mmeijeri on July 26, 2014, 07:58:51 AM

Bitstamp has been marked as "unreachable since 25 Jul, 11:22 UTC" and ignored, but the Bitstamp API appears to be working just fine.

Hi,

Bitstamp, Coinfloor and Kapiton are protected by Incapsula, our hosting provider has had a range blocked by them and they are working to resolve this. We've been contacted the these exchanges directly also and our suggestion is for them to raise a ticket with Incapsula to help speed things along.

Yet another time Incapsula have caused us issues!

Regards
BitcoinAverage

Appreciate the post thanks for the update.

BitcoinAverage

full member

Activity: 147

Merit: 102

Quote from: mmeijeri on July 26, 2014, 07:58:51 AM

Bitstamp has been marked as "unreachable since 25 Jul, 11:22 UTC" and ignored, but the Bitstamp API appears to be working just fine.

Hi,

Bitstamp, Coinfloor and Kapiton are protected by Incapsula, our hosting provider has had a range blocked by them and they are working to resolve this. We've been contacted the these exchanges directly also and our suggestion is for them to raise a ticket with Incapsula to help speed things along.

Yet another time Incapsula have caused us issues!

Regards
BitcoinAverage

MICRO

legendary

Activity: 2464

Merit: 1037

CEO @ Stake.com and Primedice.com

Quote from: rme on August 01, 2014, 04:28:58 PM

Quote from: MICRO on August 01, 2014, 04:06:32 PM

Bitcoinaverage ARE U FCN kidding me ?

Quote from: rme on June 01, 2014, 05:21:01 PM

I dont know if you already do this but just to prevent api or exchange errors I would discard any exchange rate that is 30% up or 30% lower that the other ones.

For example:
Bitcoinaverage pulls Bitstamp, Kraken and BTC-e api, result
Bitstamp: 100$
Kraken: 105$
BTC-E: 10284$ (sounds like an error here)

As BTC-E rate is more than 30% up compared to the other exchanges it is automatically discarded from the average.

Also checking if the exchange rate is more than 10$ can avoid showing 0$ when some api is down.

I know , im just kidding . Cheesy

rme

hero member

Activity: 756

Merit: 504

Quote from: MICRO on August 01, 2014, 04:06:32 PM

Bitcoinaverage ARE U FCN kidding me ?

Quote from: rme on June 01, 2014, 05:21:01 PM

I dont know if you already do this but just to prevent api or exchange errors I would discard any exchange rate that is 30% up or 30% lower that the other ones.

For example:
Bitcoinaverage pulls Bitstamp, Kraken and BTC-e api, result
Bitstamp: 100$
Kraken: 105$
BTC-E: 10284$ (sounds like an error here)

As BTC-E rate is more than 30% up compared to the other exchanges it is automatically discarded from the average.

Also checking if the exchange rate is more than 10$ can avoid showing 0$ when some api is down.

MICRO

legendary

Activity: 2464

Merit: 1037

CEO @ Stake.com and Primedice.com

Bitcoinaverage ARE U FCN kidding me ?

Topic: BitcoinAverage.com - bitcoin price index - page 6. (Read 70036 times)