Hello all,
I am trying to install bitcrack on my laptop using os ubuntu 22.04 has 16 gb ram and geforce rtx 2080. But I am getting error => make: *** [Makefile:113: dir_clunittest] Error 2.
an anybody direct me to link which shows step by step how to install bitcrack without errors and the command line to use for better results. Thanks
Topic: BitCrack - A tool for brute-forcing private keys - page 2. (Read 77093 times)
Hello,
there is a benchmark database of nvidia rtx 30s and 40s?
there is a benchmark database of nvidia rtx 30s and 40s?
hi, I am also looking for such table, but no luck till now
My results with Ubuntu 22.04, nVidia 545.x.x drivers and CUDA v12.3 on i5 CPU, 96 GB DDR5 RAM, single RTX 4090 (water cooled, from MSI)
| Software | t | b | p | result | Watts |
| cuBitCrack | 256 | 256 | 512 | ~2975 MKey/s | 466 |
| cuBitCrack | 256 | 256 | 1024 | ~3040 MKey/s | 467 |
| cuBitCrack | 128 | 512 | 1024 | ~3080 MKey/s | 467 |
| cuBitCrack | 256 | 256 | 2048 | ~3080 MKey/s | 467 |
| cuBitCrack | 128 | 512 | 2048 | ~3165 MKey/s | 464 |
| cuBitCrack | 128 | 256 | 4096 | ~3130 MKey/s | 464 |
| cuBitCrack | 256 | 128 | 4096 | ~3090 MKey/s | 464 |
I don't know if it can be better. I played with param values longer time, but many time I was stopped by "[Info] Error: out of memory" or "[Info] Error: too many resources requested for launch".
I would suggest to stop using bitcrack until it is updated, if ever.
A 4090 using the vanitysearch with bitcrack option, gets 5000 MKey/s, and using KeyHuntCuda, a 4090 gets over 6000 MKey/s.
You are wasting MKey/s by still trying to use bitcrack, IMO.
Hi @WanderingPhilospher would you share the link for vanitysearch with bitcrack option or KeyhuntCuda
https://github.com/ashraful1978/secp8x32_KeyHunt-Cuda
Thank Sir,
When your github update for new tools Sir? I use VBCr.exe but look like need more luck when running for random
any success cases ?
would like to hear hard work and reward with btc on cracking private keys from any given btc addresses on the blockchain
would like to hear hard work and reward with btc on cracking private keys from any given btc addresses on the blockchain
Hello,
there is a benchmark database of nvidia rtx 30s and 40s?
there is a benchmark database of nvidia rtx 30s and 40s?
hi, I am also looking for such table, but no luck till now
My results with Ubuntu 22.04, nVidia 545.x.x drivers and CUDA v12.3 on i5 CPU, 96 GB DDR5 RAM, single RTX 4090 (water cooled, from MSI)
| Software | t | b | p | result | Watts |
| cuBitCrack | 256 | 256 | 512 | ~2975 MKey/s | 466 |
| cuBitCrack | 256 | 256 | 1024 | ~3040 MKey/s | 467 |
| cuBitCrack | 128 | 512 | 1024 | ~3080 MKey/s | 467 |
| cuBitCrack | 256 | 256 | 2048 | ~3080 MKey/s | 467 |
| cuBitCrack | 128 | 512 | 2048 | ~3165 MKey/s | 464 |
| cuBitCrack | 128 | 256 | 4096 | ~3130 MKey/s | 464 |
| cuBitCrack | 256 | 128 | 4096 | ~3090 MKey/s | 464 |
I don't know if it can be better. I played with param values longer time, but many time I was stopped by "[Info] Error: out of memory" or "[Info] Error: too many resources requested for launch".
I would suggest to stop using bitcrack until it is updated, if ever.
A 4090 using the vanitysearch with bitcrack option, gets 5000 MKey/s, and using KeyHuntCuda, a 4090 gets over 6000 MKey/s.
You are wasting MKey/s by still trying to use bitcrack, IMO.
Hi @WanderingPhilospher would you share the link for vanitysearch with bitcrack option or KeyhuntCuda
https://github.com/ashraful1978/secp8x32_KeyHunt-Cuda
Hello,
there is a benchmark database of nvidia rtx 30s and 40s?
there is a benchmark database of nvidia rtx 30s and 40s?
hi, I am also looking for such table, but no luck till now
My results with Ubuntu 22.04, nVidia 545.x.x drivers and CUDA v12.3 on i5 CPU, 96 GB DDR5 RAM, single RTX 4090 (water cooled, from MSI)
| Software | t | b | p | result | Watts |
| cuBitCrack | 256 | 256 | 512 | ~2975 MKey/s | 466 |
| cuBitCrack | 256 | 256 | 1024 | ~3040 MKey/s | 467 |
| cuBitCrack | 128 | 512 | 1024 | ~3080 MKey/s | 467 |
| cuBitCrack | 256 | 256 | 2048 | ~3080 MKey/s | 467 |
| cuBitCrack | 128 | 512 | 2048 | ~3165 MKey/s | 464 |
| cuBitCrack | 128 | 256 | 4096 | ~3130 MKey/s | 464 |
| cuBitCrack | 256 | 128 | 4096 | ~3090 MKey/s | 464 |
I don't know if it can be better. I played with param values longer time, but many time I was stopped by "[Info] Error: out of memory" or "[Info] Error: too many resources requested for launch".
I would suggest to stop using bitcrack until it is updated, if ever.
A 4090 using the vanitysearch with bitcrack option, gets 5000 MKey/s, and using KeyHuntCuda, a 4090 gets over 6000 MKey/s.
You are wasting MKey/s by still trying to use bitcrack, IMO.
Hi @WanderingPhilospher would you share the link for vanitysearch with bitcrack option or KeyhuntCuda
Question:
Is it possible to make search specific spaces in the priv-key? Like shown below in X:
00000000000000000000000000000XXXXXXXX000000000000000000000000000
Yes this is done by using -stride option Is it possible to make search specific spaces in the priv-key? Like shown below in X:
00000000000000000000000000000XXXXXXXX000000000000000000000000000
Yes, i got it but could not figure out how can i correctly mark the start-end points. Can you give me the stride setting for this example? This will help me.
Your sample is 64 length so i assumed it is hex privatekey format. On this basis the start, end and stride for the key search will be....
start = 0x00000000000000000000000000000000000
end = 0xFFFFFFFF000000000000000000000000000
stride = 0x1000000000000000000000000000
I think you will modify it accordingly to fill your 0 values in start and end..but no need to change anything in stride.
Thank you
I would suggest to stop using bitcrack until it is updated, if ever.
A 4090 using the vanitysearch with bitcrack option, gets 5000 MKey/s, and using KeyHuntCuda, a 4090 gets over 6000 MKey/s.
You are wasting MKey/s by still trying to use bitcrack, IMO.
A 4090 using the vanitysearch with bitcrack option, gets 5000 MKey/s, and using KeyHuntCuda, a 4090 gets over 6000 MKey/s.
You are wasting MKey/s by still trying to use bitcrack, IMO.
Thank you, I wish I had known earlier
Question:
Is it possible to make search specific spaces in the priv-key? Like shown below in X:
00000000000000000000000000000XXXXXXXX000000000000000000000000000
Yes this is done by using -stride option Is it possible to make search specific spaces in the priv-key? Like shown below in X:
00000000000000000000000000000XXXXXXXX000000000000000000000000000
Yes, i got it but could not figure out how can i correctly mark the start-end points. Can you give me the stride setting for this example? This will help me.
Your sample is 64 length so i assumed it is hex privatekey format. On this basis the start, end and stride for the key search will be....
start = 0x00000000000000000000000000000000000
end = 0xFFFFFFFF000000000000000000000000000
stride = 0x1000000000000000000000000000
I think you will modify it accordingly to fill your 0 values in start and end..but no need to change anything in stride.
Question:
Is it possible to make search specific spaces in the priv-key? Like shown below in X:
00000000000000000000000000000XXXXXXXX000000000000000000000000000
Yes this is done by using -stride option Is it possible to make search specific spaces in the priv-key? Like shown below in X:
00000000000000000000000000000XXXXXXXX000000000000000000000000000
Yes, i got it but could not figure out how can i correctly mark the start-end points. Can you give me the stride setting for this example? This will help me.
Question:
Is it possible to make search specific spaces in the priv-key? Like shown below in X:
00000000000000000000000000000XXXXXXXX000000000000000000000000000
Yes this is done by using -stride option Is it possible to make search specific spaces in the priv-key? Like shown below in X:
00000000000000000000000000000XXXXXXXX000000000000000000000000000
Question:
Is it possible to make search specific spaces in the priv-key? Like shown below in X:
00000000000000000000000000000XXXXXXXX000000000000000000000000000
Is it possible to make search specific spaces in the priv-key? Like shown below in X:
00000000000000000000000000000XXXXXXXX000000000000000000000000000
Hello, I also want to join the key finder (1000 BTC Bitcoin Challenge Transaction) but I don't know how to install BitCrack program (I have one rtx 2060 video card I want to try it), is it possible to have a detailed description or a video how to install this BitCrack program step by step and set it up correctly, I would like to try the selective method.
Hello,
there is a benchmark database of nvidia rtx 30s and 40s?
there is a benchmark database of nvidia rtx 30s and 40s?
hi, I am also looking for such table, but no luck till now
My results with Ubuntu 22.04, nVidia 545.x.x drivers and CUDA v12.3 on i5 CPU, 96 GB DDR5 RAM, single RTX 4090 (water cooled, from MSI)
| Software | t | b | p | result | Watts |
| cuBitCrack | 256 | 256 | 512 | ~2975 MKey/s | 466 |
| cuBitCrack | 256 | 256 | 1024 | ~3040 MKey/s | 467 |
| cuBitCrack | 128 | 512 | 1024 | ~3080 MKey/s | 467 |
| cuBitCrack | 256 | 256 | 2048 | ~3080 MKey/s | 467 |
| cuBitCrack | 128 | 512 | 2048 | ~3165 MKey/s | 464 |
| cuBitCrack | 128 | 256 | 4096 | ~3130 MKey/s | 464 |
| cuBitCrack | 256 | 128 | 4096 | ~3090 MKey/s | 464 |
I don't know if it can be better. I played with param values longer time, but many time I was stopped by "[Info] Error: out of memory" or "[Info] Error: too many resources requested for launch".
I would suggest to stop using bitcrack until it is updated, if ever.
A 4090 using the vanitysearch with bitcrack option, gets 5000 MKey/s, and using KeyHuntCuda, a 4090 gets over 6000 MKey/s.
You are wasting MKey/s by still trying to use bitcrack, IMO.
Thanks for reply, you are right. I am not using it anymore, just made test before and want to share some results.
I went to kangaroos/bsgs where is so much space for improvements and max 4090 utilization :-)
Hello,
there is a benchmark database of nvidia rtx 30s and 40s?
there is a benchmark database of nvidia rtx 30s and 40s?
hi, I am also looking for such table, but no luck till now
My results with Ubuntu 22.04, nVidia 545.x.x drivers and CUDA v12.3 on i5 CPU, 96 GB DDR5 RAM, single RTX 4090 (water cooled, from MSI)
| Software | t | b | p | result | Watts |
| cuBitCrack | 256 | 256 | 512 | ~2975 MKey/s | 466 |
| cuBitCrack | 256 | 256 | 1024 | ~3040 MKey/s | 467 |
| cuBitCrack | 128 | 512 | 1024 | ~3080 MKey/s | 467 |
| cuBitCrack | 256 | 256 | 2048 | ~3080 MKey/s | 467 |
| cuBitCrack | 128 | 512 | 2048 | ~3165 MKey/s | 464 |
| cuBitCrack | 128 | 256 | 4096 | ~3130 MKey/s | 464 |
| cuBitCrack | 256 | 128 | 4096 | ~3090 MKey/s | 464 |
I don't know if it can be better. I played with param values longer time, but many time I was stopped by "[Info] Error: out of memory" or "[Info] Error: too many resources requested for launch".
I would suggest to stop using bitcrack until it is updated, if ever.
A 4090 using the vanitysearch with bitcrack option, gets 5000 MKey/s, and using KeyHuntCuda, a 4090 gets over 6000 MKey/s.
You are wasting MKey/s by still trying to use bitcrack, IMO.
Hello,
there is a benchmark database of nvidia rtx 30s and 40s?
there is a benchmark database of nvidia rtx 30s and 40s?
hi, I am also looking for such table, but no luck till now
My results with Ubuntu 22.04, nVidia 545.x.x drivers and CUDA v12.3 on i5 CPU, 96 GB DDR5 RAM, single RTX 4090 (water cooled, from MSI)
| Software | t | b | p | result | Watts |
| cuBitCrack | 256 | 256 | 512 | ~2975 MKey/s | 466 |
| cuBitCrack | 256 | 256 | 1024 | ~3040 MKey/s | 467 |
| cuBitCrack | 128 | 512 | 1024 | ~3080 MKey/s | 467 |
| cuBitCrack | 256 | 256 | 2048 | ~3080 MKey/s | 467 |
| cuBitCrack | 128 | 512 | 2048 | ~3165 MKey/s | 464 |
| cuBitCrack | 128 | 256 | 4096 | ~3130 MKey/s | 464 |
| cuBitCrack | 256 | 128 | 4096 | ~3090 MKey/s | 464 |
I don't know if it can be better. I played with param values longer time, but many time I was stopped by "[Info] Error: out of memory" or "[Info] Error: too many resources requested for launch".
Hello,
there is a benchmark database of nvidia rtx 30s and 40s?
there is a benchmark database of nvidia rtx 30s and 40s?
Can try different combinations multiple times, personal recommendation 256 512 1024 or 512 1024 2048？
What is the best Settings for an RTX 3090?
I have this for now -b 128 -t 256 -p 1024 but is this the best setting?
I have this for now -b 128 -t 256 -p 1024 but is this the best setting?
I remember I saw somewhere the benchmark table with the speeds for BitCrack with different nvidia cards (2080,3080,4080, .... ti versions, Tesla, etc). Can you please share it or write the current benchmarks (actual in 2024 with the most common hardware).
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.55552855Unrelated, but I am just wondering have you ever found any keys from all those sub-ranges you were searching in for on Bitcrack for a long time, or did you not find anything?
I remember I saw somewhere the benchmark table with the speeds for BitCrack with different nvidia cards (2080,3080,4080, .... ti versions, Tesla, etc). Can you please share it or write the current benchmarks (actual in 2024 with the most common hardware).
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.55552855 Jump to: