BitcoinTalk++ script - v0.2.96 - page 51.

jackjack

legendary

Activity: 1176

Merit: 1260

May Bitcoin be touched by his Noodly Appendage

Hey guys, I'm back for writing, not for developping. I should work on the script again within a week.

Todo:

Add 'translate.google.com' support. (I think you just need a Code Snippit in the body section.) From https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/request-make-bitcointalkorg-usable-by-translategooglecom-266678
~~Make it so the 'Reset BT++ password' is on the settings page~~ I deleted it actually
~~Make it optional to hide the 'List of PMs' button, or put it only on the PMs page~~ I moved the link to the settings page
~~Make it so all BT++ buttons are on the same line, separated by dividers~~ There's only the settings page link now
~~Make the MtGox button Hide-able (in the BT++ settings)~~
~~Error with an address formatting when used in a link~~
~~Change MtGox to bitcoinaverage~~ You can now choose your price source
~~Make it possible to change the currency of the BTCUSD bar (in the BT++ settings)~~ You can now choose your price source
Auto-update on Chrome
Use HTTPS
~~Display total votes: [+10/37]~~
Show rankings of voters: [+10^{Brand new}, -3^{Sr. members}, -5^{Hero members}] (this will not look like this mess)
~~JSON~~ jackjack.alwaysdata.net/btoplusone/note.php?no=21053&json=1

Also, please see this poll: https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/bitcointalk-script-thoughts-about-votes-274252
It is about the disclosure of votes

whiskers75

hero member

Activity: 658

Merit: 502

Doesn't use these forums that often.

Quote from: HeroC on August 12, 2013, 10:03:23 PM

Quote from: whiskers75 on August 12, 2013, 03:41:07 AM

* whiskers75 is really disliked.

Nobody hates you, just they disagree with you. Although, you are disliked a lot. Anyway I am on your side.

Correction:

Quote

* whiskers75 is really disagreed with.

It's because I'm a) begging for +1 and b) have that CoinChat history.

tysat

legendary

Activity: 966

Merit: 1004

Keep it real

Quote from: favdesu on August 13, 2013, 10:20:57 AM

btw, I'd rather see bitcoinaverage.com than gox

^^^

Having Mt Gox as the price source seems like the wrong way to go considering the issues people are having with them and getting money out.

favdesu

legendary

Activity: 1764

Merit: 1000

btw, I'd rather see bitcoinaverage.com than gox

HeroC

legendary

Activity: 858

Merit: 1000

Quote from: whiskers75 on August 12, 2013, 03:41:07 AM

* whiskers75 is really disliked.

Nobody hates you, just they disagree with you. Although, you are disliked a lot. Anyway I am on your side.

Correction:

Quote

* whiskers75 is really disagreed with.

escrow.ms

legendary

Activity: 1274

Merit: 1004

Quote from: whiskers75 on August 12, 2013, 03:41:07 AM

* whiskers75 is really disliked.

whiskers75 got +1

HeroC

legendary

Activity: 858

Merit: 1000

Quote from: whiskers75 on August 11, 2013, 03:07:47 AM

No, we need to see who tagged you.
Or at least have some kind of system wherein the more points you have, the more your tag affects the tagged person's rating. (e.g., I have +8, and tag someone with 0 with -1. End result: -4.)

Nah, keep them all the same.

jimmijames73

newbie

Activity: 8

Merit: 500

Quote from: jackjack on August 05, 2013, 09:19:57 AM

That was something I wanted your thoughts about.
I do have the full list of votes. For now I'm the only one having access to it.
So here are the possibilities:

I make everything public
One can see who voted for him and who he voted for
Nothing public just like now

I would prefer option 3 (nothing public), as the other two public options could discourage people from using the -1, since those people who get negative votes might give back -1 in kind.

Quote from: jackjack on August 05, 2013, 11:01:57 AM

Also, what are your thoughts about a scammer tags system? Just like the regular one.
The system could be different though.
I just want to gather opinions for now, nothing is decided.

What about the ability to tag alt accounts, i.e.

moomerycreamery
(Possible Alt of joeyjmr8484)

There would need to be some way to get a consensus on which are alt accounts, maybe a dedicated thread or endoresment by a moderator. The comments section in the trust system is sometimes used to tag alt accounts, but it would be good to have it within the thread below the username.

whiskers75

hero member

Activity: 658

Merit: 502

Doesn't use these forums that often.

* whiskers75 is really disliked.

nimda

hero member

Activity: 784

Merit: 1000

0xFB0D8D1534241423

Quote from: favdesu on August 11, 2013, 07:17:22 AM

Quote from: whiskers75 on August 11, 2013, 03:07:47 AM

No, we need to see who tagged you.
Or at least have some kind of system wherein the more points you have, the more your tag affects the tagged person's rating. (e.g., I have +8, and tag someone with 0 with -1. End result: -4.)

how would that be different from the trust system?

I'm against it. every point should have the same face value.

It would be exactly like the trust system except without the trust list. I.e. you'd "trust" everyone's ratings based on their own global ratings alone. It would be much more susceptible to shills.

Mitchell

copper member

Activity: 3948

Merit: 2201

Verified awesomeness ✔

Quote from: favdesu on August 11, 2013, 07:17:22 AM

Quote from: whiskers75 on August 11, 2013, 03:07:47 AM

No, we need to see who tagged you.
Or at least have some kind of system wherein the more points you have, the more your tag affects the tagged person's rating. (e.g., I have +8, and tag someone with 0 with -1. End result: -4.)

how would that be different from the trust system?

I'm against it. every point should have the same face value.

I do agree with that.

favdesu

legendary

Activity: 1764

Merit: 1000

Quote from: whiskers75 on August 11, 2013, 03:07:47 AM

No, we need to see who tagged you.
Or at least have some kind of system wherein the more points you have, the more your tag affects the tagged person's rating. (e.g., I have +8, and tag someone with 0 with -1. End result: -4.)

how would that be different from the trust system?

I'm against it. every point should have the same face value.

whiskers75

hero member

Activity: 658

Merit: 502

Doesn't use these forums that often.

No, we need to see who tagged you.
Or at least have some kind of system wherein the more points you have, the more your tag affects the tagged person's rating. (e.g., I have +8, and tag someone with 0 with -1. End result: -4.)

whiskers75

hero member

Activity: 658

Merit: 502

Doesn't use these forums that often.

Quote from: 🏰 TradeFortress 🏰 on August 05, 2013, 05:36:53 AM

I have 3160 PMs Cheesy

5% = me.

Also, I noticed I have -1. Sad

why? what did I ever do to deserve this

Mitchell

copper member

Activity: 3948

Merit: 2201

Verified awesomeness ✔

Quote from: jackjack on August 09, 2013, 11:38:10 AM

Not sure about the Google translation but all the rest is easy to do, and will be added within 7 days

Welcome back btw. How was your vacation? Tongue

jackjack

legendary

Activity: 1176

Merit: 1260

May Bitcoin be touched by his Noodly Appendage

Not sure about the Google translation but all the rest is easy to do, and will be added within 7 days

Mitchell

copper member

Activity: 3948

Merit: 2201

Verified awesomeness ✔

Make it possible to chance the curreny for the MtGox bar (in the BT++ settings).

HeroC

legendary

Activity: 858

Merit: 1000

Ideas:

Add 'translate.google.com' support. (I think you just need a Code Snippit in the body section.) From https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/request-make-bitcointalkorg-usable-by-translategooglecom-266678
Make it so the 'Reset BT++ password' is on the settings page
Make it optional to hide the 'List of PMs' button, or put it only on the PMs page.
Make it so all BT++ buttons are on the same line, separated by dividers.
Make the MtGox button Hide-able (in the BT++ settings)
Make the price ticker be able to use BTC-E (in the BT++ settings)

I will add more when I see/think of them. Great job!

Here is an error with an address formatting: