Topic: ◈◈Bitcredit ◈◈ Migrating to UniQredit◈◈ - page 216. (Read 284545 times)
Is this coin not listed in coinmarketcap.com?
what is the total number of coins that will be mined? I can't seem to find that information.
Also the main website in the OP is down.
Also the main website in the OP is down.
Market cap of this coin right here is about $15k. Wow.
If these masternodes or 'Bank Nodes' work properly this could be the biggest percentage increase in crypto in 2015.
And looking at price and others' posting activity, you're starting to get more attention, Dev. Just don't disappear, ala Spreadcoin Dev.
You ever consider putting your real ID to this project?
Also, speaking of Spreadcoin, the Dev before he disappeared, was working on a system of masternodes which had a dynamic requirement amount versus static amount. So overall there would be 1440 elected masternodes (1440 blocks per day) and whichever masternodes had the most Spreadcoin stored in them were the elected masternodes. So some masternodes had thousands of Spreadcoin while others only had a couple hundred but as long as the masternode had enough Spreadcoin to stay ranked among the top 1440 masternodes it would get elected.
Any chance you might consider this kind of dynamic masternode model, requiring your masternode to have as much BCR needed to stay elected, versus a static model, requiring 250k BCR ?
JL
If these masternodes or 'Bank Nodes' work properly this could be the biggest percentage increase in crypto in 2015.
And looking at price and others' posting activity, you're starting to get more attention, Dev. Just don't disappear, ala Spreadcoin Dev.
You ever consider putting your real ID to this project?
Also, speaking of Spreadcoin, the Dev before he disappeared, was working on a system of masternodes which had a dynamic requirement amount versus static amount. So overall there would be 1440 elected masternodes (1440 blocks per day) and whichever masternodes had the most Spreadcoin stored in them were the elected masternodes. So some masternodes had thousands of Spreadcoin while others only had a couple hundred but as long as the masternode had enough Spreadcoin to stay ranked among the top 1440 masternodes it would get elected.
Any chance you might consider this kind of dynamic masternode model, requiring your masternode to have as much BCR needed to stay elected, versus a static model, requiring 250k BCR ?
JL
Build fails on Xubuntu 14.04 64. All deps in build-unix.md are installed.
Quote
CXX qt/qt_libbitcreditqt_a-poolbrowser.o
In file included from qt/poolbrowser.cpp:1:0:
qt/poolbrowser.h:21:21: fatal error: QUrlQuery: No such file or directory
#include
In file included from qt/poolbrowser.cpp:1:0:
qt/poolbrowser.h:21:21: fatal error: QUrlQuery: No such file or directory
#include
Basically, whenever you have a wallet that includes a trading page, you can expect to have to specify Qt5 in order to satisfy the JSON handling requirement that arises when interacting with exchange APIs.
For me, there are some minor file permission issues with the latest commit, so ensure that autogen.sh, share/genbuild.sh and src/leveldb/build_detect_platform are all executable.
Then you should be okay to run ...
Code:
$ ./autogen.sh
$ ./configure --with-gui=qt5
$ make
(If you can live without wallet portability, you can link to the ubuntu distro libdb-5.* libs by using the incompatibility directive: --with-incompatible-bdb.)
Cheers
Graham
Build fails on Xubuntu 14.04 64. All deps in build-unix.md are installed.
Quote
CXX qt/qt_libbitcreditqt_a-poolbrowser.o
In file included from qt/poolbrowser.cpp:1:0:
qt/poolbrowser.h:21:21: fatal error: QUrlQuery: No such file or directory
#include
^
compilation terminated.
make[2]: *** [qt/qt_libbitcreditqt_a-poolbrowser.o] Error 1
make[2]: Leaving directory `/home/stu/Downloads/bicreditsnew-master/src'
make[1]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1
In file included from qt/poolbrowser.cpp:1:0:
qt/poolbrowser.h:21:21: fatal error: QUrlQuery: No such file or directory
#include
^
compilation terminated.
make[2]: *** [qt/qt_libbitcreditqt_a-poolbrowser.o] Error 1
make[2]: Leaving directory `/home/stu/Downloads/bicreditsnew-master/src'
make[1]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1
That's a QT error, i use QT5 for building.
Build fails on Xubuntu 14.04 64. All deps in build-unix.md are installed.
Quote
CXX qt/qt_libbitcreditqt_a-poolbrowser.o
In file included from qt/poolbrowser.cpp:1:0:
qt/poolbrowser.h:21:21: fatal error: QUrlQuery: No such file or directory
#include
^
compilation terminated.
make[2]: *** [qt/qt_libbitcreditqt_a-poolbrowser.o] Error 1
make[2]: Leaving directory `/home/stu/Downloads/bicreditsnew-master/src'
make[1]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1
In file included from qt/poolbrowser.cpp:1:0:
qt/poolbrowser.h:21:21: fatal error: QUrlQuery: No such file or directory
#include
^
compilation terminated.
make[2]: *** [qt/qt_libbitcreditqt_a-poolbrowser.o] Error 1
make[2]: Leaving directory `/home/stu/Downloads/bicreditsnew-master/src'
make[1]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1
Now making a serious effort to look into secure messaging and voting for the next update. Also i will return to refining the trust protocol and related material.
GUI requires update as well though i can't figure a scheme yet.
GUI requires update as well though i can't figure a scheme yet.
Shit I'm intrigued as all hell by your coin and I find your stick-to-it-iveness and problem-solving awesome, but I can't figure out how in the hell to: 1) find my address in my wallet or 2) mine this using my AMD gpu. Sorry, I'm usually a dip when it comes to .conf's and .bat's.
JL
JL
To get a receiving address, go to the receive tab and select "request payment"
You will get a uri, an address and the corresponding QR code all of which can be used to receive funds.
To mine with an amd GPU , you can choose any of the gpu miners in the OP.
Thanks
By the way, you going to update OP that BCR trades on bittrex?
I had forgotten that , done.
Shit I'm intrigued as all hell by your coin and I find your stick-to-it-iveness and problem-solving awesome, but I can't figure out how in the hell to: 1) find my address in my wallet or 2) mine this using my AMD gpu. Sorry, I'm usually a dip when it comes to .conf's and .bat's.
JL
JL
To get a receiving address, go to the receive tab and select "request payment"
You will get a uri, an address and the corresponding QR code all of which can be used to receive funds.
To mine with an amd GPU , you can choose any of the gpu miners in the OP.
Thanks
By the way, you going to update OP that BCR trades on bittrex?
Shit I'm intrigued as all hell by your coin and I find your stick-to-it-iveness and problem-solving awesome, but I can't figure out how in the hell to: 1) find my address in my wallet or 2) mine this using my AMD gpu. Sorry, I'm usually a dip when it comes to .conf's and .bat's.
JL
JL
To get a receiving address, go to the receive tab and select "request payment"
You will get a uri, an address and the corresponding QR code all of which can be used to receive funds.
To mine with an amd GPU , you can choose any of the gpu miners in the OP.
Thanks
Shit I'm intrigued as all hell by your coin and I find your stick-to-it-iveness and problem-solving awesome, but I can't figure out how in the hell to: 1) find my address in my wallet or 2) mine this using my AMD gpu. Sorry, I'm usually a dip when it comes to .conf's and .bat's.
Edit: damn, you're responsive. Thanks for help. I think I need a DIY step-by-step guide. Basically if it ain't x11 or scrypt I'm lost.
JL
Edit: damn, you're responsive. Thanks for help. I think I need a DIY step-by-step guide. Basically if it ain't x11 or scrypt I'm lost.
JL
Expansion on the idea of voting.
While working on the concepts of Banking, i realized that eventually a good business ethic and excessive funding could lead to centralization. So we need something to regulate the influence of Banks on the overall system, just the need for profit can at times not be enough incentive to maintain order and ethical business practice.
So... i came across this idea, let's introduce a credit rating system with a twist...let the people decide which is the better bank. As a customer, if you are satisfied by a Bank's performance, you can give them a thumbs up. This means that there is more at stake than just profit as a Bank, your reputation also goes on the line.
So banks serve the users, and if they fail at their jobs, they will get a low rating, thus less business.
While working on the concepts of Banking, i realized that eventually a good business ethic and excessive funding could lead to centralization. So we need something to regulate the influence of Banks on the overall system, just the need for profit can at times not be enough incentive to maintain order and ethical business practice.
So... i came across this idea, let's introduce a credit rating system with a twist...let the people decide which is the better bank. As a customer, if you are satisfied by a Bank's performance, you can give them a thumbs up. This means that there is more at stake than just profit as a Bank, your reputation also goes on the line.
So banks serve the users, and if they fail at their jobs, they will get a low rating, thus less business.
In what way a bank can influence the overall system ?
I know some very shrewd businessmen, especially now in the formative stages, with 60 BTC, someone could buy enough of the money supply to have massive influence on price, lending rates and many other service charges. Also he/she could spin up a ton of banks and try to force their agenda.
While i could apply a policy that could crush such ambitions i have to remain neutral and trust the market to do it's work, and i'm sure everyone agrees as lead dev i have to remain dispassionate and be objective.
So rather than a policy of dev interference, let's put policy management and policing functions in the hands of the average user. I will build in enforcement mechanisms as the concept grows, with an eventual expansion of the trust system to make it interactive, allowing you to vote for more than just a Bank, you can also vouch for a person.
Agree with that, but, as a "bank" or a person could influence the system, as a user. wasref said very well that. You must counterbalance in both ways. The negative feedback must be explained by user, and must be accepted or not by the bank with arguments.
About the shrewd businessmen, that could happen if you like or not, that's the "beauty" of capitalism. With 60 BTC, yes, could have an massive influence on the market, but the market will self adjust.
The implementation is still up for discussion, and i agree there needs to be balance. The problem is that it's always easy for us to coe up with a great concept....but the code is always the bottleneck.
Expansion on the idea of voting.
While working on the concepts of Banking, i realized that eventually a good business ethic and excessive funding could lead to centralization. So we need something to regulate the influence of Banks on the overall system, just the need for profit can at times not be enough incentive to maintain order and ethical business practice.
So... i came across this idea, let's introduce a credit rating system with a twist...let the people decide which is the better bank. As a customer, if you are satisfied by a Bank's performance, you can give them a thumbs up. This means that there is more at stake than just profit as a Bank, your reputation also goes on the line.
So banks serve the users, and if they fail at their jobs, they will get a low rating, thus less business.
While working on the concepts of Banking, i realized that eventually a good business ethic and excessive funding could lead to centralization. So we need something to regulate the influence of Banks on the overall system, just the need for profit can at times not be enough incentive to maintain order and ethical business practice.
So... i came across this idea, let's introduce a credit rating system with a twist...let the people decide which is the better bank. As a customer, if you are satisfied by a Bank's performance, you can give them a thumbs up. This means that there is more at stake than just profit as a Bank, your reputation also goes on the line.
So banks serve the users, and if they fail at their jobs, they will get a low rating, thus less business.
In what way a bank can influence the overall system ?
I know some very shrewd businessmen, especially now in the formative stages, with 60 BTC, someone could buy enough of the money supply to have massive influence on price, lending rates and many other service charges. Also he/she could spin up a ton of banks and try to force their agenda.
While i could apply a policy that could crush such ambitions i have to remain neutral and trust the market to do it's work, and i'm sure everyone agrees as lead dev i have to remain dispassionate and be objective.
So rather than a policy of dev interference, let's put policy management and policing functions in the hands of the average user. I will build in enforcement mechanisms as the concept grows, with an eventual expansion of the trust system to make it interactive, allowing you to vote for more than just a Bank, you can also vouch for a person.
Agree with that, but, as a "bank" or a person could influence the system, as a user. wasref said very well that. You must counterbalance in both ways. The negative feedback must be explained by user, and must be accepted or not by the bank with arguments.
About the shrewd businessmen, that could happen if you like or not, that's the "beauty" of capitalism. With 60 BTC, yes, could have an massive influence on the market, but the market will self adjust.
Expansion on the idea of voting.
While working on the concepts of Banking, i realized that eventually a good business ethic and excessive funding could lead to centralization. So we need something to regulate the influence of Banks on the overall system, just the need for profit can at times not be enough incentive to maintain order and ethical business practice.
So... i came across this idea, let's introduce a credit rating system with a twist...let the people decide which is the better bank. As a customer, if you are satisfied by a Bank's performance, you can give them a thumbs up. This means that there is more at stake than just profit as a Bank, your reputation also goes on the line.
So banks serve the users, and if they fail at their jobs, they will get a low rating, thus less business.
While working on the concepts of Banking, i realized that eventually a good business ethic and excessive funding could lead to centralization. So we need something to regulate the influence of Banks on the overall system, just the need for profit can at times not be enough incentive to maintain order and ethical business practice.
So... i came across this idea, let's introduce a credit rating system with a twist...let the people decide which is the better bank. As a customer, if you are satisfied by a Bank's performance, you can give them a thumbs up. This means that there is more at stake than just profit as a Bank, your reputation also goes on the line.
So banks serve the users, and if they fail at their jobs, they will get a low rating, thus less business.
In what way a bank can influence the overall system ?
I know some very shrewd businessmen, especially now in the formative stages, with 60 BTC, someone could buy enough of the money supply to have massive influence on price, lending rates and many other service charges. Also he/she could spin up a ton of banks and try to force their agenda.
While i could apply a policy that could crush such ambitions i have to remain neutral and trust the market to do it's work, and i'm sure everyone agrees as lead dev i have to remain dispassionate and be objective.
So rather than a policy of dev interference, let's put policy management and policing functions in the hands of the average user. I will build in enforcement mechanisms as the concept grows, with an eventual expansion of the trust system to make it interactive, allowing you to vote for more than just a Bank, you can also vouch for a person.
Expansion on the idea of voting.
While working on the concepts of Banking, i realized that eventually a good business ethic and excessive funding could lead to centralization. So we need something to regulate the influence of Banks on the overall system, just the need for profit can at times not be enough incentive to maintain order and ethical business practice.
So... i came across this idea, let's introduce a credit rating system with a twist...let the people decide which is the better bank. As a customer, if you are satisfied by a Bank's performance, you can give them a thumbs up. This means that there is more at stake than just profit as a Bank, your reputation also goes on the line.
So banks serve the users, and if they fail at their jobs, they will get a low rating, thus less business.
While working on the concepts of Banking, i realized that eventually a good business ethic and excessive funding could lead to centralization. So we need something to regulate the influence of Banks on the overall system, just the need for profit can at times not be enough incentive to maintain order and ethical business practice.
So... i came across this idea, let's introduce a credit rating system with a twist...let the people decide which is the better bank. As a customer, if you are satisfied by a Bank's performance, you can give them a thumbs up. This means that there is more at stake than just profit as a Bank, your reputation also goes on the line.
So banks serve the users, and if they fail at their jobs, they will get a low rating, thus less business.
i did say that. even if a bank node cost 50btc as long as scammers make a profit losing that 50btc is no problem to them also this feedback system would need to be moderated as some people can leave negative for no reason or just to hurt that person's account.
when i said let small players i did not mean let people with get a bank node for peanuts. my reasoning was as coins get brought up they increase in value thus reaching to a point you cannot have bank nodes and large dumps when they are released. a fixed amount of coins to unlock certain levels and limits is what you can do. something like every one starts of as beginner then pro and so on and then their limits rise too. if they mess up its from the beginning. you need to make the process long not the cost high to avoid them to scam.
ive been working on something like this for months now. il pm you what ive done then you can take it from there if you want anything as your already a step ahead and would be much better and faster than me at implementing it.
Glad to see your models are coming closer together, please check out the trust rating system, there is a very basic very rough implementation already in the code. It calculates your trust rating as an individual based on your transactional behavior and how long you have been a part of the ecosystem.
It is still incomplete (so much to do) but it already shows useable results, your rating directly affects how banks interact with you, the higher your trust rating the more "levels" you unlock. But as with any great idea i have they are almost always functional in my mind long before they are in reality. The eventual goal is that the trust rating shall be used to regulate who can be a bank, who can borrow how much can you borrow and perhaps even instate uniform interest rates for each level.
So potential bad actors have a lot to worry about, both at the average user level and the Bankers. Trust in this system is hard earned , and once you lose it, you are done
Is there a python hashing module for this algo already ?
Check out our p2pool code https://github.com/bitcreditscc/p2pool
Is there a stratum/python hashing module for this coin already ?
Expansion on the idea of voting.
While working on the concepts of Banking, i realized that eventually a good business ethic and excessive funding could lead to centralization. So we need something to regulate the influence of Banks on the overall system, just the need for profit can at times not be enough incentive to maintain order and ethical business practice.
So... i came across this idea, let's introduce a credit rating system with a twist...let the people decide which is the better bank. As a customer, if you are satisfied by a Bank's performance, you can give them a thumbs up. This means that there is more at stake than just profit as a Bank, your reputation also goes on the line.
So banks serve the users, and if they fail at their jobs, they will get a low rating, thus less business.
While working on the concepts of Banking, i realized that eventually a good business ethic and excessive funding could lead to centralization. So we need something to regulate the influence of Banks on the overall system, just the need for profit can at times not be enough incentive to maintain order and ethical business practice.
So... i came across this idea, let's introduce a credit rating system with a twist...let the people decide which is the better bank. As a customer, if you are satisfied by a Bank's performance, you can give them a thumbs up. This means that there is more at stake than just profit as a Bank, your reputation also goes on the line.
So banks serve the users, and if they fail at their jobs, they will get a low rating, thus less business.
In what way a bank can influence the overall system ?
Expansion on the idea of voting.
While working on the concepts of Banking, i realized that eventually a good business ethic and excessive funding could lead to centralization. So we need something to regulate the influence of Banks on the overall system, just the need for profit can at times not be enough incentive to maintain order and ethical business practice.
So... i came across this idea, let's introduce a credit rating system with a twist...let the people decide which is the better bank. As a customer, if you are satisfied by a Bank's performance, you can give them a thumbs up. This means that there is more at stake than just profit as a Bank, your reputation also goes on the line.
So banks serve the users, and if they fail at their jobs, they will get a low rating, thus less business.
While working on the concepts of Banking, i realized that eventually a good business ethic and excessive funding could lead to centralization. So we need something to regulate the influence of Banks on the overall system, just the need for profit can at times not be enough incentive to maintain order and ethical business practice.
So... i came across this idea, let's introduce a credit rating system with a twist...let the people decide which is the better bank. As a customer, if you are satisfied by a Bank's performance, you can give them a thumbs up. This means that there is more at stake than just profit as a Bank, your reputation also goes on the line.
So banks serve the users, and if they fail at their jobs, they will get a low rating, thus less business.
i did say that. even if a bank node cost 50btc as long as scammers make a profit losing that 50btc is no problem to them also this feedback system would need to be moderated as some people can leave negative for no reason or just to hurt that person's account.
when i said let small players i did not mean let people with get a bank node for peanuts. my reasoning was as coins get brought up they increase in value thus reaching to a point you cannot have bank nodes and large dumps when they are released. a fixed amount of coins to unlock certain levels and limits is what you can do. something like every one starts of as beginner then pro and so on and then their limits rise too. if they mess up its from the beginning. you need to make the process long not the cost high to avoid them to scam.
ive been working on something like this for months now. il pm you what ive done then you can take it from there if you want anything as your already a step ahead and would be much better and faster than me at implementing it.
Is there a python hashing module for this algo already ?
Jump to: